George Foreman, the legendary former heavyweight boxer, died Friday at the age of 76.
According to Breitbart, President Donald Trump honored legendary boxer George Foreman, who passed away at age 76, praising him as a fighter with "the heaviest and biggest punch in the history of boxing."
The heavyweight champion's family announced his death on Friday, surrounded by loved ones. They described him as a devout preacher, devoted family man, and humanitarian whose life was marked by unwavering faith and purpose.
The president shared his memories of Foreman on Truth Social, emphasizing their personal connection and the boxer's larger-than-life personality. Trump's tribute highlighted both Foreman's fighting prowess and his character as a great person.
The Trump War Room X account shared a photograph capturing a moment between the president and Foreman in New York City. The image shows both men smiling, representing their longstanding friendship.
Social media erupted with tributes from fans and supporters, recognizing Foreman's contributions both inside and outside the ring. Many emphasized his Christian faith and impact on the sport of boxing.
Foreman's journey to greatness began with his Olympic gold medal victory in 1968, defeating Soviet Union's Jonas Čepulis in Mexico City. This achievement marked the beginning of his illustrious boxing career.
President Trump shared these words about the late champion:
George Foreman is dead. What a GREAT FIGHTER!!! He had, without question, the heaviest and biggest punch in the history of boxing. With the exception of Ali, when you got hit, you went down. He was something really Special, but above all, he was a Great Person, with a personality that was bigger than life.
The boxing legend's family released this statement:
A humanitarian, an Olympian, and two-time heavyweight champion of the world, He was deeply respected — a force for good, a man of discipline, conviction, and a protector of his legacy, fighting tirelessly to preserve his good name — for his family.
After retiring from boxing, Foreman demonstrated his business acumen by launching the successful George Foreman Grill. His entrepreneurial venture became as well-known as his boxing achievements.
Trump's tribute came just before his scheduled appearance at the NCAA Division I wrestling championships in Philadelphia. The timing highlighted the president's commitment to honoring sporting legends.
The news of Foreman's passing prompted an outpouring of condolences from the boxing community and beyond. His impact on sports and American culture continues to resonate. The family has requested privacy during this difficult time as they honor Foreman's extraordinary life and legacy.
George Foreman, the Olympic gold medalist, and two-time heavyweight champion, passed away at age 76, surrounded by his family. The boxing legend, known for his powerful punches and later success as an entrepreneur with the George Foreman Grill, received a heartfelt tribute from President Trump, who remembered him as both a formidable fighter and a great person with an oversized personality. The champion's death prompted widespread tributes from fans, fellow athletes, and public figures, celebrating his achievements in boxing, his Christian faith, and his contributions to American culture. As the family mourns privately, Foreman's legacy as an athlete, businessman, and humanitarian continues to inspire many.
The United States has taken steps to prevent former Argentine leaders Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner and Julio De Vido from entering the country, citing involvement in major corruption schemes.
Under the leadership of Secretary of State Marco Rubio, this action is part of a larger initiative to bar foreign officials whose values do not align with U.S. policies, and he added that the exclusion of these individuals reflects the administration's stance against corruption in foreign governments, as Newsmax reports.
The decision targets Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, who once served as Argentina's president, and Julio De Vido, the former minister of planning. Rubio revealed in an official statement that the two misused their official roles to orchestrate and financially gain from various bribery initiatives linked to public works contracts.
This decision stems from instances of corruption during their tenure, where significant funds were unlawfully diverted from the Argentine government. As a result, multiple judicial bodies have found both Kirchner and De Vido guilty of corrupt activities, impacting the trust of the Argentine people and potential investors in the nation's future.
In an effort to clarify his position, Rubio discussed the implications of the decision in an official statement. "Today, I am announcing the designation of Cristina Elisabet Fernandez de Kirchner ("CFK"), former president of Argentina, and Julio Miguel De Vido ("De Vido"), former Minister of Planning of Argentina, for their involvement in significant corruption during their time in public office," he stated, adding that this decision not only applies to Kirchner and De Vido but also affects their immediate relatives. "[It] renders CFK, De Vido, and their immediate family members generally ineligible for entry into the United States."
