President Donald Trump stirs controversy with an explosive social media post about Bill and Hillary Clinton's alleged involvement in numerous deaths over several decades.
According to Daily Mail, Trump shared a video on Truth Social titled "THE VIDEO HILLARY CLINTON DOES NOT WANT YOU TO SEE," which attempts to connect the former First Lady and President Bill Clinton to several high-profile deaths, including John F. Kennedy Jr., DNC staffer Seth Rich, and former White House lawyer Vince Foster.
The controversial footage pushes the "Clinton Body Bags" conspiracy theory, which has circulated since the 1990s.
The video suggests Hillary Clinton orchestrated JFK Jr.'s fatal plane crash in 1999 because he was reportedly a frontrunner for the New York Senate seat she later won. Trump did not provide any personal commentary alongside the post.
The video claims Mary Mahoney, a former White House intern during Bill Clinton's administration, was murdered in 1997 because she allegedly knew details about Clinton's sexual misconduct. It also questions the circumstances surrounding Vince Foster's death by suicide in 1993, highlighting that investigators never found the bullet.
James McDougal, a key witness for White House prosecutors, is another figure mentioned in the video. According to the footage, McDougal suffered a fatal heart attack in solitary confinement in 2015 before he was scheduled to testify before a grand jury.
The video also discusses former White House Chef Walter Scheib, whose body was found at the bottom of a river. Though his death was ruled an accidental drowning, the video suggests he "might have known too much."
This is not Trump's first time sharing controversial theories about the Clintons. In 2019, he retweeted posts suggesting Bill and Hillary Clinton were connected to Jeffrey Epstein's death in prison.
The 2019 retweets included claims that unsealed court documents revealed "top Democrats, including Bill Clinton, took private trips to Jeffrey Epstein's 'pedophilia island.'" Trump also shared posts from conservative actor Terrence K. Williams questioning Epstein's death while on suicide watch.
Fact-checkers have repeatedly debunked the claims presented in the video over the decades. However, the conspiracy theories continue to circulate among certain political circles.
The latest social media post from Trump comes as he continues his presidential campaign amid various legal challenges. The video specifically mentions seven deaths it claims are connected to the Clintons, including the most recent case of Seth Rich, a 27-year-old DNC staffer killed in Washington D.C. in 2016.
The conspiracy video suggests Rich was murdered in retaliation for allegedly leaking controversial DNC emails. It also mentions Sean Lucas, though details about his connection to the DNC case remain unclear in the footage.
While Trump's sharing of the video has generated significant attention, neither Bill nor Hillary Clinton have publicly responded to these latest allegations. The video's origin and creator remain unknown, though its claims align with long-circulating conspiracy theories about the political couple.
International Criminal Court Prosecutor Karim Khan has stepped aside as an external investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct moves forward.
The United Nations’ internal oversight office is examining claims against Khan, a development that coincides with heightened scrutiny of the ICC’s recent arrest warrants targeting Israeli and Hamas leaders, as Fox News reports.
The ICC confirmed Friday that Khan will be on leave until the investigation concludes. The inquiry is being led by the United Nations Office of Internal Oversight Services, which serves as the U.N.’s internal watchdog. Khan has denied all allegations of inappropriate conduct.
Initial reports of the alleged misconduct surfaced last year in May, when two ICC staff members said a victim had privately shared accusations involving Khan. The ICC’s in-house watchdog launched a short inquiry, speaking with the alleged victim but ending the probe after five days when she declined to file a formal complaint.
Although the inquiry closed without a formal conclusion, the watchdog recommended Khan reduce direct interaction with the woman to help maintain confidence in the court. Khan himself was not interviewed during that initial review.
The situation escalated over the past week as media outlets, including the Associated Press and Fox News Digital, highlighted the unresolved misconduct claims. Fox News asked both the court and Khan if he would resign or face removal soon. Khan’s decision to pause his duties followed shortly after.
Women's rights organizations had previously pushed for Khan's resignation when the accusations first emerged. At the time, he refused. Now, with an external investigation under way, he has agreed to step back temporarily from his role. Attorneys from the British law firm Carter-Ruck Solicitors, who represent Khan, issued a statement denying all claims against him. They said he is cooperating fully with the UN-led inquiry and has done nothing wrong.
While the misconduct investigation was unfolding, Khan made international headlines with the ICC’s decision to seek arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, and three senior Hamas leaders. These charges follow the outbreak of war in October 2023, when Hamas militants entered Israel and killed more than 1,200 people, including several Americans.
