House Republicans have delayed a scheduled hearing with Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg due to changes in former President Trump’s sentencing date.

According to The Hill, the hearing was initially planned following Trump's July 11 sentencing but is now deferred to after the new September 18 date.

The House Judiciary Committee’s select subcommittee on the weaponization of government had set the hearing to take place this coming Friday. With Trump's sentencing initially lined up for July 11, the plans were altered when the sentencing was postponed until September 18.

Former President Trump faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. These charges stem from a 2016 hush money payment made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels. The delayed sentencing has consequently pushed back the planned hearing with District Attorney Bragg.

Importance of Upholding the Rule of Law

Another prosecutor involved in the case, Matthew Colangelo, was also slated to appear. The House Republicans’ postponement decision leaves the hearing without a rescheduled date at this time. The committee’s decision underscores the delicate balancing act involved with Trump's ongoing legal processes.

Bragg’s office had earlier released a statement condemning misinformation and expressing the significance of the rule of law. “The Manhattan D.A.’s Office is proud to play a crucial role in upholding and enforcing the rule of law for the people of New York. It undermines the rule of law to spread dangerous misinformation, baseless claims, and conspiracy theories following the jury’s return of a full-count felony conviction in People v. Trump,” Bragg’s office stated last month.

Although Bragg initially resisted appearing before the committee, he is now expected to participate. Bragg’s commitment is following the conclusion of Trump’s trial and the subsequent sentencing process.

Trump's Legal Strategies in Conviction Challenge

Trump’s legal team is challenging the conviction based on a recent Supreme Court ruling concerning presidential immunity. This challenge includes arguments that some of the trial evidence should be excluded under the standards set by the court.

The hearing's postponement is directly tied to these developments. With Trump’s legal maneuvers and the associated procedural delays, rescheduling before the sentencing is unlikely.

The hearing, focused on alleged government weaponization, will include critical testimony once it's eventually rescheduled. House Republicans and the public will be closely watching these unfolding events.

No New Date Set for the Postponed Hearing

The decision to delay was made to align with the adjusted timeline of Trump’s legal proceedings. Alvin Bragg’s appearance before the committee now hinges on the end of Trump’s sentencing saga.

House Republicans continue to navigate the implications of Trump’s high-profile case. The push to ensure proper legal processes underscores the complexities revealed through this unprecedented scenario.

In summary, House Republicans postponed a planned hearing with Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg owing to a delay in Trump’s sentencing. Initially set for a Friday following Trump's July 11 sentencing, the hearing is now postponed due to the new sentencing date of September 18. Trump, who faces 34 felony counts related to a hush money payment in 2016, is appealing his conviction based on a Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity, delaying the hearing until post-sentencing.

Ivanka Trump and Alice Marie Johnson spent a memorable day together playing golf and enjoying a dinner outing with their families.

According to Daily Mail, the event underscored their friendship, which began after Alice's release, following Kim Kardashian's advocacy campaign.

Ivanka Trump, 42, showcased her golfing prowess while spending the day with Alice Marie Johnson, 69, who was famously pardoned following a campaign by reality star Kim Kardashian. Both women shared The day joyously on their Instagram accounts, highlighting their enjoyable activities and strong family connections.

Ivanka was dressed in a navy workout dress, white sneakers, and a white baseball cap, while Alice opted for a teal outfit paired with black sneakers. The day was filled with laughter and camaraderie, concluding with a delightful dinner with their families. Arabella (12), Joseph (9), and Theodore (8) accompanied their mother, Ivanka, to the dinner.

Ivanka And Alice's Family-Focused Day

Ivanka Trump posted a photo in a striking yellow dress that featured a heart-shaped cutout after the day's events, continuing to share moments from their time. Alice Marie Johnson and Ivanka have formed a genuine bond since Alice’s release in 2018, which was a significant event influenced by Kim Kardashian’s advocacy efforts.

Johnson's release overturned her life sentence for her involvement in cocaine trafficking. Since her release, she has been actively advocating for compassion and hopeful applicants through her non-profit organization, Taking Action for Good (TAG), which has successfully aided 46 individuals in obtaining second chances.