This action is consistent with a broader policy strategy led by the Trump administration to deny visas to foreign officials whose morals and actions conflict with the principles upheld by the United States government. The administration has already begun to implement these comprehensive visa-related restrictions.
Among the new measures, those who facilitate illegal immigration into the United States, particularly across the Southwest border, are heavily targeted. The policy specifically addresses officials connected to immigration, customs, airport, and port authorities found to be knowingly involved in assisting such activities.
The U.S. government has recently applied similar strategies in other diplomatic scenarios. A notable instance was when Secretary Rubio proclaimed the South African Ambassador to the U.S., Ebrahim Rasool, "unwelcome" due to accusations of promoting anti-American sentiments. In a social media post, Rubio emphasized that Rasool displayed racial and anti-U.S. inclinations. As a result, the ambassador was declared persona non grata, aligning with the current administration’s policy approach.
Rubio cited these incidents as testaments to the U.S. government's straightforward stance against behaviors and actions deemed contrary to its values. Such decisions, according to Rubio, are crucial in maintaining the integrity of U.S. diplomatic relations globally.
Within Argentina, the repercussions of this exclusion could have broader implications for the nation's diplomatic relationship with the United States. The ban not only reflects on the individuals involved but potentially affects future diplomatic collaborations and investments.
As Argentina grapples with these allegations of corruption by its former leaders, its image on the international stage is under scrutiny. Investors and citizens alike are watching closely, assessing the potential impacts on the country's economic and social fabric. This new phase in U.S.-Argentina relations highlights the global stance against corrupt practices by public officials. By placing accountability at the forefront of diplomatic policies, the United States aims to set a precedent that could encourage similar actions internationally.
Through these measures, the U.S. administration reflects its commitment to transparency and integrity in governance. The move to restrict entry for foreign officials found guilty of corruption signals a strong message to the international community. The overall intent of Rubio and the administration remains clear: to foster a global community where ethical governance is prioritized. By denying entry to those involved in significant scandals, the United States asserts its role as a global leader in promoting integrity.
Diplomatic relations often hinge on more than just political and economic agreements; they require a degree of mutual respect and shared ethical values. As the U.S. continues its efforts to align foreign policy actions with these principles, its influence may encourage other nations to pursue similar measures within their domains.
Elon Musk's recent visit to the Pentagon has ignited controversy following a report by the New York Times claiming his presence was tied to strategic briefings regarding potential conflict with China.
This report was firmly denied by President Donald Trump and other officials, who characterized the meeting as informal and centered on innovation, as the Daily Caller reports.
The Times had detailed Musk's attendance in a secure briefing area, usually reserved for high-level military officials, as involving the receipt of potential war strategy discussions related to China. Following that report's release, several top officials, including Trump, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell, refuted these claims, emphasizing a more benign agenda focused on improving efficiencies.
The Times published its report based on insights received from two unnamed U.S. officials. These officials indicated that Musk might have had the clearance necessary to receive top-secret information, suggesting the gravity of the purported meeting. The publication stated that the meeting was held in "the Tank," known for its high-level security during delicate military discussions.
However, shortly after the report's release, Trump as well as other government representatives came forward to dispel these allegations. Trump, known for his outspoken approach to media criticisms, labeled the piece as a fabrication. He expressed skepticism, suggesting that the Times' story stemmed from assumptions about Musk's business dealings in China rather than factual accounts.
Hegseth also weighed in, labeling the New York Times report as entirely false. He clarified the meeting's nature as an informal discussion concerning smarter production techniques and innovation. According to Hegseth, the report mischaracterized the meeting's purpose and inflated its significance.
Musk's connection to Pentagon matters mainly revolves around his involvement with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The department recently announced substantial savings by cutting contracts worth over $580 million. Musk's participation reflects ongoing efforts to enhance the efficiency of governmental operations.
