President Donald Trump took aim at Walmart over the weekend, accusing the retail giant of unjustifiably raising prices in response to U.S. tariff policies.
The clash follows Walmart’s announcement that it will increase prices as early as next month, citing financial pressures from tariff-related costs and a notable drop in quarterly profits, as The Hill reports.
On Thursday, Walmart revealed plans to begin raising prices sometime next month, attributing the move to mounting expenses caused by a series of tariffs implemented on Trump's order. The announcement was part of the company's quarterly earnings release, which noted a decline in profit compared to the same period last year.
According to Walmart, its first-quarter earnings fell to $4.45 billion, or 56 cents per share -- a decline from the $5.10 billion, or 63 cents per share, reported a year earlier. The company also withheld a future profit forecast, citing the unpredictability of today’s economic environment. Commenting during an earnings call, Walmart CEO Doug McMillion explained that the retail chain was “not able to absorb all the pressure” stemming from the tariffs, referencing the tight operating margins that are common in the retail sector.
By Saturday, Trump had issued his personal response via his Truth Social platform, lashing out at Walmart’s explanation for the upcoming price increases. He accused the corporation of pointing fingers at tariff policies instead of managing cost internally.
“Walmart should STOP trying to blame Tariffs as the reason for raising prices throughout the chain,” Trump posted. He went on to highlight Walmart’s profitability, stating, “Walmart made BILLIONS OF DOLLARS last year, far more than expected.”
The president suggested that Walmart should deal with the extra costs itself rather than shifting them to shoppers, writing that Walmart and China alike should "EAT THE TARIFFS." He added, “I’ll be watching, and so will your customers!!!”
In response to Trump’s criticisms, a Walmart spokesperson issued a statement to The Hill on Saturday, emphasizing the company’s long-standing efforts to minimize costs at checkout. “We have always worked to keep our prices as low as possible and we won’t stop,” the spokesperson said.
The company further explained that although they aim to shield consumers from price escalations, they can only continue doing so within the constraints of thin retail profit margins. “We’ll keep prices as low as we can for as long as we can given the reality of small retail margins,” the spokesperson added. Retail experts have warned for months that the tariff landscape could translate into added costs for American consumers, particularly in the household goods and apparel markets where Walmart commands substantial market share.
Adding another layer to the economic discussion, the Trump administration earlier in the week enacted a significant change in its approach to tariffs on Chinese goods. The White House reduced those tariffs from a peak of 145% to 30% for a temporary 90-day window.
In response, the Chinese government also eased its retaliatory measures, bringing its tariff rate down from 125% to 10%. This mutual decrease in trade penalties marked a notable reversal in the international tariff policy pursued in past years.
These adjustments followed a pattern of shifting trade strategies during Trump’s presidency, with occasional exemptions applied to Chinese imports and a rollback of a 25% tariff on goods from Canada and Mexico. A 90-day pause on “reciprocal” tariffs affecting various other countries was also introduced as part of the broader reassessment.
Despite the short-term relief from lowered tariffs, Walmart's leadership remains cautious about future financial outlooks. The absence of a profit forecast for the current quarter reflects the instability businesses face amid evolving fiscal policies and global trade dynamics.
Walmart is one of the largest private employers and retailers in the United States, and its pricing decisions can have a ripple effect across the broader retail landscape. Whether the company’s upcoming price adjustments will impact its customer base remains to be seen.
As consumers prepare for potential changes at store shelves, the public dispute between Trump and Walmart underscores the broader debate over who ultimately bears the burden of international trade decisions: corporations or shoppers.
International Criminal Court Prosecutor Karim Khan has stepped aside as an external investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct moves forward.
The United Nations’ internal oversight office is examining claims against Khan, a development that coincides with heightened scrutiny of the ICC’s recent arrest warrants targeting Israeli and Hamas leaders, as Fox News reports.
The ICC confirmed Friday that Khan will be on leave until the investigation concludes. The inquiry is being led by the United Nations Office of Internal Oversight Services, which serves as the U.N.’s internal watchdog. Khan has denied all allegations of inappropriate conduct.
Initial reports of the alleged misconduct surfaced last year in May, when two ICC staff members said a victim had privately shared accusations involving Khan. The ICC’s in-house watchdog launched a short inquiry, speaking with the alleged victim but ending the probe after five days when she declined to file a formal complaint.
Although the inquiry closed without a formal conclusion, the watchdog recommended Khan reduce direct interaction with the woman to help maintain confidence in the court. Khan himself was not interviewed during that initial review.
The situation escalated over the past week as media outlets, including the Associated Press and Fox News Digital, highlighted the unresolved misconduct claims. Fox News asked both the court and Khan if he would resign or face removal soon. Khan’s decision to pause his duties followed shortly after.
