The recent involvement of Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett in identifying key actions by former President Donald Trump that could lead to his conviction has captured public attention.
Newsweek reported that Barrett's stance aims to separate Trump's official and private actions, potentially affecting the outcome of his upcoming election fraud trial.
On July 1, the Supreme Court issued a ruling concerning immunity in Trump's case. This decision has implications for the prosecution's approach to the former president's alleged involvement in election fraud. Justice Barrett has emerged as a pivotal figure, striving to balance the conservative majority's viewpoints with the dissent from Justice Sonia Sotomayor.
Randall Eliason, a law professor at George Washington University, noted the significance of Barrett's contributions. Eliason stated, "Trump's attorney at oral argument conceded that a number of the acts were private. Justice Barrett noted the same thing in her concurrence. I just don't see this as this hugely difficult problem for Chutkan." This insight highlights the nuanced understanding that Barrett brings to the case.
Barrett's position seeks to differentiate Trump's actions between his official capacity and private conduct. This distinction will play a crucial role in the trial proceedings led by Judge Tanya Chutkan. The trial, set in Washington, D.C., centers on Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election results, linked to the events of January 6, 2021. Last year, Trump was indicted on four counts related to these attempts and pleaded not guilty to all charges.
Barrett cautioned that the majority opinion might impede prosecution by excluding official acts associated with crimes. Her approach is an effort to ensure a more comprehensive scrutiny of Trump's actions.
In a significant move, Barrett dismissed the argument presented by Trump's legal team regarding the group of "alternative" state electors. Her stance indicates a firm boundary between official duties and personal actions.
The Supreme Court's decision on Trump's immunity will be evaluated by Judge Chutkan. Barrett's insights will inform this debate, emphasizing the president's lack of legal authority in influencing state electors' appointments. Her assertion clarifies that such conduct remains outside the scope of official protection.
Barrett articulated her perspective clearly:
Sorting private from official conduct sometimes will be difficult—but not always. Take the President's alleged attempt to organize alternative slates of electors. In my view, that conduct is private and therefore not entitled to protection. In short, a President has no legal authority—and thus no official capacity—to influence how the States appoint their electors. I see no plausible argument for barring prosecution of that alleged conduct.
This perspective underscores the importance of judicial clarity in distinguishing between actions conducted in an official capacity and personal endeavors. Barrett's stance is pivotal in ensuring that the prosecution can proceed without hindrances.
Eliason's commentary further reinforces Barrett's critical role in the process. Her insights contribute to understanding the core issues surrounding Trump's actions and their legal ramifications. As the trial progresses, these interpretations may significantly influence the proceedings.
The trial will continue under Judge Chutkan's oversight, with Barrett's insights serving as a cornerstone in navigating the legal intricacies. Examining Trump's actions within this context will be a critical focal point of the proceedings.
The culmination of these judicial decisions and their impact on the prosecution's strategy will be closely monitored. Justice Barrett's role in articulating the boundaries of official conduct remains a key element in the broader narrative of this significant legal endeavor.
Veteran journalist Carl Bernstein has voiced significant concerns about President Joe Biden's health, citing reports from within the administration.
According to Daily Mail, Bernstein says Biden White House insiders have informed him the president's poor health has been evident on many occasions in the last year and a half.
Bernstein claims that advisors and staffers have noted Biden’s declining health multiple times over the last 18 months, with particular concern following the recent debate. The 81-year-old president frequently lost his train of thought, trailed off mid-sentence, and mixed up topics during the event.
The debate has intensified discussions about Biden's ability to lead, prompting calls from politicians and pundits for him to consider stepping down. Carl Bernstein, renowned for his investigative journalism, discussed these issues in a recent segment with Anderson Cooper.
Bernstein stated, “In the last six months, particularly, there has been a marked incidence of cognitive decline and physical infirmity.” He emphasized that his sources have witnessed Biden in a similar state to his debate performance at least 15-20 times over the past year and a half.
