A new poll reveals a significant divide within Reform UK party leadership regarding immigration policies while highlighting overwhelming public support for deportation measures.
According to Breitbart News, a recent survey by Find Out Now shows 84 percent of British voters support deporting migrants who commit violent crimes, with even higher numbers among Reform UK party supporters.
The poll demonstrates strong public backing for stricter immigration enforcement, with 85 percent favoring the deportation of sex offenders and 66 percent supporting the removal of illegal immigrants. These figures align closely with Reform UK's manifesto, which advocates for the immediate deportation of foreign criminals after serving prison sentences.
The issue has sparked tension between party leader Nigel Farage and suspended MP Rupert Lowe, revealing deeper disagreements about the party's approach to immigration enforcement. Farage has expressed concern about using certain terminology, specifically requesting the removal of phrases like "repatriation" and "mass deportations" from public speeches.
Lowe, who was recently suspended from the party, has taken a more aggressive stance on deportation policies. According to his recent statements, he advocates for the removal of all illegal migrants regardless of the total number affected.
The suspended MP shared his position with the media, stating:
If you are here illegally, you must be deported. If that results in one million or more eventual removals then that is what must happen. That must be the aim. It is that, or an effective amnesty. I choose deportations.
Farage has defended his position by explaining that certain language choices could mistakenly suggest the deportation of law-abiding citizens with foreign backgrounds, a message he wants to avoid.
The Find Out Now survey results indicate nearly unanimous support among Reform UK voters for deportation measures, with 99 percent backing the removal of both violent criminals and illegal immigrants.
These findings emerge as Reform UK grapples with internal leadership challenges. The suspension of Rupert Lowe followed his public criticism of Farage and allegations of threats made against party chairman Zia Yusuf.
The controversy has drawn attention from prominent figures outside the party, including X (formerly Twitter) CEO Elon Musk, who has suggested Lowe as a potential replacement for Farage in the party leadership role.
The strong public support for deportation measures appears to transcend party lines, with majorities across the political spectrum backing stronger enforcement actions against criminal migrants and illegal entrants.
The survey results suggest that while Reform UK leadership debates terminology and presentation, the British public maintains clear preferences for strict immigration enforcement measures. These findings could influence future policy discussions and political positioning among UK parties.
The ongoing dispute between Farage and Lowe has exposed nuanced differences in approach rather than fundamental disagreements about deportation policies. Both leaders support the deportation of criminals and illegal migrants, though they differ in their communication strategies. Farage claims Lowe's actions are aimed at destroying Reform UK and gaining favor with Elon Musk. The controversy has highlighted the delicate balance political leaders must maintain between strong policy positions and careful messaging on sensitive issues.
In a surprising development within the White House press corps dynamics, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt made waves with her decision regarding a long-standing media tradition.
According to Fox News, Leavitt announced she will not attend the White House Correspondents' Association (WHCA) dinner scheduled for April 26, marking another significant break from the customary relationship between the administration and the press corps.
The announcement came during her appearance on "The Sean Spicer Show," where she criticized the WHCA's role in White House coverage. She emphasized the organization's transformation into what she described as a "monetized monopoly" over presidential coverage, suggesting the traditional press pool system needed modernization.
The Trump administration has implemented substantial changes to the White House press coverage system. Breaking from a century-old tradition, the White House now controls the selection of journalists for the 13-member pool that covers the president in limited-access situations.
These modifications have particularly affected major wire services, including the Associated Press, Bloomberg, and Reuters. Instead of maintaining permanent positions, these organizations must now share a single rotating spot in the press pool.
The administration's recent decision to bar the Associated Press from the press pool, following a dispute over the Gulf of Mexico renaming executive order, further intensified tensions. Though temporarily upheld in federal court, Judge Trevor N. McFadden has indicated potential challenges to the ban's legality.
Leavitt explained that the White House had received over 15,000 applications for the new media seat in the press briefing room, highlighting the administration's push for broader media representation.