Women's rights organizations had previously pushed for Khan's resignation when the accusations first emerged. At the time, he refused. Now, with an external investigation under way, he has agreed to step back temporarily from his role. Attorneys from the British law firm Carter-Ruck Solicitors, who represent Khan, issued a statement denying all claims against him. They said he is cooperating fully with the UN-led inquiry and has done nothing wrong.
While the misconduct investigation was unfolding, Khan made international headlines with the ICC’s decision to seek arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, and three senior Hamas leaders. These charges follow the outbreak of war in October 2023, when Hamas militants entered Israel and killed more than 1,200 people, including several Americans.
Khan had reportedly canceled a planned visit to Israel and Gaza shortly before making the announcement, adding fuel to suspicions that the timing of the prosecutions may have been politically motivated. Critics have questioned whether Khan’s move was an attempt to redirect attention away from the allegations against him. Lawyers for Khan defended the prosecutorial decision, saying that the ICC's judges approved the arrest warrants after determining the evidence met legal requirements under the Rome Statute. They also rejected claims that the timing of the filing was influenced by personal matters.
Legal scholars have voiced sharp criticism of the court’s operations. Eugene Kontorovich, a constitutional law professor and expert on international law, claimed that Khan's departure doesn’t go far enough. He said that deeper institutional failings at the ICC have allowed such issues to persist unchecked. Kontorovich went further by arguing that the misconduct scandal jeopardizes not only the charges brought by Khan but also casts doubt on previous prosecutions. He cited the court’s limited success over its 25-year existence -- only six final convictions for atrocity crimes—to support his argument that the ICC should be shut down altogether.
Hillel Neuer, head of U.N. Watch, suggested that Khan’s leave is a strategic move to protect the court's image while continuing what he called politically driven legal actions against Israel. He emphasized that the controversy extends beyond any one individual, challenging the motives behind the court's recent high-profile prosecutions.
Israeli officials have requested the ICC withdraw the warrants filed against its leaders, labeling the court's decisions as biased and unjust. However, the ICC has made no public move to retract its actions. A spokesperson declined to speculate on the status of the warrants, citing a pending procedural request.
In one especially controversial twist, President Donald Trump imposed sanctions on Khan in February 2025. The move heightened tensions between the ICC and the U.S. and complicated global perceptions of the court's impartiality in prosecuting international crimes. Adding to the intrigue, critics highlighted past writings by Khan that seemed to contrast with his current actions. In 2013, he published an academic piece suggesting that prosecutions like Netanyahu’s would be legally flawed, as the ICC was unequipped to ensure fair judicial processes in such cases.
So far, the Office of Internal Oversight Services has not disclosed a timeline for the investigation’s conclusion. Meanwhile, Khan remains on leave, with court operations continuing under interim leadership. The outcome of the inquiry may shape the direction and credibility of the ICC for years to come. UN officials declined to weigh in on the matter, pointing to the International Criminal Court’s status as an independent body. While the U.N.’s inspector general office leads the investigation, the judicial institution makes decisions separately from U.N. political branches.
With both legal and public attention focused heavily on the court, the ICC faces growing pressure to demonstrate transparency, accountability and adherence to legal norms. The results of the misconduct inquiry and subsequent handling by court leadership may define how the institution moves forward in the wake of deepening controversy.
A vital communications line meant to coordinate aircraft activity between the Pentagon and Reagan Washington National Airport has been down for over two years without detection.
The disabled hotline remained unnoticed since March 2022 and only came to light after two passenger jets had to abruptly abort landings due to an uncoordinated Army helicopter's presence in active airspace near Washington, D.C., as the Washington Examiner reports.
The Federal Aviation Administration confirmed last week that the dedicated hotline between Reagan National Airport’s air traffic control and military personnel at the Pentagon has not functioned since early 2022. The breakdown only became apparent after a potential collision incident involving an Army Black Hawk helicopter triggered alarms within the aviation community.
On that day, around 2:30 p.m., the helicopter approached Washington’s airspace en route to the Pentagon. As it entered the path of two incoming commercial flights, air traffic controllers were forced to issue emergency course corrections. Delta Air Lines Flight 1671 from Orlando and Republic Airways Flight 5825 from Boston both aborted their scheduled landings and conducted go-arounds, a standard safety maneuver in which aircraft circle before attempting to land again.
This close call rekindled serious concerns about coordination between military and civilian aviation operations in one of the nation’s busiest and most tightly controlled airspaces.
The Army helicopter in question belonged to a Virginia-based unit that had only recently resumed flights in the D.C. region. The unit had halted operations earlier in the year following a tragic aerial crash on January 29, when one of its helicopters collided with an American Airlines regional jet. That incident claimed 67 lives and prompted a temporary grounding of Pentagon-bound flights for review.
