President Donald Trump's aggressive stance on immigration continues to resonate with a significant portion of the American electorate.
According to Breitbart News, a recent CBS News poll reveals that 58 percent of American adults support Trump's program to locate and deport immigrants who are in the United States illegally, while 42 percent oppose the measure.
The poll demonstrates strong backing among key demographic groups, with 93 percent of Republicans and 56 percent of swing voters expressing support for the deportation initiative. White Americans, both college-educated and non-college-educated, showed substantial support at 56 percent and 69 percent, respectively. Hispanic Americans appeared more divided on the issue, with 47 percent favoring the deportations and 53 percent opposing them.
Recent polling data from multiple sources reinforces the popularity of Trump's immigration policies among the American public. The Pew Research Center's latest survey indicates that a combined 83 percent of American adults support some form of deportation for illegal immigrants.
Only a small minority, representing 16 percent of Americans, oppose all deportations from the United States. This demonstrates a clear consensus among the public regarding immigration enforcement measures.
The data shows particularly strong support for the deportation of illegal immigrants involved in criminal activities. An overwhelming majority of respondents who support partial deportations believe that those charged or convicted of violent crimes should be removed from the country.
The Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has already begun implementing Trump's deportation program with significant results. Reports indicate that more than 100,000 deportations have been carried out since Trump assumed office in January 2025.
These enforcement actions represent one of the most extensive deportation operations in recent U.S. history. The program's scope and scale reflect the administration's commitment to addressing illegal immigration through aggressive enforcement measures.
The implementation has faced praise and criticism from various sectors of society, with supporters highlighting the need for strict immigration control and opponents expressing concerns about humanitarian implications.
The strong public support for deportations suggests a potential shift in the national conversation around immigration enforcement. This backing could provide the administration with additional political capital to expand its current immigration initiatives.
The poll results may influence future policy decisions and legislative proposals related to immigration reform. With majority support from swing voters, the issue could play a significant role in upcoming political campaigns and elections.
Public opinion appears to favor a nuanced approach that distinguishes between different categories of illegal immigrants, particularly regarding their criminal history and length of stay in the United States.
A CBS News poll has revealed substantial public support for President Trump's deportation program, with 58 percent of American adults backing the initiative to remove illegal immigrants from the United States. The program has already resulted in over 100,000 deportations since January 2025, demonstrating the administration's commitment to implementing strict immigration enforcement measures. While Republicans and white Americans show the strongest support, the issue has created divisions among Hispanic Americans, with public opinion data suggesting most Americans favor a targeted approach to deportations based on factors such as criminal history.
A search and rescue operation in Lithuania took a tragic turn as military officials scrambled to locate missing American soldiers in a training exercise gone wrong.
According to Just The News, three U.S. soldiers were discovered deceased after their armored vehicle was engulfed by a peat bog during a training mission in Lithuania, while one service member remains unaccounted for.
Military authorities confirmed the discovery on Monday following days of uncertainty and conflicting reports about the soldiers' fate. The incident occurred when their M88A2 Hercules armored recovery vehicle became submerged while attempting to repair and retrieve an immobilized tactical vehicle during exercises in the Baltic nation.
The announcement came after a series of contradictory statements from NATO officials regarding the soldiers' status. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte prematurely declared the soldiers' deaths during his visit to Warsaw last week, despite lacking complete information about the situation.
Acting NATO spokesperson Allison Hart subsequently issued a correction, stating that search efforts were still ongoing at that time. The conflicting messages highlighted communication challenges within the alliance during crisis situations.
The military has maintained strict privacy protocols, withholding the identities of the affected service members pending proper notification of their families.
The discovery of the submerged vehicle in the peat bog presented unique challenges for recovery teams. Peat bogs, known for their unstable nature and ability to preserve materials for extended periods, complicated the extraction efforts.
Search operations continue for the fourth missing soldier, with specialized equipment and personnel deployed to navigate the treacherous terrain. The military has not disclosed specific details about the ongoing search methodology.
