According to the Washington Examiner, New York officials have petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to dismiss a lawsuit from Missouri that challenges former President Donald Trump’s criminal sentencing.
Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey has initiated legal action against New York in an effort to prevent Trump’s criminal sentence and lift his gag order. Bailey asserts that the conviction infringes on the constitutional rights of Missouri’s voters and electors.
The lawsuit aims to use the Supreme Court’s authority to resolve disputes between states. However, New York Attorney General Letitia James responded with a 48-page brief arguing that Missouri's claims lack basis and are grounded in an ongoing criminal case in New York.
James emphasized that the issues raised by Missouri are already being addressed in New York state courts. She argued Missouri’s claims are without merit and are speculative since the outcomes are currently under review.
In her response, James stated, "Missouri’s suit is based entirely on an ongoing criminal case between the Manhattan DA and former President Trump and does not present an actual controversy between sovereign States.” New York contends that Missouri’s attempt to intervene seriously undermines judicial integrity and risks establishing a dangerous precedent.
Bailey’s lawsuit contends that New York’s legal actions breach the First Amendment rights of Missouri residents. However, James countered that Missouri’s efforts to interfere are speculative and unwarranted.
James added, “Moreover, former President Trump has already raised, and the New York state courts are already adjudicating, the same issues Missouri seeks to raise.” This indicates that the legal proceedings in New York should intellectually and legally resolve the matter.
In May, Trump was found guilty on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to hush money payments to Stormy Daniels. The payments were intended to affect the 2016 presidential election.
James further argued that Missouri lacks the necessary standing to bring a complaint, as Bailey’s claims are based on speculative grounds. She believes the entirety of Missouri’s lawsuit should be dismissed due to this lack of standing.
“Even if the motion [to vacate the jury verdict] is denied, he can appeal his conviction, and his sentence may well be stayed pending appeal,” James wrote, underscoring that the issues Missouri is trying to push are already being actively contested.
Trump, who has denied having any affair with Daniels, has stated his intent to appeal the conviction. This highlights that there are multiple avenues through which the matter is being contested, reducing the urgency or necessity of a Supreme Court intervention.
According to James, allowing Missouri’s suit to proceed would allow an “extraordinary and dangerous end-run around former President Trump’s ongoing state court proceedings.” This could lead to a proliferation of similar, meritless litigation.
In summary, New York officials are seeking the Supreme Court’s intervention to block Missouri’s lawsuit concerning Trump’s sentencing. They argue that the issues Missouri raises are already being handled within New York’s jurisdiction and that Missouri’s claims are speculative and lack standing.
President Joe Biden's unexpected COVID-19 diagnosis in Las Vegas triggered a tense, high-speed return to his Rehoboth Beach residence in Delaware, leading to his swift withdrawal from the 2024 election race.
The Daily Mail reported that President Biden was diagnosed with COVID-19 while in Las Vegas and had to make a rapid return to his Rehoboth Beach home in Delaware. His health and the abrupt change in plans led to his eventual withdrawal from the 2024 election race.
The White House press corps was caught off guard when, less than half an hour before takeoff, they learned of President Biden’s positive COVID-19 test.
As Air Force One ascended at high speed, it began to shake, and flight attendants struggled to maintain their balance.
Reporters onboard Air Force One faced challenges as they lacked Wi-Fi access, leaving them without the flow of real-time information. Moreover, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre declined to provide updates on Biden’s condition.
No further details were furnished about the medical care Biden was receiving, and he remained out of the public eye for almost a week following his diagnosis.
This lack of transparency added to the turmoil as journalists tried to piece together the unfolding situation.
President Biden's 52-year career in politics culminated abruptly with this health crisis, ending within mere days of his diagnosis.
On Monday, July 15, President Biden appeared in high spirits at Joint Base Andrews, where he addressed various press queries.
He reassured reporters of his trust in his Secret Service detail and dismissed Ohio Senator J.D. Vance as a “Trump ‘clone’.”
Biden's agenda included significant appearances at the NAACP National Convention and the Hispanic UnidosUS conference in Las Vegas. He delivered a robust speech at the NAACP convention on Tuesday, though his subsequent health decline was rapid and highly visible.
