Vice President Kamala Harris delivered a rallying speech that underscored her determination and resilience at a vital fundraising event.
NPR reported that Vice President Harris called herself an underdog with momentum, speaking boldly about the stakes of the presidential election and brushing off Donald Trump's latest attacks.
Held at the Colonial Theatre in Pittsfield, Mass., the event marked a significant step in Harris' campaign. Roughly 800 supporters gathered on Saturday to hear Harris make her case for why she believes her campaign is gaining momentum despite the challenges ahead.
Harris set an ambitious goal for the evening to raise over $1.4 million. The energized and supportive attendees served as a testament to the grassroots support she highlighted during her speech.
During her address, Harris presented her campaign as a stark choice between two distinct visions for America. She spoke about the need for continued progress and called for unity in confronting threats to freedoms.
"We got a fight ahead of us and we are the underdogs in this race," Harris declared with resolve. She painted a vivid picture of the contrast between her vision and that of her opponents, emphasizing the necessity of a forward-thinking agenda.
Central to her message were themes of freedom, including voting rights, protection from gun violence, and reproductive freedom. Harris stressed these issues as integral to her platform, advocating for a country rooted in compassion and lawful governance.
Harris did not shy away from criticizing former President Donald Trump and his running mate, Sen. JD Vance. She accused them of attempting to roll back societal progress and instigating chaos, fear, and hatred.
"Do we want to live in a country of freedom, compassion and rule of law or a country of chaos, fear and hate?" Harris asked, challenging the crowd to reflect on the values they wish to uphold.
She addressed Trump's rhetoric head-on, referring to his claims about her record as "wild lies." Harris reassured her audience that the integrity of her campaign remained intact despite such attacks.
Embracing her role as the underdog, Harris rallied her supporters by highlighting the grassroots nature of her campaign. She expressed confidence that this approach would generate the momentum needed for a victory in November.
"This campaign is not just about us vs. Donald Trump," Harris stated, reiterating that the stakes extend far beyond a simple political contest. For Harris, the election represents a pivotal moment in defining the nation’s future trajectory.
Vice President Kamala Harris' first fundraising event as the Democratic presidential candidate was a pivotal moment that underscored her campaign's themes of progress, freedom, and compassion. She positioned herself as a resilient underdog ready to confront challenges and emphasized the stark contrast between her vision and that of her opponent, Donald Trump.
Fox 2 Detroit morning anchor Amy Andrews has recently shared the heartbreaking reason behind her absence from the airwaves was because of severe depression and anxiety.
Daily Mail reported that Andrews, who is well-known for her advocacy on mental health issues, revealed she has temporarily left her post to focus on treatment and recovery.
On Sunday, Amy Andrews publicly announced her condition and the need to step back from her duties at Fox 2 Detroit. Andrews expressed her sincere commitment to addressing her mental health struggles in order to return to her viewers in good health.
In an emotional post, Andrews admitted that her severe depression and anxiety had resurfaced, compelling her to take a necessary break. “I’ve stepped away from the anchor desk temporarily to battle with all I have,” she shared, articulating her determination to regain stability and return to the morning show.
This isn't the first time Andrews has faced such challenges. On May 18, she had announced a brief hiatus to address health issues but had returned to the air after what she hoped had been enough time to heal.
The Detroit community is familiar with her candid discussions about mental health. She has consistently utilized her platform to advocate for mental health awareness.
In June 2022, Andrews managed to come back to work after enduring similar battles. Her history of openness regarding her personal mental health struggles has already inspired many of her viewers.
Going back to 2019, Amy Andrews participated in a charity walk at Detroit's riverfront in support of the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (AFSP). This foundation aims to raise awareness and support for those struggling with mental health issues.
Andrews has drawn strength from her interactions with the audience and community throughout her journey. Speaking about her colleague Jessica Starr, who tragically died by suicide in 2018, Andrews urged everyone to be kinder and more understanding as people often battle unseen struggles.
In 2018, she took to social media to encourage open conversations about mental health. “You can have a #RealConvo with me today and any day if you’re feeling bad or have questions,” Andrews posted, underlining her commitment to being approachable and supportive.
The American Foundation for Suicide Prevention Michigan Chapter has recognized Andrews for her relentless advocacy. On July 19, they extended their gratitude to her, stating, “Thank you, Amy, for being such a fierce mental health warrior."