The incident has raised questions about safety protocols during training exercises in unfamiliar environmental conditions.
The soldiers were conducting routine maintenance operations when the tragedy occurred. Their mission involved recovering and repairing tactical vehicles, a common practice during NATO training exercises in the Baltic region.
The M88A2 Hercules, designed for heavy vehicle recovery operations, proved vulnerable to the unique characteristics of the peat bog environment. This incident may prompt reviews of equipment deployment protocols in similar terrain.
The loss of three U.S. service members in Lithuania during a training exercise marks one of the most significant non-combat military casualties in recent years. The incident began when their armored recovery vehicle became trapped in a peat bog while conducting vehicle maintenance operations.
As search efforts continue for the fourth missing soldier, military authorities maintain their commitment to understanding the full scope of the incident and preventing similar tragedies in future training exercises. The combination of challenging terrain and complex recovery operations highlights the risks service members face even during routine training missions in foreign territories.
Republican Rep. Anna Paulina Luna and Democratic Rep. Brittany Pettersen lead a groundbreaking bipartisan effort to change congressional voting rules for new mothers.
Just the News reports House Speaker Mike Johnson will reject a discharge petition on Monday that would allow new mothers in Congress to vote by proxy, despite the measure gathering 218 signatures, including support from 11 Republicans.
The petition aims to establish a system where new mothers serving in Congress could delegate their voting authority to fellow members who would cast votes on their behalf. This initiative has gained significant momentum, securing more than half of the current House members' support, reaching the threshold needed to force a full House vote on the measure.
Johnson's opposition stems from his belief that proxy voting violates constitutional requirements. His stance has created tension within the Republican party, particularly among younger members advocating for modernization of congressional practices.
Luna, who experienced firsthand the challenges of balancing motherhood and congressional duties after giving birth during her term, has emerged as a vocal advocate for this change. The Florida representative has partnered with Colorado Democrat Brittany Pettersen, who shares similar experiences as a new mother in Congress.
The initiative has sparked intense debate about accommodating working mothers in legislative roles. Luna has expressed strong criticism of the current system, highlighting its potential impact on future female political candidates.
Luna recently made serious allegations about attempts to obstruct the petition's progress. She suggested that some House Republicans received bribes to oppose the measure, though she has not provided specific evidence to support these claims.
The controversy has led to significant rifts within Republican ranks. Luna's departure from the Freedom Caucus followed disagreements over members' opposition to her proxy voting initiative.
The debate has highlighted broader questions about modernizing congressional procedures while maintaining constitutional integrity. Johnson's forthcoming rejection raises concerns about the balance between tradition and accommodation of lawmakers' personal circumstances.
The issue has broader implications for female representation in Congress. Supporters argue that maintaining current restrictions could deter young women from pursuing political careers.
Luna voiced her concerns about the message being sent to aspiring female politicians, stating: "What does it tell other younger women who are wanting to run for office? You can't vote because you have a baby? That's so backwards and archaic."
Speaker Mike Johnson's imminent rejection of the proxy voting petition represents a critical moment in congressional procedure reform. The initiative, which gathered 218 signatures including bipartisan support, aimed to provide voting alternatives for new mothers serving in Congress.
The decision affects not only current representatives like Luna and Pettersen but also sets a precedent for future congressional workplace policies. The outcome of this conflict between constitutional interpretation and workplace modernization will likely influence discussions about legislative reform and female representation in Congress for years to come.
A violent confrontation between Tesla protesters and supporters erupted outside a dealership in Meridian, Idaho, leading to the arrest of a 70-year-old man.
According to Breitbart News, Christopher Talbot was arrested and charged with aggravated battery after allegedly striking a 49-year-old Trump and Musk supporter with his vehicle during an anti-Tesla rally on Saturday.