Eugene Daniels, WHCA's board president, and Politico correspondent, expressed concerns about the White House's new approach, suggesting it undermines press independence. However, the administration maintains these changes are necessary to diversify media coverage beyond traditional outlets.
The White House has defended its position by emphasizing the importance of including new voices and independent journalists in presidential coverage. Leavitt stated during the podcast:
This is a group of journalists who've been covering the White House for decades. They started this organization because the presidents at the time were not doing enough press conferences. I don't think we have that problem anymore under this president, so the priorities of the media have shifted, especially with this new digital age.
The upcoming WHCA dinner will feature comedian Amber Ruffin as the headline entertainer. Ruffin, who writes for the "Late Show with Seth Meyers," has already generated discussion with her comments about President Trump's potential attendance.
The annual event has faced previous challenges during the Trump era, as the former president consistently declined to attend during his first term. This year's dinner preparations continue despite the mounting tensions between the administration and traditional media outlets.
The selection of Ruffin as the featured entertainer adds another layer to the ongoing discourse about the dinner's role in modern political journalism. Her previous statements about Trump's attendance have already sparked discussions within political circles.
Leavitt's decision to skip the WHCA dinner and the administration's broader media access reforms represent significant shifts in the traditional relationship between the White House and the press corps. The press secretary's announcement highlights ongoing tensions between the Trump administration and established media organizations. The White House's new approach to media access, including the restructuring of the press pool system and the expansion of coverage opportunities to non-traditional outlets, signals a fundamental change in how presidential news coverage may be managed in the future.
A lighthearted encounter between former President Donald Trump and Elon Musk's young son created an unexpected viral sensation at the White House.
According to the New York Post, heartwarming photographs of Trump walking with X Æ A-12, known as "Lil X," to Marine Force One have garnered more than 4 million views on social media platform X, drawing widespread attention and positive reactions from internet users.
The four-year-old son of tech billionaire Elon Musk was captured in various moments of pure childhood joy, dressed in a black coat adorned with a USA pin and clutching what appeared to be a bag of candy. The young boy's enthusiasm was evident as he led the way, jumping and skipping down the White House South Lawn ramp toward the presidential helicopter.
The endearing interaction occurred during one of Lil X's regular visits to the White House, where his father now serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency. Musk's appointment to lead DOGE, an initiative focused on eliminating waste, fraud, and corruption within federal government operations, has established his son's recurring presence at the presidential residence.
Trump demonstrated careful attention to his young companion, helping Lil X board Marine Force One and making playful gestures, including an "X" hand signal directed at the child. The pair was later joined by Musk and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick before departing for Joint Base Andrews.
Social media users quickly embraced the moment, with one X user commenting:
It's lovely to see [Lil] X feels that comfortable with President Trump. Day by day we see Elon and President together. You can fake that people say but X is playful with President trump. Kids don't know how to fake things or relationships. There is only love.
This is not Lil X's first memorable appearance at the White House since Trump's return to office. Last month, the young boy attended an Oval Office media briefing where his father discussed DOGE's initiatives and achievements. During the press conference, Lil X displayed typical childlike behavior, making funny faces and even picking his nose before his father lifted him onto his shoulders.
The viral photographs drew comparisons to another popular image of Elon Musk jumping at a Trump campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, last October. The parallel between father and son's enthusiastic gestures resonated with social media users.
The presence of Lil X has added a humanizing element to official White House functions, with his uninhibited behavior providing moments of levity amid serious political discussions.
The interaction between Trump and Lil X represents a unique intersection of political power and Silicon Valley influence. At 78 years old, Trump has shown a softer side in his interactions with the four-year-old son of one of America's most prominent business leaders.
Their rapport has generated significant public interest, with the White House's social media post featuring the pair becoming one of the most viewed content pieces of the week. The genuine nature of their interaction has resonated with supporters who view it as a reflection of positive leadership qualities.
Future meetings between the former president and Lil X seem likely as Musk continues his work with the Department of Government Efficiency, potentially creating more memorable moments that capture public attention.