Staffers have expressed their concerns to former White House Chief of Staff Ron Klain. Despite this, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre has dismissed public incidents where Biden appeared to 'freeze' as fabricated videos.
Bernstein recounted an incident at a June 2023 fundraiser where Biden appeared stiff and required a chair to continue the event. This episode added to the growing list of concerns about his health.
Jean-Pierre responded to these claims by stating, "That was definitely a cheap fake." She also downplayed videos showing Biden being guided by President Obama and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni.
Despite these concerns, Biden is reported to remain sharp in national security meetings, particularly on topics like Ukraine and Gaza. Bernstein noted, “I have heard for two years how sharp Joe Biden is in his national security meetings.”
There is an acknowledgment, however, that Biden has 'good days and bad days,' leading to unease about his consistency in performing presidential duties. Some high-level Democrats share Bernstein’s concerns, although public support for Biden remains steadfast among others.
Despite these controversies, Biden continues to campaign and has no public plans to resign. His family reportedly discussed his political future at Camp David, with his son, Hunter Biden, encouraging him to stay in the race.
The next debate, hosted by ABC News, is scheduled for Tuesday, September 10. Observers are keen to see how Biden performs in this upcoming event. Biden’s advisors have faced criticism for inadequate preparation for the first debate, and there is concern about the president's dip in the polls post-debate.
Carl Bernstein's revelations have sparked a heated debate within the Democratic Party about President Biden's capacity to lead the nation. As the campaign continues, the president's health remains a focal point of discussion, with both supporters and critics closely monitoring his public appearances and performances.
Luke Bryan recently shared insights about potential candidates to fill Katy Perry's judging role on "American Idol" after she announced her departure earlier this year.
According to Fox News, several names have been considered, including Pink, Miley Cyrus, and Meghan Trainor, but no final decision has been made.
Katy Perry, who joined Luke Bryan and Lionel Richie on the "American Idol" judging panel when the show was renewed for its 16th season, announced in February 2024 that she would not return for the upcoming season. Perry served as a judge for seven seasons, bringing her distinctive energy and expertise to the panel.
In a recent interview with Billboard, Luke Bryan discussed the ongoing search for Perry’s replacement. He revealed that several notable artists, including Pink, Miley Cyrus, and Meghan Trainor, have been considered for the role. “I’ve said several names. I think Pink has been in the talks, Miley Cyrus has been in the talks, Meghan Trainor has been in the talks,” Bryan shared.
Pink, however, expressed reservations about the position. In May, she told "Entertainment Tonight," "I'm not sure if I'm a good fit because I don't like hurting people's feelings and I like my day job." Despite being in discussions, she appears uncertain about taking on the judging role.
Meanwhile, Meghan Trainor has been vocal about her enthusiasm for the job. In June 2024, she expressed her interest in "Watch What Happens Live with Andy Cohen," stating, "I've done every interview in the world and said that that is my dream job... I have begged for this job. I haven’t heard any updates, so check my emails, but that is my dream job."
Various quarters have suggested replacements for Perry. During an appearance on "Watch What Happens Live" in June, Adam Lambert suggested LeAnn Rimes, praising her as “so lovely, so down to Earth—very spiritual and deep, but with a great sense of humor.” He believed Rimes would be a good fit for the show.
Katy Perry herself proposed Jelly Roll as a potential successor. In April, she told E! News, “I gotta say, Jelly Roll was crazy when he came on the show... He could sell me anything.” Perry’s endorsement highlights the varied and unique suggestions being considered for her replacement.
Despite the numerous names floating around, no final decision has been made. Bryan acknowledged the difficulty in finding the right person to fill Perry’s shoes, stating, “Perry was perfect for the job” and emphasizing that it’s “not an easy task” to find her replacement.
