June 4, 2026

Rep. Al Green calls DHS Secretary Mullin a 'racist,' then tells him to 'shut up' at House hearing

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, was caught on video calling Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin a "racist" during a House Committee on Homeland Security meeting Wednesday, then told the cabinet secretary to "shut up" when Mullin pushed back, Fox News reported.

The exchange, captured on C-SPAN cameras during a hearing focused on Department of Homeland Security funding, ended only after Chairman Andrew Garbarino, R-New York, gaveled the proceedings and called for the encounter to be suspended.

This is the kind of conduct that passes for oversight in certain quarters of Congress. A sitting member of the House hurls a racial accusation at a cabinet official during a public hearing, tells him to be quiet when challenged, and then denies having said it, all on camera.

What the video shows

The confrontation unfolded in rapid sequence. Green called Mullin a "racist" during the committee session. When Mullin responded, Green told him to "shut up."

Mullin, visibly taken aback, cocked his head and asked directly: "Did you just tell me to shut up?"

Green fired back: "It's my time." The gavel sounded.

Mullin then addressed Chairman Garbarino calmly.

"I'm not going to let anybody call me a racist chairman."

Green denied making the comment, then, in the same breath, asked Garbarino to "tell him to shut up." The chairman moved to suspend the encounter.

A pattern, not an incident

Wednesday's hearing was not Green's first public confrontation. Fox News reported that Green was ejected from President Donald Trump's primetime address to a joint session of Congress for a second year in a row in February. A file photo accompanying the report shows Green holding a sign during Trump's State of the Union address at the U.S. Capitol on Feb. 24, 2026. Another photo shows Green standing in the House Chamber before that same address.

The Texas Democrat also joined "Remove the Regime" protesters who marched from Union Station to the Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Nov. 20, 2025, speaking at a press conference tied to that demonstration.

At some point, a pattern of disruptions stops looking like principled dissent and starts looking like something else entirely.

A lame-duck lawmaker with nothing to lose

Green's willingness to escalate may have something to do with his political standing, or what's left of it. Fox News noted that Green was recently defeated in the Democratic primary runoff for Texas' 18th Congressional District by freshman Rep. Christian Menefee. A linked headline in the report referenced "10 moderates" who joined the GOP to punish Green, suggesting his conduct has cost him support even within his own party.

A lawmaker who has already lost his primary has little institutional incentive to maintain decorum. But the voters in his district who chose someone else may have had exactly this kind of behavior in mind.

The real cost of the 'racist' card

What Green did Wednesday was not just rude. It was a deliberate attempt to derail a hearing on DHS funding by making the conversation about race rather than policy. Mullin was there to discuss how the department spends taxpayer money. Green made it about a personal accusation he later denied making, on video.

The "racist" label, deployed without evidence and retracted without apology, cheapens the word. It turns a serious charge into a tactical weapon. And when it's aimed at a cabinet secretary testifying under oath about department operations, it poisons the well for every member of that committee, Republican or Democrat, who came prepared to do actual oversight.

Mullin handled the moment with restraint. He didn't shout. He didn't match Green's tone. He asked a direct question and then stated plainly that he would not accept the accusation. That's the kind of composure taxpayers should expect from a public official under fire.

Green offered the opposite. He escalated, denied, and escalated again, all within seconds.

What remains unanswered

Several questions remain open. What was said immediately before Green called Mullin a "racist"? What specific policy topic triggered the exchange? What procedural action, if any, followed the chairman's decision to suspend the encounter? The available video captures the confrontation itself but not the full context leading up to it.

Those gaps matter. Context can change the weight of an accusation. But nothing in the surrounding circumstances justifies telling a cabinet secretary to "shut up" during a congressional hearing, then denying you called him a racist while the cameras were still rolling.

Decorum isn't optional

Congressional hearings exist so that elected representatives can question executive branch officials on behalf of the public. They work only when both sides observe basic rules of conduct. The chairman gavels down disruptions. Members yield time. Witnesses answer questions.

When a member turns a funding hearing into a personal confrontation, the public loses. The questions that needed asking go unasked. The answers that needed giving go ungiven. The hearing becomes a clip, not an inquiry.

Green's own voters figured that out before the rest of Washington did. They chose someone else. The committee will be better for it, and so will the oversight process that taxpayers depend on to hold every agency, including DHS, accountable.

When the cameras catch you calling someone a racist, denying it, and then telling him to shut up, all in the same minute, the problem isn't the cameras.

Independent conservative news without a leftist agenda.
Privacy Policy
magnifier