The Biden campaign faces internal chaos, as Joe Biden's associates allege President Barack Obama is subtly encouraging efforts to eliminate Biden from the 2024 election.
According to Daily Mail, an Obama ally reveals Biden's deep resentment over being sidelined for Hillary Clinton and how Obama's staff treated him.
Tension escalated after George Clooney, a friend of Obama, publicly criticized Biden on July 10, 2024. On July 11, 2024, during his 'Morning Joe' TV show, Joe Scarborough mentioned that Democratic officials and Biden's team believe Obama is working covertly against Biden.
Scarborough revealed that Biden and many prominent Democrats assume Obama is orchestrating these movements behind the scenes. Biden voiced his displeasure with elite opposition, choosing Scarborough's show on July 8, 2024, as his platform.
The situation is further muddled by Clooney's New York Times column, "I Love Joe Biden. But We Need a New Nominee," published on July 10, 2024. Politico subsequently disclosed that Clooney consulted Obama before publishing this piece.
In a recent fundraiser in Los Angeles, Clooney reiterated concerns about Biden's decline, further amplifying the rift. Obama's campaign strategist David Axelrod also expressed apprehension about Biden's campaign, predicting a potential 'landslide' loss.
Scarborough's show highlighted Biden's longstanding animosity towards the Obamas and the Clintons. He shared that Biden has always felt marginalized and undervalued within the inner circles of Obama's political sphere.
Scarborough emphasized that critical comments from Obama's allies only deepened Biden's resolve to stay in the race, noting that every such remark pushed Biden to dig in further.
Adding to this sentiment, Democratic strategist Brad Bannon noted that Axelrod's statements likely reflect Obama's reluctance to criticize Biden openly. "It's really clear from the Obama wing of the Democratic Party that they have grave concerns about Joe Biden staying in the race," Bannon shared.
The 'Obama wing' of the Democratic Party has reportedly harbored concerns about Biden's viability since his first lackluster debate performance against Donald Trump. These worries have steadily gained traction.
Scarborough emphasized that Biden's lackluster performance at a fundraiser weeks ago showed a stark contrast from his vibrant 2010 persona, raising doubts about his current fitness for the race. Axelrod voiced his apprehensions less publicly, citing "immutable facts of life" that were, according to him, apparent on the debate stage. He expressed skepticism over Biden's readiness to confront these realities.
Biden's ongoing grievances about feeling sidelined during Obama's tenure and the 2016 election, where Hillary Clinton was favored, further fuel his determination. According to Scarborough, Biden deeply resents the attempts to push him out, feeling perpetually undervalued by Obama's staff and political insiders.
Joe Biden's team contends that Barack Obama is subtly influencing efforts to push Biden out of the 2024 race. Obama has officially supported Biden, but critiques from his former administration members suggest otherwise. Prominent Obama allies like George Clooney and David Axelrod have echoed concerns about Biden's electability, with Clooney's recent column highlighting these sentiments. Biden's retort through Scarborough's show and his resentment towards Obama's political circles underscore the widening rift, setting the stage for an unprecedented showdown within the Democratic Party.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has begun crafting new legislation to rescind former President Donald Trump's immunity for his actions following the 2020 election.
According to Fox News, this bill seeks to categorize Trump's actions in challenging the election results as "unofficial," thus stripping his immunity under a recent Supreme Court decision.
On July 2, the Supreme Court ruled that presidents have significant prosecutorial immunity for official acts committed in office. In a speech on the Senate floor, Schumer passionately challenged this ruling, emphasizing that Trump's attempts to overturn the 2020 election results amount to "election subversion acts" rather than official duties.
The Senate Majority Leader asserted that American democracy is at a "perilous crossroads." He criticized the Supreme Court's decision, stating it inaccurately declared broad immunity for Trump's actions taken during his presidency. Schumer also drew parallels to former President Richard Nixon, who once claimed that presidential actions were inherently legal.
Schumer remarked, "We were all taught in grade school that there are no kings here in America, but what the conservative justices have done is effectively place a crown on Donald Trump’s head." He voiced concerns about further negative outcomes if Trump were to be re-elected, warning of additional "disastrous rulings" and ongoing turmoil stemming from January 6, 2021.
