President-elect Donald Trump's designated border czar, Tom Homan, outlines ambitious plans to address a pressing humanitarian crisis at the southern border.
According to the Washington Examiner, Homan has highlighted the urgent need to locate approximately 300,000 unaccounted-for children who entered the United States during the ongoing border crisis as part of a comprehensive three-tier deportation strategy.
The announcement came as Trump's team prepares to declare a national emergency to facilitate mass deportations.
This dramatic measure would involve military resources and focus on implementing a structured approach to address illegal immigration. The administration's strategy prioritizes removing national security threats and securing the border before addressing the missing children crisis.
Homan, speaking on Fox News's America Reports, detailed the administration's planned approach to immigration enforcement. Here's what he said regarding the missing children crisis:
The third rail is we got over 300,000 missing children. Over half a million children have been trafficked into the United States. This administration released them to unvetted sponsors, and they can't find 300,000. And based on 3 1/2 decades, some of these children are in forced labor. We already found some in forced labor, some of them are in for sex trafficking, some of them are with pedophiles. We need to save these children. That's going to be the third rail.
The incoming administration plans to reverse what they view as the Biden administration's lax approach to removing criminal aliens.
Homan emphasized that deportations of such individuals decreased by 70% compared to Trump's first term. The new strategy aims to empower ICE by removing operational restrictions.
Several Democratic officials have already voiced their opposition to the planned deportation measures. Notable figures, including Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker and Boston Mayor Michelle Wu, have stated they won't cooperate with the Trump administration's deportation plans. This resistance indicates potential challenges in implementing the proposed strategies.
Republican National Committee Co-Chairwoman Lara Trump has defended the administration's approach. She emphasized that the deportation plans would prioritize criminals and dismissed Democratic criticism as fearmongering.
The administration also plans to complete the border wall construction, citing its effectiveness in reducing illegal crossings.
The Trump administration's renewed focus on immigration enforcement aims to address what they describe as a 300,000-person humanitarian crisis involving missing migrant children.
Their comprehensive strategy involves declaring a national emergency and implementing a three-tier approach to deportations.
The plan faces significant opposition from Democratic officials and will likely encounter implementation challenges at state and local levels. Despite these obstacles, the incoming administration remains committed to their stated goals of enhanced border security and locating missing migrant children who may be at risk of exploitation.
Vice President Kamala Harris stands at a pivotal moment in her political career as she contemplates her next strategic move.
According to Daily Caller, the Vice President has instructed her aides to keep her political options open as she considers running for either the presidency in 2028 or California governor in 2026.
Harris' inner circle reveals that she will spend the coming weeks carefully evaluating her political prospects. Her staff is actively developing a messaging strategy that addresses President-elect Donald Trump while reinforcing her position within the Democratic Party.
The Vice President's deliberations come at a critical time for the Democratic Party. Her team acknowledges the rapidly evolving political landscape may necessitate faster decision-making than initially planned. Sources close to Harris indicate that pursuing both offices simultaneously is not considered viable.
Brian Brokaw, a former Harris aide who maintains close ties to her circle, shared insights about her decision-making approach:
She is not someone who makes rash decisions. She takes, sometimes, a painfully long time to make decisions. So I would pretty much guarantee you she has no idea what her next move is.
Another former Harris campaign aide suggests establishing an organization that would enable her to maintain political relationships through travel and public speaking engagements. This approach would provide flexibility while she determines her next steps.
Harris' allies believe her brief presidential campaign has strengthened her position within the Democratic Party. They point to her improved standing with the public, particularly among Democrats with similar name recognition.
A Harris ally emphasized her political growth and current standing:
She proved a lot of skeptics wrong as a political athlete. And her standing with the public is as good as any Democrats with the name I.D. that she has.
The Vice President's team is working to craft a message that both challenges President-elect Trump and solidifies her role as a Democratic leader. This dual approach aims to maintain her visibility and influence during this transitional period.
Harris faces a complex decision-making process that will shape both her political future and potentially impact the Democratic Party's leadership landscape. Her allies acknowledge her possession of the "X factor" in future Democratic primaries, suggesting her influence extends beyond current roles.
The Vice President's decisions in the coming weeks will likely influence Democratic Party strategy and leadership dynamics leading up to both the 2026 California gubernatorial race and the 2028 presidential election. Her team continues to evaluate various pathways while maintaining political relationships and public engagement.