The day’s activities highlighted Johnson's continued influence and the deep bond she shares with Ivanka Trump, who has withdrawn from the political spotlight. Ivanka and her husband, Jared Kushner, 43, have distanced themselves from former President Donald Trump’s ongoing re-election campaign and have settled in Florida with their children following his departure from office in January 2021.

Alice Marie Johnson's Advocacy Work

Their shared day underscores the broader historical context of Johnson's role in criminal justice reform. Her case played a crucial role in the passage of the First Step Act in 2018, which promotes sentence reductions for good behavior and job training opportunities within the prison system. This monumental achievement is a testament to the tenacity and impact of her advocacy.

Alice Marie Johnson commented on her work: "It means a lot to me to tell others' stories. It is not about the things I did. It is about the people I represent." Her relentless dedication to advocacy work is evident as she continues to travel, bringing communities together and assisting families.

In reflecting on her relationship with Kim Kardashian, Johnson shared, "When I met Kim Kardashian I did not even know who she was. I did not have any preconceived ideas about her. I met her as a friend, who was advocating for me. We have a very close bond now."

The Bond That Continues To Grow

This bond is not limited to Kardashian. Johnson's connection with Ivanka Trump also exemplifies the unexpected friendships and alliances that have formed. Ivanka, despite her past significant role during her father's administration, remains focused on her family and their lives in Florida.

Alice Marie Johnson's final thoughts highlight the emotionally rewarding nature of her work: "I have been actually so busy going from state to state. Just seeing the fruit of my labor, bringing communities together and restoring families. It is hard but very rewarding work."

Through their shared experiences and public appearances, Ivanka Trump and Alice Marie Johnson continue to present a narrative of enduring friendship and impactful advocacy. Their time together, from a sunny golf day to a family dinner, is a powerful reminder of the changes brought about through determined and compassionate leadership.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has begun crafting new legislation to rescind former President Donald Trump's immunity for his actions following the 2020 election.

According to Fox News, this bill seeks to categorize Trump's actions in challenging the election results as "unofficial," thus stripping his immunity under a recent Supreme Court decision.

On July 2, the Supreme Court ruled that presidents have significant prosecutorial immunity for official acts committed in office. In a speech on the Senate floor, Schumer passionately challenged this ruling, emphasizing that Trump's attempts to overturn the 2020 election results amount to "election subversion acts" rather than official duties.

Schumer Speaks Out Against Immunity

The Senate Majority Leader asserted that American democracy is at a "perilous crossroads." He criticized the Supreme Court's decision, stating it inaccurately declared broad immunity for Trump's actions taken during his presidency. Schumer also drew parallels to former President Richard Nixon, who once claimed that presidential actions were inherently legal.

Schumer remarked, "We were all taught in grade school that there are no kings here in America, but what the conservative justices have done is effectively place a crown on Donald Trump’s head." He voiced concerns about further negative outcomes if Trump were to be re-elected, warning of additional "disastrous rulings" and ongoing turmoil stemming from January 6, 2021.

Trump's adviser, Brian Hughes, responded vehemently, accusing Schumer and Biden Democrats of weaponizing the legal system against the former president. He defended the Supreme Court's decision, underscoring the importance of preserving presidential powers to maintain the balance of power across government branches.

Reactions From Allies And Critics

Brian Hughes argued, "SCOTUS rightly protected the powers of the president—all presidents, not just Donald Trump—which is fundamental to the balance of power between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government." He labeled Schumer's moves an attack on the Constitution and an effort to undermine the Court's independence.

No text for the proposed bill was available on Congress' official website at Schumer's announcement. This legislative effort aligns with previous measures from top Democrats, including Rep. Adam Schiff's Protecting Our Democracy Act and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse's bill addressing Supreme Court criticisms.

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse emphasized that the Supreme Court has become influenced by special interests, akin to how 19th-century railroad barons swayed a railroad commission. This mirrors Schumer's concerns about what he perceives as the Court's favoritism towards Trump.

Previous Legislative Efforts And Future Implications

Schumer predicted chaos and catastrophic results if Trump's actions are not checked and if he pursues another presidential term. Schumer’s proposed legislation marks a significant stance in Democrats' broader effort to safeguard democratic institutions from what they view as extremist threats.