The response to Andrews' latest announcement has been overwhelmingly supportive. Viewers, colleagues, and mental health advocates have rallied around her, offering words of encouragement and understanding.
Andrews has not shied away from sharing her vulnerabilities. "We never know what others are dealing with," she wrote, emphasizing the need for compassion. She also thanked Fox 2 Detroit for their understanding and for giving her the much-needed time away to focus on her well-being.
In conclusion, Amy Andrews' announcement illuminates the ongoing struggles of mental health, further reinforcing her role as a prominent advocate. Her sense of duty to her well-being and her viewers is commendable. The Detroit community and beyond continue to support Andrews, anxiously awaiting her return to the morning news.
According to Just The News, the GOP-led House ended its session before the August recess without completing the 12 appropriations bills, breaking its promise to voters.
This situation heightens the likelihood of Congress resorting to another temporary Continuing Resolution to keep federal operations afloat.
Last October, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., assured colleagues that the House would not go on August recess unless all 12 appropriations bills were passed. However, the Republicans in the House canceled votes for the following week and will reconvene in early September, cutting short their session initially scheduled to last until August 1.
Federal appropriations are set to expire on September 30. So far, only five of the 12 appropriations bills for the fiscal year 2025 have passed in the House. To avoid a government shutdown, a continuing resolution must be passed by October 1, with Congress returning from recess on September 9.
House Republicans have faced internal conflicts over budget negotiations, leading to disruptions in the process. Former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., lost his position due to disagreements over spending cuts within the party. Speaker Johnson nearly faced a similar fate, as Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., threatened to oust him after he supported a $1.2 trillion "minibus" spending package.
Last Wednesday, Republicans managed to pass one of the fiscal year 2025 spending bills after several failed or tied votes. According to an unnamed Republican lawmaker, the vote saw significant pressure from the whip team on members of different factions, including the Freedom Caucus and moderates.
Majority Whip Tom Emmer, R-Minn., mentioned that he has refrained from bringing forth bills that might fail due to lack of support. Earlier in the week, the House postponed a vote on the Department of Energy funding bill over concerns about its cost.
Disagreements among GOP lawmakers regarding abortion and contraceptive protections in certain legislations have further hindered progress on appropriations measures.
Several crucial funding bills were put on hold due to internal conflicts. Bills intended to fund the Agriculture Department, the Food and Drug Administration, and Financial Services were not taken up as initially planned. Earlier in the month, the House failed to pass a $7 billion funding bill for parts of the legislative branch after 10 Republicans joined Democrats in voting against it.
The last vote before the recess involved a resolution criticizing Vice President Kamala Harris' performance as "border czar," which passed 220-196 with support from six Democrats. According to Managing Editor Kyle Kondik, this failure to pass the appropriations bills is unlikely to impact the 2024 elections, as internal GOP procedural issues are often not significant electorally. Kondik further commented that Republican voters usually do not pay close attention to the inner workings of the House.
With Congress scheduled to return on September 9, the House faces a tight deadline to pass a continuing resolution by October 1. Speaker Johnson's assurance last October sets the stage for a pressing situation as they return with only a few weeks to finalize appropriations measures.
Despite the setbacks, Republicans must navigate internal disagreements and work against the clock to prevent a government shutdown. The challenges faced in advancing appropriations bills underscore the party’s internal struggle and the pressure leaders face in aligning the interests of different factions.
The GOP-led House failed to pass all 12 appropriations bills before the August recess amid internal conflicts and disagreements over budget allocations. This increases the risk of passing another temporary Continuing Resolution to avoid a government shutdown when Congress reconvenes in September. Despite passing some spending bills, significant appropriations measures remain unaddressed.
A watchdog group has leveled serious accusations against the Pennsylvania State Education Association (PSEA).
The Freedom Foundation has charged the PSEA with illegally moving $1.5 million to support the 2022 campaign of Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro, now rumored as a potential vice-presidential candidate, as the Daily Caller reports.
In complaints filed last Thursday, the Freedom Foundation alleged multiple violations of state and federal laws. The group believes that the PSEA funneled significant funds to back Shapiro, who is now considered to be on Kamala Harris' shortlist for VP.
