The trial of Michail Chkhikvishvili, a notorious leader of a white supremacist cult, has begun in Brooklyn federal court after his extradition from Moldova.
Top military schools, including the U.S. Naval Academy, are currently entangled in controversy as backlash erupts due to the use of unofficial channels to discuss now-prohibited topics such as critical race theory, as the Daily Mail reports.
Faculty revisions of military curricula that emphasize patriotism while sidelining diversity and inclusion initiatives have sparked significant dissent among staff, resulting in protests and resignations.
The controversy began when the Trump administration implemented significant educational changes in military academies by banning certain topics and emphasizing a patriotic curriculum. These alterations sought to remove courses discussing critical race theory and flagged terms from instruction materials. Some professors have reluctantly turned to artificial intelligence to screen their research, ensuring it aligns with permissible language.
In response, some professors have expressed their dissatisfaction, claiming that such overhauls stifle academic freedom and fail to adequately prepare future officers. At the U.S. Naval Academy, an anonymous professor argued a strong stance on academic integrity, saying, "We are failing them and we are failing in our jobs if we suppress some things we know are true and we parrot other things we know are false."
Graham Parsons, a former West Point professor, became one of the most vocal critics. Disillusioned by the narrowed scope of teaching, Parsons ultimately resigned in protest. Expressing his frustrations, he noted, "I cannot tolerate these changes, which prevent me from doing my job responsibly."
Parsons pointed out the regression in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives within the armed forces, a sentiment echoed by many. This change contrasts sharply with past efforts to recognize and address systemic issues of racism and sexism in military settings. Parsons described the situation as a "feeling of real whiplash," lamenting the suppression of dialogue around these structural issues.
Meanwhile, Trump publicly doubled down on his administration's educational strategy. At this weekend's West Point graduation ceremony, he criticized past "politicization" of the military, insisting that the armed forces' core responsibility is solely to "crush America's adversaries" and to staunchly defend national interests. Trump's perspectives resonate with some, pointing to the need to remove distractions from core military objectives.
Cadets at the Naval Academy are reportedly using personal email accounts rather than official channels to discuss unauthorized topics. This method raises concerns about potential violations in maintaining secure communications. Despite these back-channel discussions, cadets express a sense of conflict, facing challenges in reconciling personal beliefs with organizational directive.
Professors have also reportedly advised cadets to act with integrity even if it means rejecting potentially unlawful orders. One piece of advice directed at them was to "reject it rather than compromise yourself." This guidance underscores a tension between authoritarian demands and individual ethical standards.
Parallel to academic challenges, Trump has been vocal in his stance against various social projects and diversity initiatives within military ranks. From Trump's perspective, such involvement detracts from the military's core responsibilities. He stated, "The job of the U.S. armed forces is not to host drag shows or transform foreign cultures."
Beyond the curriculum changes, Trump's criticism extends to previous administrations’ policies, which he alleges leveraged the military for social experiments, while concurrently neglecting border defenses and weapons stocks for overseas engagements. Such pointed criticism fuels the polarized debate on the current direction of military education and its implications.
Responses vary widely within the military education community. Some embrace the focus on traditional military values, while others urge for a multifaceted approach incorporating modern societal issues. This divide highlights the challenge of maintaining a balanced yet comprehensive educational framework that prepares officers for future challenges.
The unfolding situation reveals a complex intersection of educational policy, political ideology, and military preparedness. While certain faculty members have drawn a firm line in protest, others seek ways to adapt within the existing framework, driven by a commitment to their duties as educators and mentors.
A significant budget reconciliation bill has passed the House of Representatives, igniting debate over its implications and potential impact on green policies.
The Trump-backed bill aims to cement the 2017 tax cuts permanently, remove taxes on tips and overtime, and could spell the end for the Green New Deal, as the Daily Caller reports.
House members passed the bill early Thursday with a slim margin, clocking in at 215-214-1. This legislation seeks to solidify tax rates introduced during the fiscal policies of the first Trump administration back in 2017. By making these cuts indefinite, the bill intends to boost economic incentives for individuals and businesses alike.
Key components of the bill include the elimination of taxes on both tips and overtime pay, which lawmakers assert will provide relief to lower-income workers and stimulate the economy. However, what might be deemed more controversial is the potential cessation of the Green New Deal.