Trump's adviser, Brian Hughes, responded vehemently, accusing Schumer and Biden Democrats of weaponizing the legal system against the former president. He defended the Supreme Court's decision, underscoring the importance of preserving presidential powers to maintain the balance of power across government branches.
Brian Hughes argued, "SCOTUS rightly protected the powers of the president—all presidents, not just Donald Trump—which is fundamental to the balance of power between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government." He labeled Schumer's moves an attack on the Constitution and an effort to undermine the Court's independence.
No text for the proposed bill was available on Congress' official website at Schumer's announcement. This legislative effort aligns with previous measures from top Democrats, including Rep. Adam Schiff's Protecting Our Democracy Act and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse's bill addressing Supreme Court criticisms.
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse emphasized that the Supreme Court has become influenced by special interests, akin to how 19th-century railroad barons swayed a railroad commission. This mirrors Schumer's concerns about what he perceives as the Court's favoritism towards Trump.
Schumer predicted chaos and catastrophic results if Trump's actions are not checked and if he pursues another presidential term. Schumer’s proposed legislation marks a significant stance in Democrats' broader effort to safeguard democratic institutions from what they view as extremist threats.
Schumer's rhetoric, comparing Trump's behavior and resultant immunity to Nixon’s infamous declaration, underscores his assertion that no president should be above the law. The absence of the bill text illustrates the nascent stage of this legislative endeavor, though it has already sparked considerable political debate.
As Schumer continues to draft the bill, it remains to be seen how it will navigate the legislative process and what implications it might have for future administrations. However, the controversy surrounding the Supreme Court’s ruling and the proposed bill highlights ongoing tensions over the limits of presidential power.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer's proposed legislation aims to classify former President Trump's actions post-2020 election as unofficial, possibly removing immunity granted by a recent Supreme Court decision. This initiative has sparked criticism from Trump's allies, reflecting deep partisan divisions over presidential powers and judiciary independence. As the bill advances, it will likely remain central to debates on power balance and democratic principles in the U.S.
Iowa state Senate Majority Whip Waylon Brown, a Republican, resigned abruptly after his primary win without providing an explanation.
According to the Washington Examiner, Brown's sudden resignation has left many in the political sphere speculating about the reasons behind his departure.
Waylon Brown, who has served in the Iowa Senate since 2017, announced his resignation on Monday. Brown's decision to step down is effective as of July 10, 2024, but he did not provide a reason for his abrupt exit.
The resignation comes just weeks after Brown secured a victory in the state’s June primary. He received 53% of the vote, defeating his Republican challenger, Doug Campbell, who garnered 47%. This victory had set the stage for a general election showdown against Democrat Rich Lorence in November.
Brown expressed his gratitude to his constituents, stating, “I will forever be grateful to the people of my district who entrusted me to represent them in the Iowa State Capitol.”
He also thanked his family for their support during his tenure as state senator, adding, “I’m thankful for my wife, Julie, and our two kids, who have supported me throughout my tenure as state senator. I look forward to my next chapter. The best is yet to come!”
With Brown’s unexpected resignation, the Republican Party now faces the task of nominating a new candidate to represent the district in the upcoming general election. Under Iowa law, Republicans are allowed to hold a convention to select a new nominee.
Democrat Rich Lorence, who was set to face Brown in November, responded to the news by acknowledging Brown’s service. “I want to thank Senator Brown for his hard work and leadership in the Iowa Senate on behalf of North Central Iowa and wish him the best of luck in whatever his future endeavors are,” Lorence said.
Lorence also reaffirmed his commitment to the race: "As we move forward, I am more committed than ever to serving North Central Iowa and making our state better for everyone.”
Waylon Brown has been a prominent figure in the Iowa Senate since he first took office in 2017 after defeating a Democratic incumbent. During his time in the Senate, Brown has been recognized for his leadership and contributions to various legislative efforts.
His resignation has sparked curiosity and concern among his supporters and political analysts alike, as the reasons behind his decision remain undisclosed. The abrupt nature of his departure, especially following a primary win, adds to the intrigue. Brown’s role as the Senate Majority Whip involved rallying party members and advancing legislative priorities.
