Pennsylvania Democratic Sen. John Fetterman responds to recent media scrutiny about his physical and mental well-being.
According to Fox News, Fetterman rejected claims made in a New York Magazine article that questioned his fitness for office, comparing the experience to being "in Goodfellas" and dismissing it as a "dumb hit piece."
The controversial article, which emerged late last week, featured testimonies from former staffers who expressed concerns about Fetterman's health following his stroke during the 2022 campaign. Among the most notable revelations was a communication from Adam Jentleson, a former top aide, who reportedly wrote to Walter Reed doctors about alarming behaviors exhibited by the senator.
Former staffers, including those who previously supported Fetterman's progressive agenda, have begun speaking out about their observations of the senator's condition. The New York Magazine exposé detailed several concerning incidents, including a February 2023 episode at the Library of Congress during a Democratic caucus retreat where Fetterman was found sitting alone and unresponsive.
The report also described a near-accident involving the senator on Capitol Hill, where he was allegedly found wandering before being diagnosed with severe dehydration at George Washington University Hospital. These incidents culminated in Fetterman's admission to Walter Reed Medical Center on February 15.
Multiple sources cited in the article described a significant shift in Fetterman's behavior and demeanor following his hospital discharge. The senator reportedly became more outspoken on various issues, particularly regarding the Israel-Gaza conflict, sometimes putting him at odds with his Democratic colleagues.
The article raised questions about Fetterman's relationship with his wife, Gisele, suggesting tensions over his health management and political positions. Staff members reported challenging interactions with Mrs. Fetterman, adding another layer of complexity to the senator's office dynamics.
Fetterman addressed these claims directly on Tuesday, suggesting that former staffer Jentleson must harbor a "bizarre grudge" to speak so critically of him. The senator maintained a dismissive attitude toward the article's allegations, emphasizing that everyone has moved past the situation.
Jentleson, who previously served as an aide to Senator Harry M. Reid, declined to comment on the situation. However, he has recently expressed criticism of the progressive left's rhetoric regarding the Israel-Gaza situation in separate media appearances.
The controversy surrounding Fetterman's health and office management continues to generate discussion within political circles. Despite the scrutiny, the senator maintains his active role in the Senate, participating in crucial votes and policy discussions.
These revelations come at a time when Democratic leadership faces increased attention regarding party unity and messaging on key issues. The situation highlights the challenges of managing public service responsibilities while dealing with health concerns and internal staff dynamics.
Sen. John Fetterman faces ongoing scrutiny regarding his health and leadership capabilities following a detailed New York Magazine article featuring accounts from former staffers. The report, which emerged in May 2025, sparked discussions about the senator's recovery from his 2022 stroke and his ability to fulfill his Senate duties.
Despite the criticism and concerns raised by former staff members, Fetterman continues to maintain his position and dismiss the allegations, characterizing them as a targeted attack while emphasizing his commitment to serving his constituents.
President Donald Trump takes aim at celebrities who fled to the United Kingdom by announcing a significant tax measure affecting the film industry abroad.
According to The Western Journal, Trump revealed plans on Truth Social to implement a 100% tariff on foreign-produced movies entering the United States, particularly targeting the UK's growing film industry, where several Trump critics have relocated.
The president's announcement comes as a response to what he perceives as a threat to America's domestic film industry. Trump emphasized the rapid decline of Hollywood production and expressed concern about other countries offering incentives that draw filmmakers and studios away from the United States.
The United Kingdom's strategic tax relief program, established in 2007, has successfully attracted major film productions. The policy extends beyond movies to include high-end television productions, creating a thriving entertainment industry across the Atlantic.
British officials have implemented an aggressive tax relief system that has proven highly effective. The James Bond franchise serves as a prime example, with recent films receiving substantial tax benefits ranging from 21 million to 47 million pounds.
The upcoming "Jurassic World: Rebirth," scheduled for release in July, highlights the scale of these incentives. The film, dubbed the most expensive movie ever made, received a reimbursement exceeding 89 million pounds for choosing the UK as its production location.
Trump framed the issue as a matter of national security, pointing to what he calls "messaging and propaganda" concerns. His Truth Social announcement emphasized this perspective with characteristic directness.
In his statement, Trump wrote:
The Movie Industry in America is DYING a very fast death. Other Countries are offering all sorts of incentives to draw our filmmakers and studios away from the United States. Hollywood, and many other areas within the U.S.A., are being devastated. WE WANT MOVIES MADE IN AMERICA, AGAIN!
The president's approach aligns with his broader economic nationalism, viewing the entertainment industry's exodus as part of a larger pattern of American industrial decline.
The British Film Institute's direct funding through national lottery programs compounds the UK's attractiveness to filmmakers. However, the tax relief system remains the primary driver of growth in British film production.
Tax monitoring organizations have noted the significant impact of these incentives. While some argue about the actual cost to British taxpayers, the policy's effectiveness in attracting major productions is undeniable.
The implementation of Trump's 100% tariff would force production companies to reconsider their international filming strategies. This measure could effectively neutralize the UK's tax advantages for films intended for American audiences.
President Trump's tariff announcement represents a calculated move to protect America's entertainment industry from foreign competition. The policy specifically targets the United Kingdom's growing film sector, where several prominent Trump critics have sought refuge. The measure aims to counter British tax incentives that have successfully attracted major film productions away from the United States. As the entertainment industry awaits implementation details, the policy's impact could reshape the global landscape of film production and potentially influence the decisions of celebrities who have relocated abroad.
The legendary investor Warren Buffett made a surprise announcement during Berkshire Hathaway's Annual Shareholders Meeting in Omaha.
According to Daily Caller, the 94-year-old chairman and CEO of Berkshire Hathaway revealed his plans to retire by the end of the year, naming Greg Abel, the company's vice chairman of non-insurance operations, as his successor.
The announcement came near the conclusion of the meeting, where Buffett addressed 40,000 shareholders. He disclosed that only his children, Howie and Susie, were aware of his decision beforehand, while the news would come as a surprise to the remaining board members at their upcoming meeting.
Abel, a 62-year-old Canadian executive from Edmonton, joined Berkshire in 2000 after successfully transforming CalEnergy from a small geothermal energy company into a diversified energy business. The announcement appeared to catch Abel off guard, though he has been considered the heir apparent since 2021.
Buffett expressed confidence in Abel's leadership capabilities during the four-hour question-and-answer session. He emphasized that the decision to maintain shareholdings was based on his belief in Berkshire's improved prospects under Abel's management.
Abel committed to maintaining Buffett's patient investment philosophy and indicated his readiness to utilize Berkshire's substantial cash reserves of $347 billion when promising investment opportunities arise.
The "Oracle of Omaha" began his investment journey at a remarkably young age, purchasing his first stock at 11 and filing taxes by 13. His most significant achievement came in 1960 when he acquired Berkshire Hathaway, then a struggling textile mill.
Buffett shared his thoughts about the transition with shareholders:
Tomorrow, we're having a board meeting of Berkshire, and we have 11 directors. Two of the directors, who are my children, Howie and Susie, know of what I'm going to talk about there. The rest of them, this will come as news to, but I think the time has arrived where Greg should become the chief executive officer of the company at year end. I could be helpful, I believe, in certain respects, if we ran into periods of great opportunity or anything.
Under Buffett's leadership, Berkshire transformed from a suit-lining manufacturer into a diverse conglomerate comprising numerous companies. The company achieved a historic milestone by becoming the first non-tech U.S. company to reach a $1 trillion valuation.
Despite stepping down as CEO, Buffett, currently the world's fifth-richest person according to Forbes, plans to remain involved with the company. He indicated his willingness to provide guidance during significant opportunities or challenging periods.
The transition marks a pivotal moment for Berkshire Hathaway as Abel prepares to take the helm of one of the world's most successful investment conglomerates. His appointment represents both continuity and evolution in Berkshire's leadership approach.
The change in leadership maintains strong ties to Buffett's investment philosophy while introducing new perspectives through Abel's operational expertise.
Warren Buffett's retirement announcement marks the end of a remarkable 55-year tenure as CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, during which he transformed a failing textile company into a trillion-dollar conglomerate. The transition to Greg Abel's leadership represents a carefully planned succession, with Abel's selection as heir apparent dating back to 2021. As Berkshire Hathaway prepares for this historic change, Abel stands ready to lead the company with $347 billion in cash reserves while maintaining Buffett's patient investment philosophy.
Juan Gabriel Orona-Rodriguez, a 28-year-old active-duty Army soldier, has been arrested on federal charges connected to cocaine distribution in a recent drug raid.
The raid in which the Army soldier was entangled involved an illegal nightclub in Colorado Springs, and it resulted in 114 arrests and the confiscation of narcotics and firearms, as Breitbart reports.
On April 21, the Drug Enforcement Administration conducted a surprise operation at an underground nightclub called Warike in Colorado Springs. The raid was part of a larger crackdown initiative headed by the Department of Justice known as "Operation Take Back America," which aims to address illegal immigration and violent crime. During this operation, officers arrested Orona-Rodriguez, who is now facing charges of drug distribution and conspiracy.
Orona-Rodriguez is alleged to have sold cocaine to an undercover DEA agent during the course of a week, leading to his arrest. Federal investigators found text messages on his phone, suggesting that he had been involved in cocaine transactions dating back to Sept. 16, 2024. These communications indicate a pattern of regular drug activity.
Warike, the nightclub where Orona-Rodriguez allegedly conducted these sales, has been under suspicion for criminal activities. It has frequently been the source of emergency calls involving violence and narcotics. These activities prompted law enforcement to increase their monitoring and ultimately led to the recent raid.
Interestingly, among those arrested during the raid were 17 active-duty members of the U.S. Army, revealing a concerning connection between the military and illegal activities at the venue. Orona-Rodriguez’s involvement extends beyond drug distribution, as he is linked with Immortal Security LLC, a company that provides armed security services to nightclubs.
The connection between Immortal Security LLC and criminal networks in establishments like Warike raises questions about the extent of illegal operations protected under the guise of legitimate security. Law enforcement officials are delving deeper into these ties as the investigation continues.
The Denver FBI Field Office, along with the DEA's Colorado Springs Resident Office, is conducting an extensive investigation into this matter. They are working closely with the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Colorado to ensure all angles are covered. The raid and subsequent arrests highlight the ongoing efforts to curtail illegal activities as part of broader national operations.
As officials stated, "This case is part of President Trump’s 'Operation Take Back America,' a multi-faceted strategy leveraging the Department of Justice’s extensive resources to combat illegal immigration and eliminate transnational criminal organizations." The emphasis of the operation is also on safeguarding communities from violence.
The large number of arrests -- 114 individuals -- during the nightclub raid underscores the significance of this operation and the scale of the problem being addressed. Many of those arrested were identified as illegal aliens, further highlighting the complexities of the issues at the heart of Operation Take Back America.
Public reaction to the arrests and the broader implications of military involvement in such illegal activities have sparked a mix of concern and support. The ongoing judicial process will undoubtedly shed light on the specifics of the charges and the nature of the military personnel’s participation.
As the legal proceedings unfold, the case against Orona-Rodriguez will be closely watched. His military affiliation raises questions about the impact and reach of criminal networks, as well as the responsibility of military personnel in civilian spaces. The complexity of the charges requires careful examination to ensure a fair trial process.
The ramifications of this case extend beyond the immediate legal consequences. It touches on larger themes of military conduct, the integrity of armed forces members, and the broader societal issues of drug distribution and illegal immigration.
Authorities involved in the case are committed to thoroughly investigating all aspects and hold those responsible accountable. President Donald Trump’s operation will likely lead to tighter control and further actions against those involved in criminal networks nationwide.
The Trump administration is seeking the intervention of the U.S. Supreme Court after an injunction by a Maryland judge blocked the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing personal data held by the Social Security Administration (SSA).
The administration's emergency request follows an unsuccessful appeal to the 4th Circuit Court, which upheld the district judge’s decision in a close 9-6 ruling, as The Hill reports.
The initial injunction came from U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander, who determined that the methods proposed by the DOGE to access SSA's personal data were problematic, though their objectives were laudable. Judge Hollander’s decision allowed access only to redacted or anonymized data, provided that DOGE personnel received adequate training. She maintained that the measures put in place were necessary to protect sensitive personal information.
Solicitor General D. John Sauer, representing the Trump administration, argued that the restrictive ruling significantly hindered federal efforts to eliminate waste and fraud. In the emergency application to the Supreme Court, Sauer criticized the sweeping nature of the injunction, suggesting it severely impeded not just federal priorities but the proper functioning of the Executive Branch as well.
The contested access stems from the Department of Government Efficiency's mission to modernize government systems and cut down on inefficiencies. However, the coalition of government unions, backed by Democracy Forward, contested this access, citing concerns over privacy law violations. They argue that personal identifiable information, managed by the SSA, warrants strong legal protections.
The coalition's resistance to DOGE's data access reflects broader privacy debates that have become increasingly poignant in the digital era. Managing citizens’ personal data responsibly has posed challenges for federal agencies, and this issue underscores the tensions between efficiency and privacy safeguards.
The 4th Circuit's decision to maintain the lower court's injunction represents a significant legal roadblock for the Trump administration. This close 9-6 ruling highlights the contentious nature of the case, with both legal and ethical considerations at play. The coalition against DOGE's request remains steadfast, drawing attention to the risks involved in potentially exposing sensitive data without sufficient oversight.
Against this backdrop, Sauer asserted that preventing agency experts, specifically trained to manage waste and fraud, from performing their duties ultimately weakens federal initiatives. The emergency appeal aims to overturn previous findings and empower the DOGE to proceed with its intended data acquisition.
With the coalition's response to the Supreme Court challenge imminent, the administration is keenly awaiting the high court's take on this pivotal issue. The request to the Supreme Court marks a crucial phase in this fast-evolving narrative. The outcomes not only bear immediate implications for DOGE's operational scope but also for privacy policies across federal entities.
Legal experts suggest that the Supreme Court's response could establish a precedent for how federal agencies handle similar privacy issues in the future. It may well chart new territories in balancing government operational efficiencies with individual data rights.
The decision to escalate the matter to the Supreme Court underscores its urgency from the Trump administration's perspective, viewing the injunction as a significant impediment to its objectives. While the administration’s focus on fraud and waste reduction is uncontested, the methodology has met with substantial legal opposition rooted in privacy concerns.
The saga illustrates broader challenges faced by federal institutions as they navigate an increasingly digital landscape. The need for a robust intersection between technology and privacy law is more crucial than ever. Such legal disputes highlight the ongoing dialogue about governmental access to data versus citizens' rights to privacy -- a conversation likely to continue beyond this specific case.
While the Trump administration awaits the coalition's rebuttal due on Monday, all eyes are on the Supreme Court to determine the balance of power and responsibility. The road ahead promises to be complex, with the high court's decision potentially reshaping the contours of government efficiency and privacy protection.
Four House Democrats have withdrawn their support from a resolution seeking to impeach President Donald Trump.
According to the Washington Examiner, Representatives Robin Kelly, Kweisi Mfume, Jan Schakowsky, and Jerry Nadler removed their names as co-sponsors of the impeachment resolution after discovering it had not received proper approval through Democratic leadership channels.
The resolution, introduced by Representative Shri Thanedar on Monday, contained seven articles of impeachment against Trump, citing allegations of abuse of power, constitutional violations, and tyranny. By Thursday, all four co-sponsors had withdrawn their support, with some claiming they were either mistakenly added or unaware that the measure lacked leadership approval.
A spokesperson for Representative Mfume explained the decision to withdraw support, emphasizing the importance of proper vetting and leadership approval. Kelly's office similarly cited the lack of consultation with the House Judiciary Committee as the primary reason for removing her name from the resolution.
The confusion surrounding the co-sponsorship led to an internal communication from Nadler's legislative director, Andrew Heineman. He urged Democratic staffers to improve communication regarding bill sponsorships to prevent similar misunderstandings in the future.
Democratic leadership has expressed reluctance to pursue impeachment proceedings against Trump during his second term despite previous successful impeachment efforts during his first administration.
House Democratic Caucus Chairman Pete Aguilar addressed the situation, acknowledging impeachment as a potential tool while expressing skepticism about Republican support. He said:
Impeachment is, at times, a tool that can be used. This president is no stranger to that; he's been impeached twice. But we don't have any confidence that House and Senate Republicans would do their jobs. And so this is not an exercise that we're willing to undertake.
Representative Becca Balint highlighted the challenges of pursuing impeachment without Republican support, pointing to the limited number of GOP members willing to oppose Trump's administration. She noted:
Republicans didn't do anything when there was an insurrection, when people were fearing for their lives, and they wouldn't vote to convict. The folks in those seats haven't changed.
Several Democratic representatives have privately acknowledged their belief that Trump has committed impeachable offenses. However, they consider the timing inappropriate due to insufficient votes and a perceived lack of Republican courage to support such measures.
The situation has highlighted the complex dynamics within the Democratic Party regarding Trump-related initiatives. Leadership appears focused on more strategic approaches rather than pursuing impeachment without adequate support.
The incident has also sparked discussions about improving internal communication processes among Democratic offices to prevent similar confusion in the future.
The recent impeachment resolution withdrawal marks a significant moment in Democratic Party strategy regarding Trump's presidency. Representative Thanedar became the first Democrat to introduce impeachment articles against Trump in his second term, following two previous impeachment attempts during his first administration.
While Democrats maintain their concerns about Trump's actions, they have chosen to prioritize practical considerations over symbolic gestures, acknowledging the current political landscape's constraints on successful impeachment proceedings.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth addresses ongoing controversies while highlighting significant improvements in military recruitment under the Trump administration.
According to Breitbart, during Wednesday's Cabinet meeting, Hegseth reported unprecedented recruitment numbers across all military branches, marking a dramatic shift from the challenges faced during the Biden administration.
The Defense Secretary emphasized how the military's transformation since Trump's return to office has attracted more recruits. He pointed to several policy changes, including the restoration of traditional fitness standards and the reversal of base name changes implemented during the previous administration. The department has also welcomed back service members who were discharged due to COVID-19 vaccine mandates.
Recent data supports Hegseth's claims about recruitment success. As of mid-May, the Army had enlisted 51,837 recruits, achieving 85% of its fiscal 2025 target of 61,000 personnel. This surge in military recruitment coincides with similar trends in law enforcement and firefighting sectors nationwide.
President Trump acknowledged the widespread improvement in public service recruitment, noting that many departments now maintain waiting lists. This marks a significant turnaround from the recruitment challenges faced just six months ago.
The Department of Defense's cultural overhaul under Hegseth's leadership has played a crucial role in attracting new recruits. The secretary shared his perspective on the department's controversial decisions:
Well, Mr. President, I think we're controversial because we're over the target. And like so many things, Mr. President, you inherited a demoralized military that couldn't recruit, that was perceived as weak after what happened in Afghanistan and elsewhere because of Joe Biden. What we have seen since your election and the inauguration has been nothing short of a recruiting renaissance.
The positive recruitment news comes amid renewed media scrutiny of Hegseth regarding "Signal-gate." The New York Times recently published allegations about Hegseth sharing attack plans in a separate Signal chat, similar to those revealed in March when a left-wing journalist was accidentally added to a different chat group.
Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell strongly refuted these claims. He dismissed the allegations as politically motivated attacks from recently terminated employees. Parnell emphasized that no classified information was shared in any Signal chat conversations.
The spokesman defended the administration's progress:
Another day, another old story—back from the dead. The Trump-hating media continues to be obsessed with destroying anyone committed to President Trump's agenda. This time, the New York Times — and all other Fake News that repeat their garbage — are enthusiastically taking the grievances of disgruntled former employees as the sole sources for their article. They relied only on the words of people who were fired this week and appear to have a motive to sabotage the Secretary and the President's agenda.
In recent months, the Defense Department has focused on reversing policies implemented during the previous administration. These changes include reinstating traditional military base names like Fort Benning and Fort Bragg, strengthening physical fitness requirements, and eliminating what Hegseth describes as "wokeness" from military operations.
The recruitment renaissance has extended beyond the military to other public service sectors. Police departments and fire stations across the country report similar improvements in recruitment numbers, suggesting a broader shift in public service appeal.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's report at Wednesday's Cabinet meeting highlighted the military's successful recruitment efforts under the Trump administration. The unprecedented surge in enlistment numbers across all service branches reflects the impact of recent policy changes and cultural shifts within the Department of Defense.
The positive recruitment trends, despite ongoing controversies like Signal-gate, demonstrate the effectiveness of the administration's military reforms. As the Department of Defense continues implementing changes, officials maintain their focus on strengthening military readiness and personnel quality while addressing media scrutiny of their methods and decisions.
President Donald Trump's latest executive action targets language requirements in the commercial trucking industry amid growing safety concerns.
According to Newsweek, Trump signed an executive order on Monday that mandates commercial truck drivers demonstrate English proficiency, effectively reversing a 2016 Obama-era memorandum that had relaxed enforcement of language requirements.
The order directs the Department of Transportation to strengthen inspection procedures for verifying drivers' English language skills and reviewing commercial driver's license authentication. Under the new policy, drivers who fail to meet English proficiency standards will be immediately placed out of service, marking a significant shift from the previous administration's more lenient approach.
Republican Representative Harriet Hageman of Wyoming played a crucial role in pushing for this policy reversal. In an April 10 letter to Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, she cited data showing a consistent increase in fatal truck crashes since the 2016 memorandum's implementation.
The Trump administration emphasizes that English proficiency is essential for road safety, particularly for drivers navigating through challenging weather conditions and terrain. Officials argue that the ability to read road signs and communicate effectively with law enforcement and checkpoint personnel is non-negotiable.
State legislatures have also begun addressing this issue independently. Oklahoma's House of Representatives is currently considering legislation that would require all commercial motor vehicle operators within state borders to demonstrate adequate English language skills.
The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA), representing 150,000 truckers, has expressed strong support for Trump's decision. Todd Peters of OOIDA offered this statement:
OOIDA and the 150,000 truckers we proudly represent strongly support President Trump's decision to resume enforcement of English proficiency requirements for commercial drivers. Basic English skills are essential for reading critical road signs, understanding emergency instructions, and interacting with law enforcement. Road signs save lives—but only when they're understood. That's why OOIDA petitioned the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance earlier this year to reinstate English proficiency as an out-of-service violation.
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has announced plans to make a joint appearance with Trump to outline additional measures aimed at enhancing road safety and supporting American truckers. The administration's executive order, as shared by Breitbart News and reposted by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, states:
President Trump believes that English is a non-negotiable safety requirement for professional drivers, as they should be able to read and understand traffic signs, communicate with traffic safety officers, border patrol, agricultural checkpoints, and cargo weight-limit station personnel, and provide and receive feedback and directions in English.
The implementation of stricter language requirements comes as part of Trump's broader initiative to establish English as the official language of the United States. The Department of Transportation will oversee the enforcement of these new standards through enhanced inspection procedures.
The policy change particularly impacts areas with high commercial truck traffic and challenging driving conditions. Wyoming and other Intermountain West states have been vocal supporters of stricter language requirements due to their unique geographic and weather-related challenges.
The move has garnered support from industry associations and safety advocates who argue that clear communication is essential for preventing accidents and ensuring efficient operations at checkpoints and weigh stations.
President Trump signed the executive order in the Oval Office at 5 p.m. on Monday, setting in motion a significant shift in commercial trucking regulations. The order represents a complete reversal of the 2016 Obama administration memo that had removed out-of-service penalties for English Language Proficiency violations.
The Department of Transportation will now begin implementing stronger inspection procedures and authentication processes for commercial driver's licenses, with immediate consequences for drivers who fail to meet the English proficiency requirements. This development aligns with broader efforts to enhance road safety and standardize communication requirements across the commercial transportation sector.