In response to the latest airspace disruption, the same Army unit voluntarily suspended its flights again to conduct another internal investigation. Military officials are now working closely with air traffic authorities to examine what went wrong and how to prevent future incidents.
The FAA stated that it is reviewing whether to revoke a long-standing arrangement allowing the military to operate in the region’s restricted airspace without prior approval. Such a move could drastically change the protocols and timelines for military aviation activity in the capital region.
In fact, the agency has already made several adjustments to address safety concerns. In March, authorities closed a key commercial flight path permanently and placed limits on two of Reagan National’s smaller runways. These restrictions go into effect during times when military helicopters carry out urgent or time-sensitive missions nearby.
Despite these adjustments, the threat of miscommunication remains. A central concern for officials is that the malfunctioning hotline was completely unknown for over two years -- an oversight with significant implications for airspace safety. According to Deputy FAA Air Traffic Control Chief Franklin McIntosh, it wasn’t until the go-around event that the agency realized the direct hotline had been non-operational.
“We became aware after that event,” McIntosh said. “Now that we became aware of that event, we’re insisting upon that line to be fixed before we resume any operations out of the Pentagon.”
Until the dedicated line is restored, communication between Pentagon helipad operators and Reagan’s control tower is being handled through traditional landline calls. While considered slower, these phone calls still allow for basic coordination and flight clearance. “We still have landline abilities,” McIntosh explained. He said helipad personnel can make direct calls to the operations center, where supervisors or lead air traffic controllers can receive the information and facilitate necessary coordination.
Though these workarounds exist, the FAA has made it clear that the hotline must be repaired before full-scale operations resume out of the Pentagon. There is no official timeline for when that will happen, but McIntosh noted that the Department of Defense had been alerted, and he expected steps would be taken to “expedite” the repair process.
As the situation unfolds, lawmakers are keeping a close watch. The Senate Commerce Committee, led by Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, announced that it is actively monitoring both the safety situation at Reagan National and the broader implications for civil-military aviation coordination. “Let me say, the developments of DCA and its airspace are extremely concerning,” Cruz said. He added that the committee -- working alongside Senators Maria Cantwell, Tammy Duckworth, and Jerry Moran -- is focused on ensuring all airspace users behave responsibly and that a safe return to operations is achieved.
In the meantime, both civilian and military aviation officials are navigating the fallout from the newly discovered communications breakdown. With no direct channel currently available, close coordination and transparent updates will be key in preventing further incidents.
Federal immigration agents made a series of high-profile arrests in cities across the United States on May 15, targeting undocumented individuals with violent criminal records.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detained several non-citizens in sanctuary cities, sparking renewed debate over immigration enforcement and the impact of sanctuary policies on public safety, as Just the News reports.
In Boston, 32-year-old Mexican national Manuel Seberiano Garcia-Munoz was detained by ICE. According to federal authorities, Garcia-Munoz had previously been deported and later convicted of assault with a deadly weapon, for which he served four years in prison. ICE stated that they apprehended him due to his criminal background and immigration violations.
On the same day in Everett, Massachusetts, federal agents arrested 28-year-old Jose Reyes Alvarez, originally from El Salvador. Homeland Security officials allege Alvarez has ties to the gang MS-13, and he was apprehended for operating a vehicle without a license, and his arrest was coordinated with support from ICE’s Los Angeles division.
Later that day in Newark, authorities arrested Oscar Juracan, a 32-year-old Guatemalan national. Juracan had been convicted of aggravated sexual assault committed during a robbery and was sentenced to seven years in prison. He now remains in ICE custody as he awaits deportation proceedings.
In Philadelphia, ICE agents detained Tito Flores-Gonzalez, a 27-year-old citizen of Mexico. Officials revealed that Flores-Gonzalez had been voluntarily deported twice prior to this arrest. He was first taken into custody by Delaware State Police in January 2025 on multiple state charges.
Flores-Gonzalez faced allegations including attempted kidnapping, harassment, and terroristic threats. According to authorities, he was convicted and is currently awaiting removal proceedings in federal custody. Officials reiterated that his prior deportations and repeat offenses played a key role in his federal detention.
Assistant Homeland Secretary Tricia McLaughlin expressed strong disapproval of sanctuary city policies in the wake of the arrests. She warned that these local policies, which limit law enforcement cooperation with immigration officials, make it harder for ICE to remove individuals with criminal backgrounds. “These sanctuary politicians are playing Russian roulette with American lives,” McLaughlin said. “While they work to hinder federal efforts, the Department of Homeland Security will continue identifying and removing criminal illegal aliens from American communities.”