The incident occurred during a planned "Tesla Takedown" protest that drew approximately 30 demonstrators opposing Elon Musk's involvement in the Trump administration's federal job cuts. The anti-Tesla group was significantly outnumbered by roughly 200 counter-protesters who gathered to show support for the electric vehicle manufacturer and its CEO.
The Meridian protest is part of a larger wave of demonstrations targeting Tesla facilities across the country. These protests have intensified following Musk's appointment to a prominent position in President Trump's second administration. The controversy has led to increased vandalism and violent incidents at Tesla locations.
Recent weeks have seen multiple reports of Tesla vehicles being targeted by protesters. The demonstrations have raised concerns about public safety and the right to peaceful protest. Local law enforcement agencies have increased their presence at these events to prevent further violence.
The Meridian Police Department addressed the incident by emphasizing the importance of peaceful demonstrations. They issued a statement reminding citizens about respecting First Amendment rights without resorting to violence.
According to police reports, Talbot allegedly made an obscene gesture toward the victim before striking him with his vehicle. The incident occurred just as the counter-protester, who was driving a truck displaying pro-Trump flags, had parked and exited his vehicle.
Law enforcement officials quickly identified Talbot through his vehicle's license plate information. They located him at his residence in Meridian, where he was taken into custody. The victim sustained non-life-threatening injuries and drove himself to a nearby hospital for treatment.
The Ada County Sheriff's Office confirmed that Talbot faces one count of aggravated battery, a felony offense. He was subsequently booked into Ada County Jail following his arrest.
In a separate but related incident, authorities recently dealt with another case of Tesla vandalism in Texarkana. Demarqeyun Marquize Cox, 33, was arrested after being caught on camera deliberately ramming his ATV into a parked Tesla, causing significant damage to the vehicle.
The incident highlighted the sophisticated security features of Tesla vehicles, as the attack was recorded by the car's built-in cameras. The footage showed Cox, described as a 5-foot-2, 449-pound individual, intentionally backing up his ATV before crashing into the Tesla's driver-side door.
Police apprehended Cox after receiving reports of a second Tesla being damaged at a nearby location. During questioning, he allegedly attempted to provide false identification but was quickly identified by officers who recognized him from the surveillance footage.
Christopher Talbot's arrest in Meridian marks a significant escalation in the ongoing protests against Tesla and Elon Musk. The incident occurred during a "Tesla Takedown" demonstration where 30 protesters gathered outside a dealership in Meridian, Idaho, to voice their opposition to Musk's role in the Trump administration's federal job cuts. The situation turned violent when Talbot allegedly struck a 49-year-old counter-protester with his vehicle, leading to his arrest and subsequent charge of aggravated battery. As Tesla continues to face increased scrutiny and demonstrations nationwide, law enforcement agencies are working to maintain public safety while protecting citizens' right to peaceful protest.
Elon Musk's startling revelation about social security numbers brings new scrutiny to the immigration system under the current administration.
According to Breitbart, Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) head Elon Musk disclosed that approximately 2.1 million non-citizens obtained social security numbers in 2024, a dramatic increase from previous years.
The announcement came during a conference where Musk appeared alongside Antonio Gracias, CEO of Valor Equity Partners. Their investigation into the social security system revealed a significant jump from 270,000 non-citizens receiving social security numbers in 2021 to 2.1 million in 2024.
The substantial increase stems from policy modifications implemented by the administration that streamlined the process for migrants entering the country. These changes allowed individuals to receive social security numbers through various pathways without rigorous verification procedures.
The current system enables migrants to enter through official ports or by approaching border patrol officers directly. Officials can then process their cases as administrative offenses rather than criminal violations.
Immigration courts face severe backlogs with only 700 judges available to handle approximately 5.5 million cases. The average wait time for court appearances has stretched to six years.
Antonio Gracias detailed the process during the conference, explaining how migrants can obtain social security numbers after entering the country. His insights came from working closely with social security administration employees.