Waylon Brown’s resignation as Iowa state Senate Majority Whip has created a significant shift in the political landscape just months before the general election. Despite winning the primary election against Doug Campbell, Brown chose to step down without explanation, leaving his supporters and colleagues in speculation.
Republicans must now swiftly nominate a new candidate to replace Brown while Democrat Rich Lorence continues to push forward in his campaign for the November election. As the situation unfolds, the focus remains on who will take up the mantle and how this change will impact the future of North Central Iowa’s representation.
According to Breitbart News, French President Emmanuel Macron has refused the resignation of Prime Minister Gabriel Attal.
Despite pressure from far-left factions following a surprising legislative victory for the New Popular Front, Macron aims to maintain political stability amidst significant challenges.
The rejection of Attal's resignation has stirred intense political discourse. Far-left groups have demanded that Macron either appoint a prime minister from their ranks or resign himself.
This follows legislative elections that saw an unexpected victory for the New Popular Front, a coalition of communists, environmentalists, and socialists led by Jean-Luc Mélenchon.
The elections were strategically held to prevent the National Rally party from gaining a parliamentary majority. Macron's strategy appears to have worked, as the National Rally's president, Jordan Bardella, was effectively sidelined from becoming the prime minister. Prime Minister Gabriel Attal, the youngest and first openly gay prime minister in France, had offered his resignation Monday morning.
However, Macron reportedly persuaded Attal to remain in office. According to Le Figaro, Macron emphasized the critical need for Attal to "ensure the stability of the country." This decision underscores Macron's focus on political steadiness at a time of heightened tension and economic uncertainty.
Jean-Luc Mélenchon, leader of the New Popular Front, has been vocal in his demands. He insists that Macron either appoint a prime minister from far-left ranks or step down. Mathilde Panot, spokeswoman for the New Popular Front, echoed Mélenchon's sentiments, asserting that he should be "absolutely not be disqualified" from consideration.
France's economic situation is another significant factor in this political equation. The country faces a daunting national debt of approximately 3 trillion euros, equivalent to about 110% of its GDP. The New Popular Front's intentions to reverse recent pension reforms add to the risk of exacerbating the debt crisis.
Outgoing economy minister Bruno Le Maire has issued dire warnings about the economic ramifications if the New Popular Front takes power. Le Maire cautioned about an "immediate risk" of a financial crisis and potential economic decline. This financial instability compounds the political volatility, creating an increasingly precarious landscape.
Le Maire further emphasized the ideological rift within the nation. He warned that without addressing this ideological divide, France could face a severe regime crisis. His concerns highlight the broader stakes at play in this ongoing political struggle.
The far-left's calls for representation in the highest levels of government are not unfounded. Mélenchon's leadership has revitalized the left, garnering significant support in the recent elections. Panot pointed out that Mélenchon has "reignited hope" within leftist circles, crediting him for the New Popular Front's existence and electoral success.
This newfound momentum has given the far-left a stronger voice in French politics. Their demands for representation are grounded in their substantial electoral gains and the legitimacy of their leaders. The political clamor for representation underscores the evolving dynamics within the French political sphere.
President Emmanuel Macron's decision to retain Prime Minister Gabriel Attal amid far-left pressure shows his commitment to political stability. The New Popular Front's unexpected legislative election victory challenges the status quo, while Macron's actions prevent the National Rally from gaining a parliamentary majority. France faces economic challenges, and political tensions reveal a deep ideological divide.
House Speaker Mike Johnson proposed the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, which aims to ensure that only American citizens can vote in federal elections.
According to Fox Business, Elon Musk's endorsement of the bill has ignited controversy over the proposed penalties for treason.
The SAVE Act, initially championed by Representative Chip Roy, was unveiled by Johnson at a press conference in Mar-a-Lago, Florida, earlier this year. The bill requires proof of citizenship for voter registration in federal elections, allowing state election officials to ask about citizenship status before providing voter registration forms.
