Mark Cuban, billionaire and minority owner of the Dallas Mavericks, recently conducted a social media poll that produced surprising outcomes.
According to a report by Breitbart News, Cuban's attempt to criticize Donald Trump through the poll backfired, resulting in an unexpected victory for the former president.
On Friday, Cuban posed a question to his 8.8 million followers on social media, asking them to choose whose persona and character they would prefer young children to emulate.
The poll offered two options: Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. Despite Cuba's apparent support for Harris, the results showed that Trump won by a significant margin, with his lead doubling that of Harris.
Cuban's poll asked a specific question aimed at gauging public opinion on the character traits of two prominent political figures. The exact wording of the poll was:
Who's persona and character would you like to see young children grow up to have?
The choices provided were limited to Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. This framing of the question suggests that Cuban intended to highlight perceived differences in character between the two individuals.
Contrary to what may have been Cuban's expectations, the poll results strongly favored Donald Trump. The margin of victory was not small, with Trump's lead being described as double that of Harris. This outcome was particularly noteworthy given Cuban's known political leanings and his presumed support for Harris.
The unexpected results of the poll quickly drew attention and commentary from various social media users. Many expressed surprise at the outcome, given Cuban's apparent intention to criticize Trump through this poll.
The poll's unexpected outcome prompted swift reactions from social media users. Actor Nick Searcy was among the first to comment, predicting that the poll would not produce the results Cuban had likely anticipated. This prediction proved accurate, as evidenced by the final tally.
Other social media users also took the opportunity to comment on Cuban's poll and its results. Many of these responses were characterized as ridiculing Cuban for the apparent backfire of his polling attempt. The reactions ranged from amusement to criticism of Cuban's approach to political commentary on social media.
These responses highlight the unpredictable nature of social media polls and the potential for such efforts to produce results contrary to the pollster's intentions.
They also demonstrate the engaged and often polarized nature of online political discourse, particularly when involving high-profile figures like Cuban and the subjects of his poll.
Mark Cuban's social media poll intended to criticize Donald Trump unexpectedly resulted in a strong showing for the former president. The poll, which asked followers to choose between Trump and Kamala Harris as role models for children, saw Trump winning by a significant margin. This outcome led to numerous reactions on social media, with many users ridiculing Cuban for the perceived backfire of his polling attempt. The incident highlights the unpredictable nature of social media polls and their potential to produce unexpected results in political discourse.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., a longtime public figure, recent presidential candidate, and recent ally of Donald Trump, has expressed that the former president has undergone significant personal growth.
Kennedy, who has been vocal in his support for Trump, confessed his belief that the former president is now focused on his legacy and is preparing for the possibility of a second term in office, as The Hill reports.
Kennedy shared his insights during an interview on the All In podcast hosted by Jason Calacanis. He described Trump, whom he has known for approximately 30 years, as a changed individual. According to Kennedy, Trump is no longer the same person he was during his first term in office.
The former independent candidate's comments suggest that Trump is reflecting on the past and considering the long-term impact of his actions. "He’s focused on his legacy," Kennedy remarked, indicating that Trump is seeking to correct mistakes he made during his initial presidency.
In the interview, Kennedy also noted that Trump has become more open to listening to different perspectives, indicating a broader approach to governance should he win the upcoming election.
Beyond his observations about Trump's personal growth, Kennedy also defended Trump against accusations linking him to Project 2025. This initiative, led by the Heritage Foundation, is viewed as a conservative agenda with ties to members of Trump's previous administration.
Trump and his campaign have distanced themselves from the project, with Kennedy echoing this sentiment in his interview. Kennedy recounted how Trump, when confronted about his alleged involvement, dismissed the accusations, stating that the project was created by a "right-wing" individual not associated with his current plans.
Kennedy's defense underscores his belief that Trump is more interested in leaving a positive legacy than aligning with controversial political agendas.
In a further sign of his support, Kennedy recently suspended his own campaign in key battleground states and endorsed Trump. Despite this suspension, Kennedy's name will still appear on the ballot in most red and blue states, reflecting his continuing influence in the political arena.
Kennedy's endorsement of Trump has solidified their alliance, with Kennedy now poised to take an active role in shaping a potential second Trump administration. Trump has appointed both Kennedy and former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard to his transition team, should he win the election.
Kennedy's role on the transition committee will involve selecting key officials to serve in the administration, a responsibility that highlights the trust Trump places in him. Kennedy has emphasized the importance of a diverse range of voices in this selection process, suggesting that the next Trump administration could be more inclusive.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s recent statements and actions signal a deepening of his relationship with Donald Trump. He believes that Trump, having learned from past mistakes, is now focused on creating a lasting legacy that benefits the country. Kennedy's involvement in Trump's transition team further indicates his commitment to supporting Trump's potential return to the White House.
As the political landscape continues to evolve, Kennedy's role as a key ally to Trump will be closely watched. His insights into Trump's personal growth and his defense against controversial accusations paint a picture of a former president who is preparing for a different kind of second term.
Former President Donald Trump has declared his opposition to Florida’s Amendment 4, a measure that would extend the state’s current abortion law beyond six weeks of gestation.
Trump announced he would vote against the amendment, stating that while a six-week limit might be too restrictive, extending the period up to nine months is "radical," as the Post Millennial reports.
During an interview with Fox News’ Brian Llenas in Johnstown, Pennsylvania, Trump made his stance on the upcoming Florida ballot initiative clear. Amendment 4, brought forward by the advocacy group Floridians Protecting Freedom (FPF), seeks to allow abortions in Florida beyond the current six-week limit, up until the point of fetal viability.
Fetal viability, generally recognized around 24 weeks of gestation, serves as the proposed cutoff under the amendment. The measure would also prevent any laws that could prohibit, penalize, delay, or restrict abortion before viability or when deemed necessary to protect the patient’s health.
The current six-week abortion ban in Florida has been in effect since May, but Trump has voiced his disagreement with this limitation from the beginning, emphasizing that women need more time to make such a significant decision.
Trump, however, was quick to criticize what he perceives as the other extreme. "The Democrats are radical because the nine months is just a ridiculous situation," Trump stated, expressing his concern that extending the abortion window could lead to practices he finds unacceptable.
In his comments, Trump referenced states like Minnesota, which he claims have laws that could allow the termination of pregnancies even in the final stages. He described these scenarios as "unacceptable," underscoring his decision to oppose Amendment 4.
Trump concluded his remarks by confirming, "I’ll be voting no for that reason," drawing a clear line on his stance regarding the amendment.
Floridians Protecting Freedom, the group behind Amendment 4, has articulated their mission to protect abortion rights and limit government interference in personal medical decisions. According to their website, the amendment would explicitly block laws that prohibit or restrict abortion before viability, ensuring that the decision remains between a patient and their healthcare provider.
The group also clarifies that the amendment would not alter existing laws requiring parental notification for minors seeking an abortion. FPF emphasizes that their campaign is a citizen-led initiative aimed at removing political influence from such personal decisions. The organization argues that all Floridians should have the freedom to make medical choices without government intrusion, a point that has become a central theme of their campaign.
Trump’s opposition to Amendment 4 is likely to reignite debates over abortion laws in Florida, a state that has already seen significant legislative changes regarding the issue. His stance reflects a broader national conversation about the balance between restricting abortion access and protecting individual rights.
As Florida voters prepare to decide on Amendment 4, Trump’s position may influence public opinion, especially among conservative voters who might share his concerns about extending abortion access.
With the 2024 election cycle approaching, Trump’s views on this issue could also play a role in shaping his political platform and appeal to voters who prioritize abortion-related policies.
In the end, Trump’s announcement adds another layer to the complex debate over abortion rights in Florida, with both supporters and opponents of Amendment 4 gearing up for a contentious battle at the ballot box.
As the November vote draws near, the future of abortion access in Florida remains uncertain, with Trump’s stance now a significant factor in the unfolding political landscape.
In an unexpected turn of events, former Democratic Representative Tulsi Gabbard has been announced as the moderator for GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump's upcoming town hall in Wisconsin.
According to Just The News, this development comes shortly after Gabbard publicly endorsed Trump and joined his transition team, signaling a significant shift in her political allegiances.
The town hall, scheduled for Thursday at 7 p.m. Eastern Time in La Crosse, Wisconsin, marks a notable collaboration between the former president and the ex-Democratic presidential candidate. This event is expected to draw considerable attention, given Gabbard's recent transition from the Democratic party to becoming a vocal supporter of Trump's campaign.
Gabbard's decision to moderate Trump's town hall follows her recent endorsement of the former president. On Monday, during the National Guard Association of the United States conference, Gabbard publicly declared her support for Trump's 2024 presidential bid.
In her endorsement, Gabbard stated:
I'm committed to doing all that I can to send President Trump back to the White House, where he once again serve us as our commander-in-chief.
This statement marks a significant departure from Gabbard's previous political stance, as she was formerly a member of the Democratic Party and even sought the party's presidential nomination in 2020.
Following her endorsement, Gabbard's involvement in Trump's campaign has rapidly expanded. On Tuesday, Trump's senior campaign adviser Brian Hughes announced that Gabbard had been appointed to the former president's transition team.
This appointment, coming just a day after her public endorsement, suggests a swift integration of Gabbard into Trump's inner circle.
Her role in the transition team indicates that she may play a significant part in shaping Trump's potential future administration, should he win the 2024 election.
The town hall in La Crosse, Wisconsin, where Gabbard will serve as moderator, is set to be a key event in Trump's campaign strategy. Wisconsin, a crucial swing state, has been a focus of both major parties in recent elections due to its potential to influence the overall outcome.
By choosing Gabbard as the moderator, Trump's campaign appears to be leveraging her unique position as a former Democrat turned Trump supporter. This move could potentially appeal to a broader range of voters, including those who may have previously supported Gabbard or identified with her political stances.
The event's format as a town hall suggests that there will be opportunities for direct interaction between Trump and attendees, with Gabbard facilitating the discussion. This setup may provide insights into Trump's current policy positions and campaign strategy as he seeks to regain the presidency.
Tulsi Gabbard's role as moderator for Donald Trump's Wisconsin town hall represents a significant development in the 2024 presidential campaign. Her recent endorsement of Trump, followed by her appointment to his transition team, marks a notable shift in her political alignment. The upcoming town hall in La Crosse will likely be closely watched for its potential impact on Trump's campaign strategy and voter outreach efforts in the key battleground state of Wisconsin.
Republican presidential nominee and Marine veteran Senator JD Vance (R-OH) has launched a scathing critique of Vice President Kamala Harris regarding the U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan.
Breitbart News reported that the senator's comments reflect growing tensions between the current administration and its critics over the handling of the 2021 withdrawal.
Vance's remarks came in response to the Harris campaign's criticism of former President Donald Trump's recent visit to Gold Star families at Arlington Cemetery. The visit, which honored those who lost loved ones during the withdrawal, sparked controversy when reports emerged of an alleged altercation between a cemetery employee and Trump campaign aides over photography and filming at the ceremony.
Senator Vance did not mince words in his assessment of Vice President Harris's role in the withdrawal from Afghanistan. He expressed outrage at the loss of 13 American lives during the operation and criticized the administration for not holding anyone accountable.
Vance stated:
To have those 13 Americans lose their lives and not fire a single person is disgraceful. Kamala Harris is so asleep at the wheel that she won't even do an investigation into what happened but wants to yell at Donald Trump for showing up. She can go to hell!
The senator's comments reflect a broader frustration among some Republicans with the current administration's handling of foreign policy matters, particularly the Afghanistan withdrawal.
Former President Trump's visit to Arlington Cemetery to meet with Gold Star families became a point of contention when the Harris campaign criticized the event. However, the families themselves released a statement expressing gratitude for Trump's presence and support.
The families' statement read:
We would like to express our heartfelt thanks and appreciation to President Donald J. Trump for his presence and the recent Section 60 gathering, honoring our children and their fallen brothers and sisters. We had given our approval for President Trump's official videographer and photographer to attend the event, ensuring that these sacred moments of remembrance were respectfully captured and so we can cherish these memories forever. We are deeply grateful to the president for taking the time to honor our children and for standing alongside us in our grief, offering his unwavering support during such a difficult time. His compassion and respect meant more than words can express.
This statement contradicts earlier reports of an altercation and emphasizes the families' appreciation for the former president's visit.
The exchange between Senator Vance and the Harris campaign highlights the ongoing political divisions surrounding the Afghanistan withdrawal. Republicans have consistently criticized the Biden-Harris administration for what they perceive as a mishandled operation, while Democrats have defended the decision to end America's longest war.
This controversy is likely to remain a significant issue in the 2024 presidential campaign. As a Marine veteran, Senator Vance's perspective carries weight with certain voters, particularly those concerned with military and foreign policy issues.
The debate also underscores the delicate nature of honoring fallen service members while navigating political disagreements. Trump's visit to Arlington Cemetery and the subsequent reactions from both sides of the political aisle demonstrates the challenges of addressing such sensitive topics in a highly polarized political environment.
Senator JD Vance's strong criticism of Vice President Kamala Harris over the Afghanistan withdrawal has reignited debates about the 2021 operation. The controversy surrounding former President Trump's visit to Gold Star families at Arlington Cemetery has further fueled political tensions. As the 2024 presidential campaign progresses, the handling of the Afghanistan withdrawal is likely to remain a contentious issue, with both parties seeking to present their perspectives to the American public.
Vice President Kamala Harris issued a statement honoring the 13 U.S. service members killed during the withdrawal from Afghanistan three years ago but has not participated in any public memorials or events marking the anniversary.
According to Fox News, Harris released a statement early Monday morning naming the fallen service members and expressing condolences to their families.
In her statement, Harris called the 13 service members "devoted patriots" who represented "the best of America" by putting the nation and their fellow citizens above themselves. She said her prayers were with the families and loved ones of those who made the ultimate sacrifice.
However, Fox News noted that Harris has been conspicuously absent from any public ceremonies or events commemorating the anniversary of the deaths that occurred during the evacuation from Kabul.
Harris posted her statement to her official Vice Presidential X account on Monday. When asked by Fox News Digital if Harris had plans to honor the service members during any live events, whether public or private, neither her campaign nor her vice presidential office provided a response.
The anniversary comes just after Harris wrapped up her appearance at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago last week. There, she officially accepted the Democratic Party's nomination for president after President Biden dropped out of the race amid concerns over his mental fitness.
Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, are reportedly scheduled to visit Georgia next week in their first public event following the DNC convention. However, no events related to commemorating the fallen service members appear to be on her public schedule.
President Biden also released an early morning statement honoring the 13 fallen U.S. service members. He is currently at his beach home in Delaware with no public events scheduled for the day.
In contrast, former President Donald Trump traveled to Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia to participate in a wreath-laying ceremony at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. He was joined by family members of those killed in Afghanistan three years ago.
Trump has been vocal in his criticism of the Biden administration's handling of the Afghanistan withdrawal. In a social media post on Monday, he called it the "most embarrassing moment" in U.S. history.
When questioned about why Biden and Harris did not host or attend public events as Trump did, White House national security communications adviser John Kirby defended their approach. He stated:
You don't have to look very far at the president and the first lady's track record and the vice president's track record, over the last three and a half years to see how deeply devoted they are to the men and women of our military and to our veterans and to their families.
Kirby added that there are "many ways" for U.S. leaders to honor fallen service members that do not necessarily involve public ceremonies or media attention. He emphasized the ongoing work being done to support military families, even if it occurs without fanfare or TV cameras.
Vice President Harris issued a statement honoring the 13 service members killed during the Afghanistan withdrawal but has not participated in any public events marking the anniversary. This absence has drawn attention, especially in comparison to former President Trump's public appearance at Arlington National Cemetery. The White House has defended the administration's approach, emphasizing ongoing support for military families even without public ceremonies.
Former President Donald Trump's attorneys have submitted a reply brief to the Georgia Court of Appeals, intensifying their efforts to disqualify Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis from the ongoing election interference case.
According to Fox News, Trump's lead counsel, Steve Sadow, issued a statement emphasizing the strength of their arguments against Willis. The brief contends that Willis' rhetoric during a church speech was inflammatory and racially charged, potentially prejudicing potential jurors against the defendants.
The Trump legal team's reply brief focuses on Willis' public statements, particularly a speech she gave at an Atlanta church. They argue that her comments were inflammatory and violated the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct.
Sadow's statement highlighted the team's position that Willis' speech was calculated to increase public condemnation of the defendants. This, they claim, could unfairly influence potential jurors, compromising the integrity of the legal process.
The brief calls for Willis' disqualification and dismissal of the case, citing her alleged misconduct as the basis for these actions. This move represents a significant escalation in Trump's legal strategy in Georgia.
The Georgia Court of Appeals has scheduled a hearing for December 5 to consider the appeal by Trump and his co-defendants. This hearing will focus on their request to disqualify Willis from the case, primarily due to allegations of an improper relationship with former special prosecutor Nathan Wade.
Willis had previously filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in June. She argued that the lower court found insufficient evidence to support claims of a conflict of interest on her part.
Judge Scott McAfee's March ruling allowed Willis to remain on the case, but Trump's lawyers are now challenging this decision. They characterize Willis' motion to dismiss their appeal as a "last ditch effort" to prevent scrutiny of her conduct.
The case against Trump and his co-defendants stems from a lengthy criminal investigation led by Willis and state prosecutors in Georgia. The investigation focused on alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results in the state.
In August 2023, Donald Trump and 18 co-defendants faced charges, including violations of the Georgia RICO Act and conspiracy involving forgery and false statements. Challenges emerged as Judge McAfee dismissed six charges for being insufficiently detailed, and accusations of misconduct between prosecutor Willis and Wade led to Wade's resignation after evidentiary hearings.
Fani Willis has consistently denied any impropriety in her handling of the case. She and Wade both refuted allegations of a romantic relationship prior to his hiring and provided explanations for their shared travels.
Judge McAfee's order in response to these allegations presented Willis with two options: either her entire office could step aside from the case, or Wade could withdraw. Wade chose to resign from his position as special prosecutor.
In conclusion, Trump's legal team has intensified efforts to disqualify District Attorney Fani Willis from the Georgia election interference case. They argue that her public statements, particularly a speech at an Atlanta church, constitute professional misconduct and could prejudice potential jurors. The Georgia Court of Appeals is set to hear arguments on December 5 regarding Willis' disqualification, stemming from allegations of an improper relationship with a former special prosecutor.
In a surprising turn of events, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has found himself at the center of a family controversy.
The former Democratic presidential candidate recently endorsed former President Donald Trump, causing a stir within the Kennedy family and raising questions about the impact on his personal relationships.
In an appearance on "Fox News Sunday," Kennedy addressed the criticism he has faced from his wife and other family members following his endorsement decision.
Kennedy spoke with host Shannon Bream on Fox News, where he responded to a letter from his siblings condemning his endorsement of Trump. The letter, released on Friday, expressed disappointment and claimed that Kennedy had betrayed the family's values.
Kennedy acknowledged the discomfort his decision has caused within his family, particularly mentioning his wife, actress Cheryl Hines, who has expressed her unease with the situation on social media. Despite the tension, Kennedy emphasized the importance of maintaining familial bonds even in the face of political disagreements.
He stated, "I love my family. I feel like we were raised in a milieu where we were encouraged to debate each other and debate ferociously and passionately about things and still love each other."
Kennedy also pointed out that while some family members are troubled by his decisions, others are actively supporting his campaign efforts.
The Kennedy family's long-standing connection to the Democratic Party adds an extra layer of complexity to the situation. Kennedy acknowledged this, mentioning that some of his family members are currently working for the Biden administration.
Kennedy said:
My family is at the center of the Democratic Party. I have members of my family that are working for the Biden administration. Biden has a bust of my father behind him at the Oval Office, and he's been a family friend for many years.
This statement highlights the deep-rooted ties between the Kennedy family and the Democratic establishment, making Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s endorsement of Trump all the more controversial within family circles.
In response to Kennedy's endorsement of Trump, five of his siblings released a public statement reaffirming their support for Vice President Kamala Harris. The letter, signed by Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, Courtney Kennedy, Kerry Kennedy, Chris Kennedy, and Rory Kennedy, expressed their belief in an America defined by individual freedom, economic promise, and national pride.
The siblings' statement boldly declared, "Our brother Bobby's decision to endorse Trump [Friday] is a betrayal of the values that our father and our family hold most dear." This public rebuke from his siblings underscores the divide within the Kennedy family over Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s political choices and allegiances.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s endorsement of former President Trump has created a rift within the Kennedy family, leading to public statements of disapproval from his siblings and discomfort expressed by his wife. Despite the family drama, Kennedy maintains that disagreements should not overshadow familial love and respect. The situation highlights the complex interplay between personal relationships and political convictions, especially within a family with such strong ties to the Democratic Party.
Ohio Sen. JD Vance has recently seen a notable improvement in his public image, according to the latest Morning Consult poll.
Despite earlier controversies and ongoing challenges, Vance’s favorability ratings have improved since he was named Donald Trump’s vice-presidential running mate, as Newsweek reports.
The new poll, conducted between Aug. 16 and 18 among 2,202 registered voters, reveals that 41% of respondents now view Vance unfavorably, while 39% hold a favorable opinion of him. This marks a significant shift for Vance, whose net favorability has fluctuated during his candidacy, moving from -1 to -13 earlier to a current position of -2. The margin of error for this survey is +/- 2 percentage points.
While Vance’s net favorability of -2 is still negative, it compares favorably to other prominent political figures. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, for example, holds a net favorability of 5, with 39% viewing him favorably and 36% unfavorably. Vice President Kamala Harris, now significantly more popular since becoming the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, also has a net favorability of 5, with 50% favorable and 45% unfavorable. Former President Donald Trump, on the other hand, stands at -5, with 46% favorable and 51% unfavorable.
The rise in Harris’s popularity is particularly noteworthy. A Morning Consult analysis noted that before she ascended to the top of the ticket, Harris’s favorability ratings closely mirrored those of President Joe Biden. However, her popularity has since surpassed not only Biden but also Trump and other Democrats in Congress.
Vance's comparison to other figures doesn't end there. Reflecting on past political landscapes, Sarah Palin, who once enjoyed a peak favorability of +21 in August 2008, eventually saw her ratings decline significantly. Vance’s own ratings have been consistently negative since before July 19, with fluctuations ranging from -1 to -17.
JD Vance’s political journey has been marked by a series of controversies. Since being announced as Donald Trump’s running mate, Vance has faced criticism for various comments on topics such as women’s rights, abortion, and prominent Democratic figures. These statements have sparked widespread debate, with many accusing Vance of holding extreme views.
However, Vance has remained defiant in the face of criticism. He has accused both the media and Democrats of distorting his words to portray him in a negative light. “The media and Democrats have twisted his words,” Vance said in defense of his statements.
One of the more contentious issues Vance has grappled with is his stance on abortion. Initially, he supported a nationwide abortion ban, a position that drew sharp criticism from various quarters. However, Vance has since aligned himself with Trump’s position, advocating for states to have the authority to decide on abortion restrictions rather than imposing a federal mandate.
JD Vance’s recent favorability boost reflects broader political trends and the shifting dynamics of American politics. Despite the controversies and the challenges he has faced, Vance’s ability to slightly improve his standing among voters could be indicative of his resilience and the effectiveness of his campaign strategies.
Vance’s current net favorability of -2, while still not positive, places him in a better position than many would have anticipated earlier in his candidacy. This improvement is especially notable given the string of controversies that have plagued him since joining Trump’s ticket.
As Vance continues his campaign alongside Trump, his ability to navigate the complex and often contentious political landscape will be crucial. With other political figures like Harris and Trump also experiencing fluctuations in their favorability, Vance’s journey will be one to watch closely as the election draws nearer.
The impact of Vance’s recent favorability boost on his broader political fortunes remains to be seen. However, the fact that he has managed to narrow the gap between his unfavorable and favorable ratings suggests that his campaign may be gaining traction among certain voter segments.
In a surprising twist, former President Donald Trump called into Fox News's Gutfeld show after the network abruptly cut away from his live reaction to Vice President Kamala Harris's convention acceptance speech.
Trump's unexpected call to program host Greg Gutfeld created a series of interactions that left viewers talking, as the Daily Caller reports.
The former president, who is the Republican nominee for the 2024 presidential election, had been on a phone call with Fox News hosts Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum late Thursday night. He was responding to Harris's speech at the Democratic National Convention (DNC), which had aired earlier in the evening. However, before 11:30 p.m., the network cut away from the discussion to begin Gutfeld, its late-night talk show hosted by Greg Gutfeld.
Gutfeld, known for his comedic take on current events, addressed the situation live on air, joking that the decision to cut away from Trump was not his choice. "That wasn’t my fault, Donald Trump! He’s still talking, by the way," Gutfeld quipped as the show began, acknowledging the unusual circumstances of the network's decision.
Later in the show, during a commercial break, Trump called into Gutfeld and continued the conversation that had been interrupted. The interaction between the former president and the host was both lighthearted and pointed, with Trump making a comment that caused Gutfeld to laugh. "I think we got a lot more money," Trump said, referring to the network's decision to cut him off earlier.
Gutfeld, in turn, asked Trump to greet his live audience, leading to a continuation of their back-and-forth exchange. Trump took the opportunity to discuss his lead in the polls and his perspective on the Democratic Party's actions, particularly Harris's rise as the party's presidential candidate.
Trump did not hold back in his criticism of Harris, both during his phone call and in subsequent posts on Truth Social, the social media platform he frequently uses. Harris, who became the Democratic Party's presidential candidate on July 21 after President Joe Biden dropped out, was the target of Trump's remarks following her DNC speech. Reports have suggested that top Democrats pressured Biden to step aside after a poor debate performance against Trump in late June.
The conversation between Trump and Gutfeld eventually came to a close, with the host having to move on with the show. "Alright, Mr. President," Gutfeld said as he wrapped up the call, adding that he needed to continue with the program. Trump wished Gutfeld well before the show moved on to its next segment.
Trump's call into Gutfeld was an unexpected moment in late-night television, highlighting the former president's continued influence on the media landscape. The exchange between Trump and Gutfeld was notable for its mix of humor and political commentary, a combination that has become a hallmark of the show.
Trump's comments during the call, as well as his posts on Truth Social, underscore his ongoing criticism of the Democratic Party and its leaders. His remarks about Harris, in particular, reflect his view of the party's current trajectory as he continues his campaign for the presidency in 2024.
The interaction between Trump and Gutfeld also raises questions about the role of media in covering political figures, particularly in the context of live television. The decision to cut away from Trump's initial conversation with Baier and MacCallum to begin Gutfeld highlights the balancing act that networks must perform between news coverage and entertainment programming.
As Trump continues his campaign, his appearances on media platforms like Fox News are likely to remain a focal point of both his strategy and the broader political discourse. His ability to command attention, even in moments when he is unexpectedly cut off, demonstrates his ongoing relevance in the political arena.
Trump's call to Gutfeld, along with his posts on Truth Social, reflects his willingness to engage directly with the media and his supporters, even in unconventional ways. The former president's ability to pivot quickly and capitalize on unexpected moments is a key part of his political brand and will assuredly remain so for the rest of the campaign season.