Adding to the uncertainty, Bryan and Richie have yet to receive confirmation about their return to the show. Bryan mentioned that Disney has been “really tight-lipped” about the future of the judges' panel, saying they haven’t heard if they will be coming back. This prolonged decision-making process leaves both fans and judges in suspense.
As the show’s producers continue their search, they are considering various factors to select a judge who can bring the right blend of expertise, charisma, and audience appeal. Bryan noted that producers are “working real hard to find somebody” capable of taking on the role.
The “American Idol” community remains eager to see who will join the judges' panel next season, as the decision will shape the dynamic of the show and its continued success.
In conclusion, the search for Katy Perry’s replacement on "American Idol" is ongoing, with several high-profile names being considered. Luke Bryan, Lionel Richie, and Ryan Seacrest are all awaiting updates from Disney regarding their roles. As producers work diligently to find the right fit, fans can only wait and speculate about the next judge to grace the "American Idol" stage.
Kamala Harris has made adjustments to her schedule to lunch with President Joe Biden and join him during this week’s Fourth of July celebrations.
According to Daily Mail, she plans to join him for lunch and attend the Fourth of July White House celebrations.
This situation unfolds as doubts linger about Biden's suitability to remain the Democratic nominee following a difficult debate with Donald Trump.
Harris and Biden are scheduled to have lunch together at the White House on Wednesday. On Thursday evening, Harris, second gentleman Doug Emhoff, President Biden, and first lady Jill Biden will attend a Fourth of July celebration at the White House. The event will be held for military and veteran families, caregivers, and survivors.
Harris and Emhoff, currently in California fundraising for Biden's re-election campaign, watched the debate from the West Coast. They are set to return to Washington, D.C., on Tuesday evening. In response to calls for Biden to step down from the race, Harris defended him. She acknowledged it wasn’t his "finest hour" but emphasized his capability to defeat Trump in November.
Harris stated at a campaign event in Las Vegas:
There are three things that were true yesterday before the debate that are still true today. Let's level set on this. First, the stakes of this race could not be higher. Second, the contrast in this election could not be more stark. And third, we believe in our President Joe Biden, and we believe in what he stands for.
The Biden campaign has stated that he will not be stepping down as the Democratic nominee. The president is facing a demoralized staff and donors threatening to withdraw support from his campaign. Harris is viewed as a primary beneficiary of Biden’s poor debate performance and could become the frontrunner if he steps down.
Legally, the millions raised for Biden’s re-election campaign would likely go to Kamala Harris as his running mate. This would give her a financial advantage over other contenders like California Governor Gavin Newsom and Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer.
Harris’s name is listed next to Biden’s on all Federal Election Commission filings. Despite polling lower than Biden, Harris' supporters highlight her strong connection with minorities and younger voters, which Biden lacks.
Harris’ supporters believe her connection with minorities and younger voters could be crucial. They argue that she offers strengths that Biden does not possess, despite her lower poll numbers.
Harris emphasized at a Las Vegas campaign event, "This race will not be decided by one night in June," highlighting the importance of the broader campaign.
While her schedule adjustment may seem minor, it holds substantial political weight. Her visible support for Biden is a strategic move that could influence the campaign's direction.
As the situation unfolds, Harris’ role continues to be pivotal, reflecting a strong commitment to the administration's goals. Her support is a critical element in discussions about the future of the Democratic ticket, highlighting her dedication and potential as a leader within the party.
Kim Kardashian recently shared highlights from her sister Khloé Kardashian's 40th birthday party, which was celebrated with a Dollywood theme.
According to Fox News, Kim Kardashian doesn't remember her dance moves at Khloé Kardashian's Dollywood-themed 40th birthday party.
Kim Kardashian, 43, took to Instagram on Sunday to reveal moments from the lively event. The celebration featured energetic dancing, memorable interactions, and unexpected performances.
One highlight from the event was Kim dancing with Britney Spears' manager, Cade Hudson. Unbeknownst to her, someone filmed the duo as they danced, capturing moments Kim had no memory of.