The Green New Deal, initially brought forward by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in the wake of her 2018 election, sets ambitious goals to confront climate change while fostering justice and equality. Nonetheless, Energy Secretary Chris Wright has voiced that the new measure could bring the Green New Deal to a halt.
Wright's assertions underscore the bill's intentions to significantly slash government spending on green technology subsidies. He questioned the efficacy of long-standing subsidies for renewable energy sectors, suggesting that they contributed to rising electricity costs without sufficient benefits.
"Look, the wind subsidies are over 30 years old. The solar subsidies are over 20 years old," Wright explained. His stance signals a shift towards potentially relinquishing decades-long support for renewable energy advancement in favor of free-market competition. Wright continued to highlight that billions of taxpayer dollars had already supported these sectors, questioning the lack of tangible benefit to everyday energy consumers. "If they can compete in the marketplace, great," Wright stated.
Tensions surrounding U.S. energy policies have been ongoing. Since former President Joe Biden took office in January 2021, actions such as rescinding the Keystone XL pipeline permit and canceling an offshore lease sale in May 2022 have been points of contention.
The Biden administration's decisions also included proposed regulations targeting natural gas appliances, influenced by health studies linking gas stove usage to asthma instances in children. These regulatory efforts highlighted a divide in energy priorities and underscore political tensions over American energy independence and environmental safeguards.
Prominent political figures have criticized these regulatory moves, presenting the newly passed Trump-backed bill as a legislative countermeasure to the Biden administration's past environmental policies.
The implications of the House bill reverberate beyond the energy domain, potentially instigating broader dialogues about economic policy and government intervention. Its passage arises from a partisan environment, sparking discussions on balancing economic growth with sustainable environmental practices.
By engraving the 2017 tax policy into permanence, the bill seeks to deliver on Trump's key economic pledges, reflecting Wright's declaration that, indeed, "Promises made, promises kept." Yet, its potential repercussions on green initiatives, including the expansive Green New Deal, continue to be a focal point of both acclaim and condemnation.
The debate now heads to the Senate, where its outcome remains uncertain amid tight political scrutiny and fervent lobbying from both environmental advocates and market-focused proponents.
Democrats and immigration advocates are sounding alarms after Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) launched a new operation that targets illegal immigrants at their immigration and asylum hearings, a move driven by President Donald Trump’s administration.
According to Fox News, ICE began rolling out its nationwide effort on Wednesday, aiming to arrest and rapidly deport migrants who have been in the United States for fewer than two years and appear for scheduled immigration hearings. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is instructing agents to drop pending immigration cases, facilitating expedited removals for those arrested.
This new tactic marks a significant shift from earlier enforcement strategies, which had focused primarily on illegal immigrants with criminal convictions. Now, even those whose only alleged offense is crossing the U.S.-Mexico border illegally are being swept up in the latest round of arrests. The Trump administration’s focus on enforcement and border security continues to be a defining theme as court battles over deportation policies play out.
Supporters of the Trump administration’s strategy argue it is long overdue, citing concerns that loopholes and lengthy court processes allow many illegal immigrants to remain in the country for years. ICE officers, according to sources who spoke with Fox News Digital on condition of anonymity, say Americans should “expect to see a lot more” arrests at immigration and asylum hearings in the coming months.
Critics, however, warn the policy could have far-reaching consequences for families and communities. The expedited deportation process—requiring DHS to drop pending cases before arresting migrants—removes certain legal protections and can leave migrants with little chance to make their case before an immigration judge. Opponents argue this raises due process concerns and risks separating families who have established lives in the U.S.
The policy also comes as the Department of Homeland Security faces legal scrutiny for its deportation practices. On Wednesday, a federal judge ruled that DHS violated a court order by sending a plane of eight migrants to South Sudan without proper “credible fear interviews.” These interviews are required to ensure migrants are not sent to countries where they could face danger.
U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy has emerged as a key figure in the ongoing legal debate. On Wednesday, Murphy ruled that the eight deported migrants—convicted of crimes including homicide and robbery—had not been given the interviews mandated by law. Such interviews allow migrants facing removal to a third country to argue they would be at risk if deported there.
Murphy’s ruling did not immediately halt the deportations but did prompt a review of whether the interviews could be conducted in South Sudan or if the migrants should be returned to the U.S. pending further proceedings. The judge’s scrutiny extends to other cases, such as proposed deportations to Libya, where Murphy previously found that any plans to remove people without notice would “clearly” violate his standing orders.