By Wednesday noon, Biden was an hour behind schedule and appeared visibly pale and fatigued at a Mexican restaurant. His next public engagement was subsequently canceled, causing speculation and concern among those present.
At 3:12 PM that Wednesday, an official announcement confirmed President Biden’s COVID-19 diagnosis.
The motorcade swiftly transported him to Harry Reid International Airport.
Despite assuring reporters that he felt well, Biden's appearance suggested otherwise as he waved with a thumbs-up while boarding Air Force One. The flight to Delaware lasted almost four hours, arriving at Dover Air Force Base at 10:29 PM (EST), with Biden looking pale and unsteady as he deplaned.
Within 72 hours of his diagnosis, Biden declared his withdrawal from the 2024 presidential race via a published letter on social media.
Reflecting on the events, the anxiety and rapid developments over President Biden’s health have cast a shadow on his long-standing political career. From an optimistic mood at Joint Base Andrews to a sudden, concerning retreat to Delaware, the sequence of events highlights the unpredictable nature of health crises in high office.
This whirlwind period serves as a stark reminder of the vulnerability that accompanies positions of power, and how quickly circumstances can change. As the nation processes this abrupt political shift, the emphasis remains on the President’s recovery and the future of the democratic process.
In summary, President Biden's COVID-19 diagnosis, coupled with his forced return from Las Vegas and ultimately his retreat from the 2024 race, marked an unprecedented ending to a long and storied career.
The Justice Department has found transcripts of President Joe Biden's conversations with a biographer, becoming part of an ongoing criminal investigation concerning his handling of classified material.
Politico reported that The Department of Justice recently informed a federal judge that transcripts of President Joe Biden’s talks with a biographer had been located.
These transcripts are linked to a criminal probe examining Biden’s management of classified documents prior to his presidency.
The findings were highlighted in special counsel Robert Hur’s February report, which described President Biden as “a well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.” Since then, the DOJ has experienced a surge in Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and lawsuits from media outlets and conservative groups seeking access to records related to Hur’s investigation.
Concerns about President Biden’s cognitive abilities and overall fitness for office were amplified following his recent poor debate performance against former President Donald Trump. On the heels of these concerns, Biden announced on Sunday that he would no longer pursue reelection.
The Justice Department has resisted demands to release audio recordings of Biden's discussions, arguing that doing so would encroach upon his privacy, risk potential abuse, and discourage future witnesses from consenting to recorded interviews.
In defense, Biden invoked executive privilege over these recordings, aiming to prevent House Republicans from holding Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt.
During a hearing on June 18, DOJ attorney Cameron Silverberg stated, “We don’t have some transcript that’s been created by the special counsel that we can attest to its accuracy.” Silverberg emphasized the immense effort required to process the 70 hours of interviews between Biden and writer Mark Zwonitzer.
On Monday night, Silverberg confirmed that Hur’s office had indeed produced transcripts of segments of these interviews. Biden’s discussions with Zwonitzer, part of his work on memoirs published in 2007 and 2017, contained sensitive information.
The DOJ located six electronic files comprising 117 pages of verbatim transcripts of some of these Biden-Zwonitzer recordings. However, due to the DOJ's policy and the indeterminate nature of Biden’s recollections, prosecutors chose not to press charges.
Recently, the DOJ backtracked on its previous resistance to contacting Hur about the materials integral to his report. This move was followed by conversations with another unnamed individual involved in Hur’s investigation before finally communicating with Hur directly.
Hur's involvement went beyond utilizing the Biden-Zwonitzer audio; he also referenced Biden’s handwritten notes on an Afghanistan memo. Silverberg indicated he would discuss with parties requesting access to Hur’s materials about processing Biden’s notes for public release.
As these developments unfold, U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich has scheduled a hearing on the matter for Tuesday morning.
In summary, the Justice Department's discovery of transcripts involving President Joe Biden and a biographer has become a focal point amid heightened scrutiny over Biden's crisis with classified material.
The DOJ is navigating numerous FOIA requests and legal hurdles, while Biden's mental acuity and fitness for office remain in the spotlight following his decision to withdraw from the 2024 presidential race.
Special counsel Robert Hur's investigation continues to impact the discourse, with Biden’s executive privilege and privacy concerns playing a critical role in the handling of these sensitive materials.