Schumer's rhetoric, comparing Trump's behavior and resultant immunity to Nixon’s infamous declaration, underscores his assertion that no president should be above the law. The absence of the bill text illustrates the nascent stage of this legislative endeavor, though it has already sparked considerable political debate.

As Schumer continues to draft the bill, it remains to be seen how it will navigate the legislative process and what implications it might have for future administrations. However, the controversy surrounding the Supreme Court’s ruling and the proposed bill highlights ongoing tensions over the limits of presidential power.

Conclusion

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer's proposed legislation aims to classify former President Trump's actions post-2020 election as unofficial, possibly removing immunity granted by a recent Supreme Court decision. This initiative has sparked criticism from Trump's allies, reflecting deep partisan divisions over presidential powers and judiciary independence. As the bill advances, it will likely remain central to debates on power balance and democratic principles in the U.S.

On February 23, 2024, a junior sailor stirred concern by attempting to access President Joe Biden's restricted medical records through a government database.

According to NBC News, the incident was investigated by the Naval Criminal Investigative Service, leading to the sailor's punishment.

The junior sailor searched for "Joseph Biden" three times in the Military Health System's electronic health record system, MHS Genesis. An observant co-worker quickly identified the unauthorized activity and reported it by February 26, 2024.

The sailor's actions breached the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), raising significant privacy concerns.

Sailor's Unauthorized Search Sparks Investigation

The unauthorized search led to an investigation by the Naval Criminal Investigative Service. Their probe began immediately after being alerted of the violation and concluded on April 24, 2024. Despite the attempt, the sailor did not successfully access President Biden's medical records.

The U.S. Navy explained in a statement, "On February 26, 2024, Navy Medicine Readiness and Training Command (NMRTC) Fort Belvoir was notified of an active-duty service member's unauthorized access to medical records."

Further elaboration revealed that the sailor, driven by curiosity, searched for the President's records using his name in MHS Genesis.

Co-Worker's Quick Action Led To Timely Prevention

President Biden was informed of the incident within hours after the White House staff got the notification from the Department of Defense. The timing of the sailor's breach closely coincided with Biden's previously planned physical, which took place on February 28, 2024. However, the medical appointment was not impacted by this event.

An official from the White House acknowledged, "The president was informed within hours of White House staff being notified by the Department of Defense." The official also affirmed that the scheduled medical evaluation "was not impacted by this incident."

Breach Results In Administrative Punishment

The sailor, though punished administratively, continues to serve in the Navy. The specific details of the administrative punishment were not disclosed, but the sailor faced consequences for the breach of privacy under HIPAA regulations.

NMRTC Fort Belvoir's response underscores the Navy's commitment to safeguarding sensitive health information. They acted quickly upon discovering the unauthorized searches, displaying an effective protocol for identifying and responding to potential breaches.

While concerning, the event highlights the robust systems in place to protect privacy and the quick response mechanisms that ensure such breaches are promptly addressed. The military's approach to discipline and privacy breaches serves as a reminder of its commitment to both legal compliance and ethical standards.

Conclusion

A junior sailor's attempt to access President Joe Biden's medical records on February 23 led to an investigation by the Naval Criminal Investigative Service and subsequent administrative punishment. The unauthorized access, reported by a co-worker, constituted a breach of HIPAA regulations. Although the incident did not impact President Biden’s scheduled physical, it underscored the importance of maintaining strict privacy protocols.

LL Flooring, one of the largest flooring suppliers in the United States, is considering Chapter 11 bankruptcy amid financial troubles.

Amid declining sales and financial struggles in the retail sector, LL Flooring is seeking new capital and other measures to boost cash reserves.

According to Daily Mail, the company, which operates 442 stores in 47 states, has been experiencing a significant drop in sales over the past year. Americans have reduced spending on home renovation, contributing to the company’s financial woes.

History of LL Flooring

Founded by Tom Sullivan in 1994 as Lumber Liquidator, LL Flooring started from humble beginnings. Sullivan initially operated out of a pickup truck in Stoughton, Massachusetts, negotiating directly with mills to offer lower prices by cutting out wholesalers.