Current procedures allow individuals to apply for work documents using Form 765, which leads to receiving Form 766. Subsequently, the social security administration automatically mails social security numbers without conducting interviews or requiring identification.
Gracias emphasized that his revelations were not politically motivated, citing his own family's immigration background from Spain and his support for legal immigration pathways.
The DOGE investigation began with a comprehensive mapping of the social security system to identify potential fraud and inefficiencies. The effort received support from numerous social security administration employees.
These employees took considerable risks to expose systemic issues within the organization. Their cooperation proved instrumental in uncovering the dramatic increase in non-citizen social security number issuance.
The investigation's findings suggest significant changes in how the system processes and distributes social security numbers to non-citizens compared to previous years.
The Department of Government Efficiency, under Elon Musk's leadership, uncovered a dramatic surge in non-citizen social security number issuance during their systematic review of federal operations. The investigation revealed that 2.1 million non-citizens received social security numbers in 2024, compared to just 270,000 in 2021. These findings emerged from a broader examination of potential fraud and inefficiencies in the social security system, with cooperation from administration employees who provided crucial insights into the streamlined process that enables migrants to obtain social security numbers without traditional verification procedures.
A major transformation looms in the White House's James S. Brady Press Briefing Room as the Biden administration prepares to redefine media access protocols.
According to Breitbart, the White House will soon take over the responsibility of assigning media seats from the White House Correspondents' Association (WHCA), implementing a new system that reflects modern media consumption patterns.
The decision represents a significant shift in press room dynamics, with plans already formalized for what a senior administration official describes as a fundamental restructuring. The new arrangement will incorporate representatives from traditional television and print outlets alongside digital media platforms and online influencers.
The administration's move signals recognition of evolving media consumption habits. A senior White House official, speaking on condition of anonymity, shared insights into the planned changes:
The goal isn't merely favorable coverage. It's truly an honest look at consumption [of the outlets' coverage]. Influencers are important but it's tough because they aren't [equipped to provide] consistent coverage. So the ability to cover the White House is part of the metrics.
Some WHCA members have suggested modifying the organization's bylaws to make the White House press secretary the WHCA president, hoping to ease tensions between the two entities. Currently, Eugene Daniels from Politico holds the WHCA presidency.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has already implemented changes to increase accessibility for new media outlets. A dedicated "New Media" seat now exists for outlets not previously represented in the briefing room.
The inaugural briefing under the new system featured Breitbart News Washington Bureau Chief and Axios's Mike Allen in the New Media seat. Breaking with tradition, they received the first questions instead of the Associated Press.
The White House has also expanded the press pool by adding a "New Media" slot after assuming control of pool scheduling from the WHCA.
The restructuring reflects broader changes in media consumption patterns and the rise of digital platforms. The new seating arrangement will accommodate representatives from emerging digital outlets such as Axios, NOTUS, and Punchbowl.
The administration emphasizes that coverage capability remains a crucial factor in seat assignments. While recognizing the importance of digital influencers, officials acknowledge the challenges of incorporating content creators who may not provide consistent coverage.
These changes mark a significant departure from historical press room protocols that traditionally favored established media organizations.
The White House's decision to assume control of briefing room seating arrangements signals a significant shift in press corps dynamics. The move reflects the administration's commitment to adapting White House communications for modern media consumption patterns.
The transition from WHCA control to White House management of seating assignments represents a fundamental change in how the administration engages with media outlets. As traditional media's influence continues to evolve, the White House's new approach aims to balance established journalism practices with emerging digital platforms, potentially setting precedents for future administrations' media relations.
A high-stakes religious freedom case involving Catholic charities and state tax exemptions drew intense scrutiny during Monday's Supreme Court oral arguments.
According to Just The News, both liberal and conservative Supreme Court justices expressed concerns about Wisconsin's authority to determine which religious organizations qualify for unemployment tax exemptions based on their religious character.