Maxford Nelsen, the Freedom Foundation’s Director of Research and Government Affairs, has been vocal about these allegations. He asserts that PSEA engaged in a “scheme to secretly launder nearly $1.5 million” via the Democratic Governors Association (DGA). He contends that these actions defied numerous Pennsylvania laws and the Internal Revenue Code.
The funds were reportedly channeled to the Fund For Student Success (FSS), a PSEA-created entity, in May 2022. The FSS then allegedly forwarded the same amount to the DGA, which eventually donated $5.6 million to Shapiro’s campaign. The Freedom Foundation’s complaints highlight these transactions as a breach of both the Pennsylvania Election Code and Pennsylvania Public Employee Relations Act.
The Freedom Foundation did not stop at reporting to one authority. Complaints were filed not only with the FBI and IRS but also with Pennsylvania's attorney general, the Dauphin County district attorney, and the Pennsylvania secretary of state’s office. The watchdog group insists that the PSEA’s use of general treasury funds for political contributions is illegal under section 43 P.S. § 1101.1701.
Moreover, the FSS is accused of failing to register as a political committee. The Freedom Foundation also alleges that the FSS filed fraudulent tax returns, suggesting the funds were directed to Put Pennsylvania First instead of the DGA.
The issue extends beyond the PSEA and FSS. The DGA is also implicated in filing incomplete reports. The Freedom Foundation’s complaints indicate this could amount to criminal perjury or making false statements, as per Pennsylvania statutes 18 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 4902 and/or 4904. These discrepancies raise significant concerns about the transparency and legality of the entire funding process supporting Shapiro's campaign.
Freedom Foundation Director Maxford Nelsen condemned the PSEA's actions, remarking on the apparent disregard for both their members and Pennsylvania law. Nelsen emphasized that Pennsylvania teachers should feel confident that their dues are not being covertly used to back political candidates.
The entities involved have so far remained silent. Neither Gov. Shapiro’s office nor the PSEA responded to requests for comment. This ongoing silence adds to the gravity of the situation, leaving many questions unanswered about the integrity of the election process and the use of union funds.
The Freedom Foundation’s complaints insist that the PSEA executives' actions show a significant contempt for both their members and the law. This has become a matter of public interest given the amount involved and the potential impact on future political campaigns and union fund utilization.
This case underlines the importance of accountability within organizations that deal with substantial monetary contributions and political influence. As the investigation proceeds, the responses of the implicated organizations and individuals will be crucial in determining the outcomes and potential repercussions.
The implications of these accusations are far-reaching. The involvement of high-ranking officials and significant sums of money highlight the potential for ongoing scrutiny and legal actions. The financial contributions and political maneuvers detailed in these complaints may ignite a broader discussion on the regulatory oversight of campaign finances and union activities within Pennsylvania and beyond.
President Joe Biden paid tribute to Ambassador Martin Indyk, a renowned Middle East peace negotiator, following his passing from cancer complications.
In the wake of his death, Indyk’s legacy is being marked by his extensive contributions to White House Middle East peace efforts over the years, mentoring, and influence on U.S. foreign policy, as The Hill reports.
On Friday, Biden lauded the significant contributions of Indyk, who died on Thursday, as a Special Envoy for Israeli-Palestinian Negotiations during the Obama administration. Indyk also served twice as the U.S. ambassador to Israel during the Clinton administration, showcasing his long-standing commitment to Middle East peace.
Indyk's influence stretched beyond his official roles, mentoring numerous current administration officials and scholars dedicated to Middle East policy. Born in Australia, his experiences during the 1973 Yom Kippur War deeply impacted his dedication to peace efforts.
In addition to his diplomatic service, Indyk was a vocal critic of Israeli policies that he believed hindered peace. He notably criticized Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for not supporting the establishment of a Palestinian state and recently condemned Israel's rejection of a Saudi peace offer.
Indyk’s career began in Washington as the founding executive director of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. His tenure in the Clinton administration saw him taking a crucial role during pivotal moments, such as the assassination of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin.
Former President Bill Clinton expressed his gratitude for Indyk’s unwavering dedication to peace, highlighting his skill and perseverance in the face of obstacles. Clifton's sentiment was echoed by other notable diplomats who praised Indyk's contributions.