On her Instagram story, Kim thanked Cade Hudson and expressed her surprise at being flipped multiple times during their dance. She humorously noted her lack of recollection of the event.
Kim's discovery of additional footage showing Hudson flipping her again added to the night's amusement. She remarked about dancing until the party ended, emphasizing the night's excitement.
Kim's reflections included a humorous regret about not having shots before the dance, referencing her time on "Dancing with the Stars." This playful comment added a light-hearted touch to her stories.
Khloé Kardashian's birthday on June 27th was a significant milestone, celebrated with family and friends in high spirits. Kylie Jenner, the youngest Kardashian-Jenner sibling, also shared moments from the party on Instagram.
Kylie captioned her post as "Best night ever," to which Khloé enthusiastically responded, echoing the sentiment with an emphatic exclamation. The family's joyous interactions were evident throughout the event.
Khloé showcased her all-denim ensemble, complete with a bedazzled cowboy hat, embodying the Dollywood theme. Her Instagram post captured the festive spirit with the caption, "Oh My Dolly, it’s time to party!"
A surprise performance from rapper Snoop Dogg further enlivened the celebration. Kim revealed this surprise on her Instagram stories, adding another layer of excitement to the evening.
Khloé had no prior knowledge of Snoop Dogg's appearance, making his performance a delightful surprise for the birthday girl and her guests. The event was a blend of fun, fashion, and memorable performances.
Kim Kardashian celebrated Khloé's 40th birthday with lively dancing, memorable performances, and glamorous outfits, showcasing the family's joy and flair for celebrations. Highlights included Kim's humorous reflections on her dance moves and Khloé's surprise at Snoop Dogg's performance. The Kardashian-Jenner family again proved their talent for hosting extraordinary events, leaving fans excited for future celebrations.
According to Fox Business, a federal judge has blocked the Biden administration's ban on new LNG exports following a challenge by a coalition of over a dozen states.
On Monday, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, Lake Charles Division, issued a preliminary injunction against the Biden administration's recent pause on new LNG export approvals. This decision came in response to a request from a coalition of more than a dozen states.
The coalition argued that the administration's January 26th decision to halt all new LNG export approvals to non-Free Trade Agreement countries was detrimental. The White House and Energy Department stated that this pause aimed to allow a thorough environmental review of the new projects' impact on carbon emissions, a process expected to take more than a year.
West Virginia, among 22 states that protested this pause in a February letter to the Biden administration contended that the ban jeopardized jobs and tax revenue from natural gas production. These states saw the ruling as crucial for their economic well-being.
Patrick Morrisey, Attorney General of West Virginia, was particularly vocal about the victory. He stated, "This is a big win for the country's energy industry and the millions of jobs it supports against the attacks from the Biden administration to further its radical climate change agenda at the expense of our economy."
The court recognized the coalition's arguments, highlighting the economic harm the ban could inflict on states like Louisiana, Texas, and West Virginia. Evidence showed potential losses in revenues, market share, and procedural rights.
The January 26th decision did not affect previously approved LNG export projects, but new projects faced significant delays. The states argued that these delays threatened their economic stability.
Patrick Morrisey also criticized the administration's approach, stating, "This administration's Energy Department has no such authority to justify this ban – authority on matters like this lies with Congress and Congress alone."
Last year, the United States led the world in LNG exports, shipping over 86 million metric tons, primarily to Europe and Asia. This leadership position underscored the economic significance of LNG exports to the states involved in the lawsuit.
The preliminary injunction prevents the ban's implementation while the legal case continues. This decision is seen as a significant setback for the Biden administration's environmental agenda.
The U.S. Department of Energy expressed its disagreement with the ruling. A spokesperson stated, "The U.S. Department of Energy disagrees with today's ruling. The Department continues to review the court's order and evaluate next steps."