Elon Musk took to his social media platform, X, to voice his strong support for the SAVE Act. He labeled those opposing the bill as "TRAITORS" and questioned the appropriate penalties for such individuals. His statements have sparked a heated debate about the nature of treason and its consequences.
House Speaker Johnson circulated a memo within the House GOP conference before the July Fourth recess, advocating for the bill's necessity. He emphasized that the SAVE Act is designed to safeguard American elections by ensuring only citizens participate in the voting process.
The bill also provides a variety of documents that can be accepted for voter registration to simplify the process for citizens. Additionally, it grants states access to a federal agency database to identify and remove noncitizens from voter rolls and confirm the citizenship of registrants.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is directed by the bill to determine if noncitizens registered to vote in federal elections should be removed. The DHS is also required to notify state chief election officials when an individual is naturalized so that they can be added to the voter rolls.
The legislative push comes at a critical time, with Congress expected to return to Washington, D.C., on Monday. A vote on the SAVE Act is anticipated to take place this month, making it a significant issue ahead of former President Donald Trump's expected rematch with President Joe Biden.
Democratic critics argue that the bill is redundant, as it is already illegal for noncitizens to vote in federal elections. They contend that existing laws sufficiently address the issue, making the SAVE Act unnecessary.
Johnson continues to advocate for the bill on Musk's platform, reinforcing the message that the SAVE Act is crucial for the integrity of American elections. His persistent efforts highlight the significance of this legislation in the current political climate.
In response to the opposition, Musk's comments have intensified the debate around voter eligibility and the penalties for those who undermine election security. His call for severe punishment for "traitors" has raised questions about the limits of free speech and the appropriate response to dissenting views.
As the vote on the SAVE Act approaches, the discussion around the bill is likely to become more contentious. Both supporters and critics will continue to voice their perspectives, shaping the narrative around this pivotal piece of legislation.
The SAVE Act, proposed by House Speaker Mike Johnson and originally pushed by Representative Chip Roy, aims to ensure that only American citizens can vote in federal elections. Elon Musk's endorsement and his labeling of opponents as "TRAITORS" have sparked a debate about treason and its penalties. The bill requires proof of citizenship for voter registration and grants states access to federal databases to confirm citizenship. Democratic critics argue that the bill is unnecessary, as it is already illegal for noncitizens to vote in federal elections.
A significant dispute has reportedly erupted between President Joe Biden's family and his staff following a disappointing performance against Donald Trump in their recent debate.
The aftermath of the debate has led to intense criticism and finger-pointing among Biden’s inner circle, with family members demanding more control over the campaign, as the Daily Mail reports.
President Biden has attributed his lackluster showing to illness and simply having a bad night yet affirmed his commitment to winning the Nov. 5 election. Family members, notably his son Hunter Biden, are said to have expressed dissatisfaction with the staff’s allegedly inadequate preparation and failure to highlight the president's strengths.
Concerns about Biden’s seemingly frail and confused debate performance have worried some top Democrats. Thirteen sources close to the president have indicated that his family believes staff errors have been continual, with the debate serving as a breaking point.
One source commented, "Blunder after blunder by key staff personnel has finally reached a tipping point." The family is reportedly unhappy with the staff's tendency to assign blame to President Biden for the debate's outcome.
Emotional involvement from the Biden family is said to sometimes interfere with their political judgment. After the debate, family members, including his sister Valerie Owens and son Hunter, visited the White House to offer support.
Hunter Biden's recent felony conviction and upcoming tax fraud trial have added tension to an already strained situation. Staff worry his public presence could become a liability, though Jill Biden's former communications director, Michael LaRosa, defended Hunter as an effective campaign asset.
Family members had pushed unsuccessfully for the removal of Biden's personal lawyer Bob Bauer and top adviser Anita Dunn, both of whom were involved in debate preparations at Camp David. Jeff Zients, White House chief of staff, dispelled the rumors of their removal and expressed full confidence in them. "There is absolutely no truth to these unfounded and insulting rumors," he stated.
In spite of the family's criticisms, internal staffers noted that they trust Bauer and Dunn for providing honest feedback to Biden. Biden reportedly reached out to Ron Klain, his former chief of staff, to assure him amid the ongoing discord. Mutual accusations of overprotection and mismanagement have plagued the team. Some staffers believe that without Dunn's leadership, it will be difficult to recover and win against Trump.