President Biden emphasized Indyk’s enduring impact, noting his unshakeable optimism and commitment to peace. He lauded Indyk’s ability to inspire and educate others, solidifying his legacy in U.S. foreign policy.
Israeli opposition leader Benny Gantz recalled a meeting with Indyk earlier in the year, praising his deep commitment to Israel’s security and future. This personal connection underscored Indyk's strategic and personal importance to Israeli-U.S. relations.
Indyk held senior roles at prestigious institutions such as the Brookings Institution and the Council on Foreign Relations. His academic contributions included authoring works on American peace diplomacy and former President Barack Obama’s foreign policy. Aaron David Miller, in a social media post, mourned Indyk's passing and celebrated their shared dedication to Arab-Israeli peacemaking. Dennis Ross similarly praised Indyk’s life dedicated to fostering peace between Israel and its neighbors.
Robert Satloff underscored Indyk’s significant imprint on American Middle East policy, attributing any progress in the volatile region to Indyk’s substantial contributions. Indyk’s voice of clarity and conviction had been a guiding light during recent conflicts.
Indyk’s eloquent posts on social media continued to reflect his commitment to peace until his final days. In May, he lamented Israel's missed opportunity to accept a peace offer from Saudi Arabia, urging Israeli leaders to reconsider their course.
As the world reflects on Martin Indyk’s life, his enduring impact on Middle East diplomacy and U.S. foreign policy is unmistakable. His dedication to peace and mentorship will continue to inspire future generations of diplomats and policymakers.
President Joe Biden's initiative to reform the Supreme Court hits a significant roadblock.
According to the Washington Examiner, Biden’s efforts to enact Supreme Court legislative changes are hampered by the Republican-majority House.
President Biden has proposed several reforms targeting the highest court in the land. His plan includes setting term limits for justices, instituting an enforceable ethics code, and eliminating presidential immunity through a constitutional amendment.
During a White House press briefing this Wednesday, Karine Jean-Pierre, the White House press secretary, was questioned about President Biden's dedication to these reforms. Jean-Pierre reiterated Biden's commitment to high ethical standards for public officials but did not offer detailed policy updates.
Jean-Pierre stated, "The president believes that when you hold a high office, you should be held by a certain ethics and transparency." She underscored the importance of these principles without revealing new policy directions.
The Democratic Party's push for a Supreme Court ethics code has intensified following controversies involving Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. These issues have eroded public trust and underscored the need for reform among supporters.
Justice Thomas has come under fire for allegedly accepting lavish gifts from wealthy benefactors without proper disclosure, which he argues was not required. Meanwhile, Justice Alito has been urged by Democrats to step aside from a case linked to January 6 due to a flag linked to Capitol rioters being seen outside one of his properties. Alito has attributed this to his spouse.
Neither Justice Thomas nor Justice Alito has indicated any plans to resign. This lack of movement adds to the Democrats' mounting frustration over the absence of enforceable ethical standards.
Establishing term limits for Supreme Court justices has become a top priority for many Democratic lawmakers. Senator Alex Padilla tabled a bill last year proposing 18-year service limits for Supreme Court justices as a means to inject regularity and predictability into the Judicial branch.
Despite the potential impact of these reforms, the likelihood of their passing remains bleak. The current Republican majority in the House poses a significant barrier to the enactment of Biden's proposals in the foreseeable future.
Though political dynamics are not in Biden's favor for these Supreme Court reforms, he is no stranger to overcoming legislative hurdles. The president has already navigated a challenging political environment to sign off on landmark pieces of legislation.
Jean-Pierre acknowledged the challenges, saying, "The president has gotten a lot done, and historic pieces of legislation have been passed. That wasn't done with an easy political climate." She hinted at future announcements about upcoming legislative initiatives without providing specifics.
President Biden's ambitious legislative effort aims to reshape the Supreme Court by proposing term limits, enforceable ethics codes, and eradicating presidential immunity. During a Wednesday briefing, Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre reaffirmed Biden’s commitment to ethical standards without specifying policy actions. Democrats' pleas for an ethics code follow scandals involving Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, with Republicans in the House limiting the prospects of swift legislative progress.
A recent appearance on Fox Business became highly controversial due to remarks made about Vice President Kamala Harris.
The Daily Mail reported that on July 5, guest Alec Lace referred to Harris as the "original Hawk Tuah girl," sparking significant debate about her history and the future of her political career.