The Biden administration faces legal hurdles as it pushes forward a new debt relief plan for public service workers.
Morning Carpool reported that the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals blocked the administration’s broader monthly payment reduction plan, while President Joe Biden announced $1.2 billion in loan forgiveness for public service employees.
On Tuesday, the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily halted President Joe Biden’s efforts to lower monthly payments for millions of student loan borrowers. This order aligns with several Republican-led states challenging the administration's student loan forgiveness initiative.
This legal roadblock did not deter the President, who subsequently introduced $1.2 billion in loan forgiveness for 35,000 public service workers. This plan targets professionals including teachers, nurses, and firefighters.
The debt relief forms part of the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program, originally established nearly twenty years ago and expanded under Biden's leadership. The initiative is designed to ease the financial burdens faced by those in public service roles.
Since taking office, the Biden administration has forgiven over $168 billion in federal student loan debt, benefiting approximately 4.8 million borrowers. This latest move underscores President Biden’s commitment to making higher education more accessible.
“From day one of my administration, I promised to fight to ensure higher education is a ticket to the middle class, not a barrier to opportunity. I will never stop working to make higher education affordable – no matter how many times Republican elected officials try to stop us,” Biden asserted in a statement.
The announcement of the $1.2 billion forgiveness plan comes as the administration battles against two legal challenges concerning the SAVE (Saving on a Valuable Education) repayment plan. These lawsuits, initiated by Republican-led states, question the legality and implementation of the program.
The SAVE plan is intended to reduce monthly payments for low-income individuals and to expedite their debt relief process. It represents a significant effort by the administration to address ongoing student debt issues.
Despite the current legal impediments, the Supreme Court is anticipated to make a crucial decision on whether to block portions of the SAVE plan while it undergoes thorough litigation. This pending ruling could significantly influence the administration's ability to deliver promised relief.
This recent development adds another layer to the complex legal battles surrounding student debt forgiveness. The administration remains confident in its stance and continues to promote various relief measures.
Public service workers, such as those in education, healthcare, and emergency response, stand to benefit significantly from this initiative.
The PSLF program’s design aims to alleviate financial stress and reward community-driven careers.
These debt forgiveness measures reflect a broader strategy to encourage and retain professionals in vital public service roles.
By reducing their financial burdens, the administration hopes to foster a more stable and committed workforce.
However, the uncertainty due to ongoing legal challenges may affect the administration's ability to implement these changes uniformly and promptly. It remains to be seen how the courts will ultimately rule on these matters and the corresponding impact on borrowers.
As the Biden administration continues to push for broader student debt reform, the interplay between legal rulings and policy initiatives will be critical.
The outcomes of these legal battles could shape the future of student loan forgiveness efforts in the United States.
The combination of temporary setbacks and new announcements underscores the administration’s determination to address student debt concerns. Public service workers, in particular, may look forward to more support and recognition for their contributions.
In conclusion, despite the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals' temporary blockage of a broader debt reduction plan, President Biden’s administration has introduced a significant $1.2 billion forgiveness plan targeting public service workers.
This move is part of a larger strategy that has forgiven over $168 billion in student loans. As the SAVE plan faces legal challenges, the Supreme Court's upcoming decisions will be pivotal in determining the program's future. Public service workers remain at the heart of these efforts, underscoring the administration's commitment to education and financial relief.
According to the New York Post, South African actress Esta TerBlanche, best known for her role in the American soap opera "All My Children," has died at the age of 51.
TerBlanche passed away unexpectedly on Thursday at her North Hollywood home, with the circumstances of her death now under investigation.
Esta TerBlanche, who gained fame following her Miss Teen South Africa win in 1991, died suddenly, according to Barbie Ashley, who described the event as “unexpected.” The actress, who had a significant impact on both South African and American television, was found to have been dead for about a day before medical personnel arrived.
The investigation surrounding TerBlanche’s death is ongoing. Lisa Rodrigo commented that the star's passing is officially “under investigation.” Fans and colleagues alike are left in shock as they await further information.