The viral photographs of Trump and Lil X's White House encounter highlight the growing relationship between the former president and Elon Musk's family. Their interaction, which took place on the South Lawn while heading to Marine Force One, showcased a genuine connection between the 78-year-old leader and the tech billionaire's four-year-old son. As Musk continues his role leading the Department of Government Efficiency, his son's presence at the White House has become a regular occurrence, adding an unexpected element of childhood joy to presidential proceedings.
Governor Gavin Newsom faces mounting criticism over his handling of recent communications regarding the devastating Los Angeles wildfires.
According to Breitbart News, the governor's office has declined to release text messages and emails exchanged with Los Angeles city and county officials about the fires, claiming exemption from disclosure requirements.
The controversy deepens as Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass admitted during a news conference with local Fox affiliate KTTV-11 that her text messages related to the Palisades fire were automatically deleted after thirty days. The situation raises concerns about transparency and accountability in California's leadership during natural disasters.
The governor's office maintains that Newsom's communications are exempt from public records requests, despite growing pressure for transparency. This stance appears to conflict with the spirit of public records legislation, even as officials argue their actions comply with legal requirements.
While affected communities struggle with debris removal and rebuilding efforts, Newsom has shifted his focus to producing a podcast. The timing of this endeavor has drawn criticism from residents still grappling with the aftermath of the deadly wildfires.
Local media attempts to access communication records have been met with resistance. When KTTV-11 requested the governor's text messages with the mayor and Los Angeles county officials, they received a firm rejection.
Fox affiliate KTTV-11 reporter stated:
We were told they would not be providing those, and that the governor's communications are exempt.
The parallel actions of both Mayor Bass and Governor Newsom in withholding or failing to preserve communications have raised eyebrows among transparency advocates. Their approach to public records management appears coordinated, though both maintain they are operating within legal boundaries.
The situation highlights a growing disconnect between state leadership and affected communities. While residents navigate the challenging process of rebuilding their lives, their elected officials seem more focused on maintaining information barriers than facilitating recovery efforts.
The timing of Newsom's podcast launch has particularly irked many Californians. With numerous communities still dealing with wildfire aftermath, the governor's choice to prioritize media projects over disaster response coordination has drawn sharp criticism.
The refusal to release communications about the fires occurs against a backdrop of ongoing recovery challenges. Many affected residents argue that understanding the official response to the fires could help improve future disaster management protocols.
These developments reflect a broader pattern of communication management by California officials during crisis situations. The practice of withholding or deleting potentially crucial communications raises questions about the state's commitment to transparent governance.
Governor Newsom and Mayor Bass face increasing scrutiny over their handling of wildfire-related communications in Los Angeles. Their refusal to release text messages and emails about the Palisades fire, coupled with Bass's admission of automatic message deletion, has sparked public outrage and demands for greater transparency. As California residents continue rebuilding efforts in the wake of devastating wildfires, their leaders' focus on maintaining information barriers and pursuing media projects like Newsom's podcast raises serious questions about administrative priorities.
A grim discovery in the home of legendary actor Gene Hackman and his wife, Betsy Arakawa, has brought attention to their beloved pet's final moments.
According to the New York Post, a state necropsy report revealed that the couple's kelpie mix named Zinna, who was found dead alongside her owners in their Santa Fe residence, died from dehydration and starvation while locked in a bathroom crate.
The report detailed signs of partial mummification in Zinna's remains, with veterinarians noting an empty stomach containing only minimal amounts of hair and bile. The examination showed no evidence of infectious disease, trauma, or poisoning that could have contributed to the dog's death, though severe decomposition made a complete analysis challenging.
Arakawa, 65, succumbed to hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, a rare rodent-borne disease, approximately one week before her husband's death. Hackman, who was 95 and suffering from advanced Alzheimer's disease, remained unaware of his wife's passing.
The iconic actor's death was attributed to heart disease complications exacerbated by his Alzheimer's condition. Both bodies were discovered in their Santa Fe home on February 26, with authorities ruling the deaths as natural causes.
The Santa Fe County Sheriff's Office continues to investigate the precise timeline of events, analyzing cellphone data collected from the scene to establish a definitive sequence of the tragic occurrences.