By 2014, the company had served over two million customers and significantly impacted the hardwood flooring market. "To look back and see how far we've come in 20 years is almost like a dream," Sullivan remarked in 2014. In 2020, the company rebranded from Lumber Liquidators to LL Flooring, a move that marked a new chapter in its history.

Financial Struggles and Bankruptcy Consideration

According to Bloomberg, LL Flooring is contemplating filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection to reorganize and shield itself from creditors. The news, reported on July 3, 2024, has caused shares of LL Flooring to plummet by 31 percent.

The company is actively seeking fresh capital, with its adviser, Houlihan Lokey, in talks with potential investors. Additionally, LL Flooring is attempting to sell a distribution center in Virginia to bolster its cash reserves.

The broader retail sector is facing higher operational costs, particularly labor expenses, in the post-pandemic era, contributing to the financial strain on businesses like LL Flooring.

Widespread Retail Store Closures

LL Flooring is not alone in its struggles. In 2024, the retail industry has seen nearly 2,600 store closures. Major chains like Walmart have closed underperforming locations, with Walmart shutting down three stores and Rite Aid closing 27 pharmacies.

99 Cents Only announced in April 2024 that it would close all 371 of its stores across California, Texas, Arizona, and Nevada. Furthermore, Family Dollar and Dollar Tree plan to permanently close 1,000 stores over the next few years.

LL Flooring's potential Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing aims to address financial challenges and allow the company to reorganize its business strategy while continuing operations.

Selling the Virginia distribution center is part of efforts to improve liquidity, alongside exploring other avenues for securing capital. Despite current financial hurdles, Tom Sullivan’s vision of providing quality flooring at affordable prices remains central to the company's mission.

Conclusion

LL Flooring's consideration of Chapter 11 bankruptcy reflects financial struggles in the retail sector, with declining sales and rising operational costs. Founded in 1994, the company faces challenges similar to major chains like Walmart and Rite Aid, which are also closing locations. LL Flooring is exploring strategic measures, including selling a distribution center and seeking new capital, to address its financial issues and adapt to the changing economic environment.

Clinton strategist James Carville has suggested that Biden should step down from the 2024 presidential race.

According to Daily Mail, Carville proposes a 'mini-primary' process to select a Democratic nominee, bypassing Kamala Harris for an open selection.

James Carville, Bill Clinton's campaign strategist during his successful 1992 presidential run, recently proposed an unconventional method to determine the Democratic nominee for the 2024 presidential election. This method termed a 'mini-primary,' aims to ensure an open and transparent selection process should President Biden decide to exit the race.

Carville's Bold Suggestion

Carville's strategy is motivated by widespread concerns over Biden's age and recent public performance. A particularly troubling debate performance has amplified these concerns within the Democratic Party. Despite Biden's assertion in a Monday letter that he has already secured the nomination with millions of primary votes, Carville remains convinced that the president will eventually bow out of the race.

"Mark my words: Joe Biden is going to be out of the 2024 presidential race. Whether he is ready to admit it or not," Carville declared emphatically. He stressed the necessity of an open process to counteract what he sees as unethical tactics used by former President Donald Trump.

Carville's proposal seeks to prevent any automatic nomination, specifically mentioning Vice President Kamala Harris. He believes that "nomination should be determined in a fair, open process" and not through an anointment.

Reactions Within The Democratic Party

While Biden calls for solidifying support among lawmakers, with a notable outreach to the Congressional Black Caucus on Monday night, reactions within the Democratic Party have been mixed. Progressive Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has voiced her position, considering the matter of nomination closed.

Conversely, Senate Democrats have issued vague statements about Biden doing what is best for the country, further fueling speculation about his potential withdrawal. This uncertainty comes amid Carville's emphasis on the need for transparency in the nomination process.

Echoing Carville's sentiments, columnist Ezra Klein wrote about the necessity of choosing between a "coronation or a contest," a thought that has now gained traction within the party. House Majority Whip James Clyburn has also offered support for the 'mini-primary' idea, stressing the importance of fairness and openness.