The case centers on several Catholic organizations operating under the Catholic Charities Bureau of the Diocese of Superior, including Headwaters, Barron County Developmental Services, Diversified Services, and Black River Industries. These groups, which primarily serve disabled individuals while remaining open to non-Catholics, challenged the Wisconsin Supreme Court's ruling that deemed them insufficiently religious to receive tax exemptions granted to other religious charities.
The questioning from the bench revealed a notable alignment between traditionally opposed justices. Justice Elena Kagan's remarks highlighted the fundamental nature of religious equality under American law.
Liberal Justice Elena Kagan stated: "I thought it was pretty fundamental that we don't treat some religions better than other religions."
Conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch echoed similar sentiments during the proceedings, emphasizing constitutional protections against religious discrimination. The apparent consensus among justices from different ideological backgrounds suggests a potential victory for the Catholic organizations in their fight against what they view as discriminatory tax treatment.
The Catholic groups' legal challenge rests primarily on the First Amendment's free exercise clause, arguing that Wisconsin's criteria for religious tax exemptions violate their constitutional rights.
The state's attempt to evaluate the religious authenticity of organizations has emerged as a critical point of contention in the case. Several justices expressed skepticism about government officials making such determinations.
Constitutional scholars following the case note that a ruling in favor of the Catholic groups could have significant implications for how states handle religious tax exemptions nationwide.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court's previous ruling, which determined the Catholic organizations weren't "religious enough" to qualify for the tax exemptions, has faced intense scrutiny from legal experts.
The state's criteria for evaluating religious organizations' eligibility for tax exemptions has raised concerns about government overreach into religious matters. Critics argue that such assessments inherently violate the First Amendment's establishment clause.
The Catholic Charities Bureau of the Diocese of Superior's legal challenge represents a pivotal moment in the ongoing national debate over religious liberty and government regulation. The organizations involved continue to serve disabled individuals throughout Wisconsin while maintaining their Catholic identity and mission.
The Supreme Court's eventual decision could reshape how states approach religious tax exemptions and potentially establish new precedents for religious freedom cases. A ruling is expected to clarify the constitutional limits on state authority to evaluate religious organizations' qualifications for tax benefits.
Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla and head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), raises questions about the unexplained accumulation of wealth among members of Congress during their tenure in public service.
According to Breitbart, Musk announced during a Wisconsin town hall on Sunday that DOGE will investigate how lawmakers amass substantial wealth despite their relatively modest congressional salaries.
The initiative comes amid growing scrutiny of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which is currently facing elimination by the State Department. Musk suggested there might be a complex financial pathway where government funds sent overseas through organizations like USAID eventually find their way back to certain lawmakers' pockets.
The stark contrast between congressional salaries and some lawmakers' net worth has sparked widespread debate. While members of Congress receive an annual salary of $174,000, several have accumulated wealth far exceeding their government compensation.
Representative Nancy Pelosi's financial status exemplifies this disparity. The California Democrat, who has served since 1987, has amassed a net worth estimated between $50.9 million and $285.05 million. Similarly, Republican Senator Rick Scott of Florida maintains a significant fortune of $549.91 million, though his wealth primarily stems from his entrepreneurial ventures before entering politics.
During the town hall, Musk expressed his determination to uncover the mechanisms behind this wealth accumulation. He emphasized DOGE's commitment to investigating and preventing potential financial improprieties.
The State Department's decision to dissolve USAID adds another layer of complexity to DOGE's investigation. Secretary of State Marco Rubio's department plans to absorb USAID's programs as part of a broader reorganization effort.
Musk spoke about the intricate nature of international fund transfers and their potential connection to domestic political finances. He specifically referred to the complex routes through which government funds might circulate.
The Tesla CEO shared his perspective on the circuitous financial pathways that DOGE will investigate:
It doesn't go directly, but let's just say that there's a lot of strangely wealthy members of Congress where I'm trying to connect the dots of, 'How do they become rich?' How do they get $20 million if they're earning $200,000 a year? We're going to try to figure it out and certainly stop it from happening.
