Alabama Sen. Tommy Tuberville has stirred controversy by demanding the removal of Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough, following her ruling against key elements of a Republican initiative to slash Medicaid spending.
Sen. Tuberville's call to dismiss MacDonough came after she opposed provisions within a GOP proposal designed to aid President Trump's tax agenda by reducing federal Medicaid spending, as The Hill reports.
MacDonough, who holds the distinction of being the first woman to serve as Senate parliamentarian, was appointed in January 2012 by former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. Her recent decision blocked a Republican proposal aimed at limiting federal funds for Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) for individuals with unverifiable immigration status. It also sought to cut Medicaid funding to states covering undocumented immigrants.
Tuberville voiced his frustration with MacDonough's ruling through a post on X, labeling the parliamentarian "woke" and suggesting her advice was politically motivated. The senator criticized her decision as emblematic of disconnection from the electorate, arguing that her role should not involve pushing a particular agenda.
Despite Tuberville's outspoken criticism, not all in the GOP share his view. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, underscoring the importance of maintaining constructive dialogue, indicated that overruling MacDonough with a simple-majority vote was not in their plans. "There are things we can do," he said, expressing optimism that they could still achieve significant savings through alternative means.
Sen. John Kennedy echoed a similar sentiment. He emphasized that Republican leadership respects McDonough's position and does not intend to pursue any efforts to replace her, regardless of Tuberville's demands.
Emotions surrounding the ruling remain high within the GOP as they navigate the intricate budget reconciliation process. These rules allow legislation to bypass a filibuster but require strict compliance with the Byrd rule, which MacDonough is tasked with enforcing.
A source within the Senate GOP noted that while the current provisions might not be viable, they are focused on revising the bill to preserve the intended goals. "This is not as fatal as Dems are portraying it to be," the source insisted.
While Tuberville's critique has grabbed headlines, GOP leaders like Thune maintain confidence in the parliamentarian's impartiality. "We all have respect for the parliamentarian," Kennedy affirmed, indicating broad-based Republican support for handling legislative hurdles with deliberation and respect.
The current situation reflects the Republican Party's broader efforts to align various policy elements with fiscal discipline. This has led to a complex legislative odyssey as they attempt to balance healthcare and immigration considerations within the constraints of procedural rules.
MacDonough's ruling, while a temporary roadblock, underscores the ongoing challenges faced by political leaders striving to implement budgetary reforms. "We knew that it was going to be an interesting conversation," Thune acknowledged, reflecting on the anticipated difficulties ahead.
As lawmakers explore ways to reconcile savings with sufficient policy change, attention remains fixed on how the GOP will creatively maneuver through procedural constraints to realize their legislative vision. Whether through revised proposals or shifts in strategy, the party's course remains under active consideration.
Tuberville’s critique brings into focus the often-tense interplay between elected lawmakers and appointed officials in shaping national policy. His strong remarks highlight growing frustration among some Republicans who view procedural checks as cumbersome barriers to their policy objectives.
As these dynamics unfold, the Senate faces the dual challenges of procedural compliance and achieving consensus on potentially divisive issues. MacDonough’s role ensures adherence to established rules, a position some Republicans find increasingly difficult to navigate amid ambitious policy goals.
Ultimately, as GOP leaders pursue policy adaptations, the road ahead will require both strategic innovation and compromise. Only time will tell how these efforts will unfold within the intricate framework of the legislative process.
Hollywood power couple Katy Perry and Orlando Bloom have sparked intense speculation about their relationship status, as the singer has been spotted without her engagement ring during her Australian tour performances.
According to The Sun, Perry confided in close friends back in January that her nine-year relationship with the British actor had reached its breaking point, though the couple has yet to make any official announcement.
The high-profile pair, who share a 4-year-old daughter Daisy, have reportedly been trying to salvage their relationship while juggling demanding career commitments that have kept them apart for extended periods in 2025. Their last public appearance together was at the Vanity Fair Oscars party in March, marking a noticeable decrease in their joint appearances.
An insider close to the couple revealed that they had been struggling with their relationship since the beginning of the year but wanted to delay any public announcement. The source indicated that both Perry and Bloom hoped things might improve, especially considering their young daughter.
Their hectic schedules have contributed significantly to the strain on their relationship. Perry has been busy with her ongoing Lifetimes Tour in Australia, while Bloom has been filming his new project "Bucking Fastard" in Dublin.
The removal of Perry's engagement ring has been interpreted as a clear signal about the state of their relationship. The couple's representatives have maintained silence on the matter, despite mounting speculation from fans and media alike.
The couple's romance began in 2016, leading to their engagement three years later during a romantic Valentine's Day proposal. Their relationship has been marked by both public displays of affection and long periods apart due to their respective careers.
Neither Perry nor Bloom acknowledged each other on social media during Valentine's Day 2025, which notably marked their sixth engagement anniversary. This silence has been viewed as particularly telling by those close to the couple.
Their attempts to maintain privacy about their relationship struggles have been challenged by Perry's recent onstage hints in Sydney. During a performance, she made subtle references to relationship difficulties, adding fuel to the speculation about their separation.
Both Perry and Bloom have experienced previous marriages that ended in divorce. Perry was previously married to comedian Russell Brand from 2010 to 2012, while Bloom was married to model Miranda Kerr from 2010 to 2013, with whom he shares 14-year-old son Flynn.
Despite rumors suggesting that Perry's recent Blue Origin space flight in April had caused tension between the couple, sources close to them have dismissed these claims. Instead, they maintain that the relationship has been facing challenges for some time.
The current situation has reportedly been particularly difficult for their close friends, who had believed the couple's bond was unshakeable. However, their extended time apart and busy schedules have taken a considerable toll on their relationship.
The American singer and British actor's relationship has captured public attention since their first meeting at a Golden Globes after-party in 2016. Their romance, which led to a daughter and a lengthy engagement, appears to be at a crucial crossroads.
This week, Bloom has made efforts to spend time with Perry and their daughter in Australia, where the singer continues her tour. However, the future of their relationship remains uncertain as they navigate their professional commitments and personal challenges.
The couple's situation reflects the common struggles faced by high-profile entertainment industry couples, where demanding careers and public scrutiny often create additional pressure on relationships. As both stars continue their respective projects, fans and friends alike await any official announcement about their future together.
A dramatic escalation in retail security measures has sparked controversy as major retailers like Walmart and Target implement strict penalties for shopping cart theft, with fines reaching up to $2,500 in some states.
According to Daily Mail, approximately two million shopping carts vanish from stores annually, resulting in a staggering $175 million loss for retailers who must replace them.
The crackdown on cart theft comes amid broader retail security concerns, including rising shoplifting rates and substantial in-store losses. Retailers across the nation are adopting various preventive measures, from implementing advanced technology to enforcing stricter penalties for theft.
Arizona has emerged as one of the strictest states in combating cart theft, with potential civil lawsuits and fines of up to $250 for first-time offenders. The city of Phoenix is considering mandatory installation of locking wheels or GPS devices on shopping carts to prevent theft.
California has classified cart theft as a misdemeanor, carrying fines up to $1,000 and possible jail time of six months. San Jose has recently mandated large retailers with over 76 carts to implement comprehensive prevention plans, including locks and retrieval services.
Florida imposes initial civil fines of $100, but penalties can escalate significantly based on how long the cart remains in the thief's possession. The state's law extends to laundry carts and includes penalties for altering identifying marks or serial numbers.
Major stores are implementing various technological solutions to combat the growing problem of cart theft. Walmart has introduced robotic security guards in parking lots, while other retailers are exploring GPS tracking systems and wheel-locking mechanisms.
Some stores are taking even more dramatic steps, such as requiring deposits for cart use or installing automated barriers at store exits. These measures are part of a broader strategy to reduce retail losses, which have reached historic highs.
The retail industry's response includes partnerships with local law enforcement and investment in sophisticated surveillance systems. Many stores are also training employees to be more vigilant about cart theft and implementing new protocols for cart retrieval.
The new regulations have sparked debate about their potential impact on vulnerable populations. In Hawaii, where nearly 5,000 carts were stolen in 2022, critics argue that the laws disproportionately affect homeless individuals.
Some advocacy groups express concern that the harsh penalties could criminalize poverty and create additional barriers for disadvantaged communities. The ACLU has been notably absent from these discussions, despite the civil rights implications.
Public opinion remains divided, with some customers supporting the stricter measures while others argue for more compassionate solutions. Many communities are calling for balanced approaches that address both retail losses and social concerns.
The implementation of these new policies has begun to show measurable effects on retail operations. Store managers report reduced cart losses in areas with strict enforcement, though the cost of implementing new security measures remains significant.
The heightened security measures have altered shopping patterns, with some customers expressing frustration over additional checkout procedures and cart restrictions. However, retailers maintain that these changes are necessary to protect their assets and maintain reasonable prices.
The retail industry continues to evaluate the effectiveness of various prevention strategies, from high-tech solutions to traditional security measures. The outcome of these efforts will likely shape future policies regarding retail security and customer service.
A surprising shift in Washington's political landscape emerged as Brett McGurk, a former Biden National Security Council Coordinator, delivered unexpected praise for President Donald Trump's handling of the recent Iran-Israel crisis.
According to The Daily Caller, McGurk appeared on CNN's "Anderson Cooper 360" where he gave "extremely high marks" to Trump and his National Security team for their management of the escalating situation between Iran and Israel. The former Obama official's endorsement comes as Trump announced a "total ceasefire" agreement between the warring nations.
The development follows a series of intense military exchanges that began on June 12 when Israel launched preemptive strikes against Iran, targeting their nuclear weapons program sites and resulting in the deaths of several top military officials. This action prompted concerns about potential U.S. involvement and led to Trump issuing stern warnings to Iran about possible American intervention.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt had initially indicated that Trump would take two weeks to decide on U.S. involvement in the conflict. However, events accelerated rapidly when Trump announced successful strikes against three Iranian nuclear sites on his Truth Social platform.
McGurk revealed that extensive backchannel diplomacy had preceded the U.S. military action against Iran. The former official also noted that European allies were prepared to reinstate international sanctions against Iran if necessary, with a deadline set for October.
The ceasefire announcement came after Iran launched a retaliatory strike against the Al Udeid U.S. Air Base in Qatar, though Trump acknowledged and expressed gratitude for Iran's advance warning, which resulted in zero American casualties. This diplomatic gesture marked a significant turning point in the crisis.
The exchange of military strikes between the nations demonstrated the effectiveness of regional defense systems. McGurk highlighted that most Iranian missiles were successfully intercepted by both Qatari and U.S. defense systems.
Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi announced their military operations would continue until 4 a.m., though the Israel Defense Forces reported missile launch sirens after the deadline. The choreographed nature of Iran's response suggested a calculated approach to de-escalation.
The successful intervention by U.S. forces and the subsequent diplomatic negotiations showcased the administration's ability to balance military strength with diplomatic finesse. This approach earned praise from both supporters and previous critics of Trump's foreign policy.
McGurk emphasized the potential for broader diplomatic progress, noting ongoing discussions regarding the situation in Gaza. The presence of Hamas delegations in Cairo suggested a possible breakthrough in multiple regional conflicts.
The former Obama official expressed optimism about the current situation, stating it represented "about the best place we can be." He stressed the importance of following through with diplomatic initiatives to maintain the progress achieved.
The unexpected alliance between Trump's approach and Obama-era officials' approval has created a unique moment of bipartisan agreement on foreign policy. This development could potentially influence future diplomatic efforts in the Middle East and reshape political dynamics in Washington.
The successful negotiation of the ceasefire agreement between Israel and Iran represents a significant diplomatic victory for the Trump administration, earning praise from unexpected quarters, including former Obama official Brett McGurk. The resolution of this crisis through a combination of military deterrence and diplomatic channels has set a new precedent for handling regional conflicts.
European allies remain poised to enforce sanctions if necessary, while diplomatic channels continue to explore opportunities for peace in Gaza. The involvement of various regional players and the successful coordination of defense systems demonstrated the effectiveness of multilateral approaches to conflict resolution.
The surprising endorsement from McGurk, coupled with the successful implementation of the ceasefire, suggests a potential shift in how future Middle Eastern conflicts might be addressed. This development could lead to more bipartisan support for decisive yet measured responses to international crises.
A fierce battle for control has erupted between Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and the CIA over who gets to shape President Donald Trump's daily intelligence briefings during a critical period of war with Iran.
According to the Daily Mail, Gabbard has moved to take physical control of the President's Daily Brief (PDB) away from CIA headquarters in Langley and relocate it to her own office, causing major friction within the intelligence community.
The power struggle comes at a particularly sensitive time as the U.S. faces mounting tensions with Iran following missile strikes on American bases, requiring careful coordination of intelligence to inform presidential decision-making. Intelligence officials say Gabbard's assertive move challenges the CIA's traditional dominance over what classified information reaches the president's desk each morning.
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) has confirmed that staff who oversee the President's Daily Brief will be transferred from CIA headquarters to ODNI facilities. This marks a significant shift in how America's most sensitive intelligence is curated and delivered to the commander-in-chief.
Senior intelligence officials tell the Daily Mail that Gabbard's move has caused major ripples within the CIA's Directorate of Analysis, which has long controlled the systems used to compile the classified briefings. The transfer essentially wrests physical control of the PDB away from Langley for the first time.
While CIA Director John Ratcliffe maintains a cabinet-level position, Gabbard's role overseeing all 18 intelligence agencies gives her ultimate authority over intelligence coordination. This has created natural tensions between the two powerful agencies vying for influence over presidential briefings.
Gabbard's assertive play for control comes as she maintains nearly constant contact with President Trump regarding intelligence matters during the ongoing conflict with Iran. Sources say she has been present for every key meeting since hostilities began.
The DNI's office argues that housing PDB staff under their authority better aligns with their mission to integrate foreign, military and domestic intelligence from across agencies. They believe this will produce more comprehensive briefings rather than allowing CIA dominance.
Some intelligence veterans worry the organizational shuffle could disrupt the flow of critical information during an active military conflict. However, others say consolidating control under ODNI may actually improve coordination across the intelligence community.
The CIA has traditionally wielded enormous influence through its central role in producing the President's Daily Brief, which began under President Lyndon Johnson in the 1960s. Their Directorate of Analysis maintained the classified systems needed to compile these sensitive reports.
While the 2004 Intelligence Reform Act officially put the DNI in charge of overseeing the PDB, the CIA retained significant practical control through its institutional capabilities and expertise. Gabbard's move to physically relocate PDB staff challenges this decades-old arrangement.
Some CIA veterans argue their agency's analytical capabilities and access to human intelligence sources make them best suited to lead the presidential briefing process. However, ODNI officials counter that their broader perspective across all intelligence agencies produces a more comprehensive analysis.
The White House finds itself navigating delicate internal dynamics between two powerful intelligence chiefs during a period of military conflict. Officials say both Gabbard and CIA Director Ratcliffe remain key presidential advisors on Iran.
Internal sources suggest the power struggle reflects natural institutional tensions rather than personal conflicts between the intelligence leaders. The ODNI's statutory authority to coordinate across agencies supports Gabbard's move to consolidate control of presidential briefings.
This inter-agency friction occurs as President Trump relies heavily on intelligence briefings to inform critical decisions about military engagement with Iran. The outcome of this bureaucratic battle could shape how America's commander-in-chief receives vital national security information for years to come.
Sunny Hostin, co-host of The View, recently recounted a terrifying moment on set when she experienced a severe allergic reaction after unknowingly consuming a dish that contained walnuts.
During a recent broadcast of The View, host Sunny Hostin faced a life-threatening allergic reaction after eating walnuts, which she is highly allergic to, during a segment with guest Debbie Matenopoulos, as the Daily Mail reports.
On Wednesday's episode, the co-hosts of the popular daytime talk show welcomed Matenopoulos, who presented her new cookbook. As part of the segment, Matenopoulos offered a spread of Greek dishes for the hosts to enjoy. Unbeknownst to Hostin, one of the dishes contained walnuts.
Hostin began consuming the dish and soon realized something was wrong. She turned to her co-host, Alyssa Farah Griffin, to express her growing concern. "I have a terrible allergy to walnuts," Hostin stated, acknowledging her worry as she noticed the presence of walnuts in the dish.
Hostin immediately alerted her fellow co-host, writing a note that read, "I am allergic to walnuts." Despite the potential severity of the situation, Hostin maintained her composure and continued the segment, though she was clearly distressed by her circumstances.
The situation became more alarming when Matenopoulos confirmed the presence of walnuts in the dish. Startled by the revelation, Hostin shared how she turned to both Alyssa Farah Griffin and the show's executive producer, Brian Teta, in search of help.
Though the severity of the situation was apparent, the swift intervention by the show's medical team prevented it from escalating further. Disney-employed nurses, described by Hostin as "superheroes," promptly entered the scene and administered vital medical assistance.
Under the care of nurse Jen, Hostin received crucial treatment, including an EpiPen and Benadryl, as she navigated the ramifications of the allergic reaction. Despite feeling a considerable amount of fear during the emergency, Hostin was grateful for the timely intervention of the medical team.
Reflecting on the experience, Hostin emphasized the rarity of such allergic reactions in her life, admitting she had not undergone one of this magnitude for many years. The moment underscored the dangers she faces due to her severe walnut allergy, a fact that brought her fellow co-hosts together in support and relief.
Griffin echoed this sentiment on-air, commenting, "We're glad you made it through." The close call underscored the camaraderie among the hosts and the efficient responsiveness of the show's healthcare team.
Since joining The View as a co-host in 2016, Hostin has become a familiar face on the panel, covering a multitude of topics alongside her fellow co-hosts Whoopi Goldberg, Joy Behar, Sara Haines, Alyssa Farah Griffin, and Ana Navarro. Her personal and professional resilience was praised during this episode, which otherwise might have ended in a much more grievous situation.
Hostin's experience highlights not only the potential hazards present in routine activities for those with severe allergies but also the importance of rapid medical response in life-threatening situations. This episode serves as a crucial reminder of the unseen risks that often accompany allergies.
The incident, though frightening, provided viewers and fans with a powerful testament to Hostin's tenacity as well as the professionalism and preparedness of The View's production team in addressing unexpected emergencies.
For Hostin, moving past this critical moment meant continuing to focus on her responsibilities as a co-host while involving viewers in the personal challenges she faces with her allergy, which will undoubtedly raise awareness of similar issues.
As The View continues to draw a notable viewership, the commitment and dedication of its co-hosts remain ever apparent, as evidenced by their swift and effective handling of this event, which could have otherwise taken a devastating turn.
The unexpected movement of the E-4B "Nightwatch," President Donald Trump's emergency command aircraft, across the United States has alarmed many citizens.
Despite initial anxiety amplified by the increased friction between the United States and Iran, the Air Force announced that the aircraft's operation had been arranged in advance and bore no relation to the ongoing international tensions, as the Daily Mail reports
The E-4B, commonly referred to as the "Doomsday plane," was observed traveling between Louisiana and Maryland, from Bossier City to Joint Base Andrews, on Tuesday. Customarily stationed at Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska, this aircraft surfaced from Barksdale Air Force Base. It had earlier embarked from an area near Window Rock, Arizona, illustrating its versatility and operational scope.
The E-4B is crafted to serve as a mobile command post in case of emergencies, especially during nuclear crisis scenarios. Its design includes features to communicate across global distances, with military strategists benefiting from its comprehensive equipment, multi-deck layouts, and long-duration capabilities.
Furthermore, the E-4B is fortified with both thermal and nuclear barriers, crucial for enduring devastating conditions like nuclear explosions.
Amid the backdrop of rising tensions in the Middle East, news of its flight spurred panic. Tensions between the U.S. and Iran have grown, with Trump reportedly voicing his support for Israel's military moves against Iran.
However, the Air Force reassured the public that the flight was an unremarkable, pre-planned operation and independent of the developing tensions overseas. This clarification was essential to assuage the public anxiety sparked by the aircraft's deployment during such a sensitive period.
Secretary Dr. Troy Meink was onboard the E-4B, engaging in a Major Command (MAJCOM) immersion at the Air Force Global Strike Command.
His presence underscored the routine nature of the mission, aligning with the E-4B's versatile mission history. Notably, the aircraft served operational roles during Hurricane Opal in 1995 and post-9/11, acting as a command center for President George W. Bush.
On the other side of the globe, Iran's leadership has vehemently opposed President Trump's position and supported Israel's military efforts. Ayatollah Khamenei's strong words captured the nation's defiance, urging against any potential military involvement from the United States.
Khamenei emphasized that Iran is prepared to resist, saying, "This nation will not surrender to anyone in the face of imposition." Such remarks cautioned the U.S. against potential interventions. He underscored, "The Americans should know that any US military intervention will undoubtedly be accompanied by irreparable damage."
Amid these escalating tensions, the Trump administration is poised to decide within a fortnight regarding potential U.S. military involvement in the confrontation between Israel and Iran. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt informed that President Trump assesses the possibility of negotiations with Iran before determining the U.S. course of action.
As the world watches intently, the decision by the U.S. president holds significant implications. While the flight of the E-4B "Nightwatch" on domestic grounds may have sparked alarm due to its timing, the Air Force reassurances aim to normalize the situation within national borders.
With delicate relations at the forefront of global diplomacy, all eyes are set on whether diplomatic dialogues may prevail over military actions in the near future. The Trump administration's forthcoming decisions and their potential to either ease or exacerbate tensions will likely shape the region's geopolitical trajectory.
This episode, while highlighting existing strains between nations, also underscores the critical role of informed communication and transparency in mitigating public worry during international crises. The anticipation remains as to how these dynamics will unfold in the coming weeks.
A 32-year-old female passenger caused chaos on a Southwest Airlines flight after becoming enraged about sitting next to another woman she repeatedly insulted for her weight. The confrontation quickly escalated from verbal abuse to physical assault early Monday morning.
According to the Daily Mail, the intoxicated woman pulled another female passenger's hair, spat in her face, and kicked both the passenger and Southwest employees on a plane at LaGuardia Airport that was scheduled to depart for Kansas City.
The disturbance was captured on video by fellow passengers, who recorded the woman in a red baseball hat and all-black outfit becoming increasingly belligerent. After initially verbally attacking the other woman about her size and appearance, the situation rapidly deteriorated into physical violence.
Southwest staff and other travelers attempted to intervene as the disruptive passenger grabbed hold of the other woman's hair. Despite repeated requests from a female employee to let go, the woman maintained her grip while smiling.
When asked to release the woman's hair, the unhinged passenger denied even touching it, claiming "I'm not even touching her hair b****," while clearly continuing to hold onto it. Her defiant behavior included grinning throughout the confrontation, showing no intention of complying with staff directions.
A witness who recorded the incident told the Daily Mail that the aggressive woman even "knocked the glasses off the southwest employee." The same witness reported that when they suggested the woman "be nice," she responded with personal insults about their appearance and romantic life.
After staff called for police assistance, the disruptive passenger appeared to briefly acknowledge her behavior, shouting "Yeah, I'm sorry! I didn't want to sit next to a f***ing fat lady." Her combative stance continued as she declared everyone was "already past the point of no return."
When Southwest personnel finally managed to restrain her with her hands behind her back, she continued her tirade against the woman she had been harassing. "Look at this fat lady. Look at this fat a** b****. She can't even, look, you can't even see her stomach," she said, adding further insults about the woman's outfit and face mask.
Her verbal attacks then shifted to a male passenger seated next to her target. The belligerent woman screamed profanities and made disparaging remarks about his appearance, slurring her words and stumbling over a chair in the process.
The confrontation reached its most disturbing point when the woman deliberately spat directly in the face of the passenger she had been harassing. Airline staff then attempted to shield the victim from further assault while moving the aggressor away.
As employees tried to control the situation, the woman continued hurling obscenities and making crude, insulting comments about the woman and the man seated next to her. Her behavior became increasingly erratic as she fell to the ground in the plane's aisle.
After falling face-first, she dramatically flipped over, shouting "Shut the f*** up I can't breathe" with her hair covering her face. She then began kicking wildly, directing her attacks at both staff and passengers who were attempting to contain the situation.
Southwest Airlines confirmed to the Daily Mail that the disruptive passenger was eventually escorted off the aircraft on a gurney and prohibited from reboarding the flight. The incident significantly delayed departure for other passengers.
The Port Authority Police Department responded to a call about an "intoxicated passenger" at approximately 1:10 AM, according to their spokesperson. Following the incident, the woman was transported to a hospital for evaluation before being taken into custody.
After medical assessment, the passenger was transferred to the New York City Department of Correction and charged with aggravated assault. Southwest Airlines issued a statement commending their team members for their professionalism during the disturbing incident.