'Mini-Primary' Process Gains Support

James Clyburn discussed the potential new process on CNN, mentioning that "you can actually fashion the process that’s already in place to make it a mini-primary, and I would support that absolutely." He emphasized that this method would offer a fair opportunity for all potential candidates, including Harris.

Further advocating for the fairness of this method, Clyburn remarked, "We can’t close that down, and we should open up everything for the general election. I think that Kamala Harris would acquit herself very well in that kind of a process, but then it would be fair to everybody."

To ensure the integrity of the 'mini-primary' process, Carville suggested former Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama oversee the proceedings. However, he candidly admitted that he had not discussed this idea with them before making the suggestion, humorously adding, "Better to ask forgiveness than permission. I just throw an idea out there."

Conclusion

Democratic strategist James Carville has proposed that President Joe Biden may consider stepping down, suggesting a 'mini-primary' to select his successor instead of directly passing the torch to Vice President Kamala Harris. This idea has stirred mixed feelings within the Democratic Party, with some members like Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez viewing the nomination as already decided, while others call for a transparent vetting process.

Joe Egan, co-founder of the Scottish rock band Stealers Wheel and co-writer of their hit song "Stuck In The Middle With You," has died at the age of 77.

According to Daily Mail, Joe Egan passed away peacefully surrounded by loved ones. The news was announced on Sunday by Martha Rafferty, daughter of Gerry Rafferty, through Gerry’s official Facebook page.

Joe Egan's Musical Legacy

Egan was born in 1946 in Paisley, Scotland. He and Gerry Rafferty, who later became his bandmate, were childhood friends and attended St Mirin's Academy together. Their shared love of music led them to form Stealers Wheel in 1972.

Their debut single, "Stuck In The Middle With You," became a significant hit, reaching number six on the Billboard Hot 100 and number eight on the UK Singles Chart in 1973. The song's success was amplified years later when featured in Quentin Tarantino's 1992 film Reservoir Dogs.

Despite their early success, Stealers Wheel disbanded in 1975 due to creative differences. Egan and Rafferty continued their musical careers separately, with Egan releasing solo albums "Out Of Nowhere" in 1979 and "Maps" in 1981.

Post-Stealers Wheel Career

After his solo ventures, Joe Egan eventually retired from the music industry and chose to stay in Scotland. His music continued to resonate, particularly "Stuck In The Middle With You," which gained renewed popularity thanks to its inclusion in Reservoir Dogs.

Reflecting on his musical journey, Egan once said, "I was always interested in music, like Gerry, but I was also into football in a big way and at one stage I’d hoped to make it as a player." His love for music ultimately prevailed, leading to his successful partnership with Rafferty.

Gerry Rafferty died in 2011 from liver failure caused by alcoholism. Egan spoke fondly of their friendship and collaboration, saying, "Gerry’s death has already left a huge gap in my life. We lived in each other’s pockets for so long and, latterly, would speak regularly on the phone."

Martha Rafferty's Tribute

Martha Rafferty’s announcement of Egan’s passing included heartfelt words describing him as a "sweet and gentle soul." She noted that he passed away peacefully, surrounded by those closest to him.

Egan's reflections on his time with Rafferty revealed a deep respect and admiration for his friend’s talent. "Gerry was a supremely talented musician, and that was apparent from early on. Probably his finest quality was this amazing sense of melody he possessed," Egan said in an interview after Rafferty’s death.

Their relationship, like many close partnerships, had its ups and downs. Egan mentioned, "We had our fallouts because we spent so much time living in each others’ pockets. But we were still in touch until very recently."

Remembering Joe Egan

Joe Egan, co-founder of Stealers Wheel and the musician behind "Stuck In The Middle With You," has passed away at 77, leaving a significant legacy in music that spans generations. His impact is particularly felt through the song's revival in popular culture, notably in the film Reservoir Dogs, which introduced his work to new audiences.

Egan's collaborations with Gerry Rafferty and his gentle persona have been fondly remembered by many, including Martha Rafferty, who highlighted his kind and gentle soul. Despite Stealers Wheel disbanding in 1975, Egan's influence in music endures, and he is remembered for his contributions and the lasting connections he fostered through his art.

According to the New York Post, a senior White House official has urged President Joe Biden to reconsider his reelection bid amid growing concerns about his age and cognitive abilities.