The backdrop of these allegations is the heightened tension between China and Taiwan, with China conducting its largest naval drill since the 1990s in late 2024. These naval maneuvers have contributed to a fraught regional atmosphere, making any U.S. strategic considerations involving China more scrutinized. In an update, the New York Times included comments from administration officials disputing its initial report. Despite this, the publication did not issue a retraction. Furthermore, they did not provide comments to the Daily Caller News Foundation, which sought clarification.
Musk himself reacted strongly to the Times article, referring to it as mere propaganda. His statements suggested frustration with how information could be distorted and propagated by media outlets. Furthermore, he alluded to potential repercussions for those responsible for leaking what he termed as false information within the Pentagon.
The narrative that Musk's business activities in China might lead to compromised loyalties was robustly rejected by Trump. The president criticized other news outlets, particularly CNN, for sharing the report without due diligence -- a move he described as potentially libelous.
As the story developed, it drew attention to the broader dynamics among high-profile business executives and national security considerations. The involvement of tech leaders in government processes is often accompanied by significant scrutiny, especially when other global powers are involved. The Pentagon confirmed its dedication to ongoing dialogues with industry innovators to enhance national security and efficiency. This engagement falls within a broader strategy to incorporate private sector expertise in addressing governmental challenges.
Ultimately, while the New York Times' update mentioned responses from the administration, the initial report highlighted the tensions of interpreting high-profile government meetings. These issues not only impact those directly involved but also shape public perceptions of transparency and trust in media reporting.
In conclusion, both the administration's categorical denials and the New York Times' report underlined the complex interplay between media, government, and high-profile figures like Musk. As this story continues to unfold, it serves as a reminder of the critical role of accurate and responsible reporting in understanding such intricate topics.
A powerful activist organization with ties to Democratic megadonor George Soros ignites a fierce debate over Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer's leadership.
According to the New York Post, Indivisible, a progressive activist group that received over $7.6 million from Soros' Open Society Foundations since 2017, is leading efforts to force Schumer's retirement following his role in passing a six-month spending bill to prevent a federal shutdown.
The organization, which claims to have 1,600 local chapters and 10 paid staff members, has launched a campaign encouraging activists to write retirement cards for the 74-year-old Brooklyn Democrat. They are also organizing 17 home-district town hall events where Democratic Congress members will likely face questions about Schumer's future.
Republicans have seized the opportunity to question the Democratic party's leadership structure. A Trump White House official suggested the party faces a crucial decision about whether Schumer or Soros truly leads them.
NRCC spokeswoman Emily Tuttle offered this perspective:
Democrats are eating their own — selling out to the far-left crazies and mega-donors who are funding clown show protests across the country. It's painfully obvious that George Soros doesn't believe that 'Leaders' [Hakeem] Jeffries or Schumer have the backbone to lead.
A source close to Alex Soros, who now manages his father's investment fortune, dismissed these claims as right-wing fantasy. They emphasized that the Soros family has not taken an official stance against Schumer.
Indivisible's co-executive director, Ezra Levin, has been particularly vocal about the need for new leadership. His statement following the spending bill passage was unequivocal:
Senator Schumer should step aside as leader. Every Democrat in the Senate should call for him to do so, and begin making plans for new leadership immediately.
The organization argues that Democrats missed a crucial opportunity to leverage the spending fight to their advantage. Instead, they claim Schumer's actions represented a surrender to Republican interests.
The controversy has sparked discussions about the influence of progressive donor networks on Democratic party decisions. Some party members have begun expressing cautious criticism of Schumer's leadership.
Senator Michael Bennet of Colorado addressed the situation during a town hall event, suggesting that leaders should recognize when it's time to step down. However, he stopped short of explicitly calling for Schumer's resignation.
The situation has become further complicated by Indivisible's involvement in other political battles, including protests against Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency initiative. The group has offered financial support to activists participating in "Musk or Us" themed demonstrations.