Post-debate polls show Trump leading Biden by 2 to 3.3% in a direct matchup, and by 2.5 to 4.9% with third-party candidates. Nonetheless, potential Democratic replacements, such as Govs. Gavin Newsom and Gretchen Whitmer, have voiced their support for Biden.
"At the end of the day, Biden is very close to his family and values their advice," LaRosa remarked, signaling why the family might feel compelled to assert more control.
The fallout from this debate illustrates the intense pressures within Biden's campaign as the election approaches. With public opinion fluctuating, the quest for a robust and unified strategy becomes critical.
In summary, President Biden's poor debate performance against Donald Trump has exposed a rift between his family and staff. Biden's family has blamed the staff for inadequate preparation, while critical figures like Bauer and Dunn have faced internal pushback but remain supported by top staffers. With public polls showing a tight race, the support of Democratic leaders remains unwavering as Biden looks to navigate the complexities of his campaign.
A video of former U.S. President Donald Trump making controversial remarks about current President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris while on a golf course with his son Barron Trump has gained massive attention online.
The video, which began circulating over the July 4 holiday, has drawn widespread sympathy for Barron Trump due to what some say was his visible discomfort during the conversation, as Total Pro Sports reports.
Donald Trump was filmed sitting in a golf cart alongside his son Barron while making scathing comments about Biden and Vice Harris.
The former president referred to Biden as a “broken-down pile of crap” and a “bad guy," furthermore claiming that Biden would bow out of the 2024 presidential race. Trump also made negative remarks about Harris, though the details of those comments were not specified.
The video in question was first brought to light by the Daily Beast. As noted by TMZ, the footage shows Trump casually discussing his thoughts on Biden and Harris with several individuals who appear to be gathered on a fairway. Trump is seen sitting comfortably in a golf cart beside Barron as he delivers his disparaging comments.
The 44-second clip shows Trump asking the group for feedback on his performance in the June 27 debate before pivoting to his harsh critiques of Biden. Barron, who recently graduated from high school, has remained relatively removed from the public eye but appears to some as visibly uncomfortable throughout the duration of the video.
The clip has ignited a wave of responses on social media, with many users focusing not on Trump’s words but on Barron’s reaction. Sympathy for Barron was the prevailing sentiment, as users commented on his apparent discomfort and lack of engagement in the conversation.
“What in the hell has Barron Trump done? How can anyone have an opinion of Barron, good or bad? We’ve heard very little about him,” one user on X, formerly known as Twitter, posted. Another remarked, “Even Barron Trump is sitting in slackjawed amazement at the crap spewing from Trump’s mouth.”
The online reaction did not stop at mere observations. Some users expressed deep concern for Barron's wellbeing, calling for wellness checks and interventions. “POOR BARRON TRUMP NEEDS A WELLNESS CHECK AND AN INTERVENTION,” urged one social media user.
Speculation about Barron’s college future has been a topic of discussion in recent months, with his interest in golf also being highlighted.
The attention has placed Barron in a complex spotlight, balancing his public persona with the heavy scrutiny that comes with his family’s political legacy.
The situation presents a contrast between Barron’s private life and the political arena his father continues to operate in.
While Donald Trump remains an active figure in political discourse, the impact on his youngest son has become a point of public empathy and concern, whether warranted or not.
According to Breitbart News, President Joe Biden openly acknowledged his missteps in a recent debate against former President Donald Trump.
During an interview, the President conveyed his confidence in winning the upcoming election despite his subpar performance.
In an interview with Wisconsin radio host Earl Ingram, released on Thursday, Biden confessed, "I had a bad night." He admitted that his debate performance against Trump did not meet his or his supporters’ expectations.
Despite the blunder, Biden remains optimistic about his prospects. He confidently stated, “we’re gonna win this election,” drawing parallels to his victory over Trump in 2020.
Biden urged voters to focus on his achievements over the last 3 1/2 years rather than solely on the 90-minute debate. He highlighted that his real track record should be the basis for evaluation by the electorate.
