May 29, 2026

Hawaii triple murder suspect caught hiding in cave after court denied restraining orders days earlier

Reading Time: 4 minutes

Police on Hawaii's Big Island pulled Jacob Daniel Baker, 36, from a small cave on Thursday afternoon and arrested him on suspicion of murder, burglary, and other charges in connection with the killings of three men, deaths that unfolded over just two days this week while a judge's recent decision to deny restraining orders against Baker hung in the air.

Baker, a Pahoa resident, had been the target of a manhunt involving state and federal authorities after the bodies of three men were discovered in the Puna district between Monday night and Tuesday evening. Newsweek reported that Hawaii Police Chief Reed Mahuna said officers received a tip Thursday afternoon that Baker was hiding in a grassy area, ducking down as traffic passed. They found him in the cave and took him into custody.

No motive has been identified. Police said they are confident Baker was involved in all three killings, but Mahuna declined to say how investigators identified him as a suspect or what evidence connects him to the deaths.

Three victims, three methods, two days

The timeline is grim and compressed. On Monday night, police found Robert Shine at a residence in lower Puna, partially submerged in a cement pond. An autopsy determined Shine, 69, had been strangled.

Shortly after 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, just a few hundred feet from where Shine was discovered, officers found a 79-year-old man dead with apparent blunt force injuries. His name has not been released pending positive identification.

Then, around 10 p.m. Tuesday, police responded to a welfare check request at a property roughly 19 miles away and found 69-year-old John Carse dead. The autopsy attributed his death to "sharp force trauma."

Three different men. Three different apparent methods, strangulation, blunt force, a blade. Mahuna said investigators had found no connections among the victims, other than that two of them lived near each other.

Restraining orders denied days before the killings

What makes this case especially difficult to read is what preceded it. Just days before the slayings, two women filed temporary restraining order petitions against Baker in Hawaii court. A judge denied both, ruling there was not enough proof of harassment.

The allegations in those petitions were not ambiguous. One woman claimed Baker "threatened to kill several women who were staying on the property" and "caused a number of them to move or end their stays." She included a link to a video that allegedly captured at least one threat, but the link had either been removed or was incorrect as of Thursday.

The second woman alleged Baker threatened women and a disabled man, said he would trespass on the property, take things that didn't belong to him, and declared his intention to squat there. The names of both women have not been released.

The court found the evidence insufficient. Days later, three men were dead. Whether the restraining orders, had they been granted, would have changed anything is unknowable. But the sequence demands scrutiny. Courts exist to weigh risk, and the petitioners described a man making explicit threats of lethal violence. A video was referenced. The bar for a temporary restraining order is not a criminal conviction, it is a reasonable basis to believe someone poses a threat. The judge concluded that bar was not met.

That decision now sits alongside three autopsies.

A pattern witnesses saw coming

People who lived near Baker described a man whose behavior had been escalating. Stephen Shaffer, who lives on a property in Puna and is the ex-husband of the property owner, told reporters that Baker had lived on the property and climbed coconut trees for Shaffer's ex-wife. Baker, Shaffer said, "seemed to me kind of angry." Others in the area shared that concern.

Donald Hyatt, a friend of two of the deceased men and of Shaffer's ex-wife, said Baker had left a cabin on the property "in disarray" months ago. Recently, Baker returned and claimed "squatter's rights," a legal assertion that carried no apparent legitimate basis. Hyatt said Baker threatened Shaffer's ex-wife and that Hyatt himself urged her to seek a restraining order.

She did. The court said no.

The manhunt and arrest

After the three bodies were discovered Monday and Tuesday, authorities launched what Mahuna described as a massive search. State and federal agencies joined the effort. The manhunt ended Thursday afternoon when the tip came in and officers located Baker in the cave.

Mahuna held a news conference Thursday but kept details tight. He did not explain how police zeroed in on Baker as a suspect. He did not describe the evidence linking Baker to each killing. He confirmed only that investigations remain ongoing and that Baker faces charges of murder, burglary, and other offenses, the specific statutes were not disclosed.

The speed of the arrest, from discovery of the first body to Baker in custody in roughly three days, reflects well on the officers and agencies involved. Manhunts on the Big Island's rugged terrain are not simple operations. Similar multi-day searches elsewhere in the country have ended far less cleanly.

Questions the investigation must answer

The open questions in this case are substantial. Police have not identified a motive. They have not explained how Baker allegedly moved between victims separated by as much as 19 miles. They have not disclosed whether Baker knew any of the three men or whether the killings were random. The only known link among the victims is geographic proximity between two of them.

There is also the matter of the restraining order petitions. Did the court review the video link that one petitioner submitted? Was the link functional at the time of the hearing? Did the judge have any awareness of Baker's history of threats beyond what the two petitioners presented? These are questions the Hawaii court system will need to address, not because judges should be second-guessed lightly, but because the public has a right to understand how threat assessments are made when lives may hang in the balance.

Across the country, cases continue to emerge in which law enforcement captures dangerous suspects only after warning signs were missed or dismissed by other parts of the system. The pattern is familiar enough to warrant honest examination rather than reflexive defense of institutional decisions.

What the record shows

Baker is 36 years old. He lived in Pahoa. Multiple people who encountered him described threatening behavior directed at women, at a disabled man, and at property owners. Two women sought the protection of the courts and were turned away. Three men are now dead, one strangled, one beaten, one cut, across locations spanning nearly 20 miles of Hawaii's Big Island.

Police say Baker did it. They have not said why. The investigation continues.

Large-scale law enforcement operations, from sweeping arrest operations in Southern California to rural manhunts in Hawaii, remind us that the system's enforcement arm often works. Officers tracked Baker down in days. But enforcement after the fact is cold comfort to the families of Robert Shine, John Carse, and a 79-year-old man whose name the public does not yet know.

The cops did their job. The question is whether the court did its.

Independent conservative news without a leftist agenda.
Privacy Policy
magnifier