The push for Schumer's retirement represents a significant challenge to Democratic party unity at a crucial political moment. Indivisible, backed by Soros foundation funding, continues to organize opposition to Schumer's leadership following his decision to support the federal spending bill.
While Schumer maintains his position and has defended his choices as necessary to prevent a government shutdown, the controversy has exposed deep divisions within the Democratic party about its direction and leadership. The situation remains fluid as activists prepare for upcoming town hall events where they plan to pressure more Democratic representatives to take a stand on Schumer's leadership.
Former First Lady Michelle Obama maintains a unique nightly routine that differs from her husband's preferences.
According to Page Six, Michelle Obama revealed on the upcoming episode of "Not Gonna Lie with Kylie Kelce" podcast that her early bedtime habits have become a playful point of contention with Barack Obama. The former president often teases her about her preference for turning in shortly after dinner.
The 61-year-old Obama expressed her enthusiasm for bedtime, describing it as the best part of her day. She particularly enjoys slipping into quality sheets when the temperature is cool, though she maintains flexibility with her schedule when entertaining guests at their home.
The bedtime revelation comes amid recent public discussions about the Obamas' relationship dynamics. Their different approaches to punctuality have emerged as another point of adjustment in their marriage, with Michelle recently sharing on her "IMO" podcast about Barack's tendency toward tardiness.
The couple, who celebrated their marriage in 1992, have demonstrated growth in their relationship spanning more than three decades. Barack has made efforts to adapt to Michelle's stringent timekeeping preferences, showing improvement throughout their marriage.
Their union has produced two daughters, Malia and Sasha, now 26 and 23 respectively. The family continues to maintain strong bonds despite their grown children pursuing their own paths.
Barack Obama's solo appearances at several high-profile events have sparked public interest in the couple's relationship. His unaccompanied attendance at President Jimmy Carter's funeral and a Washington, DC dinner has drawn attention from media outlets.
Sources close to Michelle have explained her absence from certain events, particularly noting her decision to distance herself from specific political gatherings. An insider emphasized that her choices reflect genuine personal convictions rather than mere political posturing.
The former first lady has reportedly distanced herself from Washington, DC's political scene, choosing to focus on other aspects of her life and work.
Despite speculation about their relationship, the Obamas continue to express their devotion publicly. Barack's Valentine's Day message to Michelle demonstrated their enduring affection. He shared on social media: "Thirty-two years together and you still take my breath away."
Michelle responded with equal warmth, affirming their solid foundation: "You're my rock. Always have been. Always will be."
Michelle and Barack Obama's relationship continues to evolve after their time in the White House, with their differing sleep schedules and time management styles highlighting the natural adjustments within their marriage.
While Michelle maintains her early bedtime routine and has stepped back from Washington's political circles, Barack continues his public engagements. Despite occasional separate appearances and varying daily routines, the couple consistently reinforces their commitment through public declarations and shared values.
Fox News host Kayleigh McEnany made a heartfelt announcement on Monday that left viewers surprised.
As reported by Breitbart News, McEnany revealed that she and her husband, former Mets pitcher Sean Gilmartin, are expecting their third child, due in June. The couple shared the news during a segment on Outnumbered, where McEnany displayed an ultrasound and expressed her joy over the pregnancy.
McEnany described the experience as a “special time,” noting that she has been pregnant during both Christmas and Thanksgiving. She also shared how their daughter, Blake, has been excitedly interacting with her growing belly, often saying, “Let me kiss the baby.” The Fox News co-host emphasized her faith, referencing Bible verses to highlight the significance of the pregnancy.
During the segment, McEnany quoted Jeremiah 1:5, which states, “Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you,” and Luke 12:7, which speaks of God’s intimate knowledge of every individual. She explained that these verses were not just about her baby but a reminder of God’s love for everyone.
McEnany also brought humor to the moment, joking about her tight jacket and asking, “Can I unbutton my jacket now?” Her lightheartedness added a personal touch to the announcement, making it relatable to viewers.
