President Trump has unleashed a scathing critique of Fox News following the release of polling data showing mixed reviews of his administration's performance across key policy areas. The president's frustration centers on what he perceives as unfair coverage despite generally favorable ratings from the network's viewers.
According to The Hill, Trump took to Truth Social on Thursday to express his displeasure with Fox News polls showing Americans nearly evenly divided on his handling of immigration and border security issues. The post marked his latest rebuke of a network that has historically been viewed as sympathetic to his policies.
The president's criticism follows polling that revealed 53 percent of Americans approve of his handling of border security, while a majority disapprove of his approach to immigration, foreign policy, the economy, and inflation. Trump's economic ratings appear particularly concerning, with 58 percent disapproving and inflation garnering a 64 percent disapproval rating.
Trump's Thursday morning post on Truth Social left little doubt about his feelings toward the network's polling operation. He characterized Fox News polls as consistently inaccurate and biased against him throughout his political career.
"The Crooked FoxNews Polls got the Election WRONG, I won by much more than they said I would, and have been biased against me for years," the president wrote, adding that the polls are "always wrong and negative."
Despite his harsh criticism of the network's polling division, Trump made a point to distinguish between Fox's pollsters and its on-air talent, noting that his supporters dislike the network's polling "even though their anchors are GREAT." This nuanced criticism highlights the complex relationship between the president and his once-strongest media ally.
The latest conflict represents an ongoing pattern of tension between Trump and major media outlets, including those typically considered friendly to his administration. His relationship with Fox News has shown particular strain during the opening months of his second term.
Trump has repeatedly singled out Rupert Murdoch, founder and former chair of Fox Corp., for criticism regarding coverage across Murdoch's media properties. This includes not only Fox News but also The Wall Street Journal and the New York Post, suggesting a broader dissatisfaction with mainstream conservative media coverage.
Despite these tensions, Trump maintains working relationships with many Fox News journalists, regularly granting interviews to the network's personalities. In fact, several former Fox hosts and commentators now hold key positions within his administration, demonstrating the continued interconnectedness between the president and the network.
The polling that triggered Trump's response shows a divided American public on border security and immigration policy, two signature issues of both his campaigns and his presidency. While a slim majority supports his handling of border security specifically, his broader immigration approach receives net negative ratings.
These mixed results come despite the president's continued emphasis on border security as a cornerstone of his second-term agenda. Trump has implemented several executive actions aimed at reducing illegal border crossings since returning to office.
Fox's polling suggests that while Trump's core message on border security resonates with many Americans, his overall approach to immigration policy faces significant opposition. This split in public opinion mirrors the deeply polarized national debate on immigration reform and border enforcement.
Trump's direct confrontation with Fox News underscores his continued willingness to publicly challenge media coverage he views as unfavorable, regardless of the outlet's political orientation. This approach has been a defining characteristic of his communication style throughout both terms.
The president's claim that Fox's polling division is "discredited" and that the network "will never change their pollster" signals his determination to shape the narrative around his administration's performance. By questioning the methodology and motives behind unfavorable polls, Trump attempts to minimize their impact on public perception.
Trump's media strategy continues to involve direct communication with supporters through social media platforms like Truth Social, allowing him to bypass traditional media filters. This approach enables him to present his unfiltered perspective on issues ranging from policy achievements to perceived media bias.
Vice President J.D. Vance experienced a brief social media hiccup when his newly created Bluesky account was temporarily suspended shortly after joining the platform. The suspension, which raised eyebrows among supporters, was quickly reversed.
According to The Hill, the Vice President's account was flagged by Bluesky's automated systems designed to detect impersonation attempts of public figures. By Thursday morning, Vance's profile was back online and subsequently verified.
Vance had just begun engaging on the platform Wednesday evening, sharing his inaugural post: "Hello Bluesky, I've been told this app has become the place to go for common sense political discussion and analysis. So I'm thrilled to be here to engage with all of you."
The Vice President wasted no time addressing substantive issues, attaching a screenshot of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas's concurring opinion in United States v. Skrmetti. This landmark decision upheld Tennessee's ban on certain medical treatments for transgender minors.