During a segment discussing President Joe Biden's debate performance and the Democratic Party's future, Alec Lace criticized Vice President Harris, likening her to Hailey Welch, a figure known for her sexual commentary. Lace described Harris as the “original Hawk Tuah girl."
Fox host Dagen McDowell intervened with, "That was harsh," acknowledging the severity of Lace's comment. Harsh or not, Lace made it clear that voters can't allow Democrats to whitewash Harris's past.
Harris owes her career in politics to former San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown whom she became infamous for sleeping with. Without him, it's unlikely that she would be where she is today.
Lace's comment quickly drew attention on social media. Posting on X, previously known as Twitter, Lace questioned whether he was out of line or simply addressing a pivotal issue regarding Harris. He asked, "Did I go too far on FOX News calling Kamala Harris the OG Hawk Tuah girl or am I right over the target?"
The remarks gained momentum as President Biden’s announcement that he would not seek re-election positioned Harris as a potential successor.
This has intensified scrutiny over her past, particularly her relationship with former San Francisco mayor Willie Brown, a long-standing point of contention.
Harris has often been criticized, notably by political figures including former President Donald Trump. Trump has not shied away from using her past relationship with Brown as a point of attack.
Harris and Brown's relationship, which ended decades ago, has continued to be a subject of public and media interest. Brown, during the mid-1990s, was a powerful political figure, while Harris was an emerging prosecutor. Their relationship, which Brown acknowledged in a 2019 op-ed, has cast a long shadow over Harris's career.
Brown appointed Harris to two key positions during their relationship.
However, Harris has maintained that his influence did not shape her independent political trajectory. How she can claim that knowing he gave her jobs during their relationship speaks to the dishonesty surrounding this episode.
The relationship's baggage resurfaced with commentary by Trump, who recently referenced Harris's association with Brown, questioning her political achievements and independence.
Harris has been vocal about distancing herself from Brown's political legacy. In 2003, she stated, "I refuse to design my campaign around criticizing Willie Brown for the sake of appearing to be independent when I have no doubt that I am independent of him." She emphasized her autonomy in her political decisions.
The resurfacing of Harris and Brown’s past relationship underscores the challenges female politicians face regarding their personal lives and professional achievements. Harris's relationship with Brown ended years ago, and although Brown was separated from his wife at the time, the discourse around it remains potent.
Despite this, Harris has emphasized her independence and capabilities, stating her refusal to be tethered to past relationships. She married entertainment lawyer Doug Emhoff in 2014, further committing to her own life path.
The comments made by Alec Lace have ignited significant debate regarding sexism and the scrutiny faced by female politicians. The controversy surrounding Harris's past continues to influence her current political narrative.
Lace’s comments about Harris have incited discussions on social media and across political commentators regarding the implications and appropriateness of his remarks. The incident highlights ongoing issues of gender and political rhetoric in the United States.
This attention on Harris's past comes during a crucial period as the Democratic Party seeks a nominee for the upcoming presidential election.
Harris's historical relationship with Brown, and her defensive stance, perpetuate conversation about her political journey and future.
Alec Lace's statement has brought both criticism and defense from various quarters, exemplifying the complexities and challenges in American political discourse related to personal histories and public perceptions.
Amidst this controversy, Harris remains a significant figure in American politics, with her past and present continually scrutinized and evaluated as she potentially steps into a larger role within the Democratic Party.
Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN) has introduced articles of impeachment against Vice President Kamala Harris, claiming her negligence in enforcing federal immigration laws.
Breitbart reported that Ogles asserts that Harris's inaction has intensified the border crisis, triggering numerous tragic incidents involving illegal aliens. He believes that as Biden's border czar, she has liability for the crisis.
The articles of impeachment were introduced by Rep. Andy Ogles on Tuesday following the news that Harris would be taking over from President Biden after he suddenly bowed out of the presidential race.
Ogles alleges that Vice President Kamala Harris has “willfully and systematically” neglected her duty to enforce federal immigration laws. He claims her failure has resulted in a breach of public trust.
The impeachment resolution accuses Harris of “high crimes and misdemeanors” related to the border crisis and illegal immigration. According to Ogles, Harris has shown a consistent “refusal to uphold existing immigration laws” and demonstrated “palpable indifference” to Americans affected by the crisis.