The announcement sparked an outpouring of congratulations on social media. One user wrote, “Congratulations Kayleigh! The Lord is Great! Praise Jesus for His grace and love and may He bless you and your family!” Another commenter described the pregnancy as “definitely the greatest gift from God.”
McEnany, who served as White House press secretary during President Donald Trump’s first term, has often been praised for her articulate and unwavering presence in the political arena. However, this announcement highlighted her role as a devoted wife and mother, adding a new dimension to her public persona.
The couple already has two children, Blake and Nash, and the upcoming addition will expand their family to five. McEnany’s announcement not only celebrated the new life but also underscored her commitment to balancing her career and family life.
Her tenure as press secretary was marked by her sharp defense of the Trump administration, and her transition to Fox News has allowed her to continue engaging with political discourse.
However, this personal milestone has shifted the focus to her family and faith, offering a glimpse into her life beyond the political spotlight.
Kayleigh McEnany’s announcement of her third pregnancy has been met with widespread joy and support. The Fox News co-host shared the news with a mix of faith, humor, and personal anecdotes, making it a memorable moment for her viewers.
McEnany and her husband, Sean Gilmartin, are preparing to welcome their third child in June, adding to their family of four.
The announcement not only highlights McEnany’s role as a mother but also reinforces her faith-centered approach to life. As she continues her career in media, this new chapter promises to bring both personal and professional fulfillment.
The Senate took action to prevent an impending financial crisis for Washington, D.C. on Friday by approving a bill that safeguards its $1 billion local budget from cuts.
The legislation allows D.C. to continue operating at its fiscal 2025 budget levels, addressing a legislative oversight in a recently approved stopgap government funding bill, as The Hill reports.
Susan Collins, Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, explained the necessity of the measure, emphasizing it corrects an omission in the larger funding bill. She elaborated that the funding bill failed to include typical language permitting D.C. to expend its own tax revenues, despite Congress routinely endorsing such authorizations.
Under current conditions of home rule, D.C.'s budget remains subject to congressional oversight. The larger government funding bill passed earlier did not provide the standard allowance for D.C. to spend at its approved fiscal level. Consequently, this deficiency would force D.C. to operate under outdated fiscal 2024 numbers, significantly impacting essential city services.
A swift solution became imperative to avert cuts to critical services. A Democratic-led proposal to maintain D.C.'s funding at 2025 levels was previously unsuccessful. An amendment to the primary funding bill would have required a fresh vote in the House, thus delaying the process.
Democrat Sen. Tim Kaine noted cautious optimism, emphasizing the need for expeditious action after Congress resumes session following a break. He underscored that while the House remains inactive next week, adjustments to the resolution could occur without urgency to avoid a government shutdown.
Kaine confirmed that Trump has pledged support for the measure. "We talked about it at some length, and we got a commitment from President Trump that he would sign it," he said. This assurance provided a level of comfort regarding the execution of D.C.'s fiscal plans.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer hailed the legislation as beneficial for D.C. residents, including law enforcement, teachers, and basic city services. Schumer championed its passage for preventing negative effects on daily operations.
Compounding the urgency is D.C.'s preparation for a significant milestone. Sen. Mark Warner highlighted the broader implications on upcoming events, notably the 250th anniversary celebrations of America's founding in 2026. He argued, "We want to show off D.C. and the whole region. If we allow this mistake to take place, D.C. will lay off cops, it’ll close schools, it’ll shut down on trash removal."
Warner stressed the importance of correcting the error to ensure D.C. and its surroundings are showcased as an ideal destination for millions of tourists in a pivotal year.
Sen. Rick Scott emphasized the straightforwardness of the legislative process used to approve the bill, expressing satisfaction with the efficiency of the voice vote method employed by the Senate.