After winning Miss Teen South Africa, TerBlanche's acting career began with her role as Bienkie Naudé Hartman on "Egoli: Place of Gold," South Africa’s first soap opera, which she starred in from 1992 to 1995. Her notable performance there paved the way for her future in television.
In 1997, TerBlanche was cast as Gillian Andrassy on "All My Children," marking her entry into American television. Initially portrayed as spoiled and arrogant, her character evolved over time into a kinder persona, endearing her to a broad audience.
Gillian Andrassy's journey on "All My Children" ended tragically in 2001 when the character was killed off. Despite this, TerBlanche reprised her role in 2011 for the show’s closing years, returning as a spectral presence in a touching nod to her enduring legacy.
In an interview with Soap Opera Digest, published just a week before her untimely death, TerBlanche reflected on her return to “All My Children.” She recounted the emotional reunion with Cameron Mathison, her co-star, highlighting how her comeback was poignant for both of them. Her words capture the strong bonds formed during her time on the show.
After her stint on “All My Children” concluded following the show’s end in 2013, TerBlanche returned to South Africa. She spoke candidly about her desire to re-enter the Hollywood scene and was spending more time in the U.S. in anticipation of reigniting her acting career.
Her career beyond television included significant philanthropic work, particularly with the South Africa Cancer Foundation Create Your Breakthrough. Driven by her parents' battles with cancer, her commitment to the cause was deeply personal. She expressed a strong hope for medical advancements and a cure for what she described as a "heartbreaking" disease.
TerBlanche’s efforts extended beyond the screen, reflecting a passion for helping others. Her involvement with Create Your Breakthrough was a key aspect of her life. In a heartfelt statement, she shared the emotional impact of losing her mother to cancer and her father's ongoing battle with the illness.
Additionally, TerBlanche cherished her friendships and connections within the industry, often sharing personal stories. One particular memory involved babysitting a co-star’s dog suffering from cancer, an experience she found profoundly moving. Her personal life included her marriage to André Kock in 1997, which ended in divorce in 2008. Despite this, it appears that TerBlanche maintained a positive outlook on relationships and continued to build meaningful connections.
Esta TerBlanche, an accomplished South African actress, passed away at 51 under currently investigated circumstances. Renowned for her roles in “Egoli: Place of Gold” and “All My Children,” she had returned to the U.S. to rekindle her acting career. Her involvement with cancer advocacy marked her commitment to fighting the disease. Fans and colleagues are deeply saddened by her sudden death.
A rumor alleging that Janeen DiGuiseppi, an FBI assistant director, was present during an assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump has been firmly debunked.
Multiple sources, including the FBI itself, have confirmed the claim about the agency leader to be entirely false, as Snopes explains.
Former President Donald Trump narrowly escaped an attempt on his life on July 13, during a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. In the days following, social media lit up with claims that FBI Assistant Director Janeen DiGuiseppi was allegedly present at the rally, seen seated directly behind Trump.
The rumor suggested that DiGuiseppi's presence indicated the plot was an "inside job" orchestrated by official law enforcement. This unfounded theory soon went viral on X (formerly known as Twitter), TikTok, and Reddit, with various users speculating DiGuiseppi’s involvement in coordinating the shooter.
Some social media comments fanned the flames further, alleging that the assassination attempt was even state-sponsored and led by Democratic President Joe Biden. One online user declared, "Inside job and they will never prove it wasn't. History repeats itself JFK pt. 2."
The FBI’s press office responded swiftly and unequivocally to these allegations. An FBI spokesperson labeled the claims as "categorically false."
Authorities have faced challenges in identifying the shooter's motive, but there is no evidence to support these conspiracy theories. The viral spread of the rumor complicated the official efforts to manage public perception and maintain order.
The woman who sparked the rumors bore barely any resemblance to DiGuiseppi. This individual was noted to have long brown hair and wore sunglasses and a baseball cap. Her facial features did not match those of DiGuiseppi.
DiGuiseppi has never been assigned to duties in Pennsylvania, further disproving her alleged presence at the rally. She had no legitimate reason to attend the rally in Butler, and assertions that she directed the shooter are entirely baseless.
Janeen DiGuiseppi was appointed assistant director of the Insider Threat Office at FBI Headquarters in Washington, D.C., in August 2023. Before this, she served as a special agent in charge of the Albany Field Office in New York starting in August 2021. DiGuiseppi’s service history with the FBI dates back to her joining the bureau in 1999.
