Written by Staff Writers on
 August 16, 2025

Pentagon pulls security clearance from retired CIA officer implicated in Russia hoax

Susan Miller, a retired CIA officer, has recently experienced the revocation of her security clearance due to her alleged involvement in the controversial 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment regarding Russian interference in the American presidential campaign, as the Daily Caller reports.

The Trump administration claims that Miller was significantly involved in the assessment, which has come under scrutiny for alleged bias, resulting in the revocation of her security credentials.

Miller, a former senior officer specializing in counterintelligence at the CIA, has stated publicly that she played a noteworthy role in the creation of the famous 2016 U.S. Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA). The assessment scrutinized potential Russian interference and its favoring of then-candidate Trump in that year's election. However, recent disclosures question these assertions.

Trump officials confirm revocation

The Trump administration's decision to revoke Miller's security access stems from her continuous support of the ICA, even in light of emerging documents suggesting discrepancies in its conclusions. Two officials within the Trump administration confirmed this revocation to Just The News.

Documents released by Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard in July cast new shadows, implying that the intelligence personnel behind the ICA did not have conclusive evidence portraying Russia as favoring Trump during the 2016 election. These revelations have further fueled debate over the ICA's base findings.

The released records also suggest that while Russia might have obtained damaging material about Hillary Clinton, their strategy purportedly involved holding this information until after a potential Clinton victory. This perspective adds another layer to the intricate picture of the 2016 election's backdrop.

Whistleblower claims contradict Miller's

Amid these controversies, a whistleblower -- a purported former senior CIA analyst -- challenges Miller's narrative of her participation in the ICA. According to this source, Miller had no direct involvement in composing the assessment as claimed.

This whistleblower's narrative contradicts Miller's account on the SpyTalk podcast, where she claimed a pivotal role. They stated that while members of her team were engaged in formulating the ICA, she personally "had zero role." This raises further questions about the true extent of Miller's contributions and the authenticity of her claims.

John Brennan, former CIA director, is cited by many as playing a crucial role in the crafting of the assessment, adding another dimension to the already complex situation. Brennan's leadership in producing the ICA has been highlighted amid this controversy.

Responses, silence unfold

Despite these developments, the Department of Defense has maintained silence, neither confirming nor disavowing the reported clearance revocation when approached by the Daily Caller. This non-response leaves space for continued speculation and discussion.

A defense official voiced strong sentiments, stating, "This woman totally shouldn’t hold a high-level security clearance after pushing the Russia Hoax. All she did was lie to the American people to hurt Trump." This perspective echoes broader criticisms among Trump allies who have long stated that opponents of the former president used the Russia collusion narrative strategically.

Other comments from within the administration concisely make the case that her involvement in promoting the Russia narrative disqualifies her from the trust required for high-security clearance. A senior Trump authority remarked that individuals tied to the "Russia Hoax" are unworthy of security access.

Professional legacy remains complex

Despite the controversy, Miller's career achievements remain acknowledged. The International Spy Museum has lauded her for her contributions to intelligence operations, recognized through awards. Nonetheless, her current situation ties these past achievements to the present contentions surrounding her involvement in an era-defining intelligence assessment.

The complexities underlying Susan Miller’s security clearance condition underscore the challenges faced when past actions are weighed in light of new information. Whether her security access should have been revoked raises further debate about the intersection of politics, intelligence, and personal credibility.

The unfolding story around Miller offers a window into the ongoing dialogue regarding U.S. intelligence operations, their intersection with political narratives, and the individuals who craft the story we come to know as history.

Author Image

About Staff Writers

Independent conservative news without a leftist agenda.
© 2025 - American Tribune - All rights reserved
Privacy Policy
magnifier