Legal experts and immigration advocates say these court battles highlight the complexity of immigration enforcement under President Trump. While DHS defends its right to expedite removals for those with no legal status, judges continue to insist that constitutional and humanitarian protections must be respected throughout the process.
Reaction on Capitol Hill has been swift and divided along party lines. House Republicans have expressed strong support for the new ICE initiative, arguing that stricter enforcement is necessary for national security and the rule of law. Some have targeted Democratic officials accused of obstructing ICE operations, pointing to recent controversies at facilities like Delaney Hall.
Democrats, meanwhile, have accused the administration of creating chaos and fear within immigrant communities. They argue that the new policy will lead to more family separations and undermine faith in the justice system. Some Democratic lawmakers have pledged to introduce legislation to limit the administration’s ability to expedite removals without judicial oversight.
The public response reflects this polarization. Advocates for tighter border controls say the administration is finally tackling abuses in the system. Immigration rights groups, however, warn that the policy’s reach could impact thousands of migrants who have otherwise followed legal procedures to seek asylum or relief in the United States.
Legal experts believe that the Trump administration’s expanded enforcement efforts could result in a significant increase in deportations, particularly among migrants who have not committed crimes beyond illegal entry. As more cases are dropped to enable expedited removals, the fate of these individuals will largely depend on ongoing legal challenges and the administration’s willingness to adjust its policies in response to court rulings.
ICE sources have indicated that the public should brace for “a lot more” of these arrests at immigration hearings around the country. For many migrants, the prospect of arrest at their scheduled court appearance adds a new layer of uncertainty as they navigate an already complex and often intimidating immigration system.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, under the direction of President Trump and the Department of Homeland Security, is now pursuing a strategy that could fundamentally reshape the way illegal immigration cases are handled in the United States. The outcome of the current court battles and public debate will determine just how far these new policies go—and what they mean for both the nation’s borders and its values.
Tom Cruise, 62, found himself at the center of viral debate after clips surfaced showing him eating popcorn in a way that left audiences both startled and amused.
According to Daily Mail, the Mission Impossible star was filmed picking up individual pieces of popcorn with his left hand and tossing them into his mouth one at a time, a technique that quickly set social media ablaze.
Cruise, who was attending a special screening for “Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning,” seemed unfazed by the attention, yet his method sparked widespread fascination and mockery. Social media users described the scene as “freaking me out,” with many claiming they had never seen anyone consume popcorn in such a manner.
Short video clips of Cruise’s popcorn ritual at the British Film Institute in London quickly made the rounds on platforms such as X, formerly known as Twitter, and TikTok. Users were quick to voice their opinions, often in incredulous and humorous tones. One user wrote, “The way Tom Cruise eats popcorn is freaking me out.” Another chimed in, “I’ve never seen another human being eat popcorn like Tom Cruise.”
Some users found the display oddly relatable, comparing Cruise’s actions to those of a stereotypical “dad.” Others speculated playfully about his behavior, suggesting that it might be a sign of his well-known perfectionism or even a result of “doing his own stunts” outside of action scenes.
The official IMAX account joined the discourse, remarking, “This might be the most Tom Cruise way to eat popcorn.” The comment further fueled the viral storm, with fans and detractors alike dissecting the implications of Cruise’s snack habits.
Cruise’s public popcorn escapade was not the only moment to capture attention during his promotional tour. At another screening, the actor reportedly called out a fan for finishing their popcorn before the movie began, leading to a wave of secondhand embarrassment online. Witnesses described the moment as cringe-inducing, with one social media user declaring, “This dude can never go to the movies again. Just embarrassing.”
The unusual popcorn-eating technique even sparked more philosophical musings. One X user commented, “He’s kind of like AI. Copies human behavior well but often in some uniquely off ways.” The comparison underscored the sense of novelty and strangeness that many felt upon seeing Cruise’s approach.
Others, however, wondered if maybe the Hollywood superstar had it right all along. “Maybe we are all eating it the wrong way?” asked one online observer, highlighting the divide between critics and the curious.
Beyond the popcorn spectacle, Cruise used his promotional appearances to reaffirm his commitment to his career and his willingness to take risks. Speaking at the New York premiere of “Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning,” Cruise insisted he plans to continue making movies “well past his 100th birthday.” He told The Hollywood Reporter, “I will never stop doing action, I will never stop doing drama, comedy films — I’m excited.”