In summary, the Senate demonstrated bipartisanship by rectifying a crucial oversight in the government funding strategy, aiming to protect D.C.'s operational capacity. The resolution now faces scrutiny from the House and awaits President Trump's endorsement, essential steps for completing the legislative trajectory. Given occasions like the anticipated 2026 anniversary celebrations, the significance of these fiscal decisions transcends mere policy adjustments, bearing broader national and cultural importance.
D.C.'s budget sustainability stands as a critical concern as lawmakers navigate the nuances of federal oversight and local autonomy. The onus now lies on the House to expedite discussions and streamline the completion of legislative procedures after its recess.
An official from South Africa was expelled from the U.S. following a lecture in which he criticized President Donald Trump, highlighting significant diplomatic tensions between the two nations.
The U.S. officially declared the South African official as "persona non grata," citing remarks made in a lecture about Trump's role in a supposed global movement, as Breitbart reports.
The announcement of the expulsion came from Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who posted the news on X, formerly known as Twitter, late Friday afternoon. Rubio's announcement referenced an article from Breitbart News, which detailed the contentious lecture delivered by the South African official earlier the same day.
During the lecture to a South African think tank, the expelled official, Rasool, discussed various geopolitical issues while particularly focusing on Trump. He labeled Trump as the leader of a purported global white supremacist movement, attributing demographic changes in the U.S. and the response from the "MAGA" movement to a larger trend of perceived white victimhood.
The controversial lecture was reportedly the catalyst for Rasool's removal from his post as an ambassador to the U.S. Rasool's criticism of Trump was perceived as an affront by some, given its far-reaching claims about the former president's influence beyond American borders.
In his address, Rasool suggested that Trump's actions amounted to an assault on those currently in power through the mobilization of supremacist ideologies. "At home, and abroad as well, there is a mobilization of supremacism against incumbency," Rasool asserted during his lecture. His address included references to broader socio-political issues, including global demographic shifts and how certain movements are oriented toward protecting white communities. The lecture was not solely focused on Trump but also touched upon several contentious international topics.
Rasool's diplomatic history includes support for Hamas, which has previously led to American officials reportedly steering clear of meetings with him. This past support appears to have added another layer of complexity to his relationship with U.S. diplomats.
In the broader context, Rasool's expulsion is symptomatic of the increasingly strained diplomatic relations between the U.S. and South Africa. The two countries have butted heads over South Africa's expropriation laws and its cordial diplomatic relations with countries like China and Iran. More recently, South Africa's stance concerning Russia's actions in Ukraine and its efforts to diplomatically isolate Israel, following the Hamas attack in late 2023, have intensified these tensions.
Adding to the diplomatic tensions, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has openly criticized the Trump administration. In a widely read op-ed, he challenged Trump on his decision to restore sanctions against the International Criminal Court (ICC), a move deemed controversial by South African leadership.
The contention over international law and diplomatic alliances reflects broader geopolitical divides, as underscored by Rasool's address. The lecture positioned Trump within a narrative of global political shifts, which is reflective of the ongoing dialogue on white supremacism and power dynamics. These assertions underscore the current geopolitical landscape's complexity, where domestic policies are perceived to have worldwide repercussions. The expulsion is not merely an isolated event but part of a larger diplomatic discourse between nations.
While Rasool's statements were the spark for his expulsion, the action may also be a reflection of the broader diplomatic caution that defines U.S. interactions with South Africa. The concerns presented by Rasool dovetail with a host of ongoing international issues both countries are facing. Despite the expulsion, these tensions are indicative of wider, longstanding issues that involve strategies, alliances, and regional power dynamics.
The decision to expel Rasool is consistent with past responses to criticisms poised against U.S. policy and leadership, signaling an ongoing pattern within international diplomacy. The ramifications of this action are likely to resound in political corridors globally.
The future of U.S.-South Africa relations remains uncertain as each nation navigates its stance amid the shifting global political landscape. The expulsion adds another layer to this evolving relationship, challenging both nations to redefine their diplomatic engagement strategies in the wake of ongoing disputes.