This plea has sparked a national debate and prompted actions from key figures to convince Biden to step aside for the upcoming November 5th election.

The official, who has worked closely with Biden since his vice presidency, expressed doubts about Biden's ability to defeat Donald Trump in the upcoming election. Observing Biden in both private and public settings, the official concluded that the president may not have the stamina and mental sharpness required for another term.

Concerns Over Biden's Cognitive State

In recent months, Biden has shown more signs of aging, including appearing tired and speaking more slowly. His performance during a debate last month exacerbated concerns, with Biden freezing, mumbling, and losing his train of thought, which left many Democrats worried about his capacity to lead the nation.

Despite efforts to address these concerns in an interview with ABC News on Friday, Biden's support within his party continued to dwindle. The president, however, remains resolute, stating, "I am staying in the race," and asserting that only a divine intervention could persuade him otherwise.

Biden pointed to his achievements as evidence of his ability to serve another term. If re-elected, he would be 86 years old at the end of his term, making him the oldest sitting president in U.S. history.

Party Pressure Mounts

Biden is expected to be declared the Democratic Party's presidential nominee within weeks, as he has secured enough delegates to ensure his nomination. Nonetheless, the call for him to step aside has been gaining momentum.

Six House Representatives, including Angie Craig, Mike Quigley, Seth Moulton, Raúl Grijalva, and Lloyd Doggett, have publicly urged Biden to reconsider his candidacy. Additionally, more Democrats have voiced similar concerns privately.

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Mark Warner is reportedly leading efforts among Senate Democrats to encourage Biden to drop out. Warner's spokesperson did not deny these claims, and Biden dismissed them during his ABC interview.

Public and Private Urges for Withdrawal

Prominent Democratic figures like James Carville have also called for Biden to step down. In response to the mounting pressure, top administration officials have hinted that Biden is contemplating holding a rare press conference to address concerns about his cognitive state.

Biden's reluctance to hold frequent press conferences has only fueled speculation about his ability to handle the demands of the presidency. He has held fewer press conferences than any recent president, raising questions about his transparency and availability.

The debate over Biden's fitness for office comes at a critical juncture as the nation prepares for the November election. The potential implications of Biden's decision are significant, with Democrats weighing the risks and benefits of his continued candidacy.

Conclusion

A senior White House official and other Democrats have urged President Biden to reconsider running for reelection due to concerns over his age and cognitive state. Biden's recent debate performance and his handling of press conferences have intensified these concerns. Despite this, Biden remains determined to stay in the race, citing his achievements and dismissing calls for him to step aside.

Dmitri Mehlhorn, who organizes wealthy Biden supporters, explains why the President remains resolute in his decision to run in 2024 despite criticisms and low polling numbers.

According to Daily Mail, Mehlhorn emphasizes that Biden believes in his ability to win and feels his decision not to run in 2016 was a mistake.

Mehlhorn made controversial comments comparing Biden's viability to that of Vice President Kamala Harris, stating, "Either a 'dead' or 'comatose' Biden would be better than replacing him on the ticket with Kamala Harris." However, he also expressed confidence in Harris's ability to prosecute the case against Trump if necessary.

Mehlhorn Emphasizes Biden's Belief In His Ability To Win

Mehlhorn stated that Biden is determined to run and win in 2024, dismissing current unfavorable polls. He argued that the polls are within the margin of error and that Biden's position is not as weak as critics claim.

According to Mehlhorn, Biden regrets not running in 2016, believing it was a significant mistake influenced by others, including Barack Obama. The fundraiser and his donors continue to support Biden, believing he saved the country by resisting calls to step aside in 2020.

Despite Biden's age and workload, Mehlhorn insists that the President is still the best candidate for the job. He stated:

I actually think he's right, and you're all wrong. There was a lot that Biden said that I did not like, but his answer about polling - actually, everybody's wrong and Joe is right. The polls are tied, they're still within the margin of error. That's what matters at this stage.

Biden Remains Defiant Amid Criticisms And Questions

Despite criticisms and questions over his competency, especially after a recent debate and an ABC interview, Biden remains defiant. He challenged party elites to run against him if they believed he should not run.