Vice President Kamala Harris is carefully weighing her options between a 2028 presidential campaign and a 2026 California gubernatorial run. Her team is actively developing messaging strategies while maintaining flexibility in future political endeavors.
The decision-making process involves extensive consultation with advisers and careful consideration of timing, as Harris aims to maintain her influence in the Democratic Party while planning her next strategic move. Her choice will significantly impact both state and national political landscapes in the coming years.
An emerging clash between state and federal environmental policies pits California's governor against the incoming president over electric vehicle incentives.
According to Fox News, California Governor Gavin Newsom has announced plans to counter President-elect Donald Trump's potential elimination of the federal $7,500 electric vehicle tax credit by offering equivalent rebates at the state level.
The California governor's intervention strategy comes in response to reports that Trump intends to terminate Biden's signature EV incentive program upon taking office. This development marks another chapter in the ongoing environmental policy dispute between California's progressive agenda and Trump's conservative approach to energy policy.
Newsom's announcement demonstrates California's commitment to maintaining environmental initiatives regardless of federal policy changes. The state plans to reactivate its Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which ended in November 2023, to fund the new EV credits. This move aligns with California's long-standing position as a leader in environmental protection and clean energy initiatives.
Newsom expressed his determination to maintain the momentum of zero-emission vehicle adoption. As he stated:
Consumers continue to prove the skeptics wrong – zero-emission vehicles are here to stay. We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California. We're not turning back on a clean transportation future — we're going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don't pollute.
The timing of this announcement is significant, coming just before Newsom's scheduled emergency special session. The session was called specifically to strengthen California's legal defenses against potential challenges from the incoming Trump administration.
The confrontation over EV credits represents a continuation of previous tensions between California and Trump-era policies. During Trump's first term, California initiated more than 100 legal challenges against his administration's policies, highlighting the state's role as a persistent opponent of federal environmental rollbacks.
This pattern of resistance suggests that California is prepared for another extended period of legal and policy confrontations with the federal government. The state's proactive approach to maintaining environmental incentives demonstrates its determination to pursue independent climate action.
The relationship between state and federal environmental policies has historically been complex, with California often setting stricter standards than those required at the national level. This dynamic has led to numerous legal battles and policy disputes, particularly during previous Republican administrations.
Newsom's preemptive action reflects a broader strategy to maintain environmental progress despite potential federal policy reversals. The state's ability to implement its own incentive program demonstrates the significant role that state-level initiatives can play in environmental policy.
California's environmental leadership has often influenced other states' policies, potentially creating a ripple effect across the nation. The state's decision to match federal EV credits could encourage other states to develop similar programs, creating a patchwork of state-level environmental initiatives.
Governor Newsom's promise to maintain EV incentives represents California's latest effort to preserve environmental progress in the face of shifting federal priorities. The announcement directly challenges President-elect Trump's reported plans to eliminate the $7,500 federal tax credit for electric vehicles.
This confrontation between state and federal authorities over environmental policy will likely continue to evolve as the new administration takes office, with California positioned to maintain its role as a leading advocate for clean energy initiatives and environmental protection measures.
Former President Bill Clinton shares candid thoughts about the outcome of the 2024 presidential election during a television appearance.
According to the Washington Examiner, Clinton revealed on MSNBC's The Saturday Show that he anticipated the unified swing of battleground states in the recent presidential election that resulted in Donald Trump's victory over Vice President Kamala Harris.
The electoral landscape shifted dramatically as Trump secured victories in crucial swing states, including Pennsylvania, Georgia, Nevada, Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, and North Carolina.
Harris's performance in these battleground states fell short of the numbers previously achieved by President Joe Biden, marking a significant change in Democratic voter support.
During his MSNBC appearance with Jonathan Capehart, Clinton discussed passages from his new book "Citizen," which he wrote before the election results were announced. The former president's writing proved eerily prophetic about the electoral outcome. He emphasized the importance of inclusive policies and democratic preservation.
When pressed about whether Trump's victory signified a rejection of inclusive policies and democratic values, Clinton offered a measured response. He stressed that only a small percentage of voters rejected these principles, suggesting a more complex electoral dynamic at play.
