Written by Ashton Snyder on
 February 29, 2024

NY Appeals Court Denies Trump Request To Delay Payment

A New York Appeals Court judge has made a crucial ruling against former President Donald Trump in a significant turn of events.

According to Fox News, the judge denied Trump's request to delay a $464 million payment to the state, stemming from Attorney General Letitia James' lawsuit, but allowed him and his sons to keep running their business.

The legal skirmish between Trump and New York Attorney General Letitia James has been closely watched by many. It culminated recently when the court found Trump liable for a series of fraud charges, leading to a substantial financial penalty and restrictions on his business activities in New York.

Trump's Legal Battle with New York State

Letitia James' lawsuit against Trump, his family, and the Trump Organization has been a focal point of contention. The case alleges fraudulent business practices, leading to significant financial and operational repercussions for Trump and his associates.

The recent court ruling imposes a hefty financial burden on Trump and places operational restrictions. Trump and his sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump face a temporary ban from leading their business in New York, a decision that has stirred much debate.

Adding to the situation's complexity, the court has mandated that Trump post a bond for the entire judgment amount. Additionally, the appointment of an independent director of compliance has been ordered, underscoring the serious nature of the court's findings.

Responses and Reactions to the Court's Rulings

Trump's reaction to the trial and its outcome has been vociferous. He dismissed the proceedings as a "witch hunt" and criticized the absence of a jury trial, arguing that it deprived him of a fair hearing.

The defense presented by Trump and his team has been robust, challenging the accusations of fraudulent business practices. They argue that financial statements included disclaimers advising banks to perform their own assessments, asserting that their financial declarations were accurate and transparent.

Notably, NYU accounting professor Eli Bartov's testimony strongly defended Trump. "My main finding is that there is no evidence whatsoever of any accounting fraud," Bartov stated, supporting Trump's assertion that his financial statements were not materially misstated.

Looking Ahead: The Appeals Process and Beyond

The legal battle is far from over, as Trump intends to appeal the ruling. The appeals process is set to continue, with deadlines for briefs from both parties approaching rapidly. This stage of the proceedings will undoubtedly be watched with keen interest by supporters and critics of Trump.

The imposition of a partial gag order on Trump during the court proceedings adds another layer of intrigue to the case. It underscores the contentious nature of the legal battle and the high stakes involved.

In conclusion, the lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James against former President Donald Trump has resulted in a landmark court ruling. It has imposed significant financial penalties on Trump and restricted his business operations in New York.

Trump's vehement denial of wrongdoing and his intent to appeal the ruling signal that this legal saga is set to continue. The case not only highlights the complexities of legal battles involving high-profile figures but also underscores the rigorous scrutiny of business practices in the state of New York.

Author Image

About Ashton Snyder

NewsLetter

Like Gossip?

Get the latest gossip and celebrity news straight to your inbox. choose the newsletters that are right for you. 
Sign up >
Independent conservative news without a leftist agenda.
© 2024 - American Tribune - All rights reserved
Privacy Policy
magnifier