Khan had reportedly canceled a planned visit to Israel and Gaza shortly before making the announcement, adding fuel to suspicions that the timing of the prosecutions may have been politically motivated. Critics have questioned whether Khan’s move was an attempt to redirect attention away from the allegations against him. Lawyers for Khan defended the prosecutorial decision, saying that the ICC's judges approved the arrest warrants after determining the evidence met legal requirements under the Rome Statute. They also rejected claims that the timing of the filing was influenced by personal matters.
Legal scholars have voiced sharp criticism of the court’s operations. Eugene Kontorovich, a constitutional law professor and expert on international law, claimed that Khan's departure doesn’t go far enough. He said that deeper institutional failings at the ICC have allowed such issues to persist unchecked. Kontorovich went further by arguing that the misconduct scandal jeopardizes not only the charges brought by Khan but also casts doubt on previous prosecutions. He cited the court’s limited success over its 25-year existence -- only six final convictions for atrocity crimes—to support his argument that the ICC should be shut down altogether.
Hillel Neuer, head of U.N. Watch, suggested that Khan’s leave is a strategic move to protect the court's image while continuing what he called politically driven legal actions against Israel. He emphasized that the controversy extends beyond any one individual, challenging the motives behind the court's recent high-profile prosecutions.
Israeli officials have requested the ICC withdraw the warrants filed against its leaders, labeling the court's decisions as biased and unjust. However, the ICC has made no public move to retract its actions. A spokesperson declined to speculate on the status of the warrants, citing a pending procedural request.
In one especially controversial twist, President Donald Trump imposed sanctions on Khan in February 2025. The move heightened tensions between the ICC and the U.S. and complicated global perceptions of the court's impartiality in prosecuting international crimes. Adding to the intrigue, critics highlighted past writings by Khan that seemed to contrast with his current actions. In 2013, he published an academic piece suggesting that prosecutions like Netanyahu’s would be legally flawed, as the ICC was unequipped to ensure fair judicial processes in such cases.
So far, the Office of Internal Oversight Services has not disclosed a timeline for the investigation’s conclusion. Meanwhile, Khan remains on leave, with court operations continuing under interim leadership. The outcome of the inquiry may shape the direction and credibility of the ICC for years to come. UN officials declined to weigh in on the matter, pointing to the International Criminal Court’s status as an independent body. While the U.N.’s inspector general office leads the investigation, the judicial institution makes decisions separately from U.N. political branches.
With both legal and public attention focused heavily on the court, the ICC faces growing pressure to demonstrate transparency, accountability and adherence to legal norms. The results of the misconduct inquiry and subsequent handling by court leadership may define how the institution moves forward in the wake of deepening controversy.
House Democrats have initiated a probe into former President Donald Trump's acceptance of a $400 million jet from Qatar, stirring discussions over constitutional implications and potential conflicts of interest.
Democrats are questioning whether the former president's acceptance of the jet contravenes the Foreign Emoluments Clause, with a legal memo authored by Attorney General Pam Bondi becoming a central focus, as Fox News reports.
The investigation, spearheaded by Rep. Jamie Raskin of the House Judiciary Committee, aims to scrutinize the circumstances surrounding the costly gift from the Qatari government to Trump.
A letter was dispatched to Bondi and White House counsel David Warrington, urging the disclosure of a legal memorandum reportedly validating Trump’s acceptance of the plane. This memo, according to the Democrats, clashes with the constitutional clause prohibiting presidents from receiving foreign gifts without Congress's sanction.
Democrats have expressed unease over the possibility that Trump or his close associates might have solicited what they describe as a bribe. This suspicion arises partly due to Trump’s displeasure with Boeing’s delays in delivering a new Air Force One, after which the Qatari plane was dubbed "a nice gesture" by Trump.
A planned donation to Trump’s presidential library following his term has also been highlighted, implying it could serve as a bribe, according to the Democrats. Additional documents and communications related to the plane’s transfer are being requested by House Judiciary Committee Democrats.
However, in the face of Republican majority control, compelling compliance presents a challenge. The Democrats are raising ethical concerns over Bondi’s involvement, as she previously lobbied for Qatar, earning substantial amounts of money for her advocacy.
In light of the investigation, Trump took to Truth Social to defend his actions, criticizing Democrats for their concerns over what he described as a transparent transaction. Trump pointed out that, even without the plane being for his personal use, Democrats should not be preoccupied with a gift received openly. His remarks suggested a tactic of redirecting the issue towards Democrats’ alleged inadequacies.
Meanwhile, Senate Republicans have expressed limited knowledge of the unfolding situation, while Speaker Mike Johnson refrained from delving into specifics. Speaker Johnson noted that gifts from other nations are routine, leaving further details to the administration, which is better versed in the matter. The probe comes amid Trump’s ongoing diplomatic visit to several Middle Eastern countries, including Qatar, adding another layer of complexity to the events.