Central to the President's critique was Trump's stance on employment and the black community. Biden accused his rival of utilizing divisive rhetoric, particularly over “black jobs” allegedly taken by illegal immigrants.
“He’s talking about black jobs meaning only things blacks can do, manual labor, menial labor. That’s what he’s doing and that’s how he looks at it,” Biden noted, criticizing Trump's language and implications.
Biden posed the question, “Name me something he’s done to help the black community, give people a shot like I’ve gone with college and education and home-buying.” He contrasted his own contributions to the black community with Trump's actions.
The President also brought up past controversies involving Trump. He mentioned Trump’s involvement in the birther movement and his comments about George Floyd and the Central Park Five as examples of the former president's contentious positions.
Biden’s admission of a “bad night” drew reactions from various corners of the political spectrum. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, while acknowledging Biden’s lackluster performance, praised his values and core principles.
“I admit that from a performance standpoint [the debate] wasn’t great, but from a values standpoint he far outshone the other guy,” Pelosi stated. Her support underscored the deep respect for Biden’s integrity among some Democrats.
However, Senator Chris Coons reported receiving panicked responses from longtime friends and supporters concerned about the debate. These reactions suggest a significant level of unease within the party's ranks.
President Joe Biden’s admission of a poor debate against Donald Trump has stirred criticism and concern. Despite this, Biden maintains his optimism about winning the election and urges voters to focus on his track record. Key figures like Nancy Pelosi have expressed their continued support based on the president's values. The media’s significant scrutiny and internal worries among Democrats contrast with Biden's confidence and resolve.
Melania Trump responded strongly after an actor made bizarre health claims about Barron Trump, retweeting an unverified video.
According to Irish Star, a tweet and video posted by Rosie O'Donnell in 2016 suggested that Barron Trump might be autistic. This claim drew significant public attention and outrage. O'Donnell remarked on her personal experience with autism, referencing her own daughter.
The online community reacted strongly to O'Donnell's tweet. Many users defended Barron, articulating that it was inappropriate to speculate about a child's health. One user commented: "Autistic or not, the kid is not deserving of any of the -------- that’s being said about him."
Visibly angered by the rumors, Melania Trump contemplated legal measures to address the situation. Reports from TMZ confirmed Melania's rejection of the claims. Her resolve to protect her son from the invasive speculation was evident.
Rosie O'Donnell's tweet, which has since been deleted, emphasized the potential awareness that could be raised about autism. "Barron Trump Autistic? If so—what an amazing opportunity to bring attention to the AUTISM epidemic," O'Donnell commented.
A significant number of online responses were sympathetic towards the Trumps. Many users expressed dismay and anger over the spread of such rumors about a ten-year-old child. One person remarked, "It’s shameful to spread rumors about 10-year-old children."
Another user, identifying as an autism parent, stated: "I am an autism parent and I am offended that you are trying to start rumors about Barron Trump!" The sustained online backlash highlighted the public's discomfort with the personal nature of the claims.
Melania Trump’s tenacity in addressing the situation underscored her protective stance towards her family. The threat of a lawsuit signaled her readiness to confront such issues head-on.
In more recent developments, Barron Trump, now 18 years old, showcased a sense of humor about his coming of age. At a dinner party, he quipped, "I'm 18 years old, now I can get arrested for things that go on."
This remark, shared by Patrick Bet-David, host of the PBD Podcast, shed light on Barron's attitude towards growing up under public scrutiny. Bet-David had attended the event at a Florida estate where Barron made the comment.
The narrative surrounding Barron Trump's past and his mother's fierce response remains a notable instance of public and personal boundaries being challenged. Melania Trump’s actions demonstrated a commitment to her family’s privacy and well-being.
The incident in 2016, initiated by Rosie O'Donnell’s speculations, was a stark reminder of the consequences of public figures commenting on sensitive personal matters. The collective response from the public underlined the importance of respecting privacy, especially concerning children.
Melania Trump’s consideration of legal action showcased her determination to guard against unfounded rumors. Though Barron has grown older and wiser, his mother's protective nature remains unchanged.