The fundraiser emphasized Biden's ability to make tough decisions and communicate them consistently, arguing that the President is as good or better at these tasks than anyone else.

Planned Press Conference To Demonstrate Biden's Capability

Biden is planning a press conference to demonstrate his capability to handle the presidency. This comes after several Democrats called for him to drop out following the June 27 debate.

In response to the criticisms, Biden wrote a letter to congressional Democrats affirming his commitment to his campaign. He also made a surprise call to MSNBC's 'Morning Joe' to criticize party elites and reaffirm his support base.

Mehlhorn believes that Biden will ultimately listen to the voters rather than party elites. He challenged critics, asking how much the polls should drop if they are correct in their assessment of Biden's viability.

Conclusion

Dmitri Mehlhorn, a key Democratic fundraiser, provides insight into why President Biden remains committed to running in 2024 despite facing criticisms and low polling numbers. Mehlhorn emphasizes Biden's belief in his ability to win, his regret over not running in 2016, and his defiance in the face of doubts about his competency.

The fundraiser and his donors continue to support Biden, believing he is the best candidate for the job. A planned press conference aims to demonstrate Biden's capability to handle the presidency as he challenges party elites to run against him if they believe he should not seek re-election.

Experts say President Biden's unprecedented criticism of the Supreme Court's broad immunity ruling for presidents is considered dangerous.

According to the New York Post, President Biden denounced the Supreme Court’s ruling that presidents possess broad immunity from prosecution for official actions within their constitutional authority. His bold remarks are unparalleled in their apparent hostility toward the judiciary.

The Supreme Court's decision, handed down in a 6-3 vote, centered on maintaining the immunity for presidents concerning their official duties. President Biden sharply rebuked the ruling, declaring "I dissent" during his evening speech.

Unprecedented Presidential Critique

President Biden claimed the decision could set a "dangerous precedent" by potentially placing presidential actions above the law. "This nation was founded on the principle that there are no kings in America; each of us is equal before the law," Biden emphasized.

Mark Paoletta, a legal analyst, called Biden’s critique "dangerous" and "unprecedented." He argued that Biden went beyond previous presidential critiques of Supreme Court decisions by delivering his condemnation in a nationwide primetime address.

A political commentator, Kyle Brosnan, viewed Biden’s statements as part of a broader trend among the political left to erode the Supreme Court's credibility. Brosnan added that the decision could be seen as a victory for the presidency and that Biden should celebrate it.

Comparisons to Historical Precedent

Biden’s remarks have been compared to past presidential criticisms of the Supreme Court. For instance, former President Obama criticized the Citizens United ruling during the 2010 State of the Union address.

Former President Nixon also expressed discontent with the New York Times v. Sullivan decision amid the Watergate scandal. More recently, Biden criticized the court's Dobbs ruling overturning Roe v. Wade.

Despite these precedents, some experts see Biden’s approach as far more aggressive and confrontational. Jonathan Turley, a legal scholar, referred to Biden as the "most anti-free-speech executive" since former President John Adams.

Political Reverberations and Critical Reactions

Sen. Tim Scott asserted that Biden’s rhetoric unfairly targeted the Supreme Court and warned that it posed a grave danger to American democracy. "The greatest threat to American democracy today has just become Joe Biden," Scott stated.

Biden’s critical remarks included characterizing the decision as eroding the constraints that hold presidential power accountable. "The power of the office will no longer be constrained by the law," he argued.

Paoletta remarked on Biden's past controversy with Justice Clarence Thomas, suggesting that the new critique might backfire as dramatically. He referred to a historical moment when Justice Thomas described allegations against him, led by Biden, as a "high-tech lynching."

Conclusion

President Biden's unprecedented critique of the Supreme Court for its ruling on presidential immunity has sparked significant debate. Experts like Mark Paoletta view the attack as dangerously unparalleled, while others, such as Kyle Brosnan, see it as part of a broader trend to question the court's legitimacy. Comparisons to past presidential critiques show a break from tradition in both tone and intensity.

Independent conservative news without a leftist agenda.
© 2024 - American Tribune - All rights reserved
Privacy Policy
magnifier