Emmy Award-winning actor Kelsey Grammer reveals deeply personal experiences with abortion in his upcoming memoir "Karen: A Brother Remembers."
According to The Daily Wire, the 70-year-old "Frasier" star expresses profound regret over past abortion decisions, describing the experience as something that "eats away at my soul."
The memoir, set to release on Tuesday, primarily focuses on the tragic story of his sister Karen's rape and murder in 1975. However, Grammer also shares intimate details about two significant abortion experiences that have deeply affected his life, including one that occurred just six months before his sister's death.
Grammer writes candidly about his girlfriend's pregnancy in 1974 while he was studying at The Juilliard School. The actor reflects on his passive stance during this crucial moment, acknowledging his internal conflict between supporting women's rights and his personal beliefs about life.
The veteran actor expresses his current views on abortion providers with notable criticism. He questions their medical credentials while maintaining a measured tone in his commentary.
His perspective on abortion rights remains nuanced, as he continues to support women's bodily autonomy despite his personal misgivings.
Grammer shares about a more recent and particularly painful experience involving his current wife, Kate. The couple faced an agonizing choice when expecting twins. Here's what Grammer wrote about the devastating decision:
We killed him. Our son. We killed our son so Faith might live. We wept as we watched his heart stop. Saw it. It is the greatest pain I have known.
The difficult choice came after doctors advised the couple to terminate one twin when his amniotic sac ruptured, ultimately leading to the healthy birth of their daughter Faith.
The actor also shared his evolving thoughts on the subject of abortion rights:
I know that many people do not have a problem with abortion, and though I have supported it in the past, it eats away at my soul. I supported the idea that a woman has the right to do what she wants with her own body. I still do. But it was hard for me. Still is.
As one of the few outspoken conservatives in Hollywood, Grammer has maintained his support for Republican causes and President Donald Trump. His stance on various social issues, including abortion, sets him apart from many of his industry peers.
Grammer's personal life includes four marriages and seven children, with one grandchild. His successful career spans several decades, most notably as the titular character in the hit series "Frasier."
Kelsey Grammer's memoir "Karen: A Brother Remembers" provides an intimate look at the actor's life-altering experiences with abortion. The book, releasing Tuesday, chronicles his journey from a young actor facing difficult choices to his current position as a father of seven who continues to grapple with past decisions.
While maintaining his support for women's rights, Grammer's account reveals the complex emotional terrain he has navigated regarding abortion, particularly in light of his sister's tragic death and his later experience with his wife Kate.
A high-stakes legal battle unfolds as Tufts University doctoral student Rümeysa Öztürk awaits transfer from a Louisiana detention facility amid allegations of political targeting.
According to CNN, the US 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals has mandated the Department of Justice to transfer Öztürk to Vermont by May 14, rejecting the government's attempts to keep her detained in Louisiana. The three-judge panel determined that Vermont was the appropriate venue for hearing her First Amendment claims.
The ruling represents a significant setback for the Trump administration's broader effort to handle cases involving non-citizens detained during Gaza war protests through immigration courts rather than federal district courts.
The government's argument centered on jurisdictional challenges, claiming that immigration courts should have exclusive authority over such cases.
Öztürk, a 30-year-old Turkish national, was apprehended by masked federal agents near her Somerville residence in March. Her detention came after she co-authored an opinion piece criticizing Tufts University's response to student demands for divestment from companies with Israeli ties. Within 24 hours of her arrest, she was transported across multiple jurisdictions before landing in a Louisiana immigration facility.
The Department of Homeland Security leveled serious accusations against Öztürk, claiming without presenting evidence that she engaged in activities supporting Hamas. Her case has drawn attention to the broader implications of political expression among international students during times of global conflict.
Appeals court Judges Barrington Parker, Susan Carney and Alison Nathan stated:
To support the Court's resolution of these issues, the Court orders that Ms. Öztürk be physically transferred to ICE custody within the District of Vermont no later than May 14, 2025. The balance of the equities disfavors a stay. Öztürk's interest in participating in her scheduled habeas proceedings in person outweighs the government's purported administrative and logistical costs.
The government's appeal aimed to pause Vermont judges' transfer orders, arguing that deportation challenges must be handled in immigration court. Officials expressed concern about potential irreparable harm if prevented from removing individuals they deem ineligible to remain in the United States.
Due to missed deadlines in seeking a stay of the decision, Öztürk will participate virtually in her May 9 bail hearing. The development has frustrated her legal team's efforts to secure in-person representation for their client.