McLaughlin added that elected leaders have a duty to safeguard public safety and not shield individuals who pose serious threats. She stated that Americans should not have to fear that known criminals are being protected due to local immigration stances.
Tom Homan, who serves as Trump’s top adviser on border security, emphasized the administration’s immigration enforcement priorities following the arrests. He claimed that illegal border crossings have plummeted nearly 97 percent under the current administration’s tightened security measures. Homan also asserted that financial networks supporting drug cartels are weakening as continued immigration enforcement has disrupted cross-border criminal activity. One of his key responsibilities is leading what officials describe as the largest deportation campaign in U.S. history.
Beyond border security and deportations, Homan said his goals include tracing more than 290,000 missing non-citizen children identified by the Department of Homeland Security in May 2024. The status and welfare of these children remain a top priority for federal authorities, he added.
The arrests have further heightened tensions between the federal government and sanctuary jurisdictions. Local authorities in cities such as Boston, Philadelphia, and Newark have enacted policies limiting how local police may cooperate with federal immigration officers.
Federal officials argue that these policies allow violent offenders to remain in the United States. DHS representatives maintain that public safety is harmed when local law enforcement does not transfer custody of convicted criminals to federal agents once these individuals complete their sentences.
ICE officials said they acted independently where necessary to apprehend the suspects, based on known criminal histories and current intelligence. All four individuals remain in federal detention as proceedings continue regarding their removal from the United States.
While the Biden and previous Trump administrations have both faced scrutiny over immigration enforcement tactics, this latest operation highlights the persistent divide over how best to manage undocumented migrants with violent criminal records.
Washington state lawmakers are facing heated debate following the passage of a bill that could allow undocumented immigrants to receive housing support benefits.
The Democrat-led Legislature approved Senate Bill 5232 in April, which -- if signed into law -- would remove legal residency requirements for recipients of a state housing aid program, drawing criticism amid a significant budget shortfall, as Fox News reports, a move sure to infuriate the Trump administration.
Senate Bill 5232 was passed by Washington’s legislature, controlled by Democrats, and is now awaiting action from Gov. Bob Ferguson. The bill focuses on the state’s Housing and Essential Needs Referral Program, or HEN, which helps low-income individuals unable to work due to mental or physical illness.
Under current rules, only those legally in the United States -- such as citizens, lawful permanent residents, and others with legal status -- can receive these benefits. The new bill seeks to remove that legal residency requirement, potentially expanding access to undocumented immigrants. The legislation has sparked strong opposition from some Republican lawmakers and budget critics, pointing to the state’s financial issues.
Washington is currently facing a projected $16 billion gap in its budget. The HEN program already receives about $130 million in funding from the state. Opponents argue that expanding eligibility could stretch resources even thinner. State Sen. Leonard Christian has been one of the most vocal critics of the bill. “This year seems to be the year for noncitizens,” Christian said, questioning the state’s financial priorities. He also referred to previous Medicaid expansions for noncitizens, arguing that the cumulative costs are unsustainable.
Christian also took personal issue with the method of distributing cash assistance, warning from lived experience that unrestricted funds could be misused. “He used the money that was given to my mom to buy groceries and food for us kids, to buy marijuana and alcohol at the age of 12,” he said, reflecting on the potential downsides of poorly monitored financial aid.
While the bill has cleared the Legislature, it will not become law unless Ferguson signs it. Ferguson, a Democrat, has not yet stated if he will approve or veto the legislation. Fox News Digital reached out to Ferguson’s office and to the sponsors of the bill for comment. As of now, no confirmation has been given on the governor’s decision regarding SB 5232.
In recent months, Ferguson has supported measures aimed at strengthening immigrant protections in the state. These include new laws that ban bail bond agents from enforcing immigration rules and give the state authority to inspect private detention facilities.
Detractors of SB 5232 argue that giving undocumented immigrants access to housing aid may come at the expense of people who are legally residing in Washington. That concern has been echoed by Republican Rep. Travis Couture. “Same budget with more recipients. That means our people get kicked out of line in favor of illegal immigrants,” Couture said, urging the governor to reject the measure. “Gov. Ferguson -- veto this. It’s unfair and it’s wrong. Put our own people first!”
Christian expressed similar concerns about what he sees as the economic burden of expanding social support programs. He accused fellow lawmakers of ignoring financial consequences. “They don’t get the fact that somebody else has got to pay for that crazy program,” he said, pointing to what he describes as unrealistic policymaking.
Supporters of the legislation argue that HEN exists to help individuals in critical situations regardless of legal status. Removing legal residency as a requirement, they say, ensures that those unable to work due to serious health issues are not denied basic needs like housing.