Cruise is renowned for performing his own stunts, having previously shattered his ankle leaping between skyscrapers and undertaking underwater sequences and biplane wing-walking for the current Mission Impossible film. He credits his lack of fear and careful preparation for his success and longevity.
Cruise told The Hollywood Reporter, “How do I feel about fear? Oh, that’s exciting. I like the feeling. It’s not paralyzing, it doesn’t bother me. I enjoy it. In any endeavor people can be afraid, I don’t mind confronting it and going in. I wanted an interesting life that’s very dynamic.”
While Cruise hoped to focus attention on “Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning,” the popcorn incident has arguably become one of the most talked-about moments of his press tour. Fans who witnessed his unconventional eating style were divided, with some expressing admiration for his individuality while others found it unsettling.
Many questioned whether the intense scrutiny was warranted or if it simply reflected the public’s fascination with celebrity quirks. The viral moment has even prompted some to reconsider their own popcorn habits, with lighthearted debates breaking out across social media as to the “correct” way to enjoy the classic movie snack.
Regardless of the controversy, “Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning” is set for theatrical release on May 23, promising more high-octane action and, perhaps, more unexpected moments from its fearless star.
Millions of travelers hitting the road this Memorial Day weekend will find some welcome relief at the gas pump, with prices reaching a two-decade low. Breitbart News reported that the national average cost of gasoline on Memorial Day 2025 is projected to be $3.08 per gallon—its lowest level, adjusted for inflation since 2003. The drop is expected to continue through the summer, thanks to rising oil production.
Energy data analytics company GasBuddy released a forecast this week predicting that gas prices over the summer travel season will remain well below the highs seen in recent years. Their data points to an average of $3.02 per gallon from Memorial Day through Labor Day, with the chance that drivers might see prices dip under $3.00 per gallon on some days.
Compared to 2024, when the Memorial Day average was $3.58, this year marks a significant 50-cent drop. Consumers are expected to benefit as oil markets stabilize and more supply becomes available. Brent Crude, a major global oil benchmark, currently trades at $65.07 per barrel—down from $83.71 just one year ago. “
American road trip culture remains resilient,” the GasBuddy team stated as part of their 2025 Summer Travel Survey release, which estimates that nearly 70 percent of Americans plan to take a road trip during the summer months.
With prices reaching lows not seen since 2021 in nominal terms, and the cheapest Memorial Day prices adjusted for inflation in over 20 years, analysts point to dynamics within the oil industry as a key driver. Increased production—both domestically and abroad—has helped bring balance to the global oil supply, reducing costs downstream to consumers.
While energy markets have always been influenced by a range of global factors, the recent consistent growth in oil supplies has made a measurable difference in how much Americans are paying at the gas pump. The current cost per barrel of Brent Crude is one of the lowest seen in several years, offering broader impacts beyond fuel prices, including the cost of goods and transportation more generally.
GasBuddy noted that the low price level this summer excludes the extraordinary market collapse of 2020, when travel halted amid the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. That year saw gasoline prices drop to historic levels, but under exceptional circumstances.
President Donald Trump, who made pledges to lower energy costs a central point of his 2024 campaign, is receiving political credit as Americans prepare for a summer of cheaper travel. During the election cycle, Trump focused heavily on energy independence and bringing down fuel costs, a message that resonated with many voters.
At the time, his statements faced strong criticism from political opponents. Among them was Sen. Cory Booker, who sharply dismissed Trump’s affordability pledges using strong language that questioned the integrity of those claims. Booker’s phrasing, widely circulated, was paraphrased to compare the promises to “false excrement.”
Now, with day-to-day prices showing steady declines and projected to stay low, the administration is celebrating what it sees as the fulfillment of one of its more visible campaign promises. Trump advisors have circulated talking points highlighting the significance of these savings for working Americans.
According to GasBuddy's projections, the average price of gasoline between Memorial Day and Labor Day is likely to hover around $3.02 per gallon nationwide. On certain days, particularly when demand softens or supply outpaces expectations, the average could drop below $3.00 for the first time since 2021.
The travel season is often associated with price spikes due to increased demand. However, this year’s consistent supply appears to be counterbalancing those usual upticks. With nearly 7 in 10 Americans planning road trips, consumer fuel demand remains strong, yet steady oil availability has helped keep price increases at bay. For now, industry observers believe the lower pricing trend could continue, barring any disruptions in supply or unexpected geopolitical developments that might constrain oil flow.
