President Joe Biden is encountering mounting calls to exit the presidential race as worries about his mental and cognitive health intensify.

These concerns were amplified by signs prominently displayed at a recent rally, yet Biden and his staff at the White House remain resolved to continue his campaign, as Mediaite reports.

Biden was en route to Madison, Wisconsin on Friday, where community members were prepared to greet him with signs urging him to end his presidential bid. Biden has been scrutinized increasingly in the wake of last Thursday's debate with Trump, which featured several verbal blunders.

Local Sentiment in Madison

Residents in Madison, Wisconsin, have been vocal about their concerns, holding signs with messages such as “I LOVE YOU JOE, BOW OUT” and “KEEP DEMOCRACY’S FLAME BURNING, PASS THE TORCH.” This public display of sentiment highlights the anxiety many feel regarding Biden’s capabilities.

A recent survey indicates a substantial lack of confidence in Biden’s mental and cognitive abilities, with 72% of Americans doubting his fitness for the presidency. This sentiment is visible in the reluctance of some Democrats to continue supporting his campaign. On Tuesday, Rep. Lloyd Doggett of Texas became the first active Democrat in Congress to openly suggest President Biden step aside. This bold move adds to the growing chorus of voices from both within the party and the general public urging Biden to consider his position.

Internal Discontent and Campaign Anxiety

Rumors of internal discord among Democrats and a sense of unease among Biden’s campaign staff are growing. Despite this, Biden is adamant about maintaining his bid for re-election.

Biden was set for a televised interview with George Stephanopoulos on ABC News on Friday. During the interview, he attempted to address numerous pressing questions about his intentions to remain in the race.

In a move manifesting his resolve, Biden’s campaign has announced a comprehensive travel itinerary for July, coupled with a substantial $50 million “paid media blitz.” The campaign strategy includes engaging voters through unscripted interactions, aiming to reinforce his commitment to his second term.

Signs of Growing Public Concern

Broadcast journalist Boris Sanchez from CNN reported on Friday from Madison, showing crowds awaiting the president’s motorcade. This display featured signage urging Biden to reconsider his campaign.

Eli Stokols from Politico emphasized the gravity of these public reactions from Democrats, indicating a shift in the party’s outward stance on Biden's debate performance. Stokols highlighted the broader sentiment within the Democratic base, which seems to appreciate Biden’s past efforts but doubts his capacity to serve another term. The suggestion for him to step aside comes not from a place of disdain, but from concern for the party's future.

The culmination of local sentiment in Madison, internal party unrest, and public opinion polls, paints a complex picture for Biden’s campaign. His unwavering stance on continuing his campaign amidst these challenges demonstrates his commitment despite the growing calls for him to step down.

As President Joe Biden continues to face mounting pressure and scrutiny, the coming weeks will be critical in determining the course of his campaign. The Friday interview and his planned engagements were expected to play pivotal roles in shaping public and party opinion, but initial reaction to the ABC News sit-down was not overwhelmingly positive.

With residents in Wisconsin, political figures like Rep. Lloyd Doggett, and journalists like Eli Stokols voicing their concerns, the narrative around Biden's suitability for another term remains at the forefront of current political discourse.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange secured his release following a plea deal with U.S. authorities.

According to Fox News, Assange's plea agreement allows him to avoid additional prison time in the U.S. and return to his home in Australia.

On Wednesday, Assange pleaded guilty to a felony charge in the Saipan, Northern Mariana Islands federal court. This plea deal led to his sentencing of time served by U.S. District Judge Ramona Manglona.

Judge Manglona acknowledged the severity of Assange's previous incarceration in the U.K., remarking that it factored into her decision to accept the plea agreement. She stated that the prolonged nature of his detention and the lack of physical harm caused by his actions influenced her judgment.

Assange’s Long Imprisonment Comes to an End

Assange had been held at Belmarsh Prison in London since April 2019 before being flown to Saipan on a chartered flight to face U.S. charges. The charges included 17 counts of violating the Espionage Act and one count of conspiracy to commit computer intrusion, stemming from WikiLeaks' 2010 release of classified U.S. documents leaked by Chelsea Manning.

The documents publicly detailed alleged war crimes and instances of torture by the U.S. government. As part of the plea deal, Assange agreed to destroy any classified information that had been provided to WikiLeaks.