ACLU Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project deputy director Esha Bhandari emphasized:
No one should be arrested and locked up for their political views. Every day that Rümeysa Öztürk remains in detention is a day too long. We're grateful the court refused the government's attempt to keep her isolated from her community and her legal counsel as she pursues her case for release.
Öztürk's situation highlights the complex intersection between academic freedom, political expression, and immigration enforcement. The case has sparked discussions about the treatment of international students who engage in political discourse on American campuses.
The Appeals Court's ruling suggests a careful examination of the balance between national security concerns and constitutional protections for non-citizens. The decision emphasizes the importance of proper venue and due process in cases involving First Amendment claims.
Rümeysa Öztürk, the Turkish doctoral student at Tufts University, faces transfer from Louisiana to Vermont following a decisive ruling by the US 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals. Her detention, triggered by an opinion piece criticizing Tufts University's stance on Israeli divestment, has evolved into a complex legal battle involving First Amendment rights and immigration law. The upcoming bail hearing in Vermont will determine her immediate future while raising questions about the intersection of political expression and immigration status in academic settings.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth takes decisive action to restructure the military's top brass, signaling significant changes in the Pentagon's leadership composition.
According to Breitbart, Hegseth issued instructions on Monday to cut 20 percent of the military's four-star general officers as part of the Trump administration's broader initiative to streamline military efficiency.
The restructuring plan extends beyond four-star generals, encompassing a 20 percent reduction in top National Guard officers and an additional 10 percent cut in general and flag officers, including one-star officers. The defense secretary emphasized that these changes align with President Trump's vision for national security and reflect his commitment to having the right personnel in key positions.
In a detailed memo outlining the reduction strategy, Hegseth emphasized the importance of eliminating redundant force structures and streamlining leadership. The changes aim to dismantle unnecessary bureaucratic layers that may hinder military effectiveness.
These cuts will significantly impact the military's current leadership structure, which includes approximately 800 general officers. Of these, 44 hold the prestigious four-star general or flag officer positions, with the Army maintaining the largest contingent of 219 general officers, including eight four-star generals.
Democratic Representative Seth Moulton of Massachusetts, who serves on the House Armed Services Committee, voiced concerns about the potential politicization of the military. The Marine veteran suggests these changes might be politically motivated rather than efficiency-driven.
Hegseth's vision for military transformation encompasses more than just personnel reductions. His recent announcement called for creating a "leaner, more lethal force" through comprehensive reforms.
The proposed changes include the consolidation or closure of various headquarters, the removal of outdated military equipment, and significant staff reductions at the Pentagon. The defense secretary specifically targets a reduction of up to 1,000 headquarters staff positions.
Congressional involvement in these changes appears limited, as lawmakers received only a brief alert about the cuts instead of the customary advance notification. The number of general officer positions is regulated by law, making these changes particularly significant.
The defense secretary's previous statements regarding staff reductions shed light on the administration's broader objectives. Hegseth explained that these changes reflect the current administration's strategic vision for national security.
Rep. Moulton expressed his perspective on the restructuring efforts:
He's creating a formal framework to fire all the generals who disagree with him — and the president.
These changes represent one of the most significant restructuring efforts in recent military history, potentially affecting command structures across all service branches.
The Pentagon's leadership reduction initiative forms part of a broader military transformation strategy under Defense Secretary Hegseth's direction. The plan aims to streamline command structures while maintaining operational effectiveness through the removal of one-fifth of four-star general officers and additional cuts across various leadership levels. These changes reflect the Trump administration's commitment to military efficiency and effectiveness, though they have sparked debate about their potential impact on military operations and command structure.
A tragic turn of events unfolds as a car passenger succumbs to severe burns sustained during January's devastating plane crash in Philadelphia.
According to Daily Mail, Dominique Goods-Burke, 34, died on April 27 from burn injuries after the medical transport plane's debris struck her car during the January 31 crash, bringing the total death toll to eight.
The incident claimed the life of her fiancé Steven Dreuitt, 37, who was also in the car with his son when the aircraft debris hit their vehicle. While Dreuitt's son survived the accident, he suffered severe burns. The family had been returning from a shopping trip to Macy's when the tragedy occurred.
The Learjet 55 air ambulance crashed shortly after taking off from Northeast Philadelphia Airport at around 6:10 pm. All six people aboard the aircraft, who were Mexican nationals, died in the explosion.
Among the victims were 11-year-old Valentina Guzman Murillo and her mother, Lizeth Murillo, 31. The young girl had just completed four months of treatment for a serious birth defect affecting her spine at a children's hospital in Philadelphia.