The legal battle over LNG exports is far from over. The preliminary injunction is only the first step in what promises to be a lengthy court case. The states involved in the lawsuit will likely continue fighting to protect their economic interests. Meanwhile, the Biden administration will need to navigate the legal and political challenges posed by this ruling.
A federal judge blocked the Biden administration's ban on new LNG exports, granting a preliminary injunction while the case proceeds. Over a dozen states, including West Virginia, Texas, and Louisiana, argued the ban threatened jobs and revenue. The administration had paused approvals for an environmental review, leading to the ongoing legal battle with significant implications for energy and environmental policies.
Special counsel Jack Smith's indictment of former President Donald Trump for election interference is facing significant challenges following a recent Supreme Court decision.
According to the Washington Examiner, Jack Smith may need to remove accusations from Trump's indictment, including claims of pressuring his vice president to derail the 2020 election.
Jack Smith accused Donald Trump of pressuring Vice President Mike Pence to halt the January 2021 election results certification. Trump's interactions with Pence were among several key acts cited in the indictment. The Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling, divided along ideological lines, regarding the prosecution of presidential acts.
The ruling asserts that certain official acts by presidents are absolutely immune from prosecution. Others require the government to meet stringent standards to prosecute. This decision could considerably weaken Smith's case against Trump.
Trump had argued that his charges should be dropped due to his claim of absolute immunity as president. Lower courts in Washington, D.C., had previously rejected his immunity claims. However, the Supreme Court's majority categorized presidential acts into three types: absolutely immune official acts, presumptively immune official acts, and unofficial acts, which can always be prosecuted.
Judge Tanya Chutkan, presiding over Trump’s case, will now need to evaluate specific acts and make necessary excisions based on the Supreme Court's guidance. Chief Justice John Roberts suggested that Trump's communications with DOJ officials were core functions of his job and thus absolutely immune from prosecution.
Roberts noted that Trump's communication with his vice president or state officials was less clear and required lower court evaluation. The Chief Justice emphasized that prosecutorial questioning of presidential motives or using immunized acts as evidence is prohibited.
Examples of alleged acts in Smith’s indictment that are now in jeopardy include Trump's exchanges with Justice Department officials. Specifically, discussions with Acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen and others regarding false voter fraud claims. Conversations with Jeffrey Clark, a DOJ official, aimed at pressuring state officials to overturn the election are also in question.
Another significant aspect is the alleged pressure on Vice President Mike Pence regarding the January 6 certification proceeding. Trump's public comments, including social media posts, may also be immune from prosecution under the Supreme Court ruling.
Chief Justice John Roberts stated, "The indictment’s allegations that Trump attempted to pressure the Vice President to take particular acts in connection with his role at the certification proceeding thus involve official conduct, and Trump is at least presumptively immune from prosecution for such conduct." He added, "The question then becomes whether that presumption of immunity is rebutted under the circumstances. It is the Government’s burden to rebut the presumption of immunity."
Roberts highlighted the potential for these activities to "distort Presidential decision-making." Smith’s indictment detailed that on December 31 and January 3, Trump repeatedly raised false claims with the Acting Attorney General and Acting Deputy Attorney General. They informed Trump each time that his claim was false.
On December 3, Trump issued a Tweet amplifying false claims made in Rudy Giuliani’s presentation in Georgia. Smith wrote that Trump posted that Democrats were "ballot stuffing" and that Giuliani’s presentation meant an "easy win" for Trump in the battleground state.
The Trump indictment now stands at a crossroads, with the Supreme Court’s ruling challenging its core assertions. The path forward will require careful judicial consideration of the boundaries of presidential immunity and the pursuit of justice in cases of alleged election interference.
Daily Mail reported that Vice President Kamala Harris is revising her schedule to demonstrate strong support for President Joe Biden amid increasing calls for him to step down.
Harris plans to engage in high-profile activities with Biden, emphasizing her crucial role in the administration and as a potential successor.
Harris is altering her plans this week, including having lunch with President Biden at the White House on Wednesday. This move is seen as a clear indication of her support for Biden, who is facing scrutiny following his recent debate performance.