The legal memo, allegedly composed by Bondi and Warrington, that deems the gift legally permissible, has become a fulcrum of the Democrats’ argument. They assert that any such memo flies in the face of constitutional mandates, which explicitly state that Congress holds the authority to endorse or reject gifts offered by foreign states to a sitting president. The role of the attorney general, as suggested by the Democrats, becomes problematic due to Bondi's earlier professional ties as a lobbyist for Qatar.
The situation has raised serious questions regarding potential conflicts of interest, as well as broader concerns about the potential influence of foreign powers in presidential affairs. The Democrats' assertion that Bondi’s past registration as an official agent for Qatar undermines her neutrality seeks to lead the inquiry into its next phase.
The plane's intended donation to his future presidential library draws attention not only to Trump himself but also to how he intends to shape his post-presidency legacy. The Democrats argue this could serve as further evidence of a conflict between personal benefits and national interests, especially when a foreign nation is involved in such a major transaction.
As the investigation proceeds, attention could shift towards further potential insights from the memo and whether it provides a solid enough legal basis to quell the current storm. For now, the dilemma remains whether the jet represents innocent statecraft or if it undermines the foundational values encapsulated in the nation's Constitution.
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard removes two high-ranking officials from their positions at the National Intelligence Council, sparking concerns about political interference in intelligence matters.
According to NBC News, the dismissals of Michael Collins and Maria Langan-Riekhof came after their oversight of an intelligence assessment that challenged President Trump's claims about the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua's connection to the Maduro regime.
The intelligence assessment, which represented a consensus among intelligence agencies except the FBI, concluded that the gang does not operate under the direction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro's government. This finding contradicted the Trump administration's justification for invoking the Alien Enemies Act, a rarely used 1798 law, to expedite the deportation of suspected gang members without standard due process procedures.
The White House has maintained that Tren de Aragua operates as an extension of the Venezuelan government, using this claim to justify extraordinary measures for gang member deportation. The administration's unprecedented use of the Alien Enemies Act marks the first time the law has been employed outside of wartime circumstances.
Gabbard's office defended the dismissals through spokesperson Olivia Coleman, who emphasized the director's commitment to working with President Trump to prevent politicization within the Intelligence Community. Deputy Chief of Staff Alexa Henning specifically cited political bias as the reason for the officials' removal.
Far-right activist Laura Loomer had previously called for action against the National Intelligence Council, specifically targeting Collins in social media posts last month. Loomer, who claimed credit for the recent dismissal of NSA overseer Gen. Timothy Haugh, questioned the council's motives in challenging the administration's stance on the gang.
Former CIA Director John Brennan expressed serious concerns about the implications of the firings for the intelligence community. He warned that the dismissals send a threatening message to analysts throughout the intelligence sector.
It's clearly a signal to tell analysts throughout the intelligence community: 'you tell the truth, you provide objective analysis, as you're supposed to be doing, you are running the risk of getting fired. They are two of the most experienced, accomplished, and talented analysts in the entire U.S. intelligence community.
Jonathan Panikoff, a former National Intelligence Council analyst, emphasized the organization's crucial role in providing nonpartisan intelligence analysis. Democratic lawmakers have strongly criticized the move, with Senator Mark Warner describing it as a politically motivated purge.
Representative Jim Himes, the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, has taken formal action by demanding explanations from Gabbard. His letter requires evidence supporting the allegations of political bias against the dismissed officials within a week's deadline.
The House Intelligence Committee's involvement highlights growing concerns about proper notification procedures. Himes noted that such significant personnel changes should have been communicated to congressional intelligence committees as required by law.
Democratic legislators argue that the dismissals represent a dangerous precedent of punishing career intelligence professionals for producing analyses that contradict administration positions. The controversy has intensified debates about the independence of intelligence agencies under the current administration.
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard terminated two senior intelligence officials after they oversaw an assessment challenging the White House's claims about Venezuelan gang connections. The dismissed officials, Michael Collins and Maria Langan-Riekhof, had decades of experience in intelligence analysis and were responsible for a memo that questioned the administration's justification for using the Alien Enemies Act against Tren de Aragua gang members.
The former Treasury official and conservative media personality embarks on a new role in President Trump's administration.
According to Fox News, Monica Crowley received Senate confirmation on Monday evening to serve as assistant secretary of state and chief of protocol with the rank of ambassador.
The confirmation marks a significant milestone for Crowley, who previously served in the Trump administration and received recognition for her work at the Treasury Department with the Alexander Hamilton Award. Her extensive background includes roles as a Fox News contributor, foreign affairs analyst, and research assistant to former President Richard Nixon.