Though not quoted directly, bill sponsors have emphasized that access to stable housing could reduce homelessness, improve public health outcomes, and reduce emergency service costs in the long term. They contend that aid should be based on need, not immigration status. Still, the issue remains politically delicate as Washington continues to grapple with financial challenges and an increasingly divided electorate on immigration policy.
Ferguson has only a narrow window to decide the fate of SB 5232. His choice will likely intensify a growing debate over who should benefit from state-funded support programs, and what role immigration status should play in eligibility decisions.
Many are watching closely to see whether Ferguson aligns with the Legislature’s majority or responds to criticism from the bill’s detractors. His decision could set a precedent for how far individual states may go in offering benefits to undocumented immigrants.
Whether signed or vetoed, the bill has already ignited discussion around social responsibility, state spending, and legal definitions of eligibility -- issues that will remain central as lawmakers continue to address the needs of vulnerable populations.
A once-secret Cold War military installation has been detected deep beneath Greenland’s ice sheet, renewing a controversial U.S. interest in the island.
The surprising rediscovery of Camp Century by NASA scientists in April 2024 has prompted President Donald Trump to revive his goal of acquiring Greenland, citing strategic and security interests tied to the long-abandoned base, as the Daily Mail reports.
The facility, known as Camp Century, was constructed in 1959 during heightened Cold War tensions as a U.S. military outpost beneath Greenland’s ice. It served as a cover for Project Iceworm, a covert proposal to install intercontinental nuclear missile launch sites hidden in the Arctic. By 1967, the project was discontinued due to the unstable nature of the glacier, and Camp Century was subsequently abandoned. Though the nuclear reactor that once powered it was removed, various hazardous materials remained buried onsite. Details about the base’s true purpose remained classified until 1997.
In April 2024, Chad Greene, chief scientist at NASA, rediscovered the site during a radar imaging flight across northwestern Greenland. The mission used the Uninhabited Aerial Vehicle Synthetic Aperture Radar (UAVSAR) to map the glacier’s subsurface layers. Greene’s findings captured unprecedented top-down and side images showcasing Camp Century’s 3D layout and internal tunnels. According to Greene, “In the new data, individual structures in the secret city are visible in a way that they've never been seen before.”
The rediscovered base spanned 21 tunnels and stretched approximately 9,800 feet. Despite being buried under layers of snow and ice, the radar identified signatures identical to archived diagrams of the original construction.
Following the rediscovery, Trump publicly renewed his interest in placing Greenland under U.S. control. Since reclaiming the White House, Trump has named the acquisition of Greenland as a policy priority.
In a May 4 interview on Meet the Press, Trump commented, “We need Greenland very badly,” linking the island’s geography to national defense objectives. He also said, “Greenland is a very small amount of people, which we’ll take care of, and we’ll cherish them, and all of that. But we need that for international security.” When asked whether he might use military force to acquire Greenland, Trump replied, “I don't rule it out,” signaling he viewed the rediscovery of Camp Century as a potential strategic asset.
The United States' interest in Greenland dates back decades. During World War II, American forces took responsibility for defending the island while Denmark was under Nazi occupation. After the war ended, the U.S. offered Denmark $100 million in 1946 to purchase Greenland, but the offer was declined. Nevertheless, a 1951 defense treaty allowed Washington to continue building bases and stationing troops on the island.
During the Cold War, the U.S. maintained as many as 17 bases in Greenland with around 10,000 troops. Today, only about 150 U.S. personnel remain stationed at Pituffik Space Base, which supports missile defense, space surveillance and Arctic operations.
In addition to military value, Greenland has tremendous economic potential. Its territory holds vast deposits of rare earth elements, oil and natural gas -- resources increasingly sought after by global powers.
The Trump administration previously argued that Greenland’s natural resources, combined with its location along vital Arctic routes, make it critical for U.S. and NATO influence in the region. The rediscovered Cold War facility has only added to that narrative. The reopening of Camp Century discussions has, however, reawakened environmental concerns regarding the waste left behind. Though the nuclear reactor was removed in the 1960s, items like chemical waste, diesel fuel and low-level radioactive remnants remain buried in the ice sheet. NASA’s radar could now play a critical role in monitoring these potential hazards.
Analysts suggest that interest in Greenland is part of a broader scramble for Arctic influence. As ice melts and new shipping routes open, countries like the U.S., Russia and China are vying for access and stakes in polar resources.
Greenland’s geographical position and untapped natural resources make it one of the most coveted territories in this emerging landscape. Trump’s push for annexation draws on this long-term strategic calculus and a revived sense of military urgency. The rediscovery of Camp Century may have added fuel to this rationale, providing both historic and symbolic justification in support of American expansion into Arctic policymaking.