The medical team accompanying them included pilot Alan Alejandro Montoya Perale, co-pilot Josué Juárez of Veracruz, doctor Raúl Meza, and paramedic Rodrigo Lopez Padilla. They were ensuring the child's safe return to Tijuana, Mexico, with a planned stopover in Missouri.
The National Transportation Safety Board's investigation discovered that the plane's voice recorder was malfunctioning before the crash. The device was retrieved from eight feet underground at the impact site.
Meg Hagele, founder of High Point Cafe where Goods-Burke worked as baking supervisor for 10 years, shared memories of her dedicated employee.
According to Hagele, the cafe feels empty without Goods-Burke's presence. Goods-Burke's daughter would often visit after school while her mother finished work.
High Point Cafe's founder expressed her grief:
This place feels really empty and a little haunted. She was an amazing mom, she was an incredible baker, she held this place together. She just ran this ship tight. Her daughter would come after school sometimes, and we would be in the lounge area while she finished up. She was just an incredible part of this family that will never be the same.
The Philadelphia plane crash occurred just two days after a devastating mid-air collision between an American Airlines jet and an Army helicopter over the Potomac River in Washington, DC. The accident claimed 67 lives, marking it as the deadliest plane crash in the United States in 24 years.
Recent findings suggest that the Black Hawk helicopter pilot maintained an excessive altitude despite warnings from another crew member to descend. The investigation into both incidents continues as authorities work to prevent similar tragedies.
Dominique Goods-Burke, a beloved member of Philadelphia's High Point Cafe family, died on April 27 from burn injuries sustained when debris from a crashed medical transport plane struck her car on January 31. The incident, which occurred on Cottman Avenue, claimed eight lives in total, including her fiancé Steven Dreuitt and six Mexican nationals aboard the aircraft. Goods-Burke leaves behind two children, aged 15 and six, while her funeral is scheduled for May 8, following two months after her late fiancé's celebration of life ceremony.
Former Vice President Kamala Harris attended the star-studded 2025 Met Gala with questions arising about who covered the hefty cost of her entrance.
According to Daily Mail, Harris joined fashion's biggest night as a guest of Vogue editor-in-chief Anna Wintour, but details about who funded her $75,000 ticket remain undisclosed.
The former Vice President made an appearance with her husband, Doug Emhoff, wearing a creation by the luxury streetwear brand Off-White. Her outfit choice aligned with this year's theme, "Superfine: Tailoring Black Style," which was inspired by Monica L. Miller's book exploring black dandyism and styling of black diasporic identity.
Social media users quickly questioned the appropriateness of Harris's attendance, given her recent $20 million campaign debt. Many critics took to X, formerly Twitter, to express their concerns about the expensive evening.
Off-White creative director IB Kamara defended Harris's presence at the event, emphasizing the significance of her participation. Speaking about the design choice, Kamara shared his perspective:
To me the true core of dandyism is rooted in confidence and strength. There is no person who exemplifies these characteristics more than Kamala D. Harris, someone who has overcome adversity and continues to be a beacon for so many.
The former Vice President's ensemble featured a sleek black and white, long-sleeved gown with an asymmetrical cape and flowing scarf. The dress was created by Off-White, a luxury streetwear brand founded by the late Virgil Abloh, known for his groundbreaking contributions to fashion.
Prior to the Met Gala, Harris and Emhoff were spotted dining at the exclusive Polo Bar in New York City. Their security detail included two dozen Secret Service agents and police officers stationed both inside and outside the venue. The couple, worth a combined $14 million as of last year, spent approximately two hours at the renowned celebrity hotspot.
This marked one of Harris's first major public appearances since her election loss to Donald Trump in November. She recently delivered a speech at the Emerge 20th anniversary gala in San Francisco, where she criticized Trump's tariff policies.
The Met Gala appearance adds to Harris's fashion world connections, following her two previous Vogue magazine covers. Her first cover in 2021 sparked discussions when she posed in casual attire and Converse sneakers, while her second feature showcased a more formal look in a Gabriela Hearst suit.
DailyMail.com reached out to Off-White regarding the payment of Harris's ticket, but no response was provided at the time of publication. The brand's off-the-rack dresses typically start at around $400, significantly less than the event's admission price.
The former Vice President's Met Gala appearance coincides with her recent return to public speaking engagements. During her speech at the Emerge gala, she criticized Trump's economic policies, particularly his approach to international trade tariffs.
Harris argued that Trump's actions have created significant economic challenges, describing his tariff policies as detrimental to American workers and families. Her comments reflect her continued engagement in national political discourse despite her recent electoral defeat. DailyMail.com attempted to obtain clarification about the ticket payment from various sources, but the matter remains unresolved.