On Thursday evening, Harris, along with her husband, second gentleman Doug Emhoff, will join President Biden and First Lady Jill Biden for a Fourth of July celebration at the White House. The event is dedicated to honoring military families, veterans, caregivers, and survivors, underscoring the administration's commitment to these groups.
Currently, Harris and Emhoff are in California, actively fundraising for Biden's re-election campaign. They observed Biden's debate performance from the West Coast, a debate that has stirred significant political discourse.
The couple is scheduled to return to Washington D.C. on Tuesday evening, just in time for the critical mid-week engagements. This timing is crucial as it aligns with heightened political activity and speculation.
The calls for President Biden to exit the race have emerged prominently following his debate with Trump. Despite these calls, Harris has firmly defended Biden, acknowledging that while the debate was not his strongest moment, he remains capable of defeating Trump in the upcoming election.
At a campaign event in Las Vegas on Friday, Harris stated:
There are three things that were true yesterday before the debate that are still true today. Let's level set on this. First, the stakes of this race could not be higher. Second, the contrast in this election could not be more stark. And third, we believe in our President Joe Biden and what he stands for. This race will not be decided by one night in June.
The Biden campaign maintains its stance that he will continue as the Democratic nominee despite the challenges posed by recent events. This resolve is critical as the campaign navigates through a period of demoralized staff and donors threatening to withdraw their support.
Harris is seen as a potential beneficiary if Biden were to step down, making her a likely successor. Although this scenario would not guarantee her the nomination, she would certainly be a frontrunner.
Her financial advantage over other potential contenders is significant. The millions of dollars raised for Biden's re-election campaign can legally only be redirected to her as his running mate. This financial edge is a critical factor in the highly competitive political landscape.
Harris's name appears alongside Biden's on all Federal Election Commission filings, which further cements her position within the campaign infrastructure. This alignment is crucial as it positions her favorably within the party's framework.
Vice President Kamala Harris is actively supporting President Biden amid resignation calls post-debate with Trump, highlighting her role and potential as his successor. She and her husband will celebrate July 4th in Washington, D.C., with military families, demonstrating their commitment. Harris defends Biden's capability and is seen as a strong successor with financial and demographic advantages for the campaign.
First Lady Jill Biden is playing a significant role in supporting President Joe Biden's presidential campaign amidst growing concerns about his performance.
According to Conservative Brief, Bill Stevenson, Jill Biden's ex-husband, has publicly criticized her for encouraging President Biden to stay in the race despite his alleged struggles.
Her involvement and steadfast defense have sparked both criticism and praise, adding layers to the ongoing debate about President Biden's suitability for re-election. Stevenson, who was married to Jill Biden in 1970, claims that she has changed significantly since their marriage.
Stevenson expressed confusion and surprise over Jill Biden's strong defense of President Biden and her prominent involvement in the campaign. He suggests that Jill Biden may have aspirations beyond just supporting her husband, hinting that some perceive her as wanting to be president herself.
Stevenson didn't hold back in his criticism of President Biden, calling him a "liar" and alleging that Biden has lost cognitive abilities over the past few years. These comments add to the growing narrative questioning President Biden's fitness for another term.
First Lady Jill Biden’s role has reportedly expanded during President Biden's tenure and into the campaign. A viral video showed her speaking to President Biden in a manner some interpreted as reminiscent of talking to a child. This video has fueled further debate about her influence and President Biden's capacity.
Jill Biden praised President Biden's debate performance in the face of harsh criticism from both Democrats and Republicans. During a debate after-party, she publicly commended him for his ability to answer basic questions, a moment that also went viral on social media.
Stevenson’s remarks provide a unique perspective on Jill Biden's involvement in the campaign. "The Dr. Jill Biden who I’ve seen on TV in the last five years is not the same person I married or that I recognize in any way," Stevenson said. He described her as having transformed into a completely different person from the one he once knew.
