Kamala Harris, once a rising star in the Democratic Party, finds herself at a critical crossroads as whispers of her political downfall grow louder in California and beyond. The latest developments have left many wondering if her career can recover from this stunning blow.
As reported by PJ Media, Harris is grappling with a growing perception of toxicity among the very people who once funded her campaigns. This rejection comes as she contemplates a potential run for governor, with donors openly expressing their frustration and disillusionment.
This backlash isn’t just a fleeting moment of discontent; it’s rooted in Harris’s past political endeavors, particularly her role as vice president and her failed presidential campaign in 2028. That campaign, which ended in debt after burning through billions, left a bitter taste among supporters who now question her leadership and decision-making. Adding to the complexity, many donors feel misled by the Democratic establishment, including Harris, over President Joe Biden’s cognitive decline during their administration.
The donor class in California, a stronghold for Democrats, has become a significant hurdle for Harris as she weighs her next move. Once eager to back her out of fear of a Trump administration, these megadonors now view her as a liability rather than an asset. Their reluctance to support a potential gubernatorial bid speaks volumes about the erosion of trust in her political brand.
One anonymous California Democrat, who previously donated six figures to Harris’s presidential run, didn’t hold back in expressing disappointment. “Kamala just reminds you we are in this complete shit storm,” the donor said. “With Biden, we got bamboozled … I think she did the best she could in that situation, but obviously she knew about the cognitive decline too.”
The frustration extends beyond just one individual, reflecting a broader sentiment among the donor base. Many feel “traumatized” by the outcomes of recent Democratic leadership, with Harris becoming a symbol of those failures. This growing apathy, as one longtime fundraiser noted, has significantly dimmed the initial enthusiasm that once surrounded her candidacy.
As Harris considers her options, including a gubernatorial race or even another presidential bid in 2028, the road ahead looks increasingly treacherous. Her aides are reportedly scrambling to assess viable paths, but the hostility from donors and skepticism from the base pose formidable challenges. A pivot to the nonprofit sector has also been mentioned as a potential escape from the political arena.
The wounds from her past campaigns remain fresh, particularly the unanswered questions about her involvement in concealing Biden’s cognitive issues. Donors and party insiders are not ready to forgive or forget, with some warning that a gubernatorial run could dredge up painful reminders of Democratic missteps. As one longtime Democrat donor starkly put it, “If she does, she’s going to have very difficult problems.”
This mounting criticism paints a picture of a politician struggling to regain footing in a party that once championed her. Harris’s association with the Biden administration’s failures continues to haunt her, making even deep-blue California a tough battleground. The question remains whether she can rebuild trust or if her political relevance is slipping away for good.
Critics within the Democratic donor class are not mincing words about Harris’s current standing, viewing her as a reminder of a tumultuous era in party history. They argue that her leadership, or lack thereof, contributed to the current “nightmare” they feel the Democrats have created. This perspective is particularly damning in California, where loyalty to the party typically runs deep.
On the other hand, Harris’s supporters, though dwindling, argue that she was placed in an impossible position during the Biden administration. They contend that she did her best under challenging circumstances and should not bear the full brunt of the party’s failures. However, even these defenses are often lukewarm, lacking the fervor needed to rally significant support.
The criticism isn’t just personal; it’s systemic, with donors expressing fury at the Democratic establishment as a whole. Harris, unfortunately for her, has become the face of that discontent. Her potential run for governor is now seen by many as a risky move that could further damage her already tarnished image.
Kamala Harris, the former vice president and a prominent Democratic figure, is at the center of a political storm as she faces rejection from California’s Democratic donors.
The issue stems from dissatisfaction with her past roles in the Biden administration and a failed presidential campaign, leaving her political brand toxic even in a reliably blue state. The discontent is driven by feelings of betrayal over Biden’s cognitive decline and the Democratic Party’s broader failures.
Currently, Harris is weighing a gubernatorial bid in California against other options like another presidential run in 2028 or a move to the nonprofit sector. Her self-imposed deadline by the end of summer adds urgency to her decision-making process. Meanwhile, donors and party insiders remain skeptical, predicting significant challenges if she pursues a political campaign.