Vance followed his introduction with two additional posts inviting discussion about Thomas's opinion, seemingly eager to spark conversation on the controversial ruling. His entrance onto the platform represents a significant conservative voice joining what many describe as a predominantly liberal user base.
Users on X, formerly Twitter, quickly noticed and shared screenshots of Vance's suspended account, creating momentary confusion about whether the suspension was politically motivated or simply an automated error.
Bluesky representatives clarified the situation to multiple news outlets, explaining that Vance's temporary suspension resulted from standard security protocols rather than targeted action. The company emphasized its commitment to preventing impersonation.
A spokesperson for the social media platform stated the Vice President's account was "quickly restored and verified so people can easily confirm its authenticity," as reported by TechCrunch. This verification process helps users distinguish genuine public figure accounts from potential imposters.
Bluesky has grown significantly since last fall, with many Democratic users migrating from X amid complaints about the platform's environment under Elon Musk's ownership. The platform has positioned itself as an alternative space for political discourse.
The incident highlights ongoing discussions about political diversity on Bluesky, which surged in popularity as Democrats publicly announced their departure from X following the presidential election. Many cited a "toxic" environment on Musk's platform as their reason for switching.
Critics have increasingly voiced concerns that Bluesky may be developing into an ideological echo chamber with insufficient diversity of political viewpoints. The platform's user base currently skews heavily toward liberal and progressive perspectives.
Tech entrepreneur Mark Cuban, an early adopter of Bluesky, recently expressed frustration about the platform's homogeneity, writing: "The lack of diversity of thought here is really hurting usage." He further lamented that engagement had deteriorated from "great convos on many topics, to agree with me or you are a nazi fascist."
Vice President Vance's decision to join Bluesky represents a notable development in the evolving social media landscape, where different platforms increasingly attract distinct political demographics. His presence could potentially diversify conversations on the predominantly liberal platform.
Vance, known for his outspoken conservative views, appears ready to engage directly with users who may disagree with his political positions. His first posts focusing on Justice Thomas's opinion signal his willingness to address contentious political topics rather than posting merely ceremonial content.
The suspension incident, while quickly resolved, underscores the technical challenges platforms face in balancing security measures against accessibility for public figures. Bluesky's rapid verification of Vance's account demonstrates the platform's recognition of the importance of authenticated political voices.
The infamous "Gold Bar Bob" has officially traded his Senate office for a prison cell. Bob Menendez, once among Washington's most powerful lawmakers, surrendered himself to federal authorities Tuesday morning to begin serving his sentence for corruption.
According to the New York Post, the 71-year-old former New Jersey Democrat arrived at FCI Schuykill in Pennsylvania around 9 a.m., approximately two and a half hours from his Englewood Cliffs residence. His arrival marks the culmination of a dramatic fall from grace for the once-influential Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman.
The disgraced former lawmaker was convicted last year of participating in a sprawling bribery scheme that involved selling his political influence to enrich himself with gold bars, cash payments, and other valuable items. His sentencing in January brought an end to his decades-long political career while cementing his new reputation as one of the most corrupt senators in recent memory.
Federal agents discovered a trove of incriminating evidence when they searched the Menendez residence during their investigation. The findings painted a damning picture of a public servant who had betrayed his office for personal gain.
Investigators located $486,471 in cash stashed throughout the senator's home, including some hidden inside his official government jacket. Even more shocking was the discovery of 13 gold bars worth approximately $150,000 concealed in a bedroom safe, which ultimately earned him the unflattering nickname "Gold Bar Bob."
Judge Sidney Stein didn't mince words during the sentencing hearing, telling the fallen politician, "Somewhere along the way, you became, I'm sorry to say, a corrupt politician." The judge's statement underscored the severity of Menendez's betrayal of public trust and the damage done to democratic institutions.
Menendez will likely seek placement in the prison's minimum-security camp, which houses 225 male inmates and offers greater freedom of movement compared to the medium-security facility. The former senator's daily reality has dramatically shifted from steering foreign policy to navigating prison routines.
Inside FCI Schuykill, Menendez will have access to the commissary where he can purchase items like $8.55 Head & Shoulders shampoo, $13 Sensodyne toothpaste, and $4.20 Jolly Ranchers candies. His communication with the outside world will be limited to four visits per month and correspondence through letters and postcards.