Stevenson also questioned why Jill Biden is so adamant about defending President Biden and keeping him in the race. "I just don’t understand why she is so adamant about defending him and keeping him in the race since it appears that he’s struggling," he said.
The criticism from Jill Biden's ex-husband adds another layer to the ongoing debates surrounding President Biden's campaign. While some praise her dedication and support, others view her involvement as problematic given the concerns about President Biden's performance.
Stevenson didn't mince words when discussing President Biden's character, calling him a "bad person" and the best liar he knows. He believes Biden has lost a step cognitively over the past few years, stating, "Look, I’m not a doctor or a psychiatrist but yeah, I felt he lost a step three or four years ago."
Despite the criticism, Jill Biden remains a staunch defender of her husband. At the debate after-party, she addressed the audience, saying, "Joe, you did such a great job! You answered every question, you knew all the facts!" This public praise contrasts sharply with the negative media coverage of President Biden's performance.
First Lady Jill Biden plays a significant role in supporting President Joe Biden's presidential campaign amidst growing concerns about his performance. Bill Stevenson, Jill Biden's ex-husband, has criticized her for encouraging President Biden to stay in the race despite his alleged struggles. Stevenson's remarks have added to the debate about President Biden's suitability for re-election, highlighting Jill Biden's expanded role and the ongoing discussions about the future of the campaign.
Former Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin has called on Democrats to persuade President Joe Biden to withdraw from the 2024 race after a lackluster debate performance that has fueled age-related concerns.
Harkin's comments underscore a growing unease within the Democratic Party, though some prominent figures continue to support Biden.
According to Fox News, Harkin, who served alongside Biden in Congress for over two decades, voiced his concerns during an interview with Julie Gammack on Iowa Potluck. He urged Democratic leaders to convince Biden to step aside, citing a debate performance that he described as disastrous.
The former senator's remarks come in the wake of widespread criticism of Biden's debate appearance. According to Harkin, voter perception is that former President Donald Trump can take command of a situation and control the outcome despite his answers being "meandering, gobbledygook, and full of lies."
Harkin's call for Biden to release his delegates and step aside was directed at incumbent Democratic Senators and several governors. He argued that Biden's current condition starkly contrasts with his past demeanor.
"Last night was a disaster from which Biden cannot recover," Harkin asserted, emphasizing that Biden has declined since his State of the Union address. He noted the president's physical demeanor as evidence of this decline.
Following Biden's debate performance on Thursday, there were immediate calls within the Democratic Party for him to withdraw over concerns about his age. However, not all party members share Harkin's view. Former Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Majority Whip James Clyburn defended Biden, attributing his performance to "preparation overload."
The Biden campaign has not yet responded to a request for comment from Fox News Digital. In a campaign ad released after the debate, Biden addressed concerns about his age, emphasizing his experience and resilience.
"Folks, I know I’m not a young man," Biden stated in the ad. "But I know how to do this job. I know right from wrong. I know how to tell the truth. And I know, like millions of Americans know, when you get knocked down, you get back up."
Harkin's remarks highlight a growing divide within the Democratic Party regarding Biden's candidacy. While some leaders support him, others are beginning to question whether he is the best candidate to take on Trump in 2024.
As the debate over Biden's fitness for office continues, the party must grapple with the implications of either supporting an incumbent president or rallying behind a new candidate. Harkin's call for new leadership is a significant development in this ongoing discussion.
The debate performance has undeniably sparked a broader conversation about age and capability in political leadership. Biden's response and the actions of the Democratic Party in the coming months will be crucial in shaping the 2024 race.
In summary, former Sen. Tom Harkin has called for President Joe Biden to step aside following a criticized debate performance. Harkin's comments reflect a growing sentiment within the Democratic Party, although some prominent figures continue to support Biden. The Biden campaign has yet to respond to these calls, leaving the future of his candidacy uncertain.