Clinton shared his insights about the election's outcome, stating:
By the time you read Citizen, we'll know who won. I hope enough people will have chosen the benefits of inclusive, economic, and social policies and of preserving democracy against abusive power to turn the tide.
Clinton's involvement in Harris's campaign encountered several obstacles during his appearances in key battleground states. His comments about immigration screening in Georgia and economic comparisons in Michigan created unexpected controversies for the Democratic campaign.
The former president's campaign trail statements, particularly regarding the tragic case of Laken Riley and economic comparisons between administrations, highlighted the challenges faced by Democratic messaging. These moments demonstrated the delicate balance required when addressing sensitive political issues during campaign appearances.
Clinton offered a particularly notable observation about the election's outcome:
I can't say I was surprised. I had the feeling all along that at the end this thing might break one way or the other, and all the so-called swing states would vote together because the last 2% or 3%, 4% were actually pretty much alike throughout the country.
The 2024 presidential election witnessed Donald Trump's successful bid to reclaim the presidency, with Vice President Kamala Harris unable to maintain the Democratic Party's hold on key swing states.
Despite campaigning efforts from prominent party figures like Bill Clinton, the Democrats faced significant setbacks in traditionally competitive regions.
Clinton's analysis of the election results reflects his deep understanding of American electoral patterns, drawn from decades of political experience. His observations about the unified movement of swing states and the underlying voter dynamics provide valuable insight into the factors that shaped the 2024 presidential outcome.
Donald Trump is set to initiate new investigations into a topic that has plagued him for years.
The Washington Post reports that President-elect Trump plans to form investigative units within the Department of Justice to delve into allegations of voter fraud in key states during the 2020 election, as Reuters reports.
Trump, recently elected to serve another four years as president, has outlined plans to investigate alleged irregularities in the 2020 election, despite his victory in the 2024 race.
According to a report published by the Washington Post on Nov. 22, Trump intends to establish teams within the Department of Justice to search for proof of fraud in several battleground states. These efforts come after Trump repeatedly claimed he lost the 2020 election to President Joe Biden due to widespread voter fraud.
The 2020 election saw Biden defeating Trump, who has since argued the outcome was tainted by fraud -- a claim that many say has not been substantiated with concrete evidence.
Despite this, Trump continues to hold the belief that the election results were the product of dishonest practices, a sentiment shared by millions of his followers. This belief fuels Trump's current plans to direct the Department of Justice in prioritizing a search for evidence that supports these allegations.
In addition to setting up new teams, Trump has also announced intentions to dismiss those involved with the special counsel investigation led by Jack Smith.
This investigative team was crucial in indicting Trump last year on federal charges related to his alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election outcome. The dismissal of this team signifies a direct challenge to the findings and the processes of previous investigations.
Trump's victory in the 2024 U.S. presidential race highlights his continued influence and the steadfast loyalty of his support base. However, his focus on past elections underscores ongoing concerns about the legitimacy and transparency of the electoral process. By assembling these investigative teams, Trump seeks to reaffirm accusations that have dominated political discourse since 2020.
This new move may represent an intensification of Trump's efforts to substantiate his claims about the 2020 election. It raises questions about how these investigations will be carried out and what kind of impact they might have on the nation's political landscape. While it is uncertain what evidence these investigations might uncover, their initiation is likely to rekindle debates over election integrity.
The decision to release the current team associated with the special counsel has potential implications for the future functioning of the Department of Justice. It marks a significant shift in direction and priority compared to previous administrations, possibly affecting how election fraud cases are handled moving forward. The interplay between these new investigative efforts and ongoing federal processes will be closely scrutinized by political analysts and the public alike.
The broader political implications of Trump's actions remain a point of conjecture. As he prepares to assume office, the actions taken now will undoubtedly shape perceptions of his incoming administration.
These developments illustrate the enduring significance of the 2020 election and Trump's determination to address longstanding grievances.
Russia has launched a significant missile attack against Ukraine, but contrary to reports, it was not hypersonic.
The missile strike followed Western approval for Ukraine to use advanced long-range missiles and was acknowledged as an act of retaliation by Russian President Vladimir Putin, as Fox News reports.
The missile, described as an "experimental intermediate-range ballistic missile" (IRBM), was confirmed by United States officials to lack hypersonic capabilities. Russian President Putin stated the launch was a response to the recent changes in NATO nations' military support for Ukraine, specifically the authorization for Ukraine to deploy Western-supplied weapons against Russian forces.