Lawmakers in Washington state have approved legislation that could allow undocumented immigrants access to a major state-run housing assistance program, drawing polarized reactions amid deep budget concerns.
The bill, SB 5232, was passed by the Democratic-led Legislature in April 2025 and if the governor agrees, would remove a legal residency requirement for the Housing and Essential Needs Referral Program, known as HEN, as Fox News reports.
The HEN program helps low-income individuals who are unable to work due to mental or physical disabilities by providing housing assistance and other basic needs support. Previously, applicants were required to be U.S. citizens or legally residing in the country to qualify for the aid.
SB 5232 eliminates that legal status requirement, potentially extending the program’s reach to those who are undocumented. With approximately $130 million currently allocated to HEN, some legislators have raised concerns over how extending eligibility might impact the program’s finances and priority of service.
The bill has been delivered to Democrat Gov. Bob Ferguson, who has not yet said whether he will sign it into law. If enacted, it would represent a substantial policy shift amid Washington’s reported $16 billion budget shortfall. Critics argue the legislation would stretch limited resources and displace U.S. citizens in need. Rep. Travis Couture voiced opposition, stating that expanding the program without increasing the budget means “our people get kicked out of line,” and urging Ferguson to veto the proposal.
Sen. Leonard Christian also objected strongly, describing this legislative session as one focused on benefits for noncitizens. He warned that the changes would lead to direct cash and housing support for undocumented individuals, despite the state’s financial constraints.
Supporters of the bill argue it aligns with broader state efforts to protect and provide support to vulnerable populations, regardless of immigration status. This comes as Ferguson recently enacted laws increasing oversight of private detention centers and restricting bail bond agents’ role in immigration enforcement.
Christian, however, expressed skepticism about those broader initiatives, saying, “It just seems like the state is trying really hard to pick a fight with the Trump administration.” The reference points to rising national tensions over state-led immigration policies and federal immigration enforcement. Christian also shared personal experiences, revealing concerns about giving assistance to individuals with substance abuse issues. He recalled how his mother’s cash aid was misused during his childhood, saying it was spent on “marijuana and alcohol,” instead of food for the family, illustrating his worries about accountability in distributing aid.
The debate has highlighted a larger divide in Olympia over budget priorities and how far the state should go to support undocumented immigrants. Democrats have framed their proposals around equity and access to essential services, while Republicans have increasingly focused on fiscal responsibility and prioritizing assistance for legal residents.
Christian criticized the financial logic behind such expansions, suggesting Democratic lawmakers were acting emotionally. “A lot of times,” he said, “the Democratic Party thinks more with their hearts than with their head.” He also questioned who would ultimately bear the cost, stating, “Somebody else has got to pay for that crazy program.” Christian compared it to maxing out a credit card without concern for who will be left with the bill afterward.
As attention turns to the governor’s upcoming decision, pressure is mounting from both sides. Fox News Digital reportedly reached out to Ferguson's office and supporters of the bill but received no confirmation on his stance.
Backers of the measure are urging the governor to sign the bill, arguing it reflects Washington’s commitment to inclusivity. Meanwhile, opponents are calling for a veto, warning it could reduce access for current U.S. citizens in need and worsen the state’s financial crisis. If signed, the bill will mark yet another move by Washington to expand immigrant rights, which may place the state at odds with national immigration policy under a potential future Trump administration.
The final decision rests with Gov. Ferguson, whose choice could define the direction of state aid programs and influence the balance between welcoming newcomers and managing limited state resources.
A Mexican naval training vessel struck the Brooklyn Bridge on Saturday evening, triggering panic along the East River as hundreds looked on in disbelief.
A massive sail-powered ship operated by the Mexican navy collided with the iconic New York landmark after reportedly losing power while backing away from Pier 17, leaving two dead and at least 19 others injured, including several critically, as the Daily Mail reports.
The tall ship Cuauhtémoc, a Mexican training vessel built in 1981, was attempting to leave lower Manhattan just before 8:30 p.m. when the impact occurred. The ship had completed a public exhibition docked near the South Street Seaport and was scheduled to continue its voyage toward Iceland. With masts reaching up to 147 feet, the Cuauhtémoc stood taller than the Brooklyn Bridge’s 135-foot clearance. As the vessel moved in reverse, it collided with the underside of the bridge, snapping its masts and scattering debris onto the deck below.
The violent collision sent parts of the ship’s structure -- including large wooden beams, cables, fixtures, and sail cloth -- crashing down. Witness accounts describe scenes of horror, with naval cadets suspended from damaged rigging and others being thrown through the air. At the time of the incident, 277 individuals were on board, according to Mayor Eric Adams. In a message posted online, he confirmed that 19 sustained injuries during the incident, and two later died from their wounds.
