Written by Ashton Snyder on
 June 23, 2024

Most Charges Dropped Against Columbia University Extremists

The Manhattan District Attorney's Office, headed up by Alvin Bragg, has dismissed a significant portion of criminal charges against pro-Hamas extremists involved in a tumultuous event at Columbia University.

The decision has stirred controversy, particularly given Bragg's prior devotion of energies and resources to his prominent prosecution of former President Donald Trump, as the Daily Wire reports.

Earlier this year, a group of extremists stormed Columbia University's Hamilton Hall, leading to the arrest of 46 individuals. The charges were primarily for trespassing.

However, Bragg's office has decided to drop charges against 31 of the defendants, citing insufficient evidence. This decision has led to widespread outrage among law enforcement and the public.

Insufficient Evidence Sparks Outrage

The D.A.'s office claimed that there was a lack of evidence connecting the suspects to the takeover. This justification has been met with skepticism, especially among police officers who were directly involved.

One officer, questioning the ruling, remarked on the adequacy of body-worn camera footage that was available during the incident. Another officer lamented that the move could embolden further disorder.

Michael Nussbaum, a long-standing member of the Jewish Community Relations Council of New York, expressed his frustration, referring to the situation as "turnstile justice."

Community Leaders and Commentators React

Nussbaum further emphasized that such a decision sends the wrong message, potentially encouraging more property destruction. His sentiments were echoed by various commentators on social media.

A well-known conservative attorney criticized Bragg on X, indicating that his office appears to target political adversaries while leniently handling actual criminal activities.

Scott Jennings, a senior political commentator at CNN, drew a sharp contrast between this case and Trump's prosecution. He pointed out the disparity in the legal actions taken for different offenses.

Bragg's Legal Actions Under Scrutiny

Bragg's actions have increasingly come under the microscope, with critics questioning his judicial priorities. The decision to drop charges in this high-profile case has only heightened the scrutiny. Bragg, whose office is engaged in the headline-grabbing prosecution of Donald Trump, now faces dual public perspectives on his effectiveness and impartiality as a prosecutor.

The incident at Columbia University has already garnered extensive national attention, further amplifying the public debate around prosecutorial discretion and judicial fairness.

To summarize, the Manhattan District Attorney's Office, headed by Alvin Bragg, has opted to dismiss most criminal charges against pro-Hamas extremists at Columbia University. This action has ignited profound controversy, especially regarding the purported lack of evidence.

Author Image

About Ashton Snyder

NewsLetter

Like Gossip?

Get the latest gossip and celebrity news straight to your inbox. choose the newsletters that are right for you. 
Sign up >
Independent conservative news without a leftist agenda.
© 2024 - American Tribune - All rights reserved
Privacy Policy
magnifier