Two United States officials, speaking to Fox News, confirmed the nature of the missile used, emphasizing that it was not an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) and dispelling speculations about it being hypersonic. The United States was informed of the missile launch through established nuclear or risk reduction communication channels.
This missile's use marks the first time Russia has deployed this type of weapon in combat. Sabrina Singh, deputy Pentagon press secretary, confirmed this, noting the concerning implications of introducing a new type of lethal capability on the battlefield. Interestingly, there has been no indication that Russia altered its nuclear posture following the missile strike, nor has the United States made any changes in response.
President Putin claimed that the IRBM traveled at speeds equivalent to Mach 10, asserting in a national address that such velocities render existing air defenses ineffective. He emphasized the missile's potential to overcome missile defense systems developed in Europe by the United States.
Despite these assertions, U.S. defense experts have reiterated that the missile does not meet the criteria to be classified as hypersonic. Such a claim underscores ongoing tensions and the respective military posturing of the involved nations. In his address, Putin referenced the recent decision by NATO countries to supply Ukraine with long-range tactical missile systems as a catalyst for Russia's missile deployment.
The missile strike reportedly aimed at military sites within Dnipro, a city in Ukraine. However, images released by Ukrainian defense officials suggested that civilians might also have been affected, with infrastructure damage evident in populated areas.
In a reciprocal action, Ukraine utilized U.S.-supplied Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) to target Bryansk in Russia. This exchange follows the U.S. and U.K.'s revision of military aid policies to Ukraine, leading to an escalation in the conflict.
President Putin mentioned the operational testing of the "Oreshnik missile systems in combat conditions," framing it as a necessary defensive measure in light of "aggressive actions" by NATO countries. He suggested Russia’s future missile deployments would depend on further actions by the United States and its allies.
This use of an IRBM by Russia has raised international concerns. The employment of a new missile type in combat, especially amidst heightened geopolitical tensions, draws scrutiny over potential shifts in future military engagements.
Singh expressed the Pentagon's apprehension regarding this novel military capability, acknowledging its implications for battlefield dynamics and broader geopolitical stability. The situation emphasizes the importance of international dialogues to mitigate the risks inherent in such military escalations.
Overall, while the missile strike possesses significant military and strategic implications, the absence of a hypersonic designation offers some respite from the heightened alarm such an advancement might provoke. The continuation of diplomatic channels remains crucial as global powers navigate this latest development in the protracted conflict between Russia and Ukraine.
A historic Mediterranean town seeks to capitalize on post-election migration by offering Americans an escape to paradise for just over a dollar.
According to the New York Post, the village of Ollolai in central Sardinia is extending an unprecedented real estate opportunity to Americans looking to relocate following Donald Trump's decisive victory in the November 5 presidential election.
The initiative has already generated significant interest, with over 38,000 requests for information pouring in, predominantly from American citizens.
Mayor Francesco Columbu has assembled a specialized team dedicated to guiding international buyers through the purchase process, emphasizing their focus on American applicants.
The village's promotional campaign highlights Sardinia's renowned status as one of only five global "blue zones," where residents enjoy exceptionally long lifespans.
Men in the Nuoro Province average 79 years, while women typically live to 85, according to the National Health Institute. The region boasts an impressive concentration of centenarians, with nearly ten times more hundred-year-olds than the typical population.
Mayor Columbu expressed the town's specific interest in American buyers, stating:
We just really want, and will focus on, Americans above all. We can't of course ban people from other countries to apply, but Americans will have a fast-track procedure. We are betting on them to help us revive the village, they are our winning card.
The town's website directly addresses potential buyers with an enticing message:
Are you worned [sic] out by global politics? Looking to embrace a more balanced lifestyle while securing new opportunities? It's time to start building your European escape in the stunning paradise of Sardinia.
The $1.06 properties require significant renovation investment, presenting both a challenge and opportunity for adventurous buyers. For those seeking more move-in ready options, the town also offers fully renovated homes priced at $105,000, providing flexibility for different budgets and renovation preferences.
Most available properties are situated in Ollolai's historical center, which currently stands "half-empty" according to Mayor Columbu. The town plans to showcase photographs of available properties on its website soon, allowing potential buyers to visualize their future Mediterranean homes.