Emergency crews from the NYPD Harbor and Scuba units as well as city fire personnel responded rapidly. Despite the severity and chaos on deck, no one was thrown into the East River, police confirmed. All injuries occurred on board the ship itself.
Among the most harrowing moments reported by bystanders were the sights of sailors dangling in the aftermath. Spectators watched as crew members in white uniforms clung to what was left of the mangled rigging high above the deck. One witness, Lily Katz, described using her phone to zoom in on a person hanging from a harness for about 15 minutes. “We saw someone dangling, and I couldn't tell if it was just blurry or my eyes,” she said. “There was someone dangling from the top for what felt like an eternity before they were rescued.”
Another bystander, Nick Corso, 23, likened the surreal scene to something out of a film. “I didn’t know what to think,” he said, describing the sound as “like the loud snapping of a big twig” and speaking of the sense of pandemonium that followed.
City officials believe a mechanical issue led to the crash, with Mayor Adams stating that the vessel lost power while attempting to reverse. A police official also noted suspected mechanical failure but did not elaborate on the nature of the problem. Videos taken by onlookers show the Cuauhtémoc creeping backward before its tallest mast violently crumples against the bridge’s lower deck. These clips, circulated widely on social media, document the moment passengers began to fall and climb for safety.
The vessel had been on a goodwill journey, flying the Mexican flag as part of an educational and cultural exchange tour. The ship had recently opened its decks for public visits in New York Harbor in collaboration with the South Street Seaport Museum.
Fortunately, the Brooklyn Bridge reported no significant structural damage as a result of the impact. Traffic was briefly halted in both directions but resumed around 10:30 p.m., less than two hours after the initial crash. The historic bridge, a symbol of New York City since its completion in 1883, has a known clearance limitation that posed a challenge for the towering Cuauhtémoc. The incident has prompted renewed scrutiny of clearance protocols for large ships navigating under city landmarks.
Officials have not stated why the vessel attempted to reverse beneath a clearance it could not safely navigate, especially while dealing with an apparent loss of engine functionality.
In the aftermath, Mexico’s foreign ministry confirmed that the country’s ambassador to the United States and diplomatic officials were providing assistance to injured cadets and coordinating with local emergency services. The Cuauhtémoc was first commissioned in 1981 out of Spain and is widely regarded as a symbol of naval pride in Mexico. It is used both to train cadets and to represent Mexico in international maritime events.
Saturday night’s accident marks a serious setback for the voyage and casts new attention on the nautical and safety procedures followed during port departures in major urban environments like New York. Authorities have opened an investigation into the collision, and further details about mechanical failures or command decisions that led to the crash have yet to be disclosed.
Ivanka Trump made an unexpected visit to the Philadelphia Eagles’ training complex, sparking interest on social media with her inside look at the team's locker room and heartwarming scenes of her son, Theo, playing catch on the field.
The famous first daughter's visit was particularly marked by her search for Eagles cornerback Eli Ricks, who had previously complimented her appearance online, as Fox News reports.
Ivanka’s trip was shared through a post on X on Friday, where she highlighted her interactions and experiences at the Eagles’ facilities. A notable moment came when she sought out Eli Ricks. The gridiron standout caught attention when, on April 28, he tweeted about Ivanka, expressing his admiration by saying she was "beautiful." His interest didn’t stop there, as he further commented that she was "exactly my type" after meeting her in person.
During her visit, Ivanka missed meeting Ricks personally, which she mentioned in a post. However, she left behind a note for him in the Eagles' locker room, which simply read, "stopped by to say hi! Sorry to miss you! Go Birds!" This lighthearted gesture indicated a cordial relationship between her and the player, despite not intersecting during the trip.
Ivanka’s visit was not solely about Ricks. She also shared the delightful scenes of her young son enjoying a game of catch at the team’s training complex. This personal glimpse into her family life provided a lighter, more relatable touch to the visit.
Ricks, who could not personally meet Ivanka, has been making strides as a player for the Eagles. Originally joining the team in 2023, Ricks entered as an undrafted free agent after playing college football at both LSU and Alabama. His first year with the team saw him playing 16 games, and his presence was significant, especially within special teams.
Currently, Eli Ricks continues to be a part of the Eagles’ defensive lineup, having played seven games in the 2024 season. His growth and contribution to the team have been noteworthy despite the initial setback of not being drafted.
Ivanka, married to Jared Kushner, often keeps her family life in the public eye. During this visit to the Eagles’ complex, her children, Theo, Arabella, and Joseph, were evident in her shared experiences, with the focus this time on her son Theo having fun at the training facility.
