The U.S. Senate just dropped a bombshell by passing a massive defense bill that takes direct aim at China’s growing military might.
In a decisive move, the Senate approved the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), a whopping $879 billion package for the U.S. military, which includes two hard-hitting bills targeting China’s tech and biotech sectors, the Daily Caller reported.
This legislative victory didn’t come easy, emerging from the ashes of a government shutdown and a frustrating stalemate on Capitol Hill. It’s a signal that even in chaotic times, protecting American interests against strategic adversaries remains a priority. Let’s hope the momentum doesn’t fizzle out.
First up in this double-barreled approach is the FIGHT China Act of 2025, crafted by Texas Republican Sen. John Cornyn. This bill zeros in on preventing American investments and know-how from boosting China’s military tech in fields like advanced chips, AI, and hypersonic weapons. It’s a wake-up call for those who thought globalism wouldn’t come with a national security price tag.
Sen. Cornyn didn’t mince words on the urgency of this measure. “This is a transparency bill that will give us some insight into the amount of money being invested in the People’s Republic of China, and the extent to which those investment dollars are directly flowing into the arsenal of our greatest strategic adversary,” he said. If that doesn’t make you question where your tax dollars are going, what will?
The FIGHT China Act also demands regular reports to Congress on U.S. investments in Beijing’s tech industries while empowering federal agencies to block or slap penalties on risky transactions. It’s a much-needed leash on unchecked financial ties. Let’s just hope the bureaucrats don’t turn it into another paper-pushing exercise.
Not to be outdone, Tennessee Republican Sen. Bill Hagerty’s Bio-Secure Act takes on another front by barring federal contracts with biotech firms tied to the Chinese Communist Party. The focus here is on protecting sensitive genetic and biological data from falling into the wrong hands. In an era of woke overreach, at least someone’s guarding our literal DNA.
Sen. Hagerty laid out the stakes with chilling clarity. “Communist China has openly identified biotechnology as a key domain for future warfare,” he warned. That alone should make every American sit up and take notice.
He didn’t stop there, painting a grim picture of potential threats. “To cite just one chilling example, in 2017, the National Defense University of the People’s Liberation Army wrote about the possibility of ‘specific ethnic genetic attacks’ that can ‘destroy a race or a specific group of people or a specific person,’” Hagerty added. If that’s not a sci-fi horror plot turned real, what is?
The Bio-Secure Act ensures the federal government won’t fund or partner with CCP-controlled biotech outfits that could jeopardize American security. It’s a commonsense move in a world where progressive agendas often prioritize global cooperation over national safety. Why hand our enemies the keys to our biological kingdom?
Both bills, bundled into the NDAA, reflect a broader push to keep American ingenuity from fueling adversaries. It’s refreshing to see lawmakers finally acknowledge that not every international partnership is a feel-good win. Sometimes, it’s just a slow-motion surrender.
Now, with the Senate’s approval in the bag, the next step is reconciling differences between the House and Senate versions of the NDAA. This process could be a minefield, but it’s critical to get right. We can’t afford to let partisan bickering dilute these vital protections.
The passage of this defense bill, especially amid a government shutdown, shows that even a gridlocked Congress can rally around safeguarding the nation. It’s a rare bipartisan nod to reality over ideology. Let’s not pat ourselves on the back too soon, though—there’s still work to do.
These measures aren’t just about dollars and data; they’re about drawing a line in the sand against a regime that doesn’t play by our rules. The FIGHT China Act and Bio-Secure Act are steps toward ensuring American innovation doesn’t become a weapon aimed back at us. If we’re serious about national security, this is the kind of bold action we’ve been craving.
So, while the left might grumble about “isolationism,” the truth is clear: protecting our future isn’t about shutting doors—it’s about locking them against those who’d exploit our openness. Here’s to hoping this Senate vote is the start of a broader reckoning. America first isn’t just a slogan; it’s a survival strategy.