Zinna, whose full name derived from "Zinfandel," had found a loving home with Hackman and Arakawa after being returned to a shelter. The couple maintained a strong connection to animal rescue, with one of their other dogs being a stray discovered on the set of "The Replacements" in 1999.
Joey Padilla, owner of Santa Fe Tails pet care facility now caring for the couple's two surviving dogs, shared insights about Zinna's special bond with Arakawa. The dog had become an inseparable companion, rarely leaving her owner's side.
The facility has taken responsibility for the welfare of the couple's remaining pets, ensuring their continued care following the tragic loss of their owners.
The Santa Fe County Sheriff's Office spokesperson Denise Womack Avila stated: "The case is considered active until we have that information to tie up the timeline."
Authorities are meticulously examining all evidence to construct a comprehensive understanding of the events leading to the deaths of Hackman, Arakawa, and their beloved pet.
Gene Hackman and Betsy Arakawa's unexpected deaths in their Santa Fe home led to the devastating discovery of their pet Zinna's remains in a bathroom crate. The beloved kelpie mix succumbed to dehydration and starvation, as confirmed by the New Mexico Department of Agriculture's necropsy report.
The investigation continues as authorities work to establish a precise timeline of events through analysis of cellphone data recovered from the scene, while the couple's two surviving dogs have found care at the Santa Fe Tails pet facility.
A video clip from 2011 featuring former President Barack Obama has emerged, showing his stance on reducing government expenditure during his presidency.
According to Fox News, the resurfaced footage shows Obama advocating for the elimination of wasteful government spending and programs, even those that had significant public support, as part of his administration's deficit reduction strategy.
The nearly 14-year-old White House video gained renewed attention as conservative social media users shared it amid ongoing debates about government spending cuts. The timing coincides with discussions surrounding the Trump administration's current cost-cutting initiatives, drawing parallels between the two presidents' approaches to fiscal responsibility.
In the video, Obama highlighted several instances of what he considered unnecessary government spending. He specifically mentioned a website dedicated to a forest ranger folk music group called the "Fiddlin' Foresters," questioning the necessity of such expenditure.
The former president also pointed out the government's maintenance of thousands of unused buildings across the country. His administration identified these properties as prime examples of wasteful spending that could be eliminated without significant impact on essential services.
Then-Vice President Joe Biden was appointed to lead this initiative, with a mandate to investigate misused tax dollars across all government departments and agencies. Biden appeared in the video expressing his commitment to the task.
Social media platforms have seen an increase in conservative figures sharing and commenting on the video. Notable personalities, including Elon Musk and Joe Rogan, have drawn attention to the similarities between Obama's past statements and current fiscal discussions.
Obama stated in the video:
Everyone knows that getting rid of the deficit will require some tough decisions, and that includes cutting back on billions of dollars in programs that a lot of people care about.
Conservative podcast host Joe Rogan noted the timeline between Obama's statements and current actions, suggesting it took 14 years and the combined efforts of Elon Musk and Donald Trump to transform the rhetoric into actual policy changes.
The video's circulation comes at a time when Democratic lawmakers are expressing opposition to similar spending reduction proposals. This has created an interesting dynamic where conservatives are using Obama's past statements to support current fiscal policies.
Some Democratic representatives have publicly criticized Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer for supporting recent budget agreements. The contrast between the current Democratic opposition and Obama's past support for spending cuts has become a focal point in ongoing political discussions.
Representatives from both political parties have weighed in on the matter, with Republican lawmakers using the video to highlight what they perceive as inconsistency in Democratic positions on government spending over time.
The 2011 video shows former President Barack Obama's clear stance on the need to reduce government spending and eliminate wasteful programs during his administration. His specific examples, including the "Fiddlin' Foresters" website and unused federal buildings, demonstrated a practical approach to identifying unnecessary expenditures. The video has now become a talking point in current political debates, with conservatives using it to support similar spending reduction initiatives while highlighting perceived changes in Democratic Party positions on fiscal policy over the past decade.