The drop in fuel prices could also have a ripple effect on the broader economy. Lower gasoline costs mean more discretionary income for consumers, which can, in turn, boost spending across travel, hospitality, and retail sectors during the crucial summer season.
Additionally, logistics and industries that rely heavily on transportation are seeing savings in operational costs. For small businesses, especially those with delivery and fleet components, this shift offers a temporary reprieve from the inflationary pressures of recent years.
While the direct cause of the lower prices revolves around increased oil production, both domestic policy and global supply chain recalibrations have shaped the current fuel landscape. These changes demonstrate how quickly energy markets can adapt to meet economic demands.
President Donald Trump addressed a distinguished gathering of Kennedy Center Board members and administration officials during a White House dinner, where he reflected on his decision to seek re-election following his departure from office in 2021.
According to the Washington Examiner, Trump candidly expressed his motivation for running again, stating he wanted to "shove it up their a**" after claiming the 2020 election was rigged, drawing laughter and applause from the audience.
The dinner, which took place on Monday night, showcased Trump's recently restructured Kennedy Center Board, now staffed with his loyalists as part of his administration's efforts to revitalize the arts sector. Notable attendees included Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Attorney General Pam Bondi, and White House chief of staff Susie Wiles.
Trump reminisced about his first-term concerns regarding major upcoming events that would occur after his original presidency had ended. These included the 2026 FIFA World Cup and the 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles, both of which he feared would not credit him for securing them during his first administration.
The president's return to office has positioned him to oversee several significant national milestones. His second term will encompass the United States' 250th birthday celebrations, along with the previously mentioned sporting events, giving him considerable influence over their ceremonies and presentations.
During his speech, Trump emphasized how his political opponents' actions inadvertently extended his presence in American politics. His narrative suggested that without the alleged election interference, he would have peacefully retired from public service.
The president delivered his most pointed remarks when discussing his motivation for returning to politics. Trump told the gathered crowd his thought process after leaving office in 2021.
Trump stated to the audience, "And then they rigged the election, and then I said, 'You know what I'll do? I'll run again, and I'll shove it up their a**,'" generating an enthusiastic response from those present at the dinner.
This frank admission aligns with Trump's campaign messaging during the 2024 election cycle, where he frequently highlighted how his departure from office in 2021 ultimately led to his political resurgence.
The Kennedy Center Board dinner represents a shift in Trump's approach to cultural institutions during his second term. His administration has actively worked to reshape the organization's direction and programming choices.
The gathering brought together Trump's new appointees and administration officials in the State Dining Room, demonstrating his commitment to maintaining influence over American cultural institutions. This dinner marks a significant departure from his first term's relationship with the Kennedy Center.
Trump's presidency now extends to cover several major national celebrations and international sporting events that will take place during his second term. His administration will oversee the planning and execution of these significant occasions.
The convergence of the FIFA World Cup in 2026, the Los Angeles Olympics in 2028, and America's 250th anniversary celebrations provides Trump with multiple opportunities to shape these historic events. Each occasion represents a chance for his administration to influence their presentation and messaging.
President Donald Trump's candid speech at the Kennedy Center Board dinner revealed his personal motivations for seeking re-election after leaving office in 2021. The address highlighted how his claims about the 2020 election influenced his decision to run again.
Trump's second term now encompasses several major national and international events, including the 2026 FIFA World Cup, the 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles, and America's 250th birthday celebrations. His administration's influence extends to these significant occasions through his oversight of their ceremonies and presentations.
A high-profile interview with FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino has reignited scrutiny over how Jeffrey Epstein died while in federal custody.
According to Fox News, both top FBI officials insisted that Epstein's death was a suicide after personally reviewing his case file, despite years of public suspicion and conspiracy theories.
Epstein, a well-connected financier awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, was found dead in his Manhattan jail cell in August 2019. The New York City medical examiner ruled his death a suicide by hanging, but the decision triggered a firestorm of speculation, with many suggesting he was murdered to protect powerful figures.
FBI Director Patel, speaking to Fox News' Maria Bartiromo, strongly dismissed alternative theories about Epstein’s death, referencing his own experience in the prison system and legal field. Patel said he was confident in the official finding, emphasizing his background as a public defender and prosecutor and familiarity with jail environments.
Patel told Bartiromo that, in his view, the forensic and circumstantial evidence matched what he had seen in other jail suicides. Bongino, for his part, maintained that he had reviewed all the relevant documentation and echoed Patel’s conclusion. He stated firmly that the facts in the file left no reasonable doubt about the manner of Epstein’s death.