It is also important to note that the FBI was not responsible for organizing or handling security at the rally. The agency took over the investigation only after the attack occurred, underlining that DiGuiseppi's participation in the event would have been an odd anomaly.
In the aftermath of the attack, law enforcement and federal agencies concentrated on the concerted investigation of the incident. Such unsubstantiated rumors pose a challenge to the ongoing investigative processes, despite their virality online.
The rapid spread of such misinformation demonstrates the considerable power and potential hazards of social media. As seen, even outlandish theories can gain traction and potentially vindicate wild and provocative conjectures among the public.
A Russian court has sentenced U.S. reporter Evan Gershkovich to 16 years in prison after finding him guilty of espionage.
Amid outrage from political figures including Donald Trump, here is speculation of a possible prisoner swap between the U.S. and Russia involving Gershkovich and other detained Americans, as Reuters reports.
The verdict was delivered by a court in Yekaterinburg, with the state news agency RIA reporting the details. Gershkovich, 32, has steadfastly denied the espionage charges against him, claiming that the allegations are groundless.
Gershkovich, who worked for the Wall Street Journal, is accused of gathering secret information on behalf of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. Prosecutors alleged that he collected data regarding a company manufacturing tanks for Russia’s engagement in Ukraine.
Gershkovich is the first U.S. journalist arrested on espionage charges in Russia since the Cold War, marking a significant moment in international relations. Despite the typically lengthy process associated with espionage cases, Gershkovich’s trial proceeded unusually quickly. The trial was conducted behind closed doors, and Friday's hearing marked only the third in the entire process.
The Wall Street Journal has criticized the proceedings, calling the case against Gershkovich a sham. The media company has stood firmly by its reporter, advocating for his innocence and condemning the allegations as baseless.
High-level speculation has emerged about a potential prisoner exchange deal between the U.S. and Russia. Such a swap could involve Gershkovich and other Americans currently detained in Russia. However, the Kremlin has refrained from commenting on the potential for an exchange. When asked by Reuters on Friday, officials chose not to elaborate on any possible negotiations.
The trial, highlighted by its lack of transparency, has been monitored closely by international observers. The quick progression of the case has drawn attention and criticism from various quarters, intensifying the debate over Gershkovich’s innocence and the motives behind his arrest.
The prosecution alleged that Gershkovich was acting under the orders of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. According to these claims, his objective was to gather confidential details about a Russian company involved in tank production for the country’s military actions in Ukraine, though he has continued to deny all accusations.
With the case now concluded, Gershkovich faces a lengthy prison sentence. The international community continues to watch closely, especially in light of the harsh sentencing and the potential implications for U.S.-Russia relations.
The 16-year sentence handed down to Evan Gershkovich represents a severe punishment, reflecting the gravity of the charges in the eyes of the Russian judicial system. Despite the typical duration of espionage cases, which can extend for months, Gershkovich’s trial was notably expedited. Conducted entirely behind closed doors, the unusual speed of the case has fueled further controversy.
International responses have been varied, with significant criticism emanating from journalistic and human rights organizations. The opaque nature of the trial, coupled with the gravity of the charges, has ignited debates regarding press freedom and the treatment of foreign journalists.
The case of Evan Gershkovich is emblematic of the broader tensions between the U.S. and Russia, especially in the realm of media and intelligence.
With allegations rooted in espionage and the collection of sensitive information, such cases inevitably carry significant political and diplomatic ramifications.
The possibility of a presidential candidate dying or becoming incapacitated during the election is a significant concern, especially given the ages of President Joe Biden, who is 81, and former President Donald Trump, who is 78.
The USA Today explores the protocol if a presidential candidate dies, a relevant inquiry given the ages of the candidates, Trump's assassination attempt, and Biden contracting COVID again.
The procedures for replacing a candidate vary depending on when the event occurred in the election cycle. This issue has become particularly pressing after Trump recently survived an assassination attempt and Biden contracted COVID-19 for the third time.
