Written by Ashton Snyder on
 June 22, 2024

Judge Dismisses Case Against Nevada GOP Electors Amid Controversy

The contentious case against six GOP electors in Clark County, Nevada, faced a significant setback on Friday.

Judge Mary Kay Holthus dismissed the charges due to jurisdictional issues, with Nevada Attorney General Aaron Ford vowing to appeal, as the Gateway Pundit reports

.In a Friday morning hearing, Judge Holthus expressed doubts about the state prosecutors' jurisdictional arguments. The attorneys for the electors contended the charges should be addressed in either Carson City or Douglas County, relating to the locations of the false signing ceremony and the mailing of questionable elector documents, respectively.

Clark County is generally known for its Democratic-leaning jury pool, which could present unfavorable conditions for the Republican electors. According to Judge Holthus, the crime in question occurred "in another jurisdiction."

Nevada Attorney General Aaron Ford announced his immediate plans to appeal to the state Supreme Court, arguing that the judge had made an incorrect decision. The defense attorneys, however, declared the case dead due to the expiration of the statute of limitations in December.

Defense Claims Case Beyond Statute of Limitations

Margaret McLetchie, an attorney for the defense, stated, "They're done," in reference to the expired statute of limitations for re-filing the charges. She emphasized that Nevada's three-year period for filing such charges had expired, thus rendering further legal action against the GOP electors infeasible.

This event is part of a broader national context in which criminal charges against GOP alternate electors remain pending in other states, including Georgia, Michigan, and Arizona. In these states, the legal process continues to unfold.

Wider Context of Electors' Legal Struggles

The original filing period for the Nevada case ended in December; thus, re-filing in another jurisdiction was no longer an option. This procedural detail was crucial in Judge Holthus's ruling.

On Nov. 13, 2020, attorneys general from Nevada and Michigan had jointly requested the Department of Justice to refrain from interfering in state-led voter fraud investigations. This collaboration indicated a concerted effort to address electoral concerns independently at the state level.

The broader legal battles involving GOP electors are progressing variously across the nation. The Michigan case, similar to Nevada, seems to be faltering, as pre-trial proceedings have shown significant judicial skepticism.

Future Implications and Immediate Reactions

The implications of Judge Holthus's dismissal of the Nevada case are significant, raising questions about jurisdictional authority and the prosecution's procedural decisions. The electors' legal team has strongly advocated the finality of the case based on statutory deadlines.

Nevada Attorney General Ford's response was immediate and emphatic, as he declared his intention to take the matter to the state Supreme Court. He remained firm in his belief that the judge’s ruling was a misstep.

The legal landscape remains dynamic, with high stakes for all parties involved. As the appeals process unfolds, both sides brace for further judicial scrutiny and public attention.

Author Image

About Ashton Snyder

NewsLetter

Like Gossip?

Get the latest gossip and celebrity news straight to your inbox. choose the newsletters that are right for you. 
Sign up >
Independent conservative news without a leftist agenda.
© 2024 - American Tribune - All rights reserved
Privacy Policy
magnifier