The Justice Department disclosed the plea arrangement on Monday night. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese of Australia expressed his relief and support for the judgment, emphasizing that Assange's continued incarceration served no purpose.

Mixed Reactions to Plea Deal

Stella Assange, Julian's wife, expressed her relief regarding the deal, stating that it had been a tense period for the family, with uncertainty about whether the agreement would go through. Assange’s attorney, Jennifer Robinson, also expressed immense satisfaction that Assange can now reunite with his family in Australia.

Seth Stern, head of advocacy at the Freedom of the Press Foundation, criticized the prosecution yet acknowledged that ending the legal pursuit was a relief. Ben Wizner, who leads the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, shared similar sentiments, stressing that the activities Assange admitted to are fundamental to investigative journalism.

Judge Manglona emphasized the temporal aspect of her decision, suggesting that her view of the case might have been different had it occurred closer to when the acts were initially committed. Her remarks about the absence of a personal victim reinforced the decision. She reminded the court that it's 2024, implying the lengthy duration of proceedings weighed heavily on her mind.

Global Implications of Assange's Case

President Obama had previously refrained from charging Assange for the 2010 leaks. This was consistent with his commutation of Chelsea Manning's sentence in January 2017.

Looking forward, Assange’s return to Australia is welcomed by supporters who view this outcome as a victory for free speech and press freedom. Meanwhile, critics continue to reflect on the broader implications for national security and the boundaries of investigative journalism.

In summary, Julian Assange’s guilty plea ends his imprisonment and extradition battle, steadfastly supported by prominent figures in advocacy and politics. He leaves behind a contentious legacy that sparks ongoing debate in journalism and national security circles.

On Tuesday afternoon, President Joe Biden's official White House X account committed an embarrassing error in a now-deleted post.

As reported by Fox News, President Biden's account mistakenly referred to a federal judge's decision as a ruling by the Supreme Court before quickly deleting and correcting the post.

The incorrect post aimed to address a preliminary injunction issued by a Louisiana federal judge. This injunction temporarily paused the White House's ban on new liquefied natural gas exports.

Details of the Gaffe and its Immediate Impact

The case was brought forward by sixteen Republican-led states, which stood against Biden’s limitations on energy projects. The White House X account inaccurately described the ruling as a "Supreme Court ruling" rather than a federal court decision.

The original post read:

Yesterday's Supreme Court ruling on our pause on Liquified Natural Gas exports is incredibly disappointing. I'll continue doing everything I can to protect our environment and our communities, while ensuring America’s energy security.

Realizing the error, the account swiftly deleted the post and published a corrected version, omitting the mention of the Supreme Court. The corrected statement properly referred to it as "yesterday’s court ruling."

Social Media Reacts to the Blunder

Despite the swift correction, screenshots of the original post were captured and circulated by social media users, drawing widespread attention to the mistake. The community note attached to the shared images clarified, "This was not a Supreme Court decision. It was a federal judge in Louisiana."

Public figures and commentators quickly chimed in with their reactions. David Pivtorak remarked, "Good lord even the X account has dementia," while Paul Szypula added, "Wow, even his interns have cognitive issues."

The popular Libs of TikTok account noted: "Biden just deleted this post after confusing the Supreme Court with a Federal Court. This case literally had nothing to do with the Supreme Court." Christopher Calvin Reid expressed: "Biden's staff is just as inattentive to detail as he is."

Critics Question Biden’s Mental Fitness

Chaya Raichik criticized the error, questioning, "Which DEI hire is responsible for this." Michael D. Brown speculated: "Maybe Hunter Biden is now doing POTUS’ social media…"

Courtney Holland also commented on the mistake, stating: "The Biden team, in a now deleted post, confused a federal court decision with a SCOTUS decision. Not the best timing."

Overall, the gaffe and the subsequent correction have opened a dialogue about President Biden's and his administration's competence. As screenshots of the initial error continue to spread across social media, it remains to be seen how the White House will address the fallout from this mistake.

In summary, Biden’s White House X account mistakenly referred to a federal judge's ruling as a Supreme Court decision, leading to a swift deletion and correction. The lawsuit challenging the White House’s energy policies involved sixteen Republican states. Despite the swift correction, social media reactions highlighted the mistake, further fueling ongoing concerns regarding Biden's mental acuity ahead of the political battle for the presidency.

Independent conservative news without a leftist agenda.
© 2025 - American Tribune - All rights reserved
Privacy Policy
magnifier