Former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani faces another legal hurdle in his ongoing battle with two Georgia election workers who won a defamation case against him.
According to The Hill, Giuliani has filed an appeal challenging a judge's recent decision that ordered him to surrender most of his assets to satisfy a $146 million defamation judgment.
The appeal comes after U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman's October 22 ruling, which demanded Giuliani hand over numerous valuable possessions. These items include his New York apartment, a Mercedes-Benz vehicle, luxury watches, and signed New York Yankees memorabilia, along with various cash holdings.
Despite initially consenting to significant portions of the turnover order, Giuliani failed to meet the specified deadline for compliance. His new legal representation has indicated that much of the property has been transferred since then. The former mayor's decision to appeal now moves the case to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, marking another chapter in this prolonged legal dispute.
Giuliani's spokesperson has previously characterized the asset seizure efforts as a form of political intimidation. The legal team continues to maintain their position against what they view as targeted actions against the former mayor. These developments add another layer of complexity to an already intricate legal proceeding.
The basis for this legal action stems from Giuliani's false claims about election workers Ruby Freeman and Wandrea "Shaye" Moss during the 2020 election. His statements led to a jury trial in December, resulting in a substantial monetary judgment against him. Giuliani has also filed a separate appeal challenging the original verdict.
The mother-daughter duo of Freeman and Moss have recently escalated their legal actions against Giuliani. They have requested that a separate judge hold the former Trump attorney in civil contempt, citing recent statements made on his radio show that they claim constitute continued defamation.
These latest developments showcase the expanding scope of the legal consequences Giuliani faces. The situation highlights the intersection of political rhetoric and legal accountability in the aftermath of the 2020 election disputes. The case continues to draw attention as it moves through various stages of the appeals process.
The ongoing legal proceedings have significant implications for both Giuliani's personal assets and his legal standing. The case represents one of several legal challenges the former mayor currently faces, adding to the mounting pressure on his financial and legal resources.
The $146 million defamation judgment stems from Giuliani's false allegations about Freeman and Moss's activities during the 2020 election in Atlanta. The former mayor falsely accused the election workers of engaging in mass election fraud while they performed their duties in Atlanta.
Originally ordered to surrender significant assets, Giuliani now seeks to overturn this decision through the appeals process. The case highlights the serious consequences of spreading false information about election workers and the legal system's response to such actions.
The ongoing dispute between Giuliani and the Georgia election workers continues to evolve, with both sides actively pursuing their respective legal strategies. As the appeals process moves forward, the outcome could set important precedents for similar cases involving defamation and election-related claims.