President Trump highlighted the importance of Crowley's new position in a December statement, emphasizing her responsibility for overseeing several landmark events. These include America's 250th birthday celebration in 2026, the FIFA World Cup in 2026, and the 2028 Olympic Games in Los Angeles. The U.S. Travel Association expressed strong support for her nomination, recognizing the strategic importance of these upcoming events.
The organization's CEO, Geoff Freeman, shared his thoughts on Crowley's appointment:
The speed with which this decision was made gives us great confidence that Trump will seek to maximize the opportunities of the decade of sports and events that lies ahead. Landmark moments will attract millions of travelers to America and showcase the best of our great nation while creating a lasting benefit to our economy.
Crowley's professional journey began during former President Richard Nixon's post-presidency period, where she worked as a research assistant. This experience led to her authoring the book "Nixon Off the Record." She later joined Fox News Channel in 1996, becoming a prominent conservative voice alongside Sean Hannity on various programs.
Her academic credentials include a doctorate in international relations from Columbia University. Throughout her career, she has received multiple accolades, including the Woman of the Year award in 2010 from the Clare Boothe Luce Center for Conservative Women. Crowley's media presence extended beyond news commentary, including an appearance as herself in the television series "House of Cards."
During Trump's first term, Crowley faced controversy when plagiarism allegations regarding her doctoral dissertation emerged. These claims led to her withdrawal from a planned National Security Council position, though she maintained that the accusations were politically motivated, describing them as a "hit job."
The Arizona native's extensive experience in both media and government sectors has positioned her uniquely for this diplomatic role.
Her previous work in the Trump administration and understanding of international relations align with the requirements of her new position as chief of protocol.
Monica Crowley's confirmation as assistant secretary of state and chief of protocol represents a significant advancement in her public service career.
The Senate's approval positions her to oversee crucial upcoming national events that will showcase American diplomacy and culture to the world. Her responsibilities will include coordinating major international gatherings and representing the administration in diplomatic functions through 2028.
The role combines Crowley's experience in government service with her background in international relations, preparing her to manage America's diplomatic protocols during several historically significant events. With the confirmation process complete, she is set to begin her duties as a key figure in shaping America's diplomatic presence during these landmark occasions.
President Donald Trump's social media announcement about Qatar's gift of a luxury Boeing 747 jet to serve as a temporary Air Force One has sparked controversy and conflicting statements from Qatari officials.
According to Breitbart, Trump took to Truth Social to defend the proposed arrangement, which would see Qatar providing a luxury aircraft to the U.S. Defense Department at no cost, while criticizing Democrats who oppose the deal.
The situation has become more complex after Qatar's Media Attaché to the U.S., Ali Al-Ansari, contradicted Trump's announcement. Al-Ansari stated that reports about Qatar gifting a jet during Trump's upcoming visit were inaccurate, explaining that discussions between Qatar's Ministry of Defense and the U.S. Department of Defense regarding a temporary aircraft transfer were still under review by legal departments.
Sources familiar with the proposed arrangement revealed details about the unprecedented gift. The luxury Boeing 747-8 jumbo jet would serve as the new Air Force One during Trump's presidency, with ownership later transferring to the Trump presidential library foundation.
White House and Department of Justice lawyers have drafted an analysis for Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Their findings suggest the Defense Department can legally accept the aircraft from Qatar and subsequently transfer ownership to Trump's presidential library foundation.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt emphasized the administration's commitment to transparency, stating that any foreign government gifts would comply with all applicable laws.
The potential Qatar deal comes amid ongoing delays in Boeing's delivery of new Air Force One aircraft. Trump finalized a contract with Boeing in 2018 for two replacement presidential aircraft.
The original completion timeline for the new Air Force One planes has faced significant setbacks. Initially scheduled for 2024, the delivery dates have been pushed to 2027 for the first plane and 2028 for the second.
Trump's February tour of a new Boeing plane highlighted these delays. During an Oval Office meeting with reporters, he expressed dissatisfaction with Boeing's failure to meet the original timeline for producing the replacement presidential aircraft.
The proposed Qatar gift would represent the most valuable gift ever extended to the United States from a foreign government. The arrangement has drawn attention from both supporters and critics of the administration.
The luxury Boeing 747-8 aircraft has been described as a "flying palace," suggesting its exceptional amenities and technological capabilities. Trump personally inspected the aircraft during his February visit.
The proposed transfer mechanism, involving temporary use as Air Force One followed by transfer to Trump's presidential library foundation, has raised questions about the precedent it might set for future foreign government gifts.
The Qatar luxury jet announcement highlights the ongoing challenges with presidential aircraft procurement and maintenance. While Trump confirms Qatar's intention to provide a free Boeing 747, Qatari officials maintain that final decisions are pending legal review. The proposed arrangement involves multiple stakeholders, including the U.S. Defense Department, Qatar's Ministry of Defense, and various legal departments from both countries.