Through her social media posts, Ivanka frequently shares insights into her life, which sometimes intersect with public figures and events. Her visit to meet Ricks, combined with her role as a mother, added another layer of interest to the day’s events, transforming it from a simple fan encounter into a widely discussed social media moment.
While Ricks’ past comments about Ivanka piqued curiosity, her response, "Missed you today," seemed to reflect a friendly and lighthearted attitude toward the budding NFL player. Conversations like these occur often on social media, but the physical manifestation of such an interaction, as Ivanka showed, can stir notable public interest.
Ricks’ initial tweet, "Donald Trump daughter is beautiful," underscores the casual convergence of public and private lives in this digital age. Ivanka’s acknowledgment and continuation of this digital conversation further highlighted how online interactions subtly blend into everyday real-life settings, particularly with public figures.
The exchange between Ivanka Trump and Eli Ricks, albeit digital and indirect, illustrates a unique moment of celebrity and sports culture mingling. Such interactions often captivate public attention, resonating well beyond their initial scope. Ivanka’s visit to the Eagles' complex, her notes, and family interactions created a memorable narrative intertwining sports, social media, and personal life.
As the sporting world and social media continue to blur lines, encounters like Ivanka’s serve as a prime example of how public attention can be drawn from simple acts of acknowledgment, interest, and surprise visits to places of communal celebrity.
The failure last week of President Donald Trump's legislative proposal in the House Budget Committee spotlights a growing rift among Republican lawmakers.
Efforts to pass a major legislative initiative championed by Trump were stalled on Friday when the House Budget Committee rejected it, with several Republicans voting against it, as Fox News reports.
The bill, described by Trump as a "big, beautiful bill," seeks to push forward policies across various prominent sectors such as immigration, taxation, energy, and the nation's debt ceiling. The objective was for the House to approve the measure in advance of Memorial Day. The opposition it faced on the committee floor underscores significant divergences within the party's ranks.
Reps. Chip Roy, Josh Brecheen, Andrew Clyde, and Ralph Norman were among the Republican members who opposed the bill, causing its derailment. The committee also witnessed Rep. Lloyd Smucker switch his stance to oppose the bill due to procedural considerations.
The legislative package is an accumulation of work by 11 different House subcommittees, encompassing critical areas like border security and defense. The bill's unexpected failure at this stage has left party leaders scrambling to reconcile with dissenters and make necessary amendments. In a developing scenario, an unscheduled appearance by Rep. Brandon Gill at the committee hearing further influenced the vote dynamics, surprising many attendees.
Inadequacies in the proposed timing of Medicaid work requirements and criticisms of its green energy proposals have fueled opposition among fiscal conservatives, often identified as fiscal hawks. Roy expressed dissatisfaction with the delay of proposed Medicaid adjustments until 2029. He vocalized these concerns on social media, emphasizing the need for prompt action.
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise expressed determination to see the bill advance, despite the setback. He emphasized ongoing efforts to address concerns of dissenting members and to facilitate communication with the Trump administration. Simultaneously, President Trump urged his party to align with the bill, urging House members through his social media channel to look beyond narrow interests and support the legislative package in its entirety.
Members of the House Freedom Caucus, many of whom are listed among the bill's adversaries, stayed in Washington through the weekend, underscoring their commitment to shaping the legislation rather than allowing it to proceed unamended. They engaged in continued discussions with party leadership, signaling their readiness to negotiate.
With an eye on passing the bill before the Fourth of July, the House Budget Committee aims to reconvene. This decision to meet again gives a narrow window for adjustments. As divisions remain evident, opponents have articulated their criticisms through various channels. Norman warned that pushing for a vote without addressing reservations could spell further discord: "If they call for a vote now, it's not going to end well."
Scalise captured ongoing efforts to bridge gaps: "We're working on some questions that Ralph and others have, and we're going to be getting them answers as soon as we get them back from the Trump administration." His statement indicates a proactive approach to resolving outstanding issues.
The pressure for swift resolution remains high. Failure to coalesce around the proposed measures could lead to a protracted legislative battle, raising uncertainties about the eventual shape of the bills once passed. The upcoming Sunday night meeting is pivotal. As Roy remarked, staying in Washington provides an opportunity to "deliver." This sentiment is shared by others dedicated to finding a middle ground.
The reluctance of fiscal conservatives to back the bill without changes highlights the complexities of legislative maneuvering, especially when anchoring significant policy shifts. Whether the bill will eventually pass unchanged or require substantial revisions is uncertain.
Ultimately, the situation underscores the multifaceted nature of congressional decision-making. As the clock ticks toward the next committee meeting, intense discussions and negotiations are expected to continue. These efforts could determine not only the bill's fate but also the political landscape moving forward.