Epstein’s social ties fueled widespread suspicion after his death. He was known to associate with President Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, MIT Professor Noam Chomsky, and Prince Andrew. The phrase “Epstein didn’t kill himself” spread rapidly online, reflecting deep public skepticism. Patel addressed the public’s right to question official findings but stood by his professional assessment of the evidence.
In February, the Justice Department under President Trump released a trove of Epstein-related documents. However, the release was met with anger from some conservatives, who said it fell short of expectations. Instead of a so-called “client list” or new revelations, the documents largely contained Epstein’s contact list.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., voiced her frustration publicly, stating that Congress and the public had not received the information they sought. She described the document release as “a complete disappointment.”
Attorney General Pam Bondi later told Fox News in March that the DOJ had received thousands of additional pages from the Southern District of New York. She indicated a detailed FBI report was forthcoming, though one has yet to be released.
In April, Virginia Roberts Giuffre, a prominent Epstein accuser who had sued Prince Andrew, died by suicide at age 41. Giuffre had claimed Epstein’s then-girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell recruited her at age sixteen and that she was trafficked to powerful men, including Prince Andrew. Her death reignited debate about the fallout from the Epstein case and the fate of other potential witnesses.
Despite intense public speculation, Patel and Bongino remain firm in their position. They argue that those doubting the suicide ruling are entitled to their opinions but reiterate that the official findings are based on the facts.
Before concluding the interview, Patel summarized his position:
As someone who has worked as a public defender, as a prosecutor who's been in that prison system, who's been in the Metropolitan Detention Center, who's been in segregated housing, you know a suicide when you see one, and that's what that was. He added that those who disagree with him "have a right to their opinion."
Bongino also stood by his conclusion, stating that after reviewing the complete file, he was convinced it was a suicide.
Kash Patel and Dan Bongino have publicly stated, after reviewing Jeffrey Epstein’s file, that he died by suicide in his Manhattan jail cell. Their statements come amid renewed outrage over the Justice Department’s release of documents that critics say lacked substantive new information.
Both the FBI and DOJ remain under pressure to provide further details, and with additional evidence reportedly turned over, the story is unlikely to fade from public attention in the near future.
A once-secret Cold War military installation has been detected deep beneath Greenland’s ice sheet, renewing a controversial U.S. interest in the island.
The surprising rediscovery of Camp Century by NASA scientists in April 2024 has prompted President Donald Trump to revive his goal of acquiring Greenland, citing strategic and security interests tied to the long-abandoned base, as the Daily Mail reports.
The facility, known as Camp Century, was constructed in 1959 during heightened Cold War tensions as a U.S. military outpost beneath Greenland’s ice. It served as a cover for Project Iceworm, a covert proposal to install intercontinental nuclear missile launch sites hidden in the Arctic. By 1967, the project was discontinued due to the unstable nature of the glacier, and Camp Century was subsequently abandoned. Though the nuclear reactor that once powered it was removed, various hazardous materials remained buried onsite. Details about the base’s true purpose remained classified until 1997.
In April 2024, Chad Greene, chief scientist at NASA, rediscovered the site during a radar imaging flight across northwestern Greenland. The mission used the Uninhabited Aerial Vehicle Synthetic Aperture Radar (UAVSAR) to map the glacier’s subsurface layers. Greene’s findings captured unprecedented top-down and side images showcasing Camp Century’s 3D layout and internal tunnels. According to Greene, “In the new data, individual structures in the secret city are visible in a way that they've never been seen before.”
The rediscovered base spanned 21 tunnels and stretched approximately 9,800 feet. Despite being buried under layers of snow and ice, the radar identified signatures identical to archived diagrams of the original construction.
Following the rediscovery, Trump publicly renewed his interest in placing Greenland under U.S. control. Since reclaiming the White House, Trump has named the acquisition of Greenland as a policy priority.
In a May 4 interview on Meet the Press, Trump commented, “We need Greenland very badly,” linking the island’s geography to national defense objectives. He also said, “Greenland is a very small amount of people, which we’ll take care of, and we’ll cherish them, and all of that. But we need that for international security.” When asked whether he might use military force to acquire Greenland, Trump replied, “I don't rule it out,” signaling he viewed the rediscovery of Camp Century as a potential strategic asset.