Just this Monday, Trump was officially nominated at the Republican National Convention. Meanwhile, Democratic delegates have yet to vote for Biden. Should the incumbent president pass away or become incapacitated before the Democratic National Convention, slated for August 19-22, delegates would be released from their commitments, and a new nominee would be chosen during the convention.
If a Democratic candidate dies after the convention but before Election Day, the Democratic National Committee would collaborate with party leaders to appoint a new candidate, with input from the Democratic Governors Association. Rebecca Green, an associate professor of election law at William & Mary, commented, “Any one who is planning an election … knows this is a possibility.”
Historically, the Democrats have handled a similar situation in the 1972 election when they replaced Thomas Eagleton with Robert Sargent Shriver as vice presidential candidate via a special meeting of the Democratic National Committee.
For the GOP, if their nominee dies between the Republican National Convention and Election Day, the Republican National Committee members would cast their votes by delegation to select a new candidate. John Fortier, principal contributor to the American Enterprise Institute-Brookings Election Reform Project, explained, “It is essentially a party matter.”
Ballots for the general election are generally printed around early September. At this stage, state regulations differ on how to handle the replacement of candidates. Rebecca Green noted, “Different states have different rules for how to replace candidates and when.”
In the event of confusion, Ned Foley, director of the Election Law Program at Ohio State, added, “There is a potential for some confusion.” Voters may end up casting ballots for electors who are legally bound to vote for the replacement nominee even if an original candidate's name appears on the ballot.
The complexity extends further if the candidate dies before Congress convenes on January 6 to certify the election results. In this case, it is not definitively clear if Congress would count the votes for a deceased candidate. John Fortier said, “It's not 100% clear Congress would count the votes for somebody who is deceased.”
If no candidate achieves the required 270 Electoral College votes, the election could end up being decided in a contingent election by the House of Representatives. The 20th Amendment provides guidance in the event of a president-elect dying after Congress certifies the electoral results. In such a scenario, the vice president-elect would be sworn in as president on Inauguration Day.
Given their advanced ages and recent health issues, Biden's botched assassination attempt and Trump's recurrent COVID case underscore the need for clear procedures during unexpected events. Both the Democratic and Republican parties have established methods for nominating alternative candidates to ensure the stability of the electoral process.
Various mechanisms exist, from party conventions to the congressional certification of votes in January, to manage candidate replacements, aiming to maintain the democratic process. The integrity and continuity of the U.S. presidential election process depend on these established rules and their careful implementation to protect democracy in challenging times.
A man disrupted a live CNN broadcast from the Republican National Convention, drawing attention to Jeffrey Epstein's controversial connections.
During a live report from the Republican National Convention, a man videobombed CNN reporter Kristen Holmes with a T-shirt asking for Jeffrey Epstein's client list, drawing attention back to the controversies surrounding Epstein's connections.
According to Daily Mail, Kristen Holmes, a Washington, D.C.-based reporter for CNN, was reporting live from the convention hall in Milwaukee. During the event, she discussed the security arrangements for former President Donald Trump.
In the middle of her broadcast, an unidentified man appeared behind Holmes wearing a T-shirt with a provocative question: "Where is the Jeffrey Epstein client list?" Holmes seemed unaware of the man's presence as he grinned behind her.
The incident quickly spread on social media, garnering significant reactions from the public. One user commented, "He's asking the right questions!" while another praised the man's boldness, calling him a "legend."
The video continued to circulate, with many questioning why the cameraman did not alert Holmes to the intrusion. Some speculated that he might have shared the sentiments expressed on the T-shirt.
Jeffrey Epstein, who was accused of sexually abusing numerous underage girls, was found hanged in his cell at New York's Metropolitan Correctional Center in August 2019. His death was officially ruled a suicide, though conspiracy theories have persisted.
In 2015, Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein's accusers, filed a court case that revealed a list of approximately 150 alleged associates. This list was unsealed by a judge in Miami in January and included prominent figures such as Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, and Alan Dershowitz.
All the mentioned associates have denied any involvement in sexual misconduct. However, the public continues to demand transparency and accountability regarding Epstein's connections.
Epstein's connections have created challenges for both Democrat and Republican establishments. Recently, at a House Democrat leadership event, Congressman Ted Lieu mentioned that constituents are increasingly concerned about the Epstein files. He said:
We hear a lot from our constituents on different issues but something I've heard that doesn't seem to be being covered are the Epstein files. These files were released... Donald Trump is sort of all over this.