The prison already houses notable inmates, including Gurmeet Singh Dhinsa, a former gas station tycoon nicknamed the "Gas Station Gotti" who was convicted of ordering murders to conceal a scheme to defraud customers. Now, Menendez takes his place as the facility's most high-profile resident.
Menendez's crimes extended beyond simple bribery into the realm of international intrigue. The jury found him guilty not only of accepting bribes but also of serving as an illegal foreign agent for Egypt and Qatar.
Prosecutors proved that Menendez provided political favors to foreign governments while intermediaries lavished him and his wife with luxurious gifts. These included not just the infamous gold bars and cash but also a Mercedes-Benz automobile and payments funneled through a fraudulent consulting firm and a no-show job.
His wife, Nadine Menendez, 58, was also convicted for her participation in the corrupt scheme. She faces sentencing in September and was spotted Monday running errands with her husband as he prepared for his incarceration.
The former senator's journey to prison was delayed after he successfully argued for postponement to support his wife during her trial on similar corruption charges. His legal maneuvering bought him additional months of freedom before Tuesday's inevitable surrender.
In a last-ditch effort to avoid imprisonment, Menendez reportedly sought a pardon or sentence commutation from President Trump. Unless such clemency materializes immediately, the former Democratic powerbroker will call the Pennsylvania correctional facility home for the foreseeable future.
The spectacular downfall of Bob Menendez serves as a stark reminder of the consequences of corruption at the highest levels of government. From chairing the influential Senate Foreign Relations Committee to becoming inmate number at FCI Schuykill, his journey represents one of the most dramatic falls from power in recent American political history.
President Donald Trump's recent pledge to protect immigrant farmworkers from deportation appears to have had little immediate impact on enforcement operations.
Federal immigration authorities have continued targeting undocumented agricultural workers despite the president's public statement that he would "soon" implement protections for this vital workforce, according to the Washington Examiner.
The United Farm Workers union has documented ongoing enforcement actions in California's agricultural heartland, posting evidence that Customs and Border Protection agents were still pursuing farmworkers just one day after Trump indicated he would shield them from deportation. This disconnect raises questions about coordination within the administration and the timeline for implementing the president's stated policy change.
The UFW reported Border Patrol agents were "circling like sharks" around farm workers in Ventura County, particularly in Moorpark and Oxnard areas on Friday. Video evidence shared by the union earlier in the week showed federal officers in what appeared to be CBP uniforms chasing workers through agricultural fields in various California communities.
This aggressive enforcement approach quickly generated pushback from California's political leadership. Democratic Senators Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff issued a joint statement condemning the actions, emphasizing the critical role these workers play in feeding the nation.
California Governor Gavin Newsom also criticized the operations, sarcastically noting on social media that "chasing hard working people through ranches and farms and snatching women and children off the streets is not good policy." His comments came shortly after Trump announced plans to protect agricultural workers.
President Trump acknowledged the concerns of agricultural employers during a White House press conference Thursday, stating, "We're going to have an order on that pretty soon, I think. We can't do that to our farmers, and leisure too. Hotels. We're going to have to use a lot of common sense on that."
The situation creates a significant policy challenge for the administration, which has made aggressive immigration enforcement a cornerstone of its agenda. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller recently called for ICE to arrest 3,000 illegal immigrants daily, substantially more than the approximately 1,500 daily arrests currently being made.
When asked about continued enforcement against farmworkers, DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin provided a statement that acknowledged presidential direction while emphasizing enforcement priorities: "We will follow the President's direction and continue to work to get the worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens off of America's streets."
The targeting of agricultural workers highlights the complex economic realities underlying America's immigration debate. According to the Center for Migration Studies, foreign workers constitute 86% of the U.S. agricultural workforce, with nearly half – approximately 283,000 workers – being undocumented.
The UFW questioned whether Trump is "really in charge" given the continuation of raids despite his stated position. "If he's really in charge, he could prove it by ordering ICE and Border Patrol to STOP THE RAIDS," the union posted on social media Thursday evening.
Several officials familiar with the administration's immigration plans indicated they had not seen any progress on the promised policy changes, according to reporting by the Washington Post. This suggests the White House may still be formulating its approach to the issue.
White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly emphasized that Trump "has always stood up for our farmers" while balancing enforcement priorities. She stated the president would address both matters but provided no specific timeline or details on implementation.
Some lawmakers are looking beyond executive action toward legislative solutions. Representative Maria Salazar (R-FL) acknowledged the economic impact of removing long-time workers, saying: "Our construction sites, our hotels, and our farms are feeling the impact. It's time for Congress to act and bring a solution."
Salazar has announced plans to co-introduce what she describes as a "revolutionary" immigration bill with Representative Veronica Escobar (D-TX) by the end of June, potentially offering a more permanent solution to the status of undocumented agricultural workers.
Amid escalating tensions between Iran and Israel, former President Donald Trump issued a warning to Iran, stating that any attack against the United States would provoke a military response of historic magnitude. Trump’s stern message comes as the Middle East faces a critical period of unrest.
Triggered by simultaneous aerial conflicts between Iran and Israel, Trump's warning feeds into a growing dispute over nuclear negotiations and diplomatic strains, as the New York Post reports.
Over recent weeks, Iran and Israel have been locked in an aggressive exchange of airstrikes. Israel launched significant assaults on Iranian nuclear sites, reportedly targeting both nuclear power and enrichment facilities and resulting in the deaths of several senior Iranian officials.
Response came swiftly as Iran retaliated with strikes that killed 10 people and injured over 200, targeting Israeli locations, including a devastating strike near Tel Aviv that affected Bat Yam.
The U.S. government took precautions by evacuating non-essential personnel from regional outposts, anticipating potential escalations between the opposing nations. Against this backdrop, Trump affirmed that the United States had no direct involvement in the Israel-Iran skirmishes, although he acknowledged prior awareness regarding the timing of Israel’s offensive actions.
Trump’s comments on Truth Social urged Iran and Israel to seek a peaceful resolution while underscoring the willingness of the United States to enforce a severe military counteraction if Iranian provocations target U.S. interests.
His post contended, “The US had nothing to do with the attack on Iran” but firmly stated, “If we are attacked in any way... the full strength and might of the U.S. Armed Forces will come down on you at levels never seen before."
Efforts to mediate and negotiate a diplomatic solution involving Iran’s nuclear endeavors remain in a delicate state. Attempts from the Trump administration to engage Iran in dialogue began to falter in early June, with key meetings disrupted by the ongoing hostilities. Specifically, a planned meeting in Oman was hindered by Israel’s recent string of attacks.
In response to the turmoil, Iranian Foreign Affairs Minister Abbas Araghchi called on the international community to denounce Israel’s aggressive stance toward Iran. Araghchi reiterated Iran’s desire to avoid escalating the conflict despite their defensive military actions. While expressing frustrations, Iran also denounced the United States, with its Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei labeling the proposed nuclear deal efforts as “arrogant.” The deal sought to restrict Iran’s activities to the production of low-enriched uranium.
As the conflict unfolds, European nations have shown a willingness to engage constructively with Iran. Germany, France, and Britain extended offers to begin immediate negotiations regarding the nuclear program. Johann Wadephul, a German official, expressed optimism about resuming talks, hoping they may help stabilize the region.
Adding tension to the scenario, the Israeli government issued a public warning to Iranian civilians residing near weapon facilities, urging them to evacuate in anticipation of potential military actions. The alert highlighted the volatility and unpredictability of future engagements.
Trump’s commentary further emphasizes the global nature of these challenges, capturing both the immediate threat of military engagement and the long-term need for diplomatic solutions. Trump's bold proclamation, as reported, was, “I always knew of the date. I know everything.” This statement sought to dispel any misunderstandings regarding U.S. involvement.
As the situation remains fluid, international stakeholders continue monitoring developments closely, highlighting the potential for broader implications in global security dynamics. The calls for renewed dialogue and diplomatic efforts aim to de-escalate the ongoing crisis and promote regional stability.
Conservative commentator Tucker Carlson has publicly criticized President Donald Trump, claiming he bears responsibility for Israel's recent military actions against Iran. The unexpected rebuke from one of Trump's most loyal media allies signals potential fractures in their relationship as tensions escalate in the Middle East.
According to The Hill, Carlson wrote in his morning newsletter that Trump was "complicit in the act of war" following Israel's overnight attack on Iranian military targets that killed several high-ranking Iranian military leaders. The political pundit warned that what happens next "will define Donald Trump's presidency" as fears grow of a broader conflict.
Carlson's criticism comes amid heightened concerns that the United States could be drawn into another Middle Eastern war due to its close alliance with Israel. The overnight strike has dramatically escalated tensions between the two regional powers, with many observers anxiously awaiting Iran's response.
The firebrand commentator's criticism marks a notable departure from his typically supportive stance toward the president. Carlson has been one of Trump's most visible media champions throughout his political career.
Their relationship has been particularly close during the 2024 campaign season, with Carlson hosting Trump as part of a speaking tour and sitting alongside him at the Republican National Convention last summer. Trump has repeatedly praised Carlson both during his time at Fox News and after his departure from the network in 2022.
This public break on foreign policy highlights the complex dynamics within conservative media, where some voices like Carlson have long criticized what they term "neo-cons" - hawks they believe have pushed America into unnecessary military entanglements abroad. Carlson has consistently positioned himself as an isolationist voice on the right.
Israel's overnight attack targeted multiple military installations across Iran and resulted in the deaths of several high-ranking Iranian military officials. The precision strikes have significantly elevated tensions in a region already on edge.
The military action represents a major escalation in the ongoing shadow war between the two nations that has periodically flared into direct confrontation. International observers worry that the situation could quickly deteriorate into a regional conflict that might draw in other powers, including the United States.
Carlson's newsletter specifically warned about the potential for American involvement, reflecting his long-standing opposition to U.S. military interventions in the Middle East. He has frequently criticized politicians from both parties for what he characterizes as needless foreign entanglements.
Carlson's stance has placed him at odds with other prominent conservative voices who have urged Trump to take a more aggressive approach toward Iran. These disagreements reflect broader divisions within right-wing media about America's proper role in global affairs.
In recent weeks, Carlson has engaged in public disagreements with fellow conservative commentators who advocate for a more hawkish U.S. foreign policy. These disputes highlight the ongoing debate within Republican circles between more traditional interventionist positions and the "America First" approach championed by some Trump supporters.
The president now faces the difficult task of navigating these competing pressures within his own base while managing a potentially explosive international situation. How Trump responds could significantly impact both his foreign policy legacy and his standing with different factions of his supporters.
President Trump now confronts one of the most consequential foreign policy challenges of his administration as Israel and Iran stand on the brink of all-out war. The criticism from Carlson, one of his most influential media allies, adds another layer of complexity to an already delicate situation.
The president must balance America's traditional alliance with Israel against the risks of being drawn into another costly Middle Eastern conflict. Carlson's warning that the president's handling of this crisis "will define Donald Trump's presidency" underscores the political stakes involved.
As international tensions continue to mount, observers across the political spectrum are watching closely to see how Trump will respond to Carlson's public rebuke and the escalating situation between Israel and Iran. The president's decisions in the coming days could have profound implications for regional stability and America's role in the Middle East.
House Republicans secured a razor-thin victory Thursday on a major spending cuts package, delivering a legislative win for President Donald Trump despite significant resistance from within their own party. The $9.4 billion rescissions bill passed by just two votes.
According to the Washington Examiner, the House approved the Rescissions Act of 2025 by a vote of 214-212, with four Republicans breaking ranks to oppose the legislation. The package now heads to the Senate, where it faces an uncertain future.
The bill targets several federal programs for substantial cuts, including $1.1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which funds PBS and NPR. It also proposes $8.3 billion in reductions to the U.S. Agency for International Development, the African Development Foundation, and portions of the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief.
GOP leadership faced strong resistance from centrist members uncomfortable with cuts to public broadcasting. The narrow margin highlights the delicate balance Speaker Mike Johnson must maintain within his caucus.
Representatives from both rural and urban districts voiced concerns about how funding cuts would impact local public broadcasting affiliates. Nevada Republican Mark Amodei argued that while some lawmakers might want to punish national stations for perceived editorial stances against Trump, the cuts would disproportionately harm local stations.
"It's easier for the nationals to raise money if they got to make up for some deficit, for some funding, than it is these guys," Amodei said, describing local public media outlets as "important pieces of infrastructure in their communities." This sentiment was echoed by other Republican lawmakers who ultimately voted against the package.
The rescissions package now faces additional hurdles in the Senate, where Republican leadership has indicated they won't take up the bill until July at the earliest.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune confirmed that his chamber will prioritize passing a budget reconciliation bill before considering the rescissions package. "We'll do reconciliation first," Thune told reporters Thursday, adding that the rescissions vote would "probably would be a July time frame."
This delay creates potential timing challenges since the White House initiated a 45-day clock when it sent the rescissions package to Congress on June 3. This gives lawmakers until August 5 to complete the process, assuming only weekdays count toward the deadline.
The proposed $1.1 billion cut to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting has emerged as the most contentious element of the package, sparking debate about government funding for media.
Republican Representatives Don Bacon of Nebraska and Nicole Malliotakis of New York joined those expressing reservations about the broadcasting cuts. Both cited strong relationships with local affiliates and feedback from Republican constituents who oppose funding reductions for public media.
Malliotakis raised additional concerns about the package's lack of specificity, saying she was worried about "a blanket rescissions package that isn't clear about what programs are going to be cut within those accounts." She warned about potential fights to restore funding after cuts are implemented.
The rescissions package represents a significant test for President Trump's fiscal agenda as Republicans work to implement spending cuts promised during the campaign.
The White House submitted the package on June 3, triggering a legislative process that requires only a simple majority of 50 votes to pass in the Senate. This lower threshold could prove crucial given the narrow Republican majority in the upper chamber.
Meanwhile, GOP leaders are simultaneously working on a budget reconciliation package they hope to have on Trump's desk by July 4, although some Senate Republicans have expressed doubts about meeting this ambitious timeline. The dual-track approach reflects the administration's determination to demonstrate fiscal restraint early in Trump's term.
Nashville's music community is reeling after an emerging country music star was involved in a fatal traffic incident over the weekend. Rising country artist Conner Smith, known for his hit "Creek Will Rise," has found himself at the center of a tragedy following a Sunday evening accident.
According to Breitbart, Smith was driving his Chevrolet Silverado pickup truck in downtown Nashville when he struck 77-year-old Dorothy Dobbins as she crossed 3rd Avenue North. The collision occurred around 7:30 p.m., just as the city's annual CMA Fest was concluding its four-day run.
Metropolitan Nashville Police Department officials revealed that Dobbins was within a marked crosswalk when the accident occurred. The elderly resident, who lived in the vicinity, was rushed to Vanderbilt University Medical Center but succumbed to her injuries.
Police have indicated that the 24-year-old singer appeared to have failed "to yield the right of way to the pedestrian." This detail has become a central focus of the investigation as authorities work to determine exactly what transpired at the intersection.
Authorities confirmed that Smith showed no signs of impairment at the time of the incident. No charges have been filed against the musician as the investigation continues, with police stating they're still gathering evidence and analyzing the circumstances surrounding the fatal collision.
A source close to the situation told media outlets that Smith was not distracted by his phone when the accident occurred. The same source claimed that police released the singer immediately after determining he wasn't under the influence of alcohol or drugs.
An attorney representing Smith has issued a statement addressing the tragedy. The statement expressed that Smith's "heart goes out to Ms. Dobbins' family during this incredibly difficult time" and confirmed that the artist "continues to cooperate fully with the ongoing investigation."
The accident occurred on the final day of Nashville's CMA Fest, a major country music celebration that draws thousands of fans to the city. Smith had performed at the festival, posting photos from his appearance on Instagram with the caption "Hometown hits different" prior to the accident.
Following news of the incident, comments on Smith's most recent social media posts have been limited. The singer has not yet issued a personal statement about the accident on any of his social media platforms, where he regularly engages with his growing fanbase.
Smith began making waves in the country music scene at a remarkably young age, securing his first publishing deal when he was just 16 years old. His career gained significant momentum after signing with The Valory Music Co. label in 2019.
The Nashville native has been steadily building his reputation in the country music world with songs like "I Hate Alabama" and "Take It Slow." His recent festival appearance demonstrates his growing profile within the industry as he continues to expand his audience.
Smith represents part of a new generation of country artists who have leveraged both traditional career pathways and social media to build their brands. His performance at CMA Fest placed him alongside both established stars and fellow emerging artists.
The accident involving Smith has cast a shadow over what was otherwise a successful Nashville music weekend. The CMA Fest, which ran from Thursday through Sunday, typically showcases both established and emerging talent across multiple venues throughout the city.
Dorothy Dobbins, the victim in the accident, lived near where the collision occurred. Police confirmed she was using a marked crosswalk when she was struck by Smith's vehicle around 7:30 p.m. on Sunday evening, suggesting she was following proper pedestrian protocols.
The Metropolitan Nashville Police Department continues to investigate all aspects of the incident, including road conditions, visibility factors, and traffic patterns at the time of the collision. Their findings will determine whether any charges might eventually be filed against the country singer as they complete their thorough examination of the evidence.
A federal judge with significant family ties to the Supreme Court has been assigned to California Governor Gavin Newsom's legal challenge against President Donald Trump. The case centers on Trump's controversial decision to federalize National Guard troops amid ongoing unrest in Los Angeles.
According to Fox News, Judge Charles Breyer, the younger brother of retired liberal Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, will preside over the high-profile lawsuit. Charles Breyer, appointed to the federal bench by former President Bill Clinton, received the case through the Northern District of California's random assignment system.
The lawsuit alleges that Trump overstepped his authority by mobilizing California National Guard troops without Newsom's consent to address anti-immigration enforcement protests. This legal battle pits one of the nation's most prominent Democrats against the Republican president in what could become a landmark case on federal versus state authority.
Judge Charles Breyer's family connection to the Supreme Court has drawn attention, though there's no indication of impropriety in the case assignment. His brother Stephen served nearly three decades on the Supreme Court after being appointed by President Clinton in 1994.
The Northern District of California's court website explicitly states that cases are assigned "blindly and at random" through an automated system. This process is designed to prevent any perception that judges are hand-selected for politically sensitive cases.
Newsom's lawsuit represents a direct legal challenge to Trump's authority as commander-in-chief. The California governor claims the president made an "unprecedented power grab" by federalizing National Guard troops without gubernatorial approval, an unusual move that allegedly undermined state sovereignty.
The legal dispute emerges from escalating unrest in Los Angeles County where anti-ICE protests have grown increasingly violent. Some demonstrations have devolved into rioting, with protesters reportedly throwing concrete bottles at law enforcement officers.
The situation deteriorated further after Trump's National Guard deployment, with rioters setting fire to self-driving cars and looting stores in parts of the county. Newsom's lawsuit directly connects Trump's military intervention to the subsequent increase in chaos and violence.
Trump has defended his decision as necessary to protect ICE personnel and federal buildings from violent protesters. The president's action represents a rare instance of federalizing a state's National Guard without the governor's request or approval, highlighting the extraordinary nature of the current situation.
The case carries significant political weight as it involves Newsom, considered a potential Democratic presidential contender for 2028, directly challenging President Trump's authority during a period of national unrest.
The lawsuit comes amid speculation about Newsom's political ambitions beyond California. His direct confrontation with Trump on a constitutional issue concerning federal versus state power could position him as a leading voice in the Democratic Party.
The timing is particularly notable as it coincides with growing Republican criticism of Newsom's handling of the protests. Some Republican lawmakers have accused the governor of failing to maintain order, creating the conditions that led to Trump's intervention.
The assignment of Judge Breyer to this case comes amid broader concerns about judicial impartiality in politically charged cases. Some Republicans have recently questioned case assignments in Washington, D.C., specifically targeting Judge James Boasberg.
These critics have suggested that Boasberg deliberately took on Trump-related cases to influence outcomes in favor of plaintiffs. However, Boasberg has directly refuted these claims, stating that his assignments were randomly determined by computer like most other cases in his court.
As Judge Charles Breyer prepares to hear arguments in this consequential case, both the Trump administration and California officials are gearing up for a legal battle that could help define the boundaries between federal and state authority during civil unrest. The outcome may establish important precedent for presidential powers in deploying military forces within U.S. borders.