Harris reportedly “consistently refused to visit the southern border to evaluate this ongoing national crisis,” except for one visit in June 2021, which was “hundreds of miles away from the epicenter of the migrant crisis.”
President Joe Biden assigned Harris to handle illegal immigration in March 2021, tasking her with cooperating with Central American nations to address the root causes of the problem. Despite this, Ogles alleges that her inaction has exacerbated the situation.
Ogles highlights several tragic incidents purportedly connected to illegal immigration. These incidents include the August 2023 rape and murder of Rachel Morin, a mother of five, by an illegal alien.
In September 2023, another illegal alien allegedly attacked a woman and her 9-year-old daughter in Los Angeles. In February 2024, 22-year-old nursing student Laken Riley was killed by an illegal alien.
Additional incidents cited by Ogles include the May 14, 2024, rape of a 15-year-old New York girl by an illegal alien from Turkey and the June 2024 rape of a 13-year-old girl in Queens park. In June 2024, 12-year-old Jocelyn Nungaray from Houston was killed by two illegal aliens.
Ogles also mentions that five illegal aliens were charged with kidnapping a 14-year-old Indiana girl. These incidents are presented as evidence of the negative impacts of what Ogles describes as Harris's “palpable indifference.”
Ogles states that December 2023 witnessed nearly 302,000 encounters with illegal aliens at the border, the highest number ever recorded in a single month. Furthermore, the first five months of Fiscal Year 2023 saw the seizure of 106 pounds of drugs, including 11,000 pounds of fentanyl.
Aside from the border crisis, Ogles's resolution includes claims that Harris has misled the public regarding President Biden’s physical and cognitive health. This, he argues, is another breach of public trust.
Ogles maintains that Harris has committed “high crimes and misdemeanors,” impacting American women and girls disproportionately due to the ongoing border crisis. He emphasizes the need for accountability and better enforcement of immigration laws.
The impeachment articles brought forth by Ogles mark a significant escalation in the political discourse surrounding the U.S. border crisis. The outcome of this move remains to be seen.
Rep. Andy Ogles has launched impeachment articles against Vice President Kamala Harris, accusing her of failing to enforce federal immigration laws and breaching public trust.
The resolution points to Harris's handling of the border crisis and a series of tragic incidents as evidence of her alleged high crimes and misdemeanors.
In a bold and unexpected move, former San Francisco mayor Willie Brown publicly called for President Joe Biden to step down and allow Vice President Kamala Harris to become president immediately.
This statement comes as the Democratic Party attempts to improve Harris's image and boost her popularity before the 2024 election.
The Daily Mail reported that Willie Brown, aged 90, held a news conference on Sunday to make his case for Biden to step aside. Brown summoned local reporters to gather outside John's Grill, just days after President Biden's surprise decision to suspend his campaign.
At the news conference, Brown argued that Harris's chances of success would improve if Biden made her president immediately. He stated, "[Harris's] chances go up if [Biden] would at this moment say not only am I no longer the candidate, I'm no longer the president — she is,"
Brown praised Harris for her outstanding performance in her various roles throughout her career. In 2020, he had advised Harris to reject Biden's offer to be his running mate, calling it a "dead end."
Brown and Harris dated in the 1990s when Harris was an emerging star in the Alameda County District Attorney's Office and Brown was the speaker of the state Assembly. Despite being legally married to Blanche Vitero, Brown and Vitero had separated, and Brown was known for his flashy lifestyle.
Harris distanced herself from the relationship by labeling it "an albatross hanging around my neck" in a 2003 interview.
In a 2019 opinion piece, Brown confirmed their past romantic relationship and admitted helping Harris in her first race for district attorney, which she went on to win in 2003. As DA, Harris introduced a controversial anti-truancy program, which led to the arrest of Cheree Peoples in 2013 due to her daughter's school attendance issues stemming from a genetic condition.
Recently, there has been a concerted effort within the Democratic Party to rehabilitate Harris's image. In April, actress Drew Barrymore praised Harris, describing her as "Momala" and suggesting that Harris should be a maternal figure for the country.
Harris currently has a favorability rating of 39 percent, similar to Biden's rating. Her career has faced numerous allegations of hypocrisy and dishonesty, but she has managed to evolve her views to become more socially liberal over the years.
