Written by Ashton Snyder on
 February 16, 2025

Elon Musk's DOGE retrieves $1.9B in funds misplaced by Biden HUD officials

In a striking financial recovery effort, Elon Musk's newly established Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) reclaimed $1.9 billion in funds that had been misplaced from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) due to what officials described as a flawed system under former President Joe Biden's administration.

The reclaimed Biden-era funds identified by Musk's team are attributed to a task force initiative aimed at enhancing financial oversight within HUD, as the Daily Mail reports.

The initiative to recover the misplaced billions was led by the collaborative efforts of DOGE and newly appointed HUD Secretary Scott Turner. Upon discovering the irregularities, DOGE officials quickly attributed the issue to systemic inefficiencies from the previous administration.

“These funds were earmarked for the administration of financial services, but were no longer needed,” DOGE shared on X, announcing the unprecedented reversal.

DOGE Collaboration Yields Results

Turner, newly confirmed in his role, further announced the constitution of a task force dedicated to scrutinizing all spending within HUD. This team will ensure the agency's budget is effectively and efficiently serving the nation's rural, urban, and tribal communities. Turner emphasized on X the need for rigorous attention to how dollars are spent across these diverse areas.

In addition to the $1.9 billion, further savings amounting to $260 million were realized from the task force's comprehensive review. Despite the positive fiscal outcomes, critics are voicing concerns that the spending cuts could impact federal employees and various HUD programs adversely.

Impacts of Broader Spending Cuts

The scope of DOGE's budgetary revisions did not stop with HUD. The Department of Education (DOE), Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and the Pentagon have also been subject to spending cuts aligned with a broader executive order aimed at government spending reductions derived from former President Donald Trump's mandates. Specifically, $982 million was cut from DOE, impacting areas such as the Institute of Education Sciences and initiatives focusing on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.

DOGE’s inquiry into the IRS garnered support from Trump, who appreciated their efforts but assured that the institution would not be shut down. Simultaneously, the intricacies of cutting Pentagon expenditures were met with cautious agreement from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. "There's plenty of places where we want the keen eye of DOGE," Hegseth stated, acknowledging the necessity of collaboration despite reservations about certain program cuts.

Tracking Effects of Financial Reforms

To maintain transparency and public accountability, DOGE has rolled out a public live tracker showing the aggregate savings generated from these governmental reforms. Presently, they claim total savings of $48.37 billion, equating to $322 saved per taxpayer.

DOGE and its reforms have garnered attention on social media platforms, with Trump praising Musk and his team for their substantial work by heralding them as "super geniuses" undertaking 'an amazing job.' However, it is important to note that while DOGE provides its data, it is not officially recognized as conclusive.

Details surrounding the future allocation or initial intentions for the retrieved HUD funds remain undisclosed. The broader implications of these spending cuts continue to be a point of debate as stakeholders evaluate if the fiscal restraint will indeed bolster efficiency without undermining critical federal functions and personnel stability.

With the task force blazing the trail in rigorous oversight, the focus remains on correcting and optimizing processes to prevent similar losses in the future. As federal agencies adjust to these cutbacks, all eyes are on DOGE’s progress and the tangible effects of its cost-saving measures across the government.

As Congress reviews the efficacy of Musk’s DOGE approach, questions remain about the balance of oversight and the essential services these funds were initially intended to support. Whether the benefits outweigh potential drawbacks will be a key consideration as the government adjusts to its redefined fiscal strategy.

Author Image

About Ashton Snyder

Independent conservative news without a leftist agenda.
© 2025 - American Tribune - All rights reserved
Privacy Policy
magnifier