The United States' interest in Greenland dates back decades. During World War II, American forces took responsibility for defending the island while Denmark was under Nazi occupation. After the war ended, the U.S. offered Denmark $100 million in 1946 to purchase Greenland, but the offer was declined. Nevertheless, a 1951 defense treaty allowed Washington to continue building bases and stationing troops on the island.
During the Cold War, the U.S. maintained as many as 17 bases in Greenland with around 10,000 troops. Today, only about 150 U.S. personnel remain stationed at Pituffik Space Base, which supports missile defense, space surveillance and Arctic operations.
In addition to military value, Greenland has tremendous economic potential. Its territory holds vast deposits of rare earth elements, oil and natural gas -- resources increasingly sought after by global powers.
The Trump administration previously argued that Greenland’s natural resources, combined with its location along vital Arctic routes, make it critical for U.S. and NATO influence in the region. The rediscovered Cold War facility has only added to that narrative. The reopening of Camp Century discussions has, however, reawakened environmental concerns regarding the waste left behind. Though the nuclear reactor was removed in the 1960s, items like chemical waste, diesel fuel and low-level radioactive remnants remain buried in the ice sheet. NASA’s radar could now play a critical role in monitoring these potential hazards.
Analysts suggest that interest in Greenland is part of a broader scramble for Arctic influence. As ice melts and new shipping routes open, countries like the U.S., Russia and China are vying for access and stakes in polar resources.
Greenland’s geographical position and untapped natural resources make it one of the most coveted territories in this emerging landscape. Trump’s push for annexation draws on this long-term strategic calculus and a revived sense of military urgency. The rediscovery of Camp Century may have added fuel to this rationale, providing both historic and symbolic justification in support of American expansion into Arctic policymaking.
World War II veteran Denver Moore recently celebrated a landmark birthday, reaching the age of 104, with a surprise message from his favorite U.S. president, Donald Trump.
Earlier this year, Moore's birthday invite to Trump went viral on TikTok, capturing the attention of many, including the president, who responded with a personalized video message, as Fox News reports.
In the video, he candidly expressed his desire for Trump to attend, quipping about his continued support and his hope to cast future votes for Trump.
Moore's heartfelt invitation did not go unnoticed. Though Trump was working on international matters involving Russia, Ukraine, and China and could not attend in person, he ensured his presence was felt through a special video message.
In the video message, Trump greeted Moore warmly, acknowledging the remarkable milestone of his 104th birthday. Identifying himself as Moore’s "all-time favorite president," Trump expressed his regret at not being able to join the party due to pressing global issues.
Trump's words resonated beyond the birthday greeting. He thanked Moore for his exceptional service to the United States during World War II, highlighting Moore's legacy as an embodiment of patriotism. The former president also extended gratitude for Moore's unwavering support in his efforts to "make America great again."
Moore responded to Trump's message with humor and humility. He remarked jovially that the recognition "couldn't happen to a nicer guy," showcasing his modest demeanor despite the significant honor.
Local Congressman Michael Rulli also shared his admiration for Moore, emphasizing the veteran's profound patriotic spirit and dedicated service. Rulli noted his surprise upon discovering that Moore resided within his district, crediting Trump and his team for orchestrating the meaningful recognition. The lawmaker praised the team at Danbury Senior Living for their collaborative efforts to make Moore’s celebration unforgettable, ensuring it honored both Moore's life and his service to the nation.
Beyond the party, Moore has shared his perspective on life and longevity. In prior interviews, he advised staying active as a key to a long life, reflecting on his years walking as a mail carrier and his active upbringing on a farm.
In a playful tone, Moore acknowledged that Trump "may make a mistake or two," but praised the former president’s overall performance. Despite the challenges of leading a nation, Moore respected Trump’s commitment to what he considered important issues.
Moore, who voted for Trump in previous elections and expressed his eagerness to do so again in future ones, remains a dedicated supporter. His age, enthusiasm for civic engagement, and loyalty offer a unique narrative among his peers and fellow veterans.
Throughout his life, Moore has emphasized the importance of relationships. Advising others to "marry the right woman and live with her all of her life," he reveals a personal philosophy that balances personal fulfillment with community service.
Moore’s longevity story, intertwined with a rich history of public service and personal commitment, resonates deeply with many who hear it. His tale serves as a reminder of the values cherished across generations -- dedication, loyalty, and an unwavering commitment to one's principles. Trump's acknowledgment of Moore underscores the impact one individual's life can have when built on such attributes.