The initiative represents part of a broader European trend of offering heavily discounted properties to attract new residents and revitalize declining communities. Ollolai proudly positions itself as one of the first European towns to implement this innovative approach to economic rejuvenation.
The village of Ollolai, nestled in central Sardinia, has launched a targeted campaign to attract Americans seeking refuge from political upheaval following the 2024 presidential election. The initiative offers properties for as little as $1.06, with additional options available for those preferring move-in ready homes.
The program combines affordable housing with the allure of Mediterranean living, including access to a beautiful climate, incredible food, and ancient traditions. As the town awaits an influx of new residents, it stands ready to welcome Americans looking to embrace the renowned Italian lifestyle while participating in the revival of a historic Mediterranean community.
House Speaker Mike Johnson takes a controversial stance on matters concerning former Representative Matt Gaetz amid heightened political tensions.
According to the Washington Examiner, Johnson defended his decision to prevent the release of the House Ethics Committee's report on Gaetz while simultaneously supporting his nomination as attorney general in the upcoming Trump administration.
During a CNN State of the Union interview with Jake Tapper, Johnson elaborated on his position regarding the ethics report and Gaetz's nomination.
The Speaker maintained that his decision was based on established protocols rather than external pressure from President-elect Trump.
Johnson emphasized the importance of maintaining congressional traditions regarding ethics investigations of former members. His stance centers on the principle that the House Ethics Committee's jurisdiction should not extend to individuals who are no longer serving in Congress.
Speaker Johnson specifically addressed concerns about potential influence from Trump's team regarding the decision. He clarified that no discussions about the ethics report had taken place between him and the president-elect.
The speaker's statement aimed to dispel speculation about the political motivations behind blocking the report's release.
Johnson explained his position during the CNN interview, stating:
What I have said with regard to the report is that it should not come out, and why? Because Matt Gaetz resigned from Congress. He is no longer a member. There's a very important protocol and tradition and rule, that we maintain, that the House Ethics Committee's jurisdiction does not extend to non-members of Congress.
The nomination of Gaetz as attorney general has created significant discord among Senate Republicans. Many question whether his confirmation is achievable, given the controversial nature of his candidacy and past allegations. Political analysts have begun speculating about the strategic reasoning behind such a contentious choice.
When pressed about character concerns regarding Gaetz, Johnson defended the selection by characterizing him as a necessary disruptor. The Speaker emphasized the American public's apparent desire for significant changes in government operations.
Johnson provided his perspective on Trump's nominees:
These agencies need reform, and I think the vast majority of American people understand that you can't have status quo appointments in a moment like this. I'm really excited about the days ahead. I think the America First policies will deliver the American people.
House Speaker Mike Johnson finds himself at the center of two interconnected controversies regarding former Representative Matt Gaetz. The decision to block the House Ethics Committee report while supporting Gaetz's nomination as attorney general reflects the complex political dynamics at play in Washington.
The situation continues to evolve as Senate Republicans grapple with the prospect of Gaetz's confirmation hearings. Questions remain about whether sufficient support can be gathered to approve his nomination, with many viewing the selection as an especially bold move by the incoming administration.
A heated discussion on CNN's NewsNight turned contentious when a Democratic strategist made explosive claims about potential military involvement in future deportation efforts.
According to Daily Mail Online, Julie Roginsky, a 51-year-old Democratic strategist, suggested during a panel discussion that U.S. military forces might open fire on American citizens who attempt to prevent the deportation of illegal immigrants under Trump's proposed policies.
The comments came during a discussion of President-elect Donald Trump's announcement regarding the use of military assets for mass deportations. Roginsky, who co-founded the nonprofit Lift Our Voices, expressed particular concern about the potential treatment of children in migrant shelters and vowed to personally join protests against such actions.
Roginsky's fellow panelist, Scott Jennings, appeared visibly shocked by her statements, responding that the conversation had gone "way down the rabbit hole." The exchange highlighted the growing tension surrounding Trump's immigration proposals, which he claims could affect up to 20 million illegal immigrants.
The scope of Trump's planned deportation efforts has drawn scrutiny from various quarters, including his own vice president-elect, JD Vance, who suggested a more modest target of deporting one million individuals annually.
This represents a significant scaling back of the initial proposal while still maintaining an aggressive stance on immigration enforcement.