For example, Harris’s stance on marijuana has shifted from prosecuting people for violations to advocating against jail time for smoking it.
During a 2019 Democratic primary debate, Harris criticized Biden for his past collaboration with segregationist senators and his opposition to federal busing. This reportedly caused tension between her and First Lady Jill Biden, who allegedly holds a grudge against Harris.
Harris was tasked with addressing the root causes of migration in March 2021 but faced criticism for admitting in an NBC interview that she had never visited the southern border. Under the Biden-Harris administration, approximately 10 million migrants have crossed the Mexico-US border.
Additionally, thirteen staffers resigned from Harris's office between 2021 and 2022 amid claims that she was an office "bully." Harris is also criticized for her confusing public statements, often referred to as "word salad," such as her remarks on community banks and her mother's advice on existing within a context.
Willie Brown's recent call for President Biden to step down represents an effort to bolster Kamala Harris's position ahead of the 2024 election.
Despite facing numerous controversies and challenges throughout her career, Harris has garnered praise from certain public figures and is subject to ongoing efforts within the Democratic Party to revamp her image. As the election approaches, it remains to be seen how these efforts will impact her favorability and political future.
According to Newsweek, former Representative Adam Kinzinger has declared the Republican Party dead following the 2024 RNC convention, criticizing the event as a celebration of Donald Trump and his "cult of personality."
Kinzinger's comments highlighted key moments such as Trump's nomination, the selection of JD Vance as running mate, and Peter Navarro's controversial speech.
The Republican National Convention (RNC) took place in Milwaukee, marking a significant event in the political calendar. Former President Donald Trump accepted the GOP's nomination for the 2024 election, delivering a speech that lasted over 90 minutes. Trump's family members, GOP officials, candidates, entertainers, celebrities, and industry leaders appeared at the convention.
Adam Kinzinger, a former Illinois Republican Representative, declared the GOP dead in a post on X (formerly Twitter) following the convention.
In a Substack article titled "The Convention Spoke and Told Us: The GOP is Dead," Kinzinger elaborated on his thoughts about the convention. He noted the lack of serious policy debates and the celebration of Trump, who he believes has transformed the party into a "cult of personality."
Kinzinger's article emphasized the key moments of the convention, particularly Trump's choice of JD Vance as his running mate and former White House adviser Peter Navarro's speech. According to Kinzinger, Trump's selection of Vance, known for his previous criticism of Trump and support for independent candidate Evan McMullin in 2016, signaled a departure from traditional GOP values.
JD Vance was announced as Trump's running mate earlier in the week, garnering significant attention and scrutiny. Vance's political positions and his previous criticism of Trump raised eyebrows among traditional Republicans. Kinzinger highlighted this choice as indicative of Trump's disregard for appeasing the old-style GOP members.
Recently released from federal prison, Peter Navarro delivered a speech at the convention that resonated with the crowd. Navarro's address focused on his fears about government control, a message that Kinzinger criticized as feeding into the "cult of Trump." Kinzinger noted the crowd's enthusiastic response to Navarro's message, emphasizing the shift in the party's priorities.
Steve Bannon, another prominent figure in Trump's circle, began his prison sentence on July 1 for refusing to cooperate with the January 6 investigation. His absence at the convention was notable but did not deter the focus on Trump's leadership and influence over the party.
In response to Kinzinger's declaration, the Republican National Committee criticized his career and reiterated their support for Trump. RNC spokesperson Kush Desai stated, "The only thing that's dead is Adam Kinzinger's political career," highlighting Kinzinger's strained relationship with the party.
Kinzinger's endorsement of Joe Biden in June also drew mixed reactions. He justified his support for Biden by emphasizing his commitment to democracy and the Constitution. Some saw this endorsement as a betrayal of conservative values, while others viewed it as a principled stand against Trumpism.
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene responded to Kinzinger's endorsement with criticism on X, stating:
Oh look, Kinzinger finally came out of the closet. As usual, we knew all along, so not a surprise and none of us care.
The Republican National Convention in Milwaukee has brought to the forefront the ongoing debate about the future of the GOP. Adam Kinzinger's declaration of the party's death, his criticism of the convention, and his endorsement of Joe Biden illustrate the deep divisions within the party. The coming months will reveal how these tensions play out as the 2024 election draws nearer.