Since its establishment, DOGE has demonstrated significant progress in identifying government inefficiencies. The department has already achieved considerable success in its mission to optimize government spending.
The organization has reported savings of approximately $140 million for U.S. taxpayers through various efficiency initiatives. This achievement strengthens DOGE's position as it embarks on its investigation into congressional wealth.
These results suggest DOGE's capability to conduct thorough investigations into complex financial matters while maintaining its focus on government efficiency.
Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency is launching a comprehensive investigation into the wealth accumulation of congressional lawmakers, focusing on potential connections between international aid funds and domestic political finances. The investigation coincides with the State Department's plans to eliminate USAID and terminate over 4,000 employees, marking a significant shift in how foreign assistance programs are managed. With DOGE's track record of saving taxpayers $140 million, the department aims to uncover and address any irregular financial patterns in congressional wealth accumulation while ensuring greater transparency in government operations.
The Trump administration is preparing a significant transformation of the James S. Brady press briefing room that could reshape media access and representation.
According to Daily Caller, the White House aims to modify the traditional seating arrangement by including new media personalities, podcasters, and social media influencers, moving away from the long-standing system controlled by the White House Correspondents' Association (WHCA).
The proposed changes reflect a broader strategy to modernize media access based on current consumption patterns. A White House official, speaking anonymously about the unannounced plans, emphasized that the restructuring isn't solely focused on securing favorable coverage. Instead, the administration wants to consider how people consume news in today's digital landscape.
The restructuring plan aims to maintain space for traditional television, print, and digital outlets while incorporating online influencers and emerging media organizations. The White House believes this approach better reflects contemporary media consumption patterns. This marks a significant departure from the WHCA's historical control over seating arrangements.
The WHCA has responded strongly against the proposed changes. In an email to its members, the organization's board warned about the implications of government control over press access. They view the move as potentially damaging to independent journalism.
These changes follow similar adjustments implemented by the Trump administration earlier this year. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt previously announced the White House's takeover of press pool management, traditionally overseen by the WHCA.
The WHCA has faced additional challenges beyond the seating arrangement controversy. The organization recently cancelled its scheduled headliner, comedian Amber Ruffin, for its annual dinner. The cancellation came after Ruffin's controversial statements about the administration.
A White House official shared the administration's perspective on the changes, stating:
The goal isn't merely favorable coverage. It's truly an honest look at consumption [of the outlets' coverage]. Influencers are important but it's tough because they aren't [equipped to provide] consistent coverage. So the ability to cover the White House is part of the metrics.
The WHCA board expressed their concerns about the administration's plans in an email to members:
The White House should abandon this wrong-headed effort and show the American people they're not afraid to explain their policies and field questions from an independent media free from government control. But if the White House pushes forward, it will become even more clear that the administration is seeking to cynically seize control of the system through which the independent press organizes itself, so that it is easier to exact punishment on outlets over their coverage.
The proposed changes represent a significant shift in how the White House manages media access. Traditional media organizations worry about maintaining their historical role in covering the administration. The restructuring could affect how Americans receive information about White House activities.
The administration's plan to include new media outlets while preserving space for traditional press demonstrates the evolving nature of political journalism. This hybrid approach attempts to balance established journalistic traditions with modern media consumption habits.
These changes may set new precedents for future administrations' relationships with the press corps. The outcome could influence how government communications adapt to changing media landscapes.
The White House plans to reorganize the James S. Brady press briefing room by incorporating new media personalities alongside traditional press corps members. This move aims to modernize media access while reflecting current news consumption patterns. The changes have sparked concerns from the WHCA about press independence and government control over media access, setting the stage for continued debates about the future of White House coverage. The administration's decision to proceed with these changes could fundamentally alter how Americans receive information about presidential activities and policies.