During the panel discussion, Roginsky specifically addressed concerns about the demographic makeup of potential deportees, stating:
I live next to these people. I can tell you, they are women and children. Are there terrorists among them? I don't know. But what I'm telling you right now, practically speaking, there will be American citizens who will prevent these little kids from being dragged out of these shelters.
The American Immigration Council has conducted an extensive analysis of the potential costs associated with mass deportation efforts. Their findings indicate that removing just 1 million migrants could cost between $88 billion and $315 billion, with total costs potentially reaching $968 billion for 11 million deportations.
Trump has dismissed concerns about the financial burden of his proposed deportation program. In a recent NBC News interview following his election victory, he emphasized the necessity of the action regardless of cost considerations.
The president-elect expressed his determination to proceed with the deportations, stating:
It's not a question of a price tag. It's not — really, we have no choice. When people have killed and murdered, when drug lords have destroyed countries, and now they're going to go back to those countries because they're not staying here. There is no price tag.
The controversial exchange on CNN's NewsNight has brought renewed attention to the complex challenges surrounding immigration enforcement policies.
Democratic strategist Julie Roginsky's provocative comments about potential military involvement in deportation efforts have intensified discussions about the practical implementation of Trump's immigration agenda.
The debate continues to evolve as stakeholders grapple with the logistical, financial, and humanitarian implications of implementing what Trump has described as "the largest deportation effort in American history." The administration's approach to this sensitive issue remains under intense scrutiny from both supporters and critics as the country prepares for significant changes in immigration enforcement policy.
A weathered monument in Turkey has yielded its centuries-old secrets through careful photographic analysis and historical research.
According to Live Science, Pennsylvania State University professor Mark Munn has successfully decoded a 2,600-year-old inscription on the Arslan Kaya monument, revealing the name of Matheran, a revered Phrygian goddess known as "the Mother."
The monument, whose name translates to "lion rock" in Turkish, features intricate carvings of lions and sphinxes alongside the ancient text. This remarkable piece of history has puzzled scholars since the 19th century, with its heavily damaged inscription presenting a significant challenge to researchers attempting to unlock its meaning.
The decoding of the inscription provides crucial evidence of Materan's widespread influence across ancient cultures. Known to the Greeks as the Mother of the Gods and to the Romans as Magna Mater (Great Mother), this deity held significant importance in various civilizations.
Munn's breakthrough came through meticulous photographic documentation, particularly on April 25, 2024, when favorable lighting conditions allowed for enhanced visibility of the weathered text. His research suggests the monument dates back to the first half or middle of the sixth century B.C.
The monument's location and timing indicate possible connections to the kingdom of Lydia, which controlled the region and shared reverence for the goddess Materan. This historical context adds another layer of significance to the archaeological finding.
The interpretation of the inscription has generated debate among academics. Rostyslav Oreshko, a lecturer at the Practical School of Advanced Studies in France and an expert in Phrygian inscriptions, presents an alternative viewpoint on Mark Munn's conclusions.
Oreshko agrees with the accuracy of the inscription's reading but highlights its historical significance. He suggests that Munn’s work validates rather than introduces the interpretation of Materan’s name.
Mark Munn, reflecting on the discovery process, emphasized the importance of favorable lighting conditions when capturing photographs for analysis. This observation highlights the technical challenges involved in decoding ancient inscriptions and the importance of optimal conditions for archaeological research.
The monument's study represents a convergence of traditional archaeological methods and modern technological approaches. Researchers utilized detailed photography and historical records to piece together the puzzle of the ancient text.
The inscription's content suggests it was part of a larger narrative, potentially explaining the monument's commissioning and the goddess's significance. The presence of Materan's image alongside her name on the monument strengthens the interpretation's validity.
Weather damage and looting have significantly impacted the monument's condition, making the successful decoding even more remarkable. The preservation challenges underscore the urgency of documenting and studying such historical artifacts.
The deciphering of the Arslan Kaya inscription represents a significant breakthrough in understanding ancient Phrygian religious practices and cultural connections. The monument, located in modern-day Turkey, has finally revealed its message about the goddess Materan after centuries of scholarly investigation. The discovery confirms the widespread worship of the Mother Goddess across ancient civilizations and provides tangible evidence of the cultural and religious practices of the Phrygian people who flourished in the region from 1200 to 600 B.C.