Kamala Harris's attendance at the 2025 Met Gala has generated significant public interest and controversy, primarily centered around the funding of her $75,000 ticket. The former Vice President appeared at the event wearing an Off-White creation that aligned with the gala's theme celebrating black style and fashion history. While Harris's participation in the prestigious event marked one of her first major public appearances since her November election loss, questions persist about who covered the cost of her attendance, leading to ongoing discussions about transparency and appropriateness of such expenditures in the current political climate.
President Donald Trump takes aim at celebrities who fled to the United Kingdom by announcing a significant tax measure affecting the film industry abroad.
According to The Western Journal, Trump revealed plans on Truth Social to implement a 100% tariff on foreign-produced movies entering the United States, particularly targeting the UK's growing film industry, where several Trump critics have relocated.
The president's announcement comes as a response to what he perceives as a threat to America's domestic film industry. Trump emphasized the rapid decline of Hollywood production and expressed concern about other countries offering incentives that draw filmmakers and studios away from the United States.
The United Kingdom's strategic tax relief program, established in 2007, has successfully attracted major film productions. The policy extends beyond movies to include high-end television productions, creating a thriving entertainment industry across the Atlantic.
British officials have implemented an aggressive tax relief system that has proven highly effective. The James Bond franchise serves as a prime example, with recent films receiving substantial tax benefits ranging from 21 million to 47 million pounds.
The upcoming "Jurassic World: Rebirth," scheduled for release in July, highlights the scale of these incentives. The film, dubbed the most expensive movie ever made, received a reimbursement exceeding 89 million pounds for choosing the UK as its production location.
Trump framed the issue as a matter of national security, pointing to what he calls "messaging and propaganda" concerns. His Truth Social announcement emphasized this perspective with characteristic directness.
In his statement, Trump wrote:
The Movie Industry in America is DYING a very fast death. Other Countries are offering all sorts of incentives to draw our filmmakers and studios away from the United States. Hollywood, and many other areas within the U.S.A., are being devastated. WE WANT MOVIES MADE IN AMERICA, AGAIN!
The president's approach aligns with his broader economic nationalism, viewing the entertainment industry's exodus as part of a larger pattern of American industrial decline.
The British Film Institute's direct funding through national lottery programs compounds the UK's attractiveness to filmmakers. However, the tax relief system remains the primary driver of growth in British film production.
Tax monitoring organizations have noted the significant impact of these incentives. While some argue about the actual cost to British taxpayers, the policy's effectiveness in attracting major productions is undeniable.
The implementation of Trump's 100% tariff would force production companies to reconsider their international filming strategies. This measure could effectively neutralize the UK's tax advantages for films intended for American audiences.
President Trump's tariff announcement represents a calculated move to protect America's entertainment industry from foreign competition. The policy specifically targets the United Kingdom's growing film sector, where several prominent Trump critics have sought refuge. The measure aims to counter British tax incentives that have successfully attracted major film productions away from the United States. As the entertainment industry awaits implementation details, the policy's impact could reshape the global landscape of film production and potentially influence the decisions of celebrities who have relocated abroad.
Senator John Fetterman's relationship with his wife, Gisele, takes a concerning turn as she has not been seen at Capitol Hill this year while reports of his deteriorating health condition surface.
According to Daily Mail, a bombshell report revealed the Pennsylvania senator's closely guarded health history, detailing staff concerns about his erratic behavior and suggesting a growing rift between the couple.
Former and current staffers paint a troubling picture of the 55-year-old Democrat's mental state, describing episodes where he appears despondent at times while acting manic and unhinged at others. The medical director of Walter Reed's traumatic brain injury unit expressed serious concerns about Fetterman's lifestyle in an urgent letter, noting his frequent fast food consumption and uncertainty about medication compliance.
The couple's relationship has shown signs of strain, particularly regarding their differing views on political issues. Sources close to the situation report that Gisele, a progressive and formerly undocumented immigrant from Brazil, strongly disagrees with her husband's unwavering support for Israel.
One staffer recalled a heated exchange between the couple shortly after Hamas's October 7 terror attack, where Gisele confronted her husband about Israel's actions. The tension between them became more apparent when she expressed alarm over his behavior in text messages to staff members.
Gisele's concern for her husband's wellbeing was evident in her communication with his staff. In one message, she wrote:
I told him I don't want to talk to him until his blood is tested. Please promise me that he'll never have access to the Twitter account.
Senate staffers confirm that Gisele, who previously maintained a high profile around her husband's office, has been noticeably absent throughout 2024. This marks a significant change from her active presence during Fetterman's recovery from his May 2022 stroke.
Despite Fetterman's January 2024 dismissal of separation rumors as outrageous, recent events suggest growing distance between the couple. A March incident where Fetterman took an unexpected trip to Connecticut without informing his family or staff further strained their relationship.
The situation has left many wondering about the couple's future, especially given Gisele's reported frustration with her husband's behavior. During a December phone call, she was overheard asking, "Who did I marry? Where is the man I married?"
Medical professionals at Walter Reed have expressed serious concerns about Fetterman's health management following his March 2023 treatment for depression. The senator continues to rely on an iPhone to translate incoming questions due to ongoing audio-visual impairment from his stroke.
Senate staff members have observed unusual behavior from Fetterman, including extended periods spent sitting in a courtyard outside his office during working hours. This behavior has raised eyebrows given the typically packed schedules of senators.
Fetterman's office has not responded to requests for comment about these developments or his wife's absence from Capitol Hill.
The deteriorating relationship between John Fetterman and his wife Gisele has become increasingly apparent amid growing concerns about the Pennsylvania senator's health. Their marriage, which began in 2008 and produced three children, faces unprecedented challenges as Gisele remains absent from Capitol Hill while staff members report erratic behavior from the senator. The situation continues to develop as questions mount about Fetterman's ability to manage his health conditions while fulfilling his senatorial duties, with his wife's notable absence adding another layer of complexity to an already concerning situation.
Law enforcement officials and serial killer experts have initiated investigations into a series of mysterious deaths across three New England states, raising concerns about potential connections between the cases.
According to Daily Mail, 11 bodies have been discovered across Rhode Island, Connecticut, and Massachusetts since early March 2025, prompting leading experts Dr. Katherine Ramsland and Dr. Ann Burgess to analyze possible links between the deaths.
The string of discoveries began on March 6 when authorities found the body of 35-year-old Paige Fannon in Connecticut's Norwalk River. That same day, a human skull was discovered in Plymouth, Massachusetts. The discoveries continued throughout March and April, with bodies found in various locations, including cemeteries, rivers, and wooded areas.
Dr. Katherine Ramsland, a forensic psychology professor at DeSales University known for studying BTK killer Dennis Rader, emphasizes the importance of avoiding premature conclusions. She explains that while some victims share similar characteristics, such as being women in their 50s, this alone does not definitively indicate a pattern.
Dr. Ann Burgess, renowned for her work in developing serial killer profiles with the FBI's behavioral unit, notes that the number of bodies found in such a short timeframe is concerning. However, she maintains that more information is needed before establishing concrete connections between the cases.
Dr. Ramsland shares her perspective on the public's growing suspicion of law enforcement handling these cases:
I think people are highly influenced by the LISK [Long Island serial killer] situation where remains were found all over the place and now they're beginning to be connected to one individual. Because of the way that investigation was poorly handled, because there were cover-ups and the FBI was shoved out, I think people are very suspicious of police handling these investigations.
The cases have garnered significant attention on social media platforms, with a Facebook group dedicated to the theory growing to 68,000 members within days. Videos discussing the cases on TikTok have accumulated millions of views, leading to both productive discussions and problematic speculation.
Law enforcement agencies have found themselves responding to various claims made online, including investigating an anonymous confession posted in a Facebook group. A two-day search involving detectives and cadaver dogs was conducted after the poster claimed to have buried bodies near a Massachusetts beach.
The social media attention has also affected victims' families. Michele Romano's sister publicly demanded her sister's name and pictures be removed from online discussions, stating that Romano was not killed by a serial killer.
Several cases have already been resolved independently of any serial killer theory. Suzanne Wormser's roommate, Donald Coffel, has been charged with her murder, while police have ruled out foul play in Denise Leary's death.
Dr. Burgess emphasizes the need for more information about death circumstances, victimology, and crime scene patterns before establishing potential links between cases. She suggests continued monitoring of the situation to determine if more bodies are discovered.
Law enforcement agencies maintain there are no confirmed connections between the cases, though experts believe they are likely comparing notes behind the scenes.
A series of mysterious deaths across New England has prompted investigations by leading serial killer experts Dr. Katherine Ramsland and Dr. Ann Burgess. The discovery of 11 bodies in Rhode Island, Connecticut, and Massachusetts since March 2025 has sparked widespread speculation about potential connections between the cases. While some deaths have been explained through individual investigations, experts continue to analyze the remaining cases for possible links while cautioning against premature conclusions about the existence of a serial killer.