Trump, when Epstein was jailed in 2019, acknowledged knowing Epstein but claimed they had a falling out years ago. "Well, I knew him, like everybody in Palm Beach knew him," Trump said. "I had a falling out a long time ago with him."
Trump further distanced himself, stating, "I don't think I've spoken to him in 15 years. I wasn't a fan ... I was not a fan of his, that I can tell you."
The incident at the Republican National Convention has once again put the spotlight on Jeffrey Epstein's controversial network. The man's T-shirt served as a reminder of the lingering questions about Epstein's client list and the demand for answers. The public's interest in Epstein's connections, particularly those involving high-profile figures, shows no sign of waning. The renewed focus on this issue underscores the need for transparency and accountability in addressing Epstein's legacy.
Daily Mail reported that a leaked phone call between Donald Trump and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has revealed details of an assassination attempt on Trump and his views on vaccines.
The call, which took place in private, was leaked online, showcasing Trump’s harrowing experience during a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. Trump described the bullet that grazed his ear as feeling like "the world's largest mosquito."
Robert F. Kennedy III, RFK Jr.’s son, inadvertently made public this conversation by posting a video clip of the call online before deleting it. The leak has sparked controversy and allegations of collusion between Kennedy and Trump.
During the call, Trump spoke candidly about the assassination attempt, recounting how he narrowly avoided serious injury. He detailed his conversation with Joe Biden afterward, in which Biden inquired about Trump's last-second movement that saved his life. Trump’s depiction of the incident was vivid, likening the bullet’s impact to an enormous insect bite.
Trump also used the opportunity to discuss his skepticism about current vaccination practices, particularly concerning the dosage given to infants. He expressed concerns about the amount administered, suggesting it seemed more appropriate for a much larger animal rather than a baby. Trump has long been vocal about his views on vaccinations, advocating for smaller doses.
Trump attempts to recruit RFK Jr., known for his vaccine skepticism, to join his team and work on immunization policy if he wins a second term. RFK Jr. appeared receptive, though the subsequent leak of their conversation has cast a shadow over their potential collaboration.
RFK Jr.'s son, Robert F. Kennedy III, corroborated the call, emphasizing the importance of public transparency in such discussions. However, his decision to post the video was met with significant backlash, leading to its swift removal. RFK Jr. apologized for the incident, blaming an in-house videographer for the accidental post.
The leak has incited outrage among Democrats, who accuse RFK Jr. of colluding with Trump. Lis Smith, a DNC communications adviser, labeled Kennedy a "spoiler candidate" for Trump, alleging his campaign is funded by Trump's biggest supporters. Smith's accusations highlight the deepening divide and mistrust between the political factions.
Despite the controversy, Trump remains optimistic about his chances of re-election. He mentioned that his lead over Biden is significant, further fueling speculation about his future political plans. Trump's detailed recounting of the attempt on his life and his policy discussions with Biden add another layer to the ongoing political drama.
The assassination attempt, which occurred on a Saturday, has become a focal point of the leaked call. Trump’s candid description of the event and his subsequent conversation with Biden provide a rare glimpse into the behind-the-scenes interactions of political rivals. The exchange between Trump and Biden was surprisingly cordial, with Biden showing genuine concern for Trump's well-being.
RFK Jr.'s involvement in the call and the subsequent leak have put him in a precarious position. His apology for the video’s release and his admission of fault reflects the seriousness of the situation. He stressed that the recording was unintentional and should have stopped the videographer immediately.
The fallout from the leak continues to reverberate, with both Trump and RFK Jr. facing scrutiny. The revelation of their private conversation has opened a new chapter in the ongoing political saga, with potential implications for both their futures.
In conclusion, the leaked call between Donald Trump and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has revealed new details about an assassination attempt on Trump and his controversial views on vaccines. The incident has sparked outrage among Democrats, who accuse RFK Jr. of colluding with Trump. Trump remains optimistic about his political prospects, while RFK Jr. faces the fallout from the leaked video. The call has added another layer of intrigue to the already complex political landscape.