June 12, 2026

Phil Mickelson loses golf club membership after employee accuses him of inappropriate physical contact

Reading Time: 4 minutes

Phil Mickelson, the 55-year-old six-time major champion, is no longer a member of The Farms Golf Club near San Diego after a female employee accused him of making nonconsensual and inappropriate physical contact with her this spring. The club confirmed it investigated the allegation, took what it called "decisive action," and removed him from membership.

The accusation, first reported by Golf Digest and detailed by OutKick's Mark Harris, describes an incident at the clubhouse before a round of golf. Multiple sources told Golf Digest that Mickelson approached the employee and made physical contact she did not consent to. After he left the clubhouse and returned to the course, the employee reported what happened to her supervisors.

Club officials then located Mickelson during the middle of his round, confronted him with the accusation on the golf course, and told him to leave the premises. He reportedly left before finishing his round.

The Farms Golf Club confirms removal, cites California law

The Farms Golf Club, located in Rancho Santa Fe in the San Diego area, issued a statement to Golf Digest that confirmed the broad strokes without naming Mickelson directly:

"Following a staff member report of member misconduct, the Club provided immediate and ongoing support to the staff member, conducted a thorough independent investigation of the incident and took decisive action. This individual is no longer a member of The Farms Golf Club."

The club added that it "conducts thorough reviews of all reported matters according to California Law and takes appropriate action when warranted, consistent with our commitment to integrity, excellence and accountability." It declined to comment further, citing the safety and privacy of staff and members.

Golf Digest identified and verified the club employee, but she declined to participate in the story. No direct statement from her has been published.

Mickelson's attorney pushes back, cites video evidence

Mickelson's side has not stayed silent. His spokesperson told Golf Digest that "any misunderstanding has been cleared up," the New York Post reported. The spokesperson added that Mickelson "continues to attend to a family health matter and is uncertain when he will be able to return to professional golf."

His legal team went further. Attorney Tom Clare, described as defamation counsel retained by Mickelson, issued a sharper statement to Golf Digest. Breitbart reported Clare's response:

"There is a great deal of misinformation circulating and, while Phil's full attention is devoted to a private family health matter, he has retained defamation counsel and is determined to hold accountable any publication or individual trafficking in speculation or false rumors."

Clare also stated that the allegations are "squarely contradicted by objective, video evidence." He did not elaborate on the nature of that video or make it publicly available.

That creates a sharp factual dispute. The club says it investigated and acted. Mickelson's lawyer says the evidence clears him. Both sides claim the facts support their position. Neither has released the underlying evidence to the public.

A golfer already sidelined by personal troubles

The allegation lands at a moment when Mickelson has largely vanished from competitive golf. He has played in just one of LIV Golf's nine completed events this season, a late March appearance in South Africa at The Club at Steyn City in Johannesburg, where he finished T-48.

On April 2, a week ahead of the Masters, Mickelson posted a statement on X explaining his absence. He said he would not be teeing it up at Augusta National and would be away for "an extended period of time as my family continues to navigate a personal health matter." He offered no further details about the nature of that health matter.

His spokesperson has since confirmed that Mickelson has been away from professional golf since February, attending to what his representatives describe as a private family health situation. The timeline means the alleged incident at The Farms, described only as happening "this spring", overlapped with a period when Mickelson was already stepping away from the public eye.

Whether the family health matter and the club incident are connected, or simply coincidental, remains unclear. No reporting has drawn a direct link between the two, and Mickelson's camp has treated them as separate issues. The pattern, though, is one of a career in visible retreat, a once-dominant figure increasingly absent from the sport that made him famous, now facing an accusation that could define his legacy in ways no major championship ever did.

What remains unanswered

Several questions hang over this story. No law enforcement involvement has been reported. No civil, criminal, or administrative filing has surfaced. The specific nature of the alleged physical contact has not been described in detail by any published source. The findings of the club's "thorough independent investigation" have not been made public.

Golf Digest cited multiple sources in its reporting, but those sources remain unnamed. The employee herself has not spoken publicly. And the "objective, video evidence" Mickelson's attorney says contradicts the allegation has not been released or described beyond that single claim.

The AP confirmed the core facts: Mickelson is no longer welcome at The Farms, the club investigated a staff member's report of misconduct, and his spokesperson characterized the matter as a misunderstanding. Beyond that, the public record is thin.

In an era when allegations of misconduct against prominent figures can surface rapidly and reshape careers overnight, the gap between accusation and evidence matters. Mickelson deserves the same presumption of innocence any accused person does. The employee who reported the incident deserves to have her complaint taken seriously and investigated fairly.

What no one deserves is a process that stays sealed while both sides make public claims of vindication. If video evidence exists that clears Mickelson, his legal team should have every incentive to produce it. If the club's investigation found conduct serious enough to revoke membership from one of the most famous golfers alive, the substance of those findings matters.

Former ESPN host Trey Wingo has already said publicly that Mickelson will never play on the PGA Tour again. That assessment predated this allegation and reflected Mickelson's complicated departure to LIV Golf. But the trajectory is now steeper. A golfer who once captivated galleries at Augusta National now faces questions that have nothing to do with birdies or bogeys.

Accountability in public life does not wait for the convenient moment. Whether the subject is a political figure, a convicted associate of the powerful, or a sports icon, the principle is the same: serious allegations require serious answers, not carefully worded statements designed to run out the clock.

Mickelson's camp says the facts are on his side. The club says it acted decisively. Somewhere between those two claims is the truth, and the public has learned to be skeptical when powerful people insist that everything has been handled while refusing to show their work.

If the video clears him, release it. If the investigation condemns him, say so plainly. Silence and spin serve no one, except the person with the most to lose.

NewsLetter

Like Gossip?

Get the latest gossip and celebrity news straight to your inbox. choose the newsletters that are right for you. 
Sign up >
Independent conservative news